
'The White Lotus' is wrong: Women need deeper things than friendship to be happy
Show Caption
Hide Caption
'The White Lotus' star reveals why her storyline can be triggering
'The White Lotus' star Michelle Monaghan talks to Ralphie Aversa about how the female friendship story line is so relatable and toxic.
The Season 3 finale of "The White Lotus" included a powerful monologue by a character named Laurie, played brilliantly by Carrie Coon. Fans loved what she had to say about women's roles and expectations in our modern world.
During a final dinner at the White Lotus resort in Thailand, Laurie tells two of her childhood friends that she's sad and feeling lost.
'I have no belief system," she says. "Well, I mean, I've had a lot of them. I mean, work was my religion for forever, but I definitely lost my belief there. And then, and then I tried love and that was just a painful religion − just made everything worse. And then even for me, just like being a mother, that didn't save me either. But I had this epiphany today: I don't need religion or God to give my life meaning, because time gives it meaning. We started this life together. I mean, we're going through it apart, but we're still together. ... I'm just happy to be at the table.'
Laurie's point about female friendships was beautiful. But as much as I adore my girlfriends, and have long-standing friendships as far back as second grade, Laurie's conclusion about friendship wasn't the best part to me. It was instead her observations about the modern woman's dilemma that fascinated me most. It tapped into something a lot of women feel but can't or won't express.
Women have achieved so much but are still unhappy
Women in the United States are doing better than ever before.
According to the Pew Research Center, the gender gap in pay has narrowed in the past 20 years. Last year, women earned an average of 85% of what men earned, up 4 percentage points from 2023.
Women earn more college degrees than men. Single women own more homes than single men. Strong majorities of both women and men say women are now doing much or somewhat better in careers and education than 20 years ago.
Yet, research also shows that women are more unhappy than ever before, just like Laurie in "The White Lotus."
A 2024 study, "The female happiness paradox" by researchers with Dartmouth College and University College London, found that women have worse mental health than men, including problems with anxiety, depression, fearfulness, sadness, loneliness and anger. Women also "have more days with bad mental health and more restless sleep."
The researchers found that women are "less satisfied in the moment in terms of peace and calm, cheerfulness, feeling active, vigorous, fresh, and rested."
Opinion: 'White Lotus' reflects new reality. We voted for Trump − and we're not weird.
Laurie's monologue isn't popular just because she concluded that friendship is the key to happiness. I think fans applauded the scene because she found words to describe a common female experience, especially for women in midlife.
Laurie asked something so many American women find themselves wondering. We have more now than ever before. More equality, more pay, more education and more rights. Why are we still unhappy?
Feminism hasn't brought us happiness
Perhaps that's because the things we thought would bring happiness − career success, money, status and material goods − aren't able to deliver.
Women have been told that equality at work and in society as a whole would bring satisfaction and fulfillment. Yet, the feminist movement has pushed women so far in the direction of pursuing career and self interests that it has backfired. Because self-centeredness goes against many women's God-given desires.
Laurie describes this angst so well: Work was her religion, then love was, but both failed. Being a mother didn't satisfy her ache for something more, and even God didn't fulfill her needs. She can't figure out why she's so unhappy.
Like Laurie, women now have the freedom to do anything we want to do, but many of us still find ourselves unhappy and are baffled as to why.
In the name of equality, many feminists declared that they didn't need men or children. They needed only their work, girlfriends and a glass of wine. Some women have even knowingly copied the toxic habits of angry and isolated men as a declaration of independence.
Opinion: I'm tired of being mocked and hated because I'm a conservative woman
The modern feminist movement has sold women a yarn of lies, and many of us listened. Women now delay or forgo marriage, have no interest in children, find passion in careers and gave up God for yoga. They also seek purpose not in traditional values like faith and family but in politics. Abortion rights and women's marches have become rallying cries not just on specific issues but also on what it means to be a woman.
Gen Z, millennial women push back with tradwife movement
Some younger women have pushed back. A small number of millennial and Generation Z women have embraced the "tradwives movement," which promotes a stereotypical, romanticized view of stay-at-home motherhood and marriage.
Tradwives make a lot of people angry for a lot of reasons. The women often seem like they are cosplaying at being wives and mothers.
But I think the tradwives movement also angers women because it taps into a desire that's hardly progressive but still innate. Many women would love to be happily married to a healthy, masculine man, raise kids and work from home while they keep an eye on their sourdough bread baking in the oven. It's not for everyone, of course, and that's OK. Still, some women have those desires but feel like our society tells them they shouldn't.
I don't want to go back to the 19th century, when women had few rights and were forced to accept marriage and children as their only purpose. I don't want to go back even to the 1970s, when women still had to have a male cosigner to get a credit card. Women fought hard for a long time to achieve equal rights, and I celebrate those women who sacrificed so much for women like me. I can write a column like this only because I stand on their shoulders.
