Israeli Likud party ministers urge Netanyahu to annex West Bank, World News
They issued a petition ahead of Netanyahu's meeting next week with US President Donald Trump, where discussions are expected to centre on a potential 60-day Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal with Hamas.
The petition was signed by 15 cabinet ministers and Amir Ohana, speaker of the Knesset, Israel's parliament.
There was no immediate response from the prime minister's office. Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, long a confidant of Netanyahu, did not sign the petition. He has been in Washington since Monday for talks on Iran and Gaza.
"We ministers and members of Knesset call for applying Israeli sovereignty and law immediately on Judea and Samaria," they wrote, using the biblical names for the West Bank captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war.
Their petition cited Israel's recent achievements against both Iran and Iran's allies and the opportunity afforded by the strategic partnership with the US and support of Trump.
It said the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel demonstrated that the concept of Jewish settlement blocs alongside the establishment of a Palestinian state poses an existential threat to Israel.
"The task must be completed, the existential threat removed from within, and another massacre in the heart of the country must be prevented," the petition stated.
Most countries regard Jewish settlements in the West Bank, many of which cut off Palestinian communities from one another, as a violation of international law.
With each advance of Israeli settlements and roads, the West Bank becomes more fractured, further undermining prospects for a contiguous land on which Palestinians could build a sovereign state long envisaged in Middle East peacemaking.
Israel's pro-settler politicians have been emboldened by the return to the White House of Trump, who has proposed Palestinians leave Gaza, a suggestion widely condemned across the Middle East and beyond.
[[nid:719736]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
28 minutes ago
- CNA
China warns against trade deals that 'hurt' others after Vietnam-US pact
Shares in clothing companies and sports equipment manufacturers - which have a large footprint in Vietnam - rose on the news, but later declined sharply after Trump released details including the continued tariffs, which were higher than expected. Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro has called Vietnam a "colony of China", saying that one-third of Vietnamese products are in fact relabelled Chinese goods. Beijing's commerce ministry said on Thursday it had "always firmly opposed" US tariffs. "China's position is consistent," He Yongqian, spokeswoman for China's ministry of commerce, told a briefing. "We are happy to see all parties resolve economic and trade differences with the United States through equal consultations, but we firmly oppose any party reaching a deal at the expense of China's interests," she said.
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US House sets make-or-break final vote on Trump tax Bill
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson spent much of July 2 struggling to cajole holdouts into playing along. WASHINGTON – US lawmakers teed up a final vote on Mr Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending Bill for July 3 after a bruising day of Republican infighting that threatened to derail the centrepiece of the president's domestic agenda. Mr Trump is seeking a green light in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill' – but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson spent much of July 2 struggling to corral his rank-and-file members as the package scraped through a series of 'test' votes that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was set for a final vote to advance it from Congress to Mr Trump's desk around 8.30am (8.30pm Singapore time) after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours. 'We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward,' an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. 'So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill – the president's 'America First' agenda – and we're going to do right by the American people.' Originally approved by the House in May, Mr Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on July 1 by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. The package honours many of Mr Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing US$4.5 trillion (S$5.7 trillion) to extend his first-term tax relief. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore $500 in Child LifeSG credits, Edusave, Post-Sec Education Account top-ups to be disbursed in July Singapore PAP questions Pritam's interview with Malaysian podcast, says politics should stop at water's edge World Liverpool's Portuguese forward Diogo Jota dies in car crash in Spain, TVE reports Singapore Man to be charged after he allegedly damaged PAP campaign materials on GE2025 Polling Day Singapore Scoot launches flights to Da Nang, Kota Bharu and Nha Trang; boosts frequency to other destinations Singapore Electrician who bit off part of coworker's ear during fight gets 6 months' jail Asia 4 dead, 30 missing after ferry sinks on way to Indonesia's Bali Singapore $1.46b nickel-trading scam: Ng Yu Zhi's bid for bail midway through trial denied by High Court But it is expected to pile an extra US$3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps programme and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of re-election, fiscal hawks are chafing over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Mr Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's Bill. 'Abomination' Republican leaders had been hoping to spend just a few hours on July 2 approving the package, although they had some breathing room ahead of Mr Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline on July 4. The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's US$37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about plans for around US$1 trillion in health care cuts. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance under the Bill at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Legislation in the House has to go through multiple preliminary votes before it can come up for final approval, and a majority of lawmakers must wave it through at each of these stages. But there were warning signs early on as the package stumbled at one of its first procedural steps, with a vote that ought to have been straightforward remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes – making it the longest in House history. Mr Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Mr Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. 'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!' Mr Trump thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform that sounded increasingly frustrated as the marathon voting session on July 2 spilled into July 3. The minority House Democrats have signalled that they plan to campaign on the Bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. 'Shame on Senate Republicans for passing this disgusting abomination,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. AFP
