
Letters to the Editor: Climate action — we need to move from rhetoric to action
At week two of the UN Bonn climate talks, which will shape the road to the Cop30 climate summit in Brazil, governments are starting to engage with the idea of a just transition. This is to be welcomed.
The climate crisis is no longer a distant threat, but a burning reality for millions.
Yet, the climate burden continues to fall unfairly on the world's poorest communities and those who have contributed least to global emissions and climate change.
A just transition will ensure that the shift to a low carbon economy is fair, inclusive, and delivers job security and affordable food and energy access to the most vulnerable.
But it also means rich nations stepping up with grants-based finance to support communities and countries most affected by climate meltdown, countries burdened by debt and denied climate finance.
It also means a commitment to a serious shift away from fossil fuels.
While the level of fossil fuel finance had been declining since 2021, last year saw two thirds of banks increasing their financing by a combined $162bn — a period when the world experienced its hottest year since records began.
Ireland is shamefully playing its part in fossil fuel financing. A recent report by ActionAid Ireland and Trócaire revealed that, as of June 2024, an astonishing €3bn in fossil fuel investments were held by Irish-based financial institutions.
Even more disturbing, 91% of that investment is tied to companies actively expanding fossil fuel operations in direct defiance of international scientific consensus on the need to limit global warming to 1.5C.
Without a clear agreement on just transition at Cop30, the energy transition risks deepening inequality and further destabilising fragile economies.
But a just transition framework, backed by funding, strong labour protections, and international co-operation, can turn this challenge into an opportunity for shared prosperity and resilience.
It was encouraging to read Ali Sheridan, the chair of Ireland's Just Transition Commission, an independent advisory body established by the Government last year, affirm recently that it's essential any climate action must be fair for all.
The world must move beyond rhetoric to action. A fair climate future must work for everyone, not just the privileged few.
Karol Balfe, CEO, ActionAid Ireland, Dublin
Criticism towards IHCA unwarranted
Sarah Harte asserted in her piece ('The Gaza catastrophe is testing Ireland's conscience – and its credibility', June 11) that the Irish Hospital Consultants Association (IHCA) has taken a position of 'deafening silence in calling out genocide' in relation to Israel's systematic campaign of violence in Gaza.
Such criticism is completely unwarranted.
The IHCA has issued five statements since the beginning of 2024, condemning the unlawful destruction of hospital infrastructure and subsequent targeting of healthcare practitioners by the Israeli military.
We are unequivocal in stating that the actions of the Netanyahu government and Israeli Defence Forces equate to crimes that contravene international law; accordingly, the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant.
We agree with the Government's assessment that these crimes against humanity include a genocide against the Palestinian people.
In tandem with these repeated statements, I wrote for The Medical Independent a piece entitled 'We cannot be bystanders to genocide' (May 12, 2024), long before any Western government named it as such.
In my first public address as president of the Irish Hospital Consultants' Association, I called for an end to the 'targeting of medical staff and hospital infrastructure in plain sight'.
Several of our members are working on the frontline in Gaza hospitals, coming under live fire.
We cannot be silent when it is these colleagues, their patients, and our Palestinian peers facing these desperate circumstances every day.
We will always defend the right of healthcare practitioners to deliver care without fear of death or violence, and for their patients to live healthy dignified lives, whether that be in Ukraine, the Middle East, or any other conflict.
Gabrielle Colleran, President, Irish Hospital Consultants Association, Dublin 14
You are as old as how you feel
'You are as old as you are portrayed' may be true ( Editorial, Saturday 21), but what about hitting the dance floor well in to your 80s and 90es as reported by an international newspaper last week about a group of Belgian nursing home residents as they danced and jived to 'bass-heavy' music among their much younger counterparts at a nightclub in central Brussels?
You are as old as how you feel and your attitude to doing new things.
'There's no real age limit for knowing how to party, ' says the manager of the nightclub where Papy Booom — a Belgian non-profit that aims to address loneliness among older people and create more opportunities for fun — held their night out. Bring it on I say!
