Elon Musk Using Eugenics Startup to Inspect DNA of Potential Babies for Intelligence
That company, Orchid Health, provides tony clients the opportunity to screen their embryos for genetic illnesses starting at around $22,500. While there are a handful of similar genetic prediction firms, Orchid stands out by claiming that it can sequence embryos' entire genome using as few as five cells and predict far more than its competitors.
And according to two sources close to the company who spoke to the Washington Post, its services have been used for at least one of Zilis and Musk's four children.
While it's not at all news that Musk, the father of at least 14 children by multiple women, is obsessed with reproduction, this claim — which expands on reporting from The Information last year — casts the billionaire's pronatalism in a new and even more unsettling light.
One of WaPo's Orchid insiders, who was not named to protect their privacy, told the newspaper that 30-year-old company founder Noor Siddiqi had provided Musk and Zilis with special screenings, which supposedly use bespoke algorithms to determine the embryo's potential for being intelligent. (While the company insists it's not involved in "eugenics," a word meaning "good genes," it is very literally helping parents select good genes, and the alleged intelligence selection does sound a lot like the dictionary definition of the practice.)
That claim appears to fall in line with a telling tidbit Zilis divulged to Musk biographer Walter Isaacson: that the billionaire "really wants smart people to have kids," and that she chose to procreate with him after he encouraged her to have her own.
When WaPo reached out to Orchid to ask about Musk and Zilis, as well as those intelligence screening allegations, the company declined to comment and claimed that although it does screen for intellectual disabilities, it does not offer any predictions about a future child's intelligence.
Be that as it may, services like Orchid's are mired in both ethical and practical issues. Along with the perception that such services are tantamount to playing God, genetics experts who spoke with WaPo were very skeptical about Orchid's claim that it can sequence an embryo's entire genome from just five cells.
According to Svetlana Yatsenko, a Stanford research genetics specialist, the company's use of a process called amplification, which copies DNA strands from small samples for analysis, is problematic because it's essentially using photocopies that could introduce inaccuracies to either rule out or declare genetic disorders.
"You're making many, many mistakes in the amplification," Yatsenko told WaPo. "It's basically Russian roulette."
Beyond the broad strokes, Orchid's own accountability problems appear much darker when considering how often Musk has cast bigoted aspersions on other races for their purported intellectual inferiority.
More on genetic services: Genetics Startup Advertises App-Based Eugenics Service for Parents to Select "Smartest" Embryos
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's EU trade deal is based on massive energy purchases that are unlikely to materialize, analysts say
President Donald Trump's massive energy deal with the European Union will be difficult to implement, setting Washington and Brussels up for a potential future confrontation over tariffs and trade. The EU has agreed to purchase $750 billion of U.S. energy and invest $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028, according to the White House. In exchange, Trump has agreed to a tariff of 15% on EU goods excluding steel and aluminum, which is half the 30% rate that he had threatened. But the $600 billion investment in the U.S. is not binding on EU member states or companies. The European Commission, the bloc's executive body, simply said that companies "have expressed interest in investing at least" that amount in the U.S by 2029. The massive energy purchases in the deal are unrealistic due to market and political constraints, analysts said. The EU cannot force member states and companies to buy U.S. energy just as the Trump administration cannot force producers to sell to Europe, said Mathieu Utting, an analyst at Rystad Energy. "This is non-binding. It's a pledge," said Erik Brattberg, an expert on Europe at the Atlantic Council, a think-tank with a focus on international affairs. "The EU itself doesn't buy energy. It would be member states or companies from member states." A White House official told CNBC on Tuesday that Trump expects the EU to abide by its commitments under the deal. "That is what the EU agreed to purchase," the official said. "The President reserves the right to adjust tariff rates if any party reneges." The energy purchases are divided into $250 billion annual installments over the rest of Trump's term, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters Sunday. The EU is pledging significant purchases U.S. oil, liquified natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel to replace Russian fossil fuels, von der Leyen said. But it is unclear how much EU member states and companies intend to buy of each fuel type. "Details have to be sorted out and that will happen over the next weeks," von der Leyen told reporters. EU member states bought about $80 billion U.S. oil, liquified natural gas, liquified petroleum gas and coal from the U.S. in 2024, according to data from Kpler. The bloc would have to triple its purchases of U.S. energy to meet the $250 billion annual purchase target laid out in the agreement. "If this deal were to be realized, we'd be talking about the United States providing the lion's share of European energy imports," Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC on Monday. EU energy imports totaled $433 billion in 2024, according to Eurostat. Increasing U.S. oil exports to the EU is difficult because production is flat and will likely decline in the coming months, said Svetlana Tretyakova, an oil analyst at Rystad. U.S. companies would have to reroute exports from customers in Asia and Latin America to the EU, Tretyakova said. Importing more oil also does not align with the EU's climate goals and the continent's refining capacity is declining, she said. Surging LNG exports is also tough, Utting said. U.S. terminals always run at full capacity so there isn't slack capacity to increase shipments to the EU right now, he said. As in the case with oil, LNG would have to be diverted from other customers to Europe, he said. More LNG capacity is coming online over the next two years that could be exported to Europe, he said. But the EU already receives more than half its imports from the U.S., Utting said. "It's very unrealistic that Europe would import exclusively from the U.S.," he said. "They will want to diversify to some extent." While the headline $750 billion figure is unrealistic, the EU is showing that it is serious about expanding its energy trade with the U.S., said Alex Munton, director of global gas and LNG research at Rapidan Energy. The EU was already planning to eliminate what remains of Russian LNG and pipeline gas imports to the bloc by 2028. This will create a supply gap of 25 million metric tons per year that the U.S. is perfectly positioned to fill, Munton said. "The interests line up, they go hand in hand," he said. "That's why it's essentially a convenient deal."
