Teen killed in spring break crash, IN cops say. Dad ‘never got to say goodbye'
Jordan Laskowski, his sister Riley, his mother, his grandmother and another sister, were driving through Lebanon, Indiana, when the single-car crash occurred April 4, according to WMAQ.
The crash ejected Jordan and Riley from the car, WMAQ reported. He was pronounced dead at a local hospital and his sister was severely injured, the outlet reported.
WLS reported his other sister, mom and grandma weren't seriously injured.
'This is a very tough time for (the) family,' a friend said in a GoFundMe.
The Daily Herald reported that Jordan was an eighth grade student at Wredling Middle School in St. Charles Community Unit District 303.
His father Scott called Jordan an 'amazing kid' in a Facebook post expressing his devastation. Before the crash, he was excited to watch his son play high school football within the year.
'I never got to say goodbye to my son,' he said. 'He was my best friend and everyone knew that. I wish I could trade places with him.'
The crash is still under investigation, WRTV reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC influencer admits to filming, laughing at toddler forced to smoke vape after years-old video resurfaces
A New York City influencer and popular TikToker admitted to filming and laughing at a toddler forced to smoke a vape by her pal after her years-old video of the disturbing incident resurfaced online. Fiona Jordan, a 23-year-old with nearly 600,000 followers on TikTok, apologized after she was lambasted online for the shocking clip. 4 Fiona Jordan, 23, posted an apology video addressing an old clip of her friend giving a toddler she babysat a vape. Fiona Jordan/Instagram In the video, the tyke leans into a vape offered to him by Jordan's friend and takes a hit before he breaths out a visible cloud of smoke and descends into a coughing fit. The young boy — whom the pair was babysitting — flashes confused and concerned glances between a teenage Jordan behind the camera and the vape owner as the girls laugh uncontrollably, the 8-year-old clip shows. 4 In the video, the young toddler sucked on the vape and coughed up a cloud of smoke. Jordan blamed typical teenage stupidity for the blatant disregard for the toddler's well-being in an apology video shared on her social media Monday. She said she was 15 and was grieving the recent death of her mother at the time the clip was filmed. 'I am a human, I make mistakes and this is one that I regret more than anything in this world. That moment does not reflect who I am today or the values that I live by. I cannot change what I did, but I can acknowledge how wrong it was and continue to hold myself accountable,' the TikToker said. 4 Jordan, who was 15 years old at the time, could be heard cracking up behind the camera. She said that the same day the video was recorded, she also 'fully cooperated with law enforcement' and 'took full responsibility' for the situation, adding that just being there and filming the moment alone made her 'just as guilty.' Jordan said that her mother had been murdered shortly before the ill-fated video was recorded and contended that she wasn't in the right headspace, while a provocative group of teens in her social circle and alcohol only exacerbated her delinquency. Not everyone online took the sympathy bait — even as others resonated based on their own experiences as 'literal menaces' during their testy teen years. 'I've grieved a lot but never once thought about hurting a CHILD while grieving,' one follower commented. 4 Jordan attributed her actions to her grief and to surrounding herself with the wrong group of people. Fiona Jordan/Instagram 'What does your trauma have to do with you doing that stuff to a Child… gross,' another added. 'No you could have KILLED someone's else's child. This is not a mistake, that's f–king sick. That is SICK,' one user raged. Jordan, who shot up to popularity through her 'get ready with me' and 'day in my life' videos, has previously secured partnerships with high-profile brands including White Fox Boutique, Bloom and Essence Makeup. The Post reached out to Jordan for comment.
UPI
8 hours ago
- UPI
Wife of slain NYPD officer Didarul Islam gives birth to son
Mourners attend the funeral services for NYPD officer Didarul Islam at Parkchester Jame Masjid on July 31, in New York City, after Islam and three other people were shot and killed at the 345 Park Avenue office building in Midtown Manhattan. On Monday, the NYPD announced Islam's wife had given birth to the couple's third son. Photo by Derek French/UPI | License Photo Aug. 18 (UPI) -- The wife of slain NYPD officer Didarul Islam, who was among four people killed in a mass shooting last month, has given birth to the couple's third son. New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch announced baby Arham's arrival Monday. Tisch said New York City Mayor Eric Adams joined Islam's widow, Jamila Akhter, at Mount Sinai Hospital on Sunday night after she went into labor. "Out of tragedy, a new life has entered this world," Tisch said. "Arham joins his two big brothers, Ahyan and Azhaan. "Together, they will carry forward their father's legacy of service and courage -- a legacy the NYPD will guard and uphold with the same devotion Didar gave to this city. Jamila, Ahyan, Azhaan, and now, Arham will forever be part of the NYPD family." Out of tragedy, a new life has entered this world. Last night, Jamila Islam, the wife of Detective First Grade Didarul Islam, gave birth to their beautiful son, Arham. Arham joins his two big brothers, Ahyan and Azhaan. Together, they will carry forward their father's legacy of... Jessica S. Tisch (@NYPDPC) August 18, 2025 NYPD officer Didarul Islam was killed July 28, while working security inside the New York City skyscraper, which houses the corporate offices of the National Football League and Blackstone. Islam was the first to be struck inside the lobby, where the suspect shot several other people before heading to the elevator. On the 33rd floor, the suspect shot another person and then himself. Islam, 36, was a three-and-a-half-year veteran of the department and an immigrant from Bangladesh. During his funeral at a Bronx mosque three days later, New York's police commissioner promoted Islam to detective, as thousands of officers and mourners lined the streets. Since the deadly shooting, two online fundraisers on behalf of Islam's family have raised nearly $500,000 to help care for Islam's wife and three sons. A GoFundMe has raised nearly $80,000, while another fundraiser by several law enforcement and NYPD organizations has received more than $416,000. "I know how special Arham's birth is for this family that is still dealing with heartbreak after losing their hero," Adams said in a post on X. "Rest in peace, Det. Islam. Your legacy lives on in your beautiful family."
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Meta's Failures Show Why The Future Of AI Depends On Trust
The recent Reuters story of Meta's internal AI chatbot policies does far more than shock; it reveals a systemic collapse of structural safety. A 200-page internal document, 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards,' reportedly allowed AI chatbots to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' describe a shirtless eight-year-old as 'a masterpiece, a treasure I cherish deeply,' and even craft racist or false content under broad conditions. When confronted, Meta confirmed the document's authenticity but insisted the examples 'were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' acknowledging enforcement had been 'inconsistent.' Meta's System with No Brakes This is not a minor misstep; it's the result of building systems that prioritize engagement over safety. Meta's guidelines effectively permitted chatbots to flirt with minors or fabricate harmful content, as long as disclaimers or framing were added afterward. The tragic case of Thongbue 'Bue' Wongbandue, a 76-year-old New Jersey retiree with cognitive decline, makes clear that AI's failures are no longer abstract—they are mortal. Over Facebook Messenger, a Meta chatbot persona known as 'Big sis Billie' convinced him she was a real woman, professed affection, and even gave him an address and door code. That evening, he rushed to catch a train to meet her. He collapsed in a Rutgers University parking lot, suffering catastrophic head and neck injuries, and after three days on life support, died on March 28. Meta declined to comment on his death, offering only the narrow clarification that 'Big sis Billie … is not Kendall Jenner and does not purport to be Kendall Jenner.' But the lesson here is far larger than one fatality. This was not a 'glitch' or an edge case; it was the predictable outcome of deploying a system designed for speed and engagement, with governance treated as secondary. This is the pivot the industry must face: 'ship fast, fix later' is not just reckless, it is lethal. When AI systems are built without structural guardrails, harm migrates from the theoretical into the human. It infiltrates relationships, trust, and choices, and, as this case shows, it can end lives. The moral stakes have caught up with the technical ones. Meta's Industry Lesson: Governance Can't Be an Afterthought This crisis illustrates a broader failure: reactive patches, disclaimers, or deflection tactics are insufficient. AI systems with unpredictable outputs, especially those influencing vulnerable individuals, require preventive, structural governance. Meta and the Market Shift: Trust Will Become Non-Negotiable This moment will redefine expectations across the ecosystem: What Meta failed at is now the baseline. Three Certainties Emerging in AI After Meta If there's one lesson from Meta's failure, it's that the future of AI will not be defined by raw capability alone. It will be determined by whether systems can be trusted. As regulators, enterprises, and insurers respond, the market will reset its baseline expectations. What once looked like 'best practice' will soon become mandatory. Three certainties are emerging. They are not optional. They will define which systems survive and which are abandoned: The Opportunity for Businesses in Meta's Crisis Meta's debacle is also a case study in what not to do, and that clarity creates a market opportunity. Just as data breaches transformed cybersecurity from a niche discipline into a board-level mandate, AI safety and accountability are about to become foundational for every enterprise. For businesses, this is not simply a matter of risk avoidance. It's a competitive differentiator. Enterprises that can prove their AI systems are safe, auditable, and trustworthy will win adoption faster, gain regulatory confidence, and reduce liability exposure. Those who can't will find themselves excluded from sensitive sectors, healthcare, finance, and education, where failure is no longer tolerable. So what should business leaders do now? Three immediate steps stand out: For businesses integrating AI responsibly, the path is clear: the future belongs to systems that govern content upfront, explain decisions clearly, and prevent misuse before it happens. Reaction and repair will not be a viable strategy. Trust, proven and scalable, will be the ultimate competitive edge. Ending the Meta Era of 'Ship Fast, Fix Later' The AI industry has arrived at its reckoning. 'Ship fast, fix later' was always a gamble. Now it is a liability measured not just in lawsuits or market share, but in lives. We can no longer pretend these risks are abstract. When a cognitively impaired retiree can be coaxed by a chatbot into believing in a phantom relationship, travel in hope, and die in the attempt to meet someone who does not exist, the danger ceases to be theoretical. It becomes visceral, human, and irreversible. That is what Meta's missteps have revealed: an architecture of convenience can quickly become an architecture of harm. From this point forward, the defining challenge of AI is not capability but credibility. Not what systems can generate, but whether they can be trusted to operate within the bounds of safety, transparency, and accountability. The winners of the next era will not be those who race to scale the fastest, but those who prove, before scale, that their systems cannot betray the people who rely on them. Meta's exposé is more than a scandal. It is a signal flare for the industry, illuminating a new path forward. The future of AI will not be secured by disclaimers, defaults, or promises to do better next time. It will be secured by prevention over reaction, proof over assurances, and governance woven into the fabric of the technology itself. This is the pivot: AI must move from speed at any cost to trust at every step. The question is not whether the industry will adapt; it is whether it will do so before more lives are lost. 'Ship fast, fix later' is no longer just reckless. It is lethal. The age of scale without safety is over; the age of trust has begun. Meta's failures have made this truth unavoidable, and they mark the starting point for an AI era where trust and accountability must come first.
