Chalmers fuels private sector fear of ‘protection racket' for unions
As unions use Labor's industrial relations laws to grow their influence across the economy and exert authority in the ballooning public service, business leaders erupted over union attacks on employers that were legitimised by Jim Chalmers on Friday.
Ahead of attending the Prime Minister's roundtable next month, industry leaders representing the biggest employers, manufacturers, builders and small business rejected claims by ACTU secretary Sally McManus that 'poor management performance' by employers was among the 'most significant causes of slow productivity growth'.
Business chiefs believe Mr Albanese's pledge to strike consensus positions on tax, productivity and growth reforms at the Canberra roundtable will be sabotaged by unions.
Industry bosses said IR laws and regulations backed by trade unions were crippling employers and raised concerns about union demands around artificial intelligence, four-day working weeks, higher wages with no productivity offsets and abolishing the Productivity Commission.
The Treasurer said on Friday: 'I think the ACTU should be able to make their views public. I think it's obvious that when it comes to decisions taken by managers and by boards and by others, obviously, that has implications for productivity.'
Amid business warnings that Labor's IR laws are undermining productivity, The Australian can reveal Freedom of Information documents show former workplace relations minister Murray Watt, who shifted to the environment portfolio after the election, ignored advice from his then department against making a captain's call in appointing industrial relations expert Mark Bray to co-author an 'independent' statutory review into Labor's IR laws.
FOI documents show that on three occasions between July and September last year, Senator Watt's office was cautioned by the department about not acting as 'the decision maker for the procurement process' and that doing so could carry 'probity and reputational concerns' and potentially breach commonwealth procurement rules.
After the department failed through two procurement processes to find a university or research institute to lead the IR review, Senator Watt selected Alison Preston and Emeritus Professor Bray, who employers believed was not an impartial appointment given his previous commentary supporting unions and what they perceived as bias against business groups.
In a fourth departmental brief to Senator Watt in September, Workplace Relations Department officials said it was 'likely that some stakeholders would disagree with Professor Bray's commentary or may raise concerns about the impartiality of his consideration of the issues for review'.
After the draft Secure Jobs, Better Pay report was released in January, the ACTU praised the review for confirming 'Labor's IR reforms a success'. The final report was expected to be handed to government before March 31 but is yet to be tabled.
Quizzed in a Senate hearing in February about who appointed the IR experts, Senator Watt said he would need to check but his 'recollection is that the two reviewers were recommended in some form, whether it be written or verbal … by the department'.
On the same day, Workplace Relations Department first assistant secretary Jody Anderson said: 'They were chosen by the minister.'
Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth said the review was undertaken by leading industrial relations experts, independent of government.
'The interim report found that the Secure Jobs, Better Pay reforms are, on the whole, achieving the Australian government's intent,' Ms Rishworth said. 'The final review report is set to be tabled by early September.'
In April, The Australian revealed Senator Watt was informed by his department about 'impartiality' concerns regarding his appointment of Mining and Energy Union boss Tony Maher – a close friend of Mr Albanese – to chair Safe Work Australia.
As some business figures who fear a repeat of the 2022 jobs and skills summit privately warn that the government is running a 'protection racket' for unions, Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox said the ACTU had engaged in 'yet another wild and baseless attack on all Australian employers (demonstrating) how detached from economic reality they really are'.
'Again they have chosen to mindlessly attack employers without suggesting anything meaningful to remove blockages to our lacklustre productivity performance which is costing workers thousands of dollars per year,' Mr Willox said.
'What the ACTU stubbornly refuses to recognise is that Australian employers are weighed down by ever-growing regulatory and compliance burdens which the ACTU has enthusiastically promoted over many decades. It is truly disturbing that all we have heard (from unions) in the lead-up to a productivity summit are calls for four-day weeks at the same pay, higher wages with no productivity offsets, a handbrake on the take-up of technology, the abolition of the Productivity Commission, and another mindless attack on employers.'
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry acting chief executive David Alexander accused the ACTU of 'stooping to a new low with its generalised smear about Australian business managers'.
'Australia's industrial relations laws are some of the most complex in the world, a nightmare for employers to deal with, so it takes some gall from the ACTU to now run down Australian managers who have to deal with that problem,' Mr Alexander said. 'The unions blame everybody when it comes to low productivity because they don't want to admit that things such as the fair work laws that they've constantly argued for have created a one-size-fits-all restrictive working environment.'
Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison said it would be disappointing if 'these discussions decline to a blame game rather than a development of positive possibilities for true economic reform'. 'Small business are inhibited by the multitudes of obligations and their limited capacity to comply,' Mr Addison said. 'Time and resources only stretch so far.'
Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black said the ACTU attack was a 'distraction tactic by unions'.
'Suggesting Australia's productivity slump is due to bad management by businesses is misguided, untrue and just plain wrong,' Mr Black said.
'Our IR system is entirely out of balance and that's a major factor contributing to our poor productivity growth.
'Business is coming to this roundtable in good faith. Australian businesses know engaging with their workforce is essential to implementing change, but they're also crystal clear that our current IR framework is too restrictive.' Mining & Energy
Environmental regulators have ordered NSW coal mines to dramatically cut emissions or face penalties, with fears the state will miss its climate targets. Politics
The steelmaking giant will have access to rival proposals for the SA facility under a 'right of last offer', giving it a significant advantage over competitors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
44 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
A 'really important initiative' or 'complete overreach': New WFH plan draws mixed reactions
With new Australian-first rules suggested, working from home might soon be a legal right for Victorians. Premier Jacinta Allan announced on Thursday that she would introduce legislation in 2026 legally enshrining the right to work from home for two days a week. Allan said she expected the plan to face some criticism but said many Victorians stood to benefit from the changes, which will cover all employees who can "reasonably" do their job from home. "Bosses who think being seen at a desk is more important than a parent getting home for dinner with their kids, if they want to look their workers in the eye and tell them their time with their families doesn't count, they know where my government stands," Allan said. "We won't stand by while workers — especially women, single mums, carers — get punished for needing balance in their lives." Details are yet to be worked through but Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. 'Complete overreach' Peak business bodies have criticised the plan, with Committee for Melbourne CEO Scott Veenker calling it a "complete overreach". "It's another regulatory burden or requirement that just makes the cost of doing business too hard," he said, adding that his group "hadn't been consulted with prior to the announcement". "The reality is that we want to actually have an environment where businesses can thrive and flourish, and they don't need more regulation and more legislation to prevent them [from] doing that." Veenker said the state government's new plan will make "members both small and large" of the business advocacy group ask if they should "continue trading in Victoria". "We know that businesses will move their staff and their resources accordingly, and we don't want Victoria to be seen as a place that's too hard to do business," he said. "They should be arrangements that are really done in conjunction with staff and the employers, rather than the state government trying to put their nose into this. "We want the state government to be looking at how we should be focusing on economic growth and enabling businesses to prosper." The Committee for Melbourne, which merged with the Melbourne Chamber of Commerce in 2024, describes itself as being founded "to champion key initiatives to stimulate the economy and civic development, which put Melbourne on a pathway to become one of the world's most liveable cities". 'A really good initiative' However, several people SBS News talked to on the streets of Melbourne said they supported the proposal. One young woman said it was "a really good initiative". "I think working from home allows people to have a bit more of better work-lifestyle balance, therefore making them happy — happy to be at work when it is time to be at work, [and] happy to be at home," she said. Another woman SBS News spoke to said the ability to work from home "just makes life so much easier". Source: SBS News A middle-aged man said he currently had an arrangement to work one day a fortnight at home and would "certainly be keen for that to be made a legal thing to do more". A young man who works from home said: "going to [the] office necessarily doesn't mean full productivity, so that's something people have to consider," he said. Several experts recently told SBS News that working from home breaks down barriers to gender equality in the workplace and is necessary for modern families, especially those who face significant commutes to work. LISTEN TO More than one in three Australian employees typically work from home, but that figure rises to 60 per cent among managers and those in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The ABS also says 43 per cent of those who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. State Opposition signals possible support Allan — whose announcement coincided with the Victorian Labor Party meeting for its annual conference — has promised to introduce the law in 2026, prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Allan, who lags Opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. On Saturday, Battin indicated he might support the proposal. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal Opposition's proposal to eliminate remote work for public servants was partly blamed for its poor performance in the May federal election, even though it abandoned the policy before voting day. During the campaign, former Opposition leader Peter Dutton apologised after admitting that the proposal to end work-from-home arrangements for public servants was a "mistake". The plan was immediately framed by Labor and Greens parliamentarians as being a regressive move for women's working rights. — With additional reporting from the Australian Associated Press

SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Garma 2025: Minister for Indigenous Australians, Sentaor Malarndirri McCarthy
Minister for Indigenous Australians, Sentaor Malarndirri McCarthy sat down with NITV's John Paul Janke at 25th Garma Festival, following Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's keynote address.


SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Garma 2025: Uncle Ned Jampijinpa Hargraves
Warlpiri Elder Uncle Ned Jampijinpa Hargraves travelled to Northeast Arnhem Land with a powerful message for the Northern Territory Government. Uncle Ned has expressed deep frustration and grief over recent youth justice reforms and the continued inaction following the deaths in custody of his two grandsons.