
Trump's EU Deal May Not Hurt Putin
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen said the deal she struck with Donald Trump will lessen the reliance on Russia's energy exports but there is doubt over whether the agreement can curb funding for Vladimir Putin's war machine.
The EU-U.S. deal for 15 percent tariffs for European goods included a pledge by Brussels to buy $750 billion of American energy, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) over the next three years.
Von der Leyen has said too much Russian energy was still entering the EU but there are questions over whether the deal can stifle Moscow's main revenue generator as it continues its military aggression.
Septimus Knox, from the cyber and security consultancy S-RM, told Newsweek as long as there is a market for Russian oil, it will be difficult for Ukraine's allies in Europe to pressure Moscow economically.
Newsweek has contacted the European Union for comment.
President Donald Trump, accompanied by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (L), speaks during a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland.
President Donald Trump, accompanied by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen (L), speaks during a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland.
Andrew Harnik//Getty Images
Why It Matters
Headlines of the EU-U.S. deal focused on the 15 percent tariffs that European goods would face in the U.S.—half the 30 percent level that Trump had threatened.
But the agreement also included a requirement by EU companies to buy $250 billion worth of U.S. oil, natural gas and nuclear technologies for each of the next three years.
The EU has pledged to phase out Russian energy sources by 2028 and Trump's deal could help with that but questions remain over how such a pledge can be carried out while Europe tries to decarbonize its economy.
In 2024, the EU imported more than $435.7 billion worth of energy, the Financial Times reported— but U.S. fossil fuel supplies to the bloc are worth only $75 billion, meaning a huge spike in trade would be needed under the terms of the deal.
What To Know
Von der Leyen said the EU would start large-scale purchases of U.S. oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel as it moves to phase out Russian energy sources.
The EU chief said too much Russian energy still enters Europe, despite sanctions, and expanding energy cooperation with the U.S. would diversify sources of supply and increase energy security.
Septimus Knox, director, disputes and investigations at S-RM told Newsweek the deal is more about securing future supplies rather than decoupling the EU from Russian energy, which has been a Brussels objective since the start of the war.
However, as long as a market exists for cheap Russian oil, it will be very difficult for Ukraine-aligned countries to pressure Moscow financially, he said.
This was because the Russian economy has been distorted by the sole objective of sustaining the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin can also accept heavy economic damage to achieve this, calculating it is unlikely to lead to civil discontent.
Russia also seems to have been successful in pivoting away from the EU toward China, India and Turkey, which have all surpassed the EU in terms of energy imports, said Knox.
But closer collaboration between the EU and U.S. could mean that the cost of Russia's forced diversification away from the EU cuts deeper economically, he added.
Leigh Hansson, partner in Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Group, told Newsweek the EU has already drastically reduced its reliance on Russian gas.
Incoming pipelines leading to the Bovanenkovo gas field on the Yamal peninsula in the Arctic Circle on May 21, 2019.
Incoming pipelines leading to the Bovanenkovo gas field on the Yamal peninsula in the Arctic Circle on May 21, 2019.Hanson said although the details of the energy element of the EU-U.S. deal are not entirely clear, it likely will further decrease European dependence on Russian gas.
But Svitlana Romanko, founder and executive director of Razom We Stand, told Newsweek that the Trump deal risks locking the EU into another cycle of gas dependence.
She said the deal should be treated as a short-term bridge while Europe doubles down on clean energy solutions that permanently end the Kremlin's leverage over energy exports.
The EU passed its 18th sanctions package against Russia this month.
Knox said its targeting of two Chinese banks and the Nayara Energy oil refinery in India, partly owned by Russia's Rosneft, showed how Brussels is willing to target China and India to curtail Moscow's access to these markets.
The EU and the U.S. can also use sanctions to drive the cost of sales up for Russia and, with reduced revenues, the Kremlin will have to make increasingly difficult choices with regards to state funding, Knox added.
What People Are Saying
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said: "We will replace Russian gas and oil by significant purchases of US LNG, oil and nuclear fuels...we want to absolutely get rid of Russian fossil fuels."
Septimus Knox, from the cyber and security consultancy S-RM, told Newsweek: "As long as a market exists for cheap Russian oil, it will be very difficult for Ukraine-aligned countries to pressure Russia financially.
Knox added: "Ultimately, Russia will always be able to derive significant revenues from its energy production."
Svitlana Romanko, founder and executive director of Razom We Stand: "This deal should be treated as a short-term bridge while Europe doubles down on clean energy solutions that permanently end the Kremlin's leverage over our energy systems."