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Tammy Bruce warns Russia needs to 'take Trump seriously' after moving deadline
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce discusses former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev's response to President Donald Trump moving his ceasefire deadline as the president continues securing trade deals.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump's EU Deal May Not Hurt Putin
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen said the deal she struck with Donald Trump will lessen the reliance on Russia's energy exports but there is doubt over whether the agreement can curb funding for Vladimir Putin's war machine. The EU-U.S. deal for 15 percent tariffs for European goods included a pledge by Brussels to buy $750 billion of American energy, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) over the next three years. Von der Leyen has said too much Russian energy was still entering the EU but there are questions over whether the deal can stifle Moscow's main revenue generator as it continues its military aggression. Septimus Knox, from the cyber and security consultancy S-RM, told Newsweek as long as there is a market for Russian oil, it will be difficult for Ukraine's allies in Europe to pressure Moscow economically. Newsweek has contacted the European Union for comment. President Donald Trump, accompanied by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (L), speaks during a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. President Donald Trump, accompanied by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (L), speaks during a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Andrew Harnik//Getty Images Why It Matters Headlines of the EU-U.S. deal focused on the 15 percent tariffs that European goods would face in the U.S.—half the 30 percent level that Trump had threatened. But the agreement also included a requirement by EU companies to buy $250 billion worth of U.S. oil, natural gas and nuclear technologies for each of the next three years. The EU has pledged to phase out Russian energy sources by 2028 and Trump's deal could help with that but questions remain over how such a pledge can be carried out while Europe tries to decarbonize its economy. In 2024, the EU imported more than $435.7 billion worth of energy, the Financial Times reported— but U.S. fossil fuel supplies to the bloc are worth only $75 billion, meaning a huge spike in trade would be needed under the terms of the deal. What To Know Von der Leyen said the EU would start large-scale purchases of U.S. oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel as it moves to phase out Russian energy sources. The EU chief said too much Russian energy still enters Europe, despite sanctions, and expanding energy cooperation with the U.S. would diversify sources of supply and increase energy security. Septimus Knox, director, disputes and investigations at S-RM told Newsweek the deal is more about securing future supplies rather than decoupling the EU from Russian energy, which has been a Brussels objective since the start of the war. However, as long as a market exists for cheap Russian oil, it will be very difficult for Ukraine-aligned countries to pressure Moscow financially, he said. This was because the Russian economy has been distorted by the sole objective of sustaining the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin can also accept heavy economic damage to achieve this, calculating it is unlikely to lead to civil discontent. Russia also seems to have been successful in pivoting away from the EU toward China, India and Turkey, which have all surpassed the EU in terms of energy imports, said Knox. But closer collaboration between the EU and U.S. could mean that the cost of Russia's forced diversification away from the EU cuts deeper economically, he added. Leigh Hansson, partner in Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Group, told Newsweek the EU has already drastically reduced its reliance on Russian gas. Incoming pipelines leading to the Bovanenkovo gas field on the Yamal peninsula in the Arctic Circle on May 21, 2019. Incoming pipelines leading to the Bovanenkovo gas field on the Yamal peninsula in the Arctic Circle on May 21, said although the details of the energy element of the EU-U.S. deal are not entirely clear, it likely will further decrease European dependence on Russian gas. But Svitlana Romanko, founder and executive director of Razom We Stand, told Newsweek that the Trump deal risks locking the EU into another cycle of gas dependence. She said the deal should be treated as a short-term bridge while Europe doubles down on clean energy solutions that permanently end the Kremlin's leverage over energy exports. The EU passed its 18th sanctions package against Russia this month. Knox said its targeting of two Chinese banks and the Nayara Energy oil refinery in India, partly owned by Russia's Rosneft, showed how Brussels is willing to target China and India to curtail Moscow's access to these markets. The EU and the U.S. can also use sanctions to drive the cost of sales up for Russia and, with reduced revenues, the Kremlin will have to make increasingly difficult choices with regards to state funding, Knox added. What People Are Saying European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said: "We will replace Russian gas and oil by significant purchases of US LNG, oil and nuclear want to absolutely get rid of Russian fossil fuels." Septimus Knox, from the cyber and security consultancy S-RM, told Newsweek: "As long as a market exists for cheap Russian oil, it will be very difficult for Ukraine-aligned countries to pressure Russia financially. Knox added: "Ultimately, Russia will always be able to derive significant revenues from its energy production." Svitlana Romanko, founder and executive director of Razom We Stand: "This deal should be treated as a short-term bridge while Europe doubles down on clean energy solutions that permanently end the Kremlin's leverage over our energy systems." What Happens Next More details will be negotiated in the coming weeks in the framework deal. The European Commission can negotiate trade deals for the entire bloc but it still needs the backing of the 27 EU member states, whose ambassadors will meet next week.