Tom McElligott, Listowel, Co Kerry
Industry crying out for tradespeople
I have spent 39 years in the construction business, 33 of them as a self-employed contractor. To me, the elephant in the room is the lack of tradesmen and also general operatives in this sector.
When I started out in 1986, we spent our first year in Anco — a government-based training facility and Cork RTC, now MTU.
It was a great grounding for green lads starting out.
Unfortunately, now we are moving all our children into college because of their popularity and encouragement from secondary schools to encourage kids to go there.
There is also a perception out there, from parents mainly, that the construction industry is beneath their child.
It's OK for them to train as a engineer/architect/quantity surveyor or possibly some of the physically easier trades of electrical or plumbing.
The reality is we are crying out for groundsman, carpenters, blocklayers, and plasterers — the latter two are not a dying trade and will become extinct in the next 10 years or less, which will stagnate the construction industry.
What needs to happen is for the Government to financially incentivise builders and tradesmen to employ and train young people.
What's your view on this issue?
You can tell us here
At the moment, tradesmen as a whole — there are exceptions — aren't interested in putting the time into training an apprentice.
The Government also needs to hold the revenue received from the construction industry, and use it to reinvest in the sector when there is a downturn in the economy and invest in public buildings such as schools, libraries, and hospitals to get better value for money during those times.
More importantly, it will keep our building workforce in jobs.
This process would encourage young people to go into the sector for stability, and also make parents more content in seeing their child enter the sector.
Finally, a strong advertising campaign is needed to get young people to join the industry.
Working in the industry can be deeply satisfying, working with your hands and brain and getting a lot of satisfaction.
If you are prepared to work hard, listen, and learn, there are great opportunities to earn a good living and become financially secure after a few years of working, compared to going to college and having massive financial outlays in the process and struggling financially in poorly paid jobs at the end of your four or five years of college.
Stephen McGrath, Fermoy, Co Cork
Landing big tax bill
The Connacht Tribune recently reported the dismay of Mayo councillors at the €385,000 that their council must pay to Revenue for their unused residential zoned land.
If a council with an annual budget of €213m for 2025 alone cannot make use of its lands, what hope is there for mere mortal private developers without the fairy god-exchequer to fund them and who have things like tax to deal with.
Local authorities have cumulatively paid over €11m in residential zoned land tax (RZLT) — clearly, councils have land they are not making use of. Remember that they have deemed their own land ready and suitable for housing.
The Land Development Agency is seeking powers to buy private land, but this is a distraction from the real land hoarding done by the many arms of the State itself.
Politicians created the ridiculous RZLT.
That they find their own councils on the receiving end is a most pleasing karma indeed.
Alex Wilsdon, Dublin Rd, Kilkenny
Read More
Letters to the Editor: My mother had a happy experience of residential care
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Seán Kelly says he is reconsidering Fine Gael nomination for presidential election
Sean Kelly is reconsidering seeking a nomination to run for president, the Fine Gael MEP has said. The party is re-entering a nomination process for the Áras an Uachtaráin posting, after Mairead McGuinness withdrew from the race on health grounds weeks after securing the party's backing. Former Fine Gael minister Heather Humphreys, who was also previously deputy leader of the party, is also considered to be in the running for the nomination. Heather Humphreys (Brian Lawless/PA) Mr Kelly told Newstalk on Saturday that he had waited to make a statement on the matter. 'My complete sympathy is with Mairead McGuinness. We worked together in the European Parliament for a good number of years 'She was all set to put in a tremendous campaign and hopefully be elected as president. 'I didn't want to say anything, I think she needed the time and space.' Fine Gael will consider the election in the coming days through a meeting of its executive council. Mr Kelly said: 'But obviously the goalposts have changed and you have to definitely reconsider.' He said he did not seek a nomination last time, but added he would 'reconsider very carefully' and 'weigh up all the options' before making a decision. He added that anyone who enters any race had to be 'in it to win it'. Mr Kelly said he wanted to see what Fine Gael's executive believed would be best for the party and country, as well as consider what would be best for his own family. Pressed on whether Ms Humphreys had the backing of the party already, he said he did not think discussions had reached that stage. 'There's no rush, let's take it as it comes.' Elsewhere in the race, independent TD Catherine Connolly has secured the backing of Labour, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and a range of other independents. Catherine Connolly (Brian Lawless/PA) Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will field a candidate. Fianna Fáil minister Jim O'Callaghan offered reaction to Ms McGuinness's decision to RTÉ News: 'I wish her well in the future. It's a campaign that's getting exciting – as one would expect as we head towards September.' Meanwhile, Nutriband entrepreneur Gareth Sheridan is among hopefuls seeking a nomination. A presidential election is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before the term of Michael D Higgins ends on November 11. To be eligible to run, a candidate must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older. They must be nominated either by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or at least four local authorities. Former or retiring presidents can nominate themselves.


