Can you be sacked in Germany for a workplace romance?
All countries have different rules on this tricky issue, so could an inter office hook-up - even an adulterous one - get you fired in Germany?
Companies in Germany tend to take a more relaxed view of personal relationships in the workplace, especially compared to places where office romances are frowned upon, such as at companies in the United States.
This is due in no small part to German law, which puts heavy emphasis on preserving human dignity and peoples' privacy.
For their part, most workers in Germany are not afraid of dating around the office. A 2012 survey found that
more than half of German workers have had an office romance
, and nine out of ten reportedly said they thought sleeping with colleagues was okay. However the majority of people surveyed thought kissing at work was completely unacceptable.
There are other limits to what's accepted, and German companies can enforce certain rules around personal relationships at the workplace.
READ ALSO:
'Liebeskummer' - How to talk about dating like a German
Article 2.1 of Germany's Basic Law (
Grundgesetz
) protects every person's right to "the free development of his or her personality", and this broad protection also extends to the workplace.
Generally speaking, German law therefore prevents employers from having a say over who you have a relationship with - so long as the nature of the relationship doesn't disrupt your work for the company.
This was upheld in a 2005 ruling by the Düsseldorf Higher Labour Court against the American retail group Walmart.
The company, which was operating in Germany at the time, had attempted to ban romantic relationships among its employees. According to media
reports
, workers had received a notice which said they were not to date or enter into romantic relationships, and additionally prohibited "lustful looks, ambiguous jokes and sexually interpretable communication of any kind".
The Düsseldorf Higher Labour Court ultimately ruled that the blanket ban on romantic relationships between employees was a violation of human dignity, it added that the company must make efforts to protect workers from sexual harassment but that the limits for such provisions would need to be agreed with its works council.
What are your rights around workplace relationships?
In Germany, a person's right to a free choice of partners extends to the workplace, where workers cannot be prohibited from dating or falling in love, even with people they meet in a professional context.
Advertisement
Also, there is no obligation for employees to report their relationship to the boss or to a works council.
Put simply, if your love life is not affecting your work, then it's no-one's business but yours.
This is generally true even if the relationship is between an employee and their superior. However employers may transfer an employee or engage in restructuring to avoid conflicts of interest.
How much can companies regulate romance?
While companies cannot legally enforce a blanket ban on love, or inter office relations, they can take steps to ensure that their business is not negatively affected by personal relationships.
This could include prohibiting intimate acts at the office or during working hours, or making sure that company property - including work phones or computers - are not used for personal chats.
If you are in a senior position and engage in office romance, you should be conscious of the risk of favouritism and may be expected to take steps to avoid any potential conflict of interest.
According to an
article
by Jura law firm, which focuses on employment law in North Rhine Westphalia, companies could therefore require employees to disclose relationships that cross certain levels of hierarchy.
Advertisement
At German media giant Axel Springer SE, for instance, executives are required to disclose relationships with their subordinates. This policy was introduced following a 2021 scandal in which the editor-in-chief of the
Bild
daily newspaper was dismissed after multiple
allegations
surfaced that he had affairs with, and exploited, young colleagues.
READ ALSO:
How to know if you're getting a good severance package in Germany
Employees cannot be dismissed solely for having initiated a workplace relationship. But if a relationship, or its disclosure in the workplace, leads to disruptions then an employer can take certain sanctions such as giving warnings, or even dismissing workers in extreme cases.
Dismissals are usually only justified when a worker has engaged in conduct that violates the terms of their employment contract, and usually requires a warning first.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Turns Up Pressure With Trump Trade Deal 'In Reach'
With the contours of a hard-fought EU-US trade deal taking shape, the European Union is flexing its muscles in a bid to squeeze concessions from US President Donald Trump in the run-up to his deadline of August 1. Brussels and Washington appear to be inching towards a deal with a baseline 15-percent US levy on EU goods, and potential carve-outs for critical sectors, multiple diplomats told AFP. The EU's 27 countries have largely let the European Commission focus on seeking a deal to avoid hefty US tariffs -- as Trump repeatedly upped the stakes, finally threatening them with 30-percent levies without an accord by month's end. But since the US leader's latest ultimatum, the tone has hardened from key EU capitals Paris and Berlin: they say it is time for Brussels to show its mettle and willingness to respond forcefully if needed. Reflecting the toughened stance, EU states Thursday backed a package of retaliation on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of US goods -- to kick in from August 7 if talks fall short. The counter-tariffs are "intended to support negotiations, not escalate tensions", an EU diplomat emphasised. Economist Eric Dor said the EU would be "capitulating" by accepting a 15-percent baseline. He warned it would harm businesses with profit margins too small to absorb the tariff hike, and drive relocations to the United States. Most states prefer a deal to no deal -- even with undesirable levies of 15 percent -- but exemptions are key, with aircraft, steel, lumber, pharmaceutical products and agricultural goods under discussion, diplomats said. The approaching deadline comes with a sense of deja-vu: before Trump's 30-percent threat on July 12, EU officials also believed they were on the cusp of a deal following months of difficult talks. "The final decision is in the hands of President Trump," stressed another EU diplomat -- even if Japan securing an agreement with 15-percent flat levies has boosted expectations of a European deal. The mood music seems different this time, however. Trump Wednesday said Washington and Brussels were in "serious negotiations". "If they agree to open up the union to American businesses, then we will let them pay a lower tariff," the US leader added. EU trade spokesman Olof Gill Thursday reiterated the "twin tracks" approach: "Negotiation, and preparation for the event that the negotiations don't lead to the outcome we want." The thought now in many European capitals is that if the EU does not get a deal, "retaliation must be significant", Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank told AFP. Trump takes umbrage at the EU's surplus in goods trade, but in fact, for services, the bloc had a trade deficit of 109 billion euros with the United States in 2023. Brussels is already drawing up a list of services to potentially target. Beyond that, France has been most vocal in calling for the EU to bring out the "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. Paris says it has Berlin's support, following talks this week between President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Under the instrument, the EU can curb imports and exports of US goods and services as well as intellectual property rights, and impose restrictions on access to the EU market, including public procurement. But it's an open question whether the bloc would have the stomach to escalate the fight by deploying the potent tool, described by Gill as the EU's "most powerful deterrent". And even if it did, retaliation would not be swift. Under the rules, the commission would usually have four months to investigate the third country it accuses of detrimental trade policies -- then EU states would have eight to 10 weeks to back any action. Only then would the commission have a green light to prepare measures within six months. Experts seem unconvinced the EU would opt for this "nuclear" option, especially when Europe wants to keep Trump's support for Ukraine and the US security umbrella intact. "It is questionable whether all EU members would ever agree to such drastic action against their principal security provider," wrote Daniel S Hamilton of Brookings Institution in a paper published this week.
Local Germany
8 hours ago
- Local Germany
EXPLAINED: How product warranties can save you money in Germany
People in Germany are covered by strong consumer protections, and knowing how to use them can save you both money and buyer's remorse. Understanding some basic rules around product warranties and guarantees (one of which is mandated by EU law) can help you ensure that a defective product is either repaired, replaced or refunded. Here's what you need to know. The first thing that's important to understand is the difference between a statutory warranty (which applies to certain products sold in the EU) and a product guarantee (which is voluntarily offered by a manufacturer or vendor). The former is called Gewährleistung in German, and comes with a standard set of rules meant to protect consumers. The former is often referred to as a Garantie, and the rules for how it's applied can vary on a case by case basis. READ ALSO: What is German liability insurance and do foreigners need it? Both of these terms are sometimes translated to the English word "warranty", which is important to note if you're reading translated text on German websites. What are your protections under warranty? ( Gewährleistung ) A statutory two-year warranty applies to consumer goods sold in the EU. Generally this protection is automatically applied to electronics, household appliances, furniture, clothes, shoes and even new and used cars. The warranty covers all defects that already existed at time of purchase - even if the defects are only