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Beijing braces for US trade deals that aim to shut out China
[BEIJING] The trade truce between Washington and Beijing may be holding for now, but China is increasingly wary about what's happening elsewhere: US efforts to forge deals that could isolate Chinese firms from global supply chains. Ahead of a Jul 9 deadline, US officials are deep in talks with major trading partners in Asia and Europe, pushing for new agreements that would include restrictions on Chinese content, or secure commitments to counter what Washington sees as China's unfair trade practices. In the first such deal, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (Jul 2) announced a tiered tariff agreement with Vietnam. Exports to the US from the South-east Asian nation will be charged a 20 per cent rate, Trump said in a social-media post, with 40 per cent levied on any goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. That will hit products with components from China and possibly other nations, which are routed through Vietnam or subject to only minimal final assembly before being exported to the US. The approach mirrors provisions in an existing US trade agreement with Mexico and Canada. India, another nation seen as close to a deal, has also been negotiating over 'rules of origin'. Washington wants at least 60 per cent of a product's value added locally to qualify as 'Made in India' and benefit from the deal, Bloomberg News previously reported. India has pushed to bring that down to around 35 per cent, according to the report. 'Asia's dilemma when it comes to Trump's trade war is all about dependence on US final demand while relying heavily on China's value added in domestic production,' Alicia Garcia Herrero, Asia-Pacific chief economist at Natixis, said in a recent report, adding that Vietnam, Cambodia and Taiwan were among the most exposed. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China, a larger trade partner than the US for most Asian economies, has warned of consequences if its interests are threatened, and Foreign Minister Wang Yi is likely to raise that again on his visit to Europe this week for talks in Brussels, Germany and France. 'China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of Chinese interests in exchange for so-called tariff reductions,' the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Saturday, repeating earlier warnings. 'If this happens, China will never accept it and will resolutely counter it to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump's 90-day pause on what he called 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of America's trading partners ends on Jul 9. Unless those countries reach trade deals with the US, they could potentially face much higher tariffs. Some governments are making moves to stay on the right side of Washington. Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea have all put in place measures to stop goods from being rerouted through their countries to the US since Trump's tariffs were unveiled in April. South Korean customs announced a crackdown on transshipments, citing a rise in the practice. Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te also flagged the issue and followed up with new rules requiring all US-bound exports to carry a legal declaration that they were made on the island. Export controls Another concern for Beijing is whether the US could convince others to impose or tighten export controls on high-tech equipment, which would further hamper Chinese efforts to buy the tools it needs to produce advanced semiconductors. Taiwan in June added Huawei Technologies and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation to its so-called entity list, barring Taiwanese firms from doing business with them without government approval. The pressure is not limited to Asia. Europe, too, finds itself in a delicate position. The EU is China's largest export destination for electric vehicles (EVs), and investment from Chinese firms into the bloc, plus the UK, hit 10 billion euros (S$15 billion) last year, according to recent research from Rhodium Group. Yet trade tensions are rising. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently accused Beijing of 'weaponising' rare earths and magnets and warned of the risks posed by Chinese overcapacity. Beijing is particularly concerned that the EU might sign up to provisions similar to those in the UK's deal with the US, which included commitments around supply chain security, export controls, and ownership rules in sectors such as steel, aluminium and pharmaceuticals. While the language did not name China, Beijing criticised the agreement in a rare public statement, interpreting it as a direct challenge, the Financial Times reported. 'China is clearly worried that the EU will accept the same wording as the UK did on export controls,' said Joerg Wuttke, a partner at the Albright Stonebridge Group in Washington and former president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China. 'They are pushing the EU not to do this, and the US is pushing the EU to do it.' Brussels and Washington are aiming to reach some form of an agreement before Jul 9, when Washington is set to impose a 50 per cent tariff on nearly all EU products. With European exports to the US worth more than double the amount to China, the bloc sees Washington as the more important partner, giving the US leverage in the talks. China's weekend statement is 'obviously aimed entirely at Brussels', said Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, director of the European Centre for International Political Economy in Brussels, who was recently in Beijing for meetings ahead of an EU-China summit this month. 'China is concerned about what the EU might agree with the US.' The long-term risk for Beijing is that these efforts coalesce into a broader shift, not just a US-led campaign to curb Chinese exports, but a reshaping of global trade around 'trusted' supply chains, with China increasingly on the outside. In a visit to South-east Asia earlier this year, President Xi Jinping urged the region to stand together as an 'Asian family', warning against trade fragmentation. Beijing has often responded to actions it opposes with targeted trade measures. When the EU imposed tariffs on Chinese EVs last year, China launched anti-dumping probes into European brandy, dairy and pork. It halted Japanese seafood imports in 2023 after Group of Seven meetings in Japan were seen as critical of China. A spat with Australia in 2020 led to trade restrictions on billions of US dollars' worth of goods, including lobsters, wine and barley. 'If some agreements explicitly list China as a target and show that some countries are cooperating or collaborating with the US to 'contain China', then China will definitely respond,' said Tu Xinquan, dean of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing and a former adviser to the Chinese Commerce Ministry. BLOOMBERG