Women do need friendships, and I thank God for the women in my life. But Laurie in "The White Lotus" wrote off everything else that makes us happy. Married women on average are happier than single women. (Laurie is divorced; I am as well.) Married women with children tend to be happier than those without children. Women in equal partnerships − where their partner or spouse helps carry household responsibilities and the mental load of modern life − tend to be happier. Women who seek community and religion also tend to be happier than those who are nonreligious.
Conservative women in general tend to pursue most of these things. Yet, as a conservative woman I'm often excoriated for talking positively about marriage, children and faith. I adhere to a belief system that is the opposite of Laurie's − conservative politics, kids, God. I am hated for this. And every time I object to abusive comments from angry progressives, I am met with more disdain. It's almost like progressives fear that I'm right.
Laurie was right to be sad. Friendship is vital, but it was never intended to replace those deeper relationships that give life meaning and deliver true happiness and joy.
Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@gannett.com and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sydney Sweeney Parties Hard In Blue Jeans During Boozy Night Out As She Ignores AE Ad Backlash
Sydney Sweeney recently shared photos of herself and some friends partying in Florida, while rocking blue jeans. The "Euphoria" star recently came under fire after she featured in a commercial for denim brand American Eagle, which some critics slammed as racist. Many had demanded that she release a statement or an apology, but Sydney Sweeney has ignored her critics as she returned to Instagram to promote her film "Americana." Sydney Sweeney's Boozy Night Out With Pals Sweeney flaunted her love for denim as she enjoyed a boozy night out with some pals. The "White Lotus" actress took to her Instagram account to share photos from the fun experience, and she can be seen rocking a blue denim with a white cotton crop top that flashed her toned midriff, and white sneakers. The event seemingly took place at a crowded location, as fellow partygoers were spotted scattered around in the background. Sweeney held up a tray of shots to hand out to friends in one photo. She kept her blonde hair down and is also seen holding up a microphone with a girl pal on a stage for some karaoke. "Duval diaries," she captioned the photos. The Actress's AE Controversy Surrounding The Actress Sweeney's time out with friends comes some weeks after she faced backlash for her American Eagle "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans" commercial. In the ad, the 27-year-old actress made a "jeans/genes" pun, but critics argued that it supported eugenics and white supremacist rhetoric. A Salon report noted that the term "great genes" is "historically used to celebrate whiteness, thinness and attractiveness," seemingly making the commercial "a tone-deaf marketing move." Amid the backlash from several online, Sweeney has remained silence, seemingly opting to let the issue die down. The Brand Has Responded To The Sydney Sweeney Backlash Unlike Sweeney, American has since released a statement insisting that the "'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans." "Her jeans. Her story," they added. "We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone." After posting the ad on her Instagram last month, she seemingly went on a hiatus from posting amid the backlash. However, she returned 3 days ago and shared a series of pictures promoting her new film "Americana." "A few years ago, I filmed this little movie with some friends, and now you get to meet Penny Jo," she wrote in the caption. The Actress's Silence On The Ad Controversy May Be A Bad Idea In The Long Run, PR Expert Claims Although a poll showed that only 12% of Americans see the ad as controversial, crisis PR expert Eric Schiffer believes the situation bears some risk if the movie star continues to go silent about it. "Sydney's mute button is a toxic time‑bomb with some people on the left – every hour of hush hurls her wholesome brand deeper into racial quicksand," he told the Daily Mail. The CEO of Reputation Management Consultants warned that failing to speak out "will be seen as a brutal insult to many shoppers on the left." "Sydney's no‑comment stance will scream ruthless privilege to those offended, and critics feast on the void like vultures on a desert carcass," Schiffer continued. He, however, acknowledged how some conservatives may resonate well with her silence. "For conservatives, Sydney refusing to grovel denies the mob its delicious public‑shaming ritual and would be seen as a brutal power move," he said. "Because for conservatives, silence isn't weakness, it's an ironclad shield against manipulative narrative‑hijackers." Sydney Sweeney Remains Single After Split From Her Ex-Fiancé Sweeney became single again after her relationship with her fiancé, Jonathan Davino, came to an end. The pair first sparked romance rumors in 2018 before blossoming into a full relationship and even later getting engaged. However, the actress raised eyebrows earlier this year when she deleted a photo of them kissing on New Year's Eve. According to People Magazine, an insider claimed that the break-up happened after Sweeney came to realize she wasn't prepared to get married and "didn't feel right" about her connection with Davino. "She's exactly where she wants to be. Most people would feel overwhelmed by her working schedule this year, but not Syd. She's all about working right now and very excited about all her projects," the source said. "What did make her overwhelmed, though, was her relationship and her wedding. She didn't feel right about it," the insider continued. The source added that Sweeney "is not ready to settle down" and that her relationship with Davino "only lasted for this long because it was hard for her to break it off." Solve the daily Crossword


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
American Eagle ‘almost paralyzed by body positivity' before it launched ‘sultry' Sydney Sweeney ads
American Eagle Outfitters has made a bold, divisive bet on its 'sultry' Sydney Sweeney ads — but only after its commitment to the 'body positivity' movement started to falter, experts told The Post. A decade ago, the mall-based chain's 20-year-old lingerie brand Aerie famously took off as millennials shunned Victoria's Secret and its leggy, angel-winged supermodels in favor of Aerie's ads featuring ordinary women and diverse body types. But recently, American Eagle's flagging sales show that 'inclusive fashion' has its limits — especially after the election of President Trump, experts say. Advertisement 7 Sydney Sweeney's provocative ad for American Eagle Outfitters has created a firestorm that's even drawn in President Trump. American Eagle 7 Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle was ratcheting up the provocative ads before the Sweeney campaign. American Eagle 'They were almost paralyzed by their body positivity movement and were cautious about coming across too sexy,' according to retail analyst Gabriella Santaniello, who heads up A-Line Partners. Advertisement In recent months, the retailer has been pivoting to more provocative looks — even before the Sweeney campaign rocked the internet late last month, Santaniello said. String bikinis and 'cheeky bottoms' that expose more of women's butts, for example, were previously only available on American Eagle's website, but started cropping up in its stores earlier this year, she noted. Susan Scafidi, director of the Fashion Law Institute, has likewise noticed 'edgier' looks and 'more sultry styling. 'This means featuring fewer boxy t-shirts and more cropped camisoles,' she said. 7 American Eagle has been edgier in its marketing even before the Sydney Sweeney campaign, experts told The Post. American Eagle Advertisement What's more — unlike competitors including Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, and the Gap — some pages on American Eagle's website have lately shown models going braless under various tops — and they aren't always subtle about it. 'All of the teen retailers shy away from the nipple,' Santaniello said. 'That's why it's so odd that they're going for it.' 7 Most teen retailers avoid the nipple look, according retail analyst Gabriella Santaniello. American Eagle Then, in late July, came the Sweeney spots. In one video, the 'White Lotus' and 'Euphoria' star tinkers under the hood of a vintage Mustang GT350 before slamming it shut, wiping her hands on the butt of her jeans — and peeling off in a cloud of burning rubber. Advertisement Days later, President Trump gushed that the ads were 'hot' and 'fantastic' after he learned Sweeney was a registered Republican. The company's shares surged 23% on Trump's comment, drawing comparisons to meme stocks. 7 American Eagle has been among the leading voices among retailers on body positivity messaging. Getty Images for Aerie 'They had to do something different,' said Hitha Herzog, a fashion management professor at Parsons School of Design. 'We have a conservative president in office and we are seeing conversations that skew away from body positivity, inclusion and diversity. 'American Eagle has always been good about knowing where the conversations are going,' Herzog added. Traffic to American Eagle's US website soared following the campaign's rollout on July 23, rising more than 60% on July 28 compared to the same day last year, according to data and insights company Consumer Edge. Meanwhile, however, left-wing critics seized upon the campaign's tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans'. In one clip, Sweeney explains that genes 'often determin[e] traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' before declaring, 'My jeans are blue.' 7 The Sydney Sweeney American Eagle campaign includes scenes of the star looking under a hood of Mustang. American Eagle An ensuing fracas claimed the ads were promoting Nazi ideology, calling for boycotts of the 48-year-old company. According to a survey this week by Axios and Generation Lab, 39% of young women and 42% of Democrats said the ads made them less likely to buy American Eagle jeans. Advertisement In the week of Aug. 3, foot traffic at American Eagle stores dropped 8.9% on top of a 3.9% decline the previous week — far steeper than drops at rival chains including Abercrombie and the Gap, according to Pass_by. 'When a brand sees momentum stall so sharply, it often reflects a reputational or cultural factor,' said James Ewen, vice president of marketing for Pass_by. 7 Aerie won market share from Victoria Secret's teen brand, Pink. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement American Eagle posted its only message about the ad so far on Aug. 1 on its Instagram account. 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone,' the company said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Don't snoop through your partner's phone. Learn to sleuth instead
Put yourself in Emma's shoes: You're scrolling on your phone and get a text notification that says, 'Hey girly, your boyfriend said you guys would have a threesome with me, and I think he didn't tell you about that.' Would you (a) ignore the message or (b) look through his conveniently unattended phone? If you chose (b), don't feel too bad. Nearly 30% of American adults say it's at least sometimes acceptable to look through a significant other's phone without permission, according to a Pew Research Center survey. 'I have looked through many of my partners' phones, and I definitely have quite a few stories,' said Emma, who didn't want to include her last name to protect her privacy. An age-old debate surrounding phone snooping has been revived by the July breakup between JaNa Craig and Kenny Rodriguez, stars of the 2024 season of the reality dating show 'Love Island USA.' 'Discovering that someone you loved isn't who you thought they were and that the relationship you thought you were building hasn't been genuine since day one has been truly devastating,' Craig wrote in an Instagram story post confirming the split. Craig's friend then took to Instagram to advise other women in relationships to 'go thru your mans phone TODAY' if they had access and search for 'keywords like 'I don't like black women, I thought I would get more money from this'' — potentially implying newly discovered racism and dishonest intentions for being in the relationship on Rodriguez's part. (Craig and Rodriguez haven't confirmed these implications nor the more specific details of their breakup.) Searching through someone's phone may not be aligned with a person's character and values, but they might have valid suspicions and no other way find the truth — so they look. Doing so may turn out to be fair game when you learn incriminating information, according to divorce lawyer Dennis R. Vetrano, who is also a mediator and content creator based in New York's Hudson Valley. Not so much to this psychologist. 'In general, I think that invading another person's private space — whether it's snooping on their phone, reading their personal journal, or invading their physical space — is unethical without their permission,' said Dr. Cortney Warren, board certified clinical psychologist and adjunct clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Snooping also can be illegal, depending on privacy laws in your state or other jurisdiction, so it's not advised that you go through your partner's phone, according to Vetrano. But is such snooping even necessary anymore? With so much out in the public sphere online, do you really need to snoop? Why not replace snooping with sleuthing? Do you need to look through a partner's phone? The easy answer is no. While snooping is considered a breach of privacy because you're searching for information someone hasn't given you permission to access, with sleuthing you're working with information that's available in an online public space. And so many people are online: Seventy percent of American adults are on Facebook, 50% on Instagram, and 33% on TikTok, according to a 2024 survey. Sleuthing is easier these days with the creation of websites that can locate dating profiles, apps that track location, and most notably, social media platforms that allow you to see everyone who a person follows and the content they like. It's all there for anyone to mine. That was the case with Emma. 'I had already been kind of suspicious of this boyfriend for a while,' Emma said. 'So I was sleuthing through (his) TikTok following, and it was just girl after girl after girl of those OnlyFans models and anime cosplayers that, you know, cosplay minor characters in very inappropriate ways.' Is sleuthing OK to do? 'Technology is out there to track everything that you do, so I think the question — is it the right thing to do — is really something that we have to center on,' said Dr. Angela Corbo, a professor and chair of the department of communication studies at Widener University in Chester, Pennsylvania. As far as Emma was concerned, going through her previous partners' social media followings was justified because she was accessing public information and she ended up finding evidence of behavior she didn't like. 'I had been very straight up with my partners, and I don't like (them) following OnlyFans models because honestly, it was kind of embarrassing when everybody can see that your partner is liking photos and sharing weird adult content videos publicly,' she said. When it comes to social media, people can formulate an image of what another person is like based on who they follow and the content with which they interact. 'I think social media is a great way of getting an idea without waiting for someone to show you, or without having to break someone's boundaries and invade their privacy,' said Diana Prime, a relationship coach on Instagram and TikTok. 'If someone has adult-rated content, if they're following OnlyFans models, that is enough to not continue a relationship with that person because it gives you an insight to what they do.' Is snooping through someone's phone still wrong? Yes, Warren said. Snooping is also a sign of other troubles, such as not respecting your partner, Prime said. In that case, you're 'not going to think twice about invading their privacy.' Generally, sleuthing 'is different in the sense that the material online is often public — so the deceptive element of violating a partner's personal boundaries is less pronounced,' said Warren, author of 'Letting Go of Your Ex: CBT Skills to Heal the Pain of a Breakup and Overcome Love Addiction.' Think of it like this: Say you're sitting beside a partner and happen to glimpse a notification on their phone. 'You've done nothing wrong,' Corbo said. 'I think it's when you go behind somebody's back to retrieve information that they're not giving you permission for — I think that's when a violation has occurred.' You're already in breakup territory if you're feeling like your partner's behavior leaves you no other option but to snoop. 'That's a deeper-rooted problem that will lead to bigger issues down the road, and that's enough to walk away from someone, because what happens when you find information by snooping is that you hurt your own feelings times 10,' she said. 'It will do you more damage to snoop through that person's phone than to honor your own intuition about something being off,' Prime added. 'What within you wants to play things out, versus just trusting yourself the first time?' If your ex-partners have treated you badly and you're regularly suspicious of a partner who hasn't given you a reason to be, Corbo suggested evaluating your feelings and considering the evidence before you assume the worst. Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being. CNN's Kristen Rogers contributed to this report.