What Happens Next
More details will be negotiated in the coming weeks in the framework deal. The European Commission can negotiate trade deals for the entire bloc but it still needs the backing of the 27 EU member states, whose ambassadors will meet next week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto's $10 Billion Shakeout: Why Bitcoin's Rally Just Hit a Wall
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) extended its slide for a fifth straight session, dipping as much as 2.2% to $113,979 its lowest level in nearly a month as investor enthusiasm continues to cool following July's all-time high. That peak, which saw Bitcoin touch $123,200 just before President Donald Trump signed the country's first crypto regulatory framework into law, now feels like a distant memory. Ether also retreated sharply, falling 4.5% to $3,567, while the broader digital asset market gave back some of its recent gains after briefly crossing a $4 trillion market cap milestone last month. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The rally had been fueled by blockbuster ETF flows Bitcoin products attracted $6 billion in net inflows in July (third-best on record), while Ether ETFs brought in $5.4 billion, marking their strongest month yet. But momentum is showing signs of fatigue. Bitcoin's Coinbase premium a real-time measure of US investor appetite flipped negative this week for the first time in two months, according to CryptoQuant. Futures open interest on CME has dropped 13% for Bitcoin and 21% for Ether from their July peaks. These shifts suggest that institutions could be taking a more cautious stance as Q3 gets underway. Traders appear to be repositioning quickly. Over $800 million in leveraged long positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours alone including $251 million tied to Ether and $200 million to Bitcoin, based on Coinglass data. At the same time, downside protection is gaining traction. Nick Forster, founder of noted that Bitcoin's 30-day options skew has swung from +3% to -1.5%, pointing to rising demand for puts over calls. Roughly $10 billion in BTC was sold OTC on July 15, triggering a 4% price dip, he added. Miners also sold off about 15,000 BTC after the record high. Meanwhile, Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) shares fell as much as 17% after Q2 revenue came in below estimates, underscoring a broader pullback in retail and institutional engagement alike. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs Pump Cash, Reshoring Pitch Splits Opinion
The U.S. just started collecting another big haul now that the August 1 tariff hikes landed. Even countries that cut new deals with Washington didn't get a passJapan and the EU are still paying 15%. Markets dipped, but stocks barely blinked; they're still close to record highs. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Importers are the ones writing the checks, and they're coping however they can: passing costs to customers, trimming margins, finding other suppliers, or cutting their own costs. The bottom line is simplethose tariffs are stuffing the Treasury. The White House isn't pretending this is only about money. Trump's pitch is that the pain will pull manufacturing back to U.S. soil, that higher import costs will nudge companies to build here again. That's a big assumption, and people are split. The cash is already showing up: June brought a rare $27 billion surplus, largely thanks to customs duties. Still, the bigger picture is soberingthe U.S. is running a $1.34 trillion deficit year to date, so unless spending gets reined in, the tariff windfall only goes so far. Tariffs are buying time and filling coffers, but whether this becomes a real reshoring story or just temporary noise depends on follow-through and whether Washington pairs revenue with discipline. Watch if the money keeps coming and if spending gets tightened. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian removes references to Trump's impeachments from exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History removed references to President Donald Trump's two impeachment proceedings from an exhibit on the "Limits of Presidential Power," a Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed to ABC News. The spokesperson said a future exhibit will include all presidential impeachments. The museum decided to "restore" the section of a permanent exhibition to its "2008 appearance" because various topics had not been updated since that year and therefore they removed references to Trump, the Smithsonian spokesperson told ABC News on Thursday. Trump is the only U.S. president to have been impeached twice. "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden exhibition needed to be addressed. The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion," the spokesperson said. MORE: Artist Amy Sherald cancels Smithsonian exhibit, citing 'culture of censorship' The exhibit now only includes references to the impeachment proceedings against Presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868, Richard Nixon in 1973 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Nixon is the only U.S. president to resign following the commencement of impeachment proceedings. While serving as the 45th President of the United States, Trump was first impeached twice by Congress during his first term – with the first proceeding beginning on Dec. 18, 2019 on charges of abuse of power and obstruction in connection with an alleged quid pro quo call with the Ukrainian president. Trump was acquitted when the trial concluded in the Senate on Feb. 5, 2020. Following the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, Trump was impeached for a second time on Jan. 13, 2021, on the charge of incitement of insurrection, but was again acquitted on Feb. 13, 2021, days after he left office after losing the 2020 election to President Joe Biden. Trump denied all wrongdoing in both of his impeachment cases. Following Trump's first impeachment proceeding, the Smithsonian released a statement on Jan. 21, 2020, about the collection of objects regarding Trump's impeachment. The statement said that as the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History "actively engages," with history, curators are following Trump's impeachment trial and will determine "which objects best represent these historic events for inclusion in the national collection." The Smithsonian spokesperson on Thursday said the museum "installed a temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" in Sept. 2021, which was "intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." "A large permanent gallery like The American Presidency that opened in 2000, requires a significant amount of time and funding to update and renew. A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments," the spokesperson added, in explaining the removal of Trump references. An online description of the exhibit of the Smithsonian's website still referenced Trump's two impeachments as of Friday morning. The removal of references of Trump's impeachments was first reported by The Washington Post on Thursday. The report cited "a person familiar with the exhibit plans, who was not authorized to discuss them publicly," who told the Post that "the change came about as part of a content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director." Asked by ABC News about this claim, the Smithsonian spokesperson did not immediately comment. Museums and parks must remove some items related to race and gender: Executive order The Smithsonian affirmed its autonomy from outside influences in a June 9 statement after President Trump announced that he fired National Portrait Gallery head Kim Sajet for allegedly being a "highly partisan person." Sajet resigned on June 13, a Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed to ABC News. "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution. All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board. Lonnie G. Bunch, the Secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian," the statement said. "The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values," the Smithsonian added. Trump signed an executive order in March placing Vice President J.D. Vance in charge of supervising efforts to "remove improper ideology" from all areas of the Smithsonian and targeted funding for programs that advance "divisive narratives" and "improper ideology." The order -- called "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" -- directed Vance and Interior Department Secretary Doug Burgum to restore federal parks, monuments, memorials and statues "that have been improperly removed or changed in the last five years to perpetuate a false revision of history or improperly minimize or disparage certain historical figures or events."