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
How Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 ago sowed the seeds of devastating conflict we see today
Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-prime minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that reverberate today. The emotional images of Jews being ripped from their homes by Israeli soldiers galvanised Israel's far-right and settler movements. The anger helped them organise and increase their political influence, accounting in part for the rise of hard-line politicians like national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. On Thursday, Smotrich boasted of a settlement expansion plan east of Jerusalem that will 'bury' the idea of a future Palestinian state. For Palestinians, even if they welcomed the disengagement, it didn't end Israel's control over their lives. Soon after, Hamas won elections in 2006, then drove out the Palestinian Authority in a violent takeover. Israel and Egypt imposed a closure on the territory, controlling entry and exit of goods and people. Though its intensity varied over the years, the closure helped impoverish the population and entrenched a painful separation from Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. Israel couldn't justify the military or economic cost of maintaining the heavily fortified settlements in Gaza, explained Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Misgav Institute and the Institute for National Security Studies think tanks. There were around 8,000 Israeli settlers and 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza in 2005. 'There was no chance for these settlements to exist or flourish or become meaningful enough to be a strategic anchor,' he said. By contrast, there are more than 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, most living in developed settlement blocs that have generally received more support from Israeli society, Mr Michael said. Most of the world considers the settlements illegal under international law. Because Israel withdrew unilaterally, without any co-ordination with the Palestinian Authority, it enhanced Hamas's stature among Palestinians in Gaza. 'This contributed to Hamas's win in the elections in 2006, because they leveraged it and introduced it as a very significant achievement,' Mr Michael said. 'They saw it as an achievement of the resistance and a justification for the continuation of the armed resistance.' Footage of the violence between Israeli settlers and Israeli soldiers also created an 'open wound' in Israeli society, Mr Michael said. 'I don't think any government will be able to do something like that in the future,' he said. That limits any flexibility over settlements in the West Bank if negotiations over a two-state solution with the Palestinians ever resume. Anita Tucker, now 79, was part of the first nine Jewish families that moved to the Gaza Strip in 1976. She and her husband and their three children lived in an Israeli army outpost near what is today Deir al-Balah, while the settlement of Netzer Hazoni was constructed. Originally from Brooklyn, she started a farm growing vegetables in the harsh, tall sand dunes. At first relations were good with their Palestinian neighbours, she said, and they worked hard to build their home and a 'beautiful community'. She had two more children, and three chose to stay and raise their families in Netzer Hazoni. She can still recall the moment, 20 years ago, when 1,000 Israeli soldiers arrived at the gate to the settlement to remove the approximately 400 residents. Some of her neighbours lit their houses on fire in protest. 'Obviously it was a mistake to leave. The lives of the Arabs became much worse, and the lives of the Jews became much, much worse, with rockets and October 7,' she said, referring to the decades of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel and the date in 2023 of the Hamas attack that launched the ongoing war. Despite the passage of time, her family still is 'yearning and longing for their home', she said. Several of her 10 grandchildren, including some who spent their early childhood in the Gaza settlements, have served in the current war and were near her old house. 