logo

Canada's new government implements Interim Reciprocal Procurement to protect Canadian businesses from unfair trade practices

Cision Canada3 hours ago
GATINEAU, QC, /CNW/ - As Canada's new government negotiates a new economic and security partnership with the United States, it is also taking action to protect Canadian workers and businesses from unfair trade practices.
Today, the Honourable Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement announced that the government has implemented a new Interim Policy on Reciprocal Procurement. Under this new policy, suppliers from countries that limit Canadian access to their own government contracts can be restricted from bidding on Canadian federal contracts. This measure will prioritize suppliers from Canada and from our reliable trading partners that provide reciprocal access to suppliers from Canada through trade agreements.
The policy applies to all federal departments and agencies and will be implemented in two phases:
Phase 1, the interim policy, will focus on applying the policy based on the location of suppliers, started with the roll-out of training and tools on June 30, 2025, to support implementation. The interim policy is effective as of July 14, 2025.
Phase 2, the complete policy, will determine supplier eligibility based on the origin of goods and services being offered, and will be introduced at a later date.
As shared earlier this year, the government is also exploring additional ways to maximize the use of Canadian steel and aluminum in government-funded projects, including in coordination with Canadian provinces and territories.
By enforcing fair and reciprocal procurement access, the government will protect Canadian innovation, jobs, and economic growth, and ensure that Canadian suppliers remain competitive in the global marketplace. We will defend the interests of Canadians, safeguard Canada's workers and businesses, and build one Canadian economy – the strongest economy in the G7.
Quotes
"The Government of Canada is committed to protecting and defending the interests of all Canadians, and will not compromise when it comes to ensuring fair market access for Canadian industry. The Policy on Reciprocal Procurement will help leverage our purchasing power to support Canadian businesses and workers impacted by unjustified American tariffs."
The Honourable Joël Lightbound
Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement
Quick facts
The Policy on Reciprocal Procurement will apply to all new non-defence procurements over $10,000 for the Government of Canada. Contracts and solicitations posted prior to July 14, 2025, will not be impacted.
Suppliers from non-trading-partner countries will not have access to Government of Canada procurements, unless there is a valid exception under the policy.
Public Services and Procurement Canada plays a crucial role in ensuring that Canada's procurement practices comply with national and international trade agreements.
Associated links
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs
Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs

Vancouver Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs

When U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to increase tariffs on Canada in a letter last week, he complained that the federal government had 'financially retaliated against the United States.' In the letter, posted to Truth Social on Thursday, Trump said the U.S. tariff on Canadian goods would jump from 25 per cent to 35 per cent on Aug. 1 and he warned Prime Minister Mark Carney not to consider raising Canada's counter tariffs on the U.S. In response to Trump's tariffs, Canada has announced tariffs on $96 billion worth of U.S. merchandise, according to an Oxford Economics analysis. However, Carney has also since exempted a number of products from these tariffs. The Oxford Economics analysis also found that at least $56 billion is eligible for exemption or remittance from tariffs. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Here's what we know about the current state of Canada's retaliatory tariffs against the United States. Over the course of the spring, Canada announced several rounds of tariffs. On March 4, a 25 per cent tariff on $30 billion worth of U.S. imports. On March 13, a 25 per cent tariff on a further $29.8 billion worth of U.S. goods, including steel and aluminum. As of April 9, a 25 per cent tariff on $35.6 billion worth of cars and parts that are not compliant with existing free-trade agreements. At present, the government of Canada lists 37 pages of goods that are facing tariffs. It includes items such as food, clothing and cosmetics. On page 37, for example, scent sprays and other toilet sprays are listed as being subject to a 25 per cent tariff. The same tariff is applied to everything from chicken and powdered milk on page 1, to prune wine on page 7 and négligés on page 16. All in, Oxford Economics estimates between $32 billion and $40 billion in U.S. product remain tariffed by