identified later. It's typically considered valid for two years, but can be longer in certain circumstances. Advertisement As an example, if you bought a new pair of shoes and after a few weeks of regular wear the sole falls off one of them, the warranty would apply because it can be assumed that the product was defective at the time of purchase. In this case you have the right to demand a repair or replacement of the product. According to information shared by Germany's consumer centre ( Verbraucherzentrale ), you can decide whether the purchased good should be repaired or replaced. Also you are not bound by this decision, you can request a repair first and then a replacement later if the repair is unsuccessful. In either case, the seller bears the costs of transport, labour and materials. The warranty does not apply to damage done by normal use over time. So, taking the shoe example, it wouldn't apply to shoes that were worn down through months or years of use. Because damage by normal wear is not covered by the warranty, the burden of proof on the customer increases over time. READ ALSO: Six apps to help you save money in your daily life in Germany Normally within the first six months, it can be assumed in many cases that a defect was present at the time of purchase. If you've had a product for more than a year, however, you may need to prove that the defect existed from the beginning. However, your product may still be protected in some cases of wear - especially if it doesn't live up to its marketed performance. The author of "Smart Living in Germany", a newsletter for spending and money tips, recently wrote that they successfully had their Fitbit smartwatch replaced after wearing it for 1.5 years because it died in the pool despite being marketed as waterproof. What are your protections under guarantee? ( Garantie ) As opposed to the EU's statutory warranty, a product guarantee (also called a warranty in English), is basically a promise that is made voluntarily by a manufacturer or sometimes a retailer. The rules around a product guarantee are defined by the manufacturer, so they vary between companies and products. Advertisement Read the terms and conditions of a product guarantee carefully before invoking it to make sure it can be applied to your case. German law does mandate that the terms and conditions of product guarantees are published and include; information about the guarantor, duration and content of the warranty, and the procedure to follow as a buyer. READ ALSO: Germans turn to balcony solar panels to save money Note that a product guarantee does not supersede your protections under the statutory warranty - so you can still invoke the Gewährleistung if the terms of a guarantee are not as favourable. It's always worth a try Legal protections and guarantees aside, many successful brands maintain a policy of encouraging loyal customers by going above and beyond in terms of reimbursements and replacements. So if a new product doesn't meet your expectations it can be worth contacting the manufacturer or retailer to explain your issue and ask if they can replace it or give you a refund.
Int'l Business Times
11 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tariff Negotiations With US 'Not Finished', Says Philippines
Negotiations over the Philippines' new 19 percent US tariff rate are "not finished", a key government economic adviser said Thursday, tamping down fears over the deal's potential impact on the agriculture sector. President Ferdinand Marcos flew back to the country late Wednesday after a three-day trip to Washington that saw him emerge from a meeting with Donald Trump having shaved a single point off a 20 percent levy on Filipino goods. What might "seem like a very small concession" was in fact a "significant achievement", Marcos told reporters who questioned if the Philippines -- a longtime US treaty ally -- was getting the short end of the stick. The US president, meanwhile, touted "zero tariffs" on American goods headed to the archipelago nation of 115 million. But Marcos economic adviser Frederick Go said Thursday that tariffs would not be dropped in every category. "The negotiations are not yet finished. Our technical working groups will continue to work with their counterparts from America to finalize the details of this arrangement," he told reporters in Manila. "There are still many things to be discussed." Since the Trump meeting, the Marcos administration has downplayed the potential effects of the tariffs, noting just 16 percent of the country's exports go to the United States, with about two-thirds being electronic components not subject to levies. On Thursday, Go said that while tariffs would disappear for certain agricultural products like soy and wheat, key areas such as sugar, corn, rice, fish and pork would remain protected for Filipino farmers. "I can guarantee to you we studied our biggest industries in the country where we are a significant market producer. We didn't include those in our arrangements with the United States," he said. Go also touted the benefit to Filipino consumers of dropping some tariffs, particularly on pharmaceuticals. "Medicines are expensive in the Philippines. If they are tariff-free, then that can lower the price of medicine in our country," he said. Jesus Felipe, an economics professor at Manila's De La Salle University, told AFP the actual number of Philippine exports hit by the full tariff would likely be low. "That's the number (19 percent) that has been flagged, but our feeling is that many products -- a substantial share of Philippine exports to the US -- will have to be exempted." While predicting the effect on Philippine GDP would effectively be "nothing", Felipe said the "imperialist attitude" with which the United States was treating smaller countries remained worrying. Countries with far larger US trade deficits like China, Mexico and Canada had "much more power and leverage" to fight back, he said. "The Philippines cannot retaliate."