'It's hard to believe, because of all the terrible things that happened that we predicted, but we're willing to build there again,' said Ms Tucker. After Israel's withdrawal 20 years ago, many Palestinians described Gaza as an 'open-air prison'. They had control on the inside – under a Hamas government that some supported but some saw as heavy-handed and brutal. But ultimately, Israel had a grip around the territory. Many Palestinians believe Sharon carried out the withdrawal so Israel could focus on cementing its control in the West Bank through settlement building. Now some believe more direct Israeli occupation is returning to Gaza. After 22 months of war, Israeli troops control more than 75pc of Gaza, and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of maintaining security control long term after the war. Amjad Shawa, the director of the Palestinian NGO Network, said he doesn't believe Netanyahu will repeat Sharon's full withdrawal. Instead, he expects the military to continue controlling large swathes of Gaza through 'buffer zones'. The aim, he said, is to keep Gaza 'unlivable, to change the demographics', referring to Netanyahu's plans to encourage Palestinians to leave the territory. Israeli former Major General Dan Harel, who was head of the country's Southern Command during the disengagement, remembers the toll of protecting a few thousand settlers. There were an average of 10 attacks per day against Israeli settlers and soldiers, including rockets, roadside bombs big enough to destroy a tank, tunnels to attack Israeli soldiers and military positions, and frequent gunfire. 'Bringing a school bus of kids from one place to another required a military escort,' said Mr Harel. 'There wasn't a future. People paint it as how wonderful it was there, but it wasn't wonderful.' Mr Harel says the decision to evacuate Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip was the right one, but that Israel missed crucial opportunities. Most egregious, he said, was a unilateral withdrawal without obtaining any concessions from the Palestinians in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority. He also sharply criticised Israel's policy of containment toward Hamas after disengagement. There were short but destructive conflicts over the years between the two sides, but otherwise the policy gave Hamas 'an opportunity to do whatever they wanted'. 'We had such a blind spot with Hamas, we didn't see them morph from a terror organisation into an organised military, with battalions and commanders and infrastructure,' he said. The October 7 attack, Israel's largest military intelligence failure to date, was not a result of the disengagement, said Mr Harel. 'The main issue is what we did in the 18 years in between.'

The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Debunked: Viral video of Trump berating the Irish government over immigration is fabricated
IN A VIDEO showing a White House press conference, Donald Trump railed against the Irish government, calling the Taoiseach and Tánaiste 'criminals' and 'evil'. That speech, however, never happened. The footage that appears to show the US president ranting about Simon Harris and Micheál Martin has been viewed tens of thousands of times on Facebook, despite being an AI-generated hoax. The actual footage comes from a recent announcement by Trump about an investment by the US electronics company Apple. However, in the fabricated version of the video, the audio has been switched out with what appears to be an AI-generated rant against immigration in Ireland. 'You who say Irish identity, sovereignty, and culture is backward,' Trump appears to say in the hoax video, before smiling toward Apple CEO Tim Cook, standing awkwardly next to him. 'I will punish, humiliate and belittle you, for your sick globalist and woke ideology, anti-Irish agenda'. The fabricated audio, which is filled with misinformation, goes on to depicts migrants as a threat to women and children and the Irish government as EU puppets. The speech, however, is fake. The footage is an exact match for a video posted by the US Public Affairs Network C-SPAN on 6 August, in which he announced that Apple had pledged to invest $100 Billion into America. Advertisement Trump also spoke on other issues, including insulting TV hosts such as Stephen Colbert, and saying news about the administration's handling of the Epstein situation was a 'hoax'. He did not, however, address Simon Harris or Micheál Martin, or talk about immigration in Ireland during that press conference. The audio in the fabricated video appears to be generated by Artificial Intelligence software. While the accent of the speaker is American, and the tone of the voice is not unlike Trump's, it does not sound like him. The rhythm of the speech is unnatural, and sentences are broken up in odd ways that don't make sense, possibly in an attempt to keep the audio in sync with Trump's mouth movements in the video. However, despite these flaws, the video appears to have duped many people. 'Never thought I would agree with him but in this case I do', says one comment with more than 200 likes, posted under a Facebook video. A reply saying 'that's fake AI' garnered only five emoji responses. Other posts disagreed with the message in the video, but also seemed to be convinced that the footage itself was real. 'He should talk about crime,' one comment read. 'He's the biggest criminal in history.' That version of the fabricated video has been viewed more than 72,000 times since being posted to Facebook on 10 August. Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal