logo
New Zealand will make it easier to run businesses in conservation areas

New Zealand will make it easier to run businesses in conservation areas

Reuters4 days ago
Aug 2 (Reuters) - New Zealand will make it easier to run businesses in conservation zones and charge foreign tourists to enter some areas in an effort to create jobs and increase economic growth, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Saturday.
The decision by the centre-right government, elected in 2023, is part of its efforts to boost New Zealand's tourism industry and stimulate a limp economy.
It also comes at a time when people in countries around the world are protesting what they see as excessive numbers of tourists.
"We're going to fix the Conservation Act to unleash a fresh wave of concessions – like tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure, in locations where that makes sense," Luxon said in a statement.
Business activities from guided walks and skiing to livestock grazing and infrastructure construction already take place in conservation areas, but permission takes too much time and effort to obtain, he said.
"Unleashing economic growth on one-third of New Zealand's land will create jobs and increase wages across the country," the statement said.
Foreign visitors will also be charged between NZ$20 and NZ$40 ($12-$24) to access some popular sites, while locals will continue to go free.
"Tourists make a massive contribution to our economy, and no one wants that to change. But I have heard many times from friends visiting from overseas their shock that they can visit some of the most beautiful places in the world for free," said Conservation Minister Tama Potaka.
($1 = 1.6903 New Zealand dollars)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining
Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining

If there was an annual award for anti-tourism then surely this year's prize would have to go to Venice. Yes, the usual suspects in Barcelona and the Canary Islands may have been busy with their water pistols again but it's their counterparts in the Floating City who have truly upstaged them this time around. Maybe organising a weekend of street protests against Jeff Bezos's wedding was always going to seize the news agenda, given the hordes of reporters already heading to Venice to cover it. But the protests also deserve some credit for just how effectively they revealed the true face of anti-tourism protests as another iteration of the same old politics of envy. Venice as a billionaire's playground for the weekend? What on earth would the great old Doge have made of it all? While the ancient Venetian rulers might have other concerns (like why their name has been pinched by a US government department), does anyone believe they wouldn't be delighted to see that the city they built is still able to court the ultra-wealthy? In truth, the Venice naysayers show the hypocrisy of the anti-tourism movement. In Barcelona, protesters point to the deluge of Airbnbs across the city contributing to the housing affordability crisis as well as dumping drunken party-goers into residential neighbourhoods. But the idea that this applies to the ultra-rich who visit Venice is frankly ludicrous. Everyone knows the super rich love Venice, which is exactly why so many of them flock there every year for the Venice Film Festival or the Biennale. And when they get there they stay in dreamy hotels that were built for their custom – quite literally in some cases. Did you know the Four Seasons spent more than $30 million to restore the glorious Hotel Danieli as a five-star hotel. What would have happened to that building if it weren't for the roaring demand from high-net-worth travellers? In some ways, it's a tale as old as Venice itself. Like its modern-day equivalent in Dubai, much of the city was built to cater to the super rich of the 13th and 14th centuries. And you can bet those glorious palazzos were pretty controversial in their heyday too. Just look at the famous Ca' d'Oro (House of Gold). Built by one of Venice's founding families, the Contarini, it was practically the antidote to old-fashioned Christian modesty. Still, that's what Venice does: it attracts the rich and famous, and those who want to walk in their footsteps. Remember the iconic images of Princess Diana in her gondola? How many trips to Venice do you think they inspired in the decade that followed? Within a year, she'd probably put most of those gondoliers' future children through university with the extra business. And don't listen to anyone tell you that 'overtourism' is ruining Venice either. In fact, the truth remains that the city is actually much less crowded than it was 500 years ago – even when you factor in those cruise ships. These days, the city has just 20,000 residents, and attracts around 15,000 tourist per day, on average. But this compares to 180,000 residents back in the Renaissance days. That means it isn't difficult to find a quiet bistro or bar, provided you're happy to wander ten minutes away from St Mark's Square. Even the most visited parts of Venice still have a seductive charm. Perhaps it's the constraints that come with being a canal city, but I'm always struck by how well modern Venice seems to have managed to maintain not just its character, but also the kind of characters who frequent it – particularly after the sun goes down and the cruise ship day-trippers disappear. Last time I was there, I dined at the Club del Doge in the famous Gritti Palace. As I was perusing the menu, a hushed silence fell over the room. When I looked up, I saw a rather famous designer followed by what appeared to be their two romantic partners (an arrangement that the TikTok generation calls a 'polycule') in tow. Witnessing the rich and famous with their guard down is always interesting. But in Venice it is something else entirely. In those scandalous seconds, I felt the same thrill that well-heeled Venetian traders must have experienced when catching a glimpse of the most powerful nobles peeking from behind their carnival masks. It's that sort of magic that makes Venice such an intoxicating place. And while certain locals might pull their hair about the city's all-year-round popularity, the truth is that none of the kind of gimmicks we've seen in recent years – like the tourism tax on day-trippers or the ban on groups of over 25 people – will put a dent in its appeal to the rest of us, and certainly not to the super rich. Still, at least Venice makes for a stunning backdrop for those who do still want to protest. Let's just hope they leave the water pistols behind for now.

The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas
The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas

While most of us Vegas regulars have long assumed that Sin City is immortal, viral videos on social media are apparently telling a different story. Over on YouTube, there are dozens of clips of seemingly empty scenes on the Strip, as influencers gawp into the camera and proclaim that the party is truly over. Can it really be that Vegas is emptying out, and falling from favour? The official statistics suggest that, at the very least, there is a downward trend at play. Numbers from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (the guys who coined the 'What happens in Vegas' slogan) show tourism is down 6.5 per cent since last year, with a marked slump since April. As you might expect, gambling revenues have dwindled too, with a 2.9 per cent year-on-year drop across the sector – enough to wipe some $600 million from casino revenues this year. If you concentrate purely on the Strip casinos that depend almost exclusively on out-of-towners, the drop is even bigger at 3.9 per cent. Some claim it's down to the general squeeze of disposable income, with surveys showing a drop in overall consumer confidence across the States. Naturally, anti-Trump types have been quick to jump on any evidence that the decline could be partly the fault of the White House – and when it comes to one particular measure they may well have a point. According to LVCVA figures, Canadians make up around 3 per cent of Vegas visitors, with 1.4 million making the trip last year. Yet one year later, the data shows that more Canadians are thinking twice about crossing the border, perhaps due to the President's fiery rhetoric towards his northern neighbour. Recent figures from Vegas's Harry Reid Airport show that arrivals on Air Canada jets are down 5 per cent year-on-year, while passenger numbers for the low-cost Canadian carrier Flair have plummeted 55 per cent. Not the sort of thing you want to see in an already tight economy. Where does it all leave Vegas? The overall decline is real, but it isn't as bad as some headlines suggest, says casino expert John Mehaffey, who runs the Vegas Advantage website. 'The slowdown has been more noticeable at the lower end of the market, but luxury resorts appear broadly level with last year,' he says. 'In any event, Vegas is always a bit slower in the summer.' As for those viral videos showing the supposed death of Vegas, he suspects some of the creators have been disingenuous in their tactics. 'I saw one picture of empty side walks in front of Caesars Palace, but you could see from the position of the sun that the photo was taken in the early part of the morning,' he says. @chasasworld ♬ original sound - chasasworld On the other hand, plenty of social media users are convinced they've found the real reason that fewer people are visiting Las Vegas – rip-off prices. In June, a humble bottle of water briefly became a social media sensation, when one stunned traveller revealed that it had been priced at a shocking $26 in the mini-bar at the iconic Bellagio hotel. The story was picked up across the American media. On the popular discussion website Reddit, meanwhile, forums about Las Vegas have descended into a strange game of Top Trumps, with users competing to see who can find the most excessive examples of Vegas pricing during their visit. 'I paid $14 for a bottle of Sprite and $32 for chicken tenders,' posted one user, sounding strangely proud about the whole experience. Of course, steep prices are nothing new in Sin City. But while the world's entertainment capital has never been cheap, the data shows that prices have jumped disproportionately since the pandemic, with a 50 per cent rise in the average hotel room price since 2019. Fees and charges have also spiked, as casinos seek to make up for lost revenues during the shutdown. As Vegas regulars will know, it isn't hard to avoid the worst of the pricing – provided you do your homework in advance. As a rule of thumb, I always advise anyone staying on the Strip to do as much as their discretionary spending (things like refreshments and snacks) outside of the casino resort, given that most are notorious for high prices. Another option is to get off the Strip altogether and opt for a downtown casino. Fremont Street might lack some of the extravagance of the Bellagio, but it's certainly no less vibrant. Not only are the prices much cheaper (and the odds marginally more generous), but it's a much shorter walk to get to independent restaurants and bars that cost a fraction of those on the Strip. Some might say that penny-pinching goes against the Vegas spirit. But my attitude has always been the less money you spend unnecessarily – for example, on a $10 coke from a casino concession store – the more you have to spend on the genuinely exciting stuff, whether that's playing the tables or seeing one of the shows. Will the falling visitor numbers force Vegas to change tack on its premium prices? There are already signs that some casinos are doing just that, says John Mehaffey. This summer, the Resorts World hotel and casino waived some of its charges (including the hated resort fee) in a bid to attract more visitors. As for what the future holds beyond that, Sin City will have plenty on its plate dealing with everything from Gen Z's famous aversion to alcohol to the liberalisation of sports betting across much of the States. Expect the push towards big sporting events like the Super Bowl and Formula 1 to continue at full speed, given they don't rely on gamblers or drinkers to make money. All in all, it seems the decline of Vegas has been exaggerated. This glorious city has seen off a slump many times before, and you can bet your bottom dollar it will do the same again.

The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer
The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer

A TINY fishing village where the sun doesn't set for 69 days is one of the most beautiful places in the world. Home to just 300 people, the island's residents have chosen not to live by strict time conventions and instead "do what they want—when they want". 6 6 6 Sommarøy meaning summer island has constant sunlight between May 18 to July 26 every year. You can walk across the gorgeous wind sandy beaches at 2am, and stroll amongst the gorgeous Arctic mountains whilst others are sleeping. Due to its northern location, it hardly ever gets warm in Sommarøy, with average temperatures between seven and 15 degrees. And in the winter, the midnight sun is replaced by constant darkness, which occurs between November and January. The long polar nights are perfect for seeing the Aurora Borealis, which can light up the sky at any time during the "day" or "night". The island's economy depends on fishing and tourism and there's so much to do for visitors, including hiking, swimming and kayaking. Time free zone Due to it's unusual daylight hours, Sommarøy exists without the normal time constraints placed on society. In fact, the iconic Sommarøy Bridge, which is used as a way to access the island is covered in watches from visitors, who want to ditch the concept of time whilst on the island. In 2019, the inhabitants launched a campaign to make Sommarøy "time free". 'In many cases this can be linked to the feeling of being trapped by the clock", ' Kjell Ove Hveding, the leader of the campaign said. "We will be a time-free zone where everyone can live their lives to the fullest … Our goal is to provide full flexibility, 24/7. "If you want to cut the lawn at 4am, then you can do it." The campaign called for opening hours to be abolished, and for people do be allowed to do whatever they liked at any time of day. Residents of the island said: "Here we enjoy every minute of the midnight sun, and yes, a coffee with friends on the beach at 2am is a normal thing.' It was later revealed that the campaign was partly a marketing ploy by Visit Norway, to boost tourism to the island. However, the island's residents did have a meeting to sign a petition to become the word's first time-free zone, and their unique attitude to time is real. 'We apologize as we should have been [clearer] from the start about the role of the agency", Marianne Mork, former head of business communications for Visit Norway, told CNN. "However, the initiative is real and came from the islanders themselves, and their time-free way of living is real." 6 6 6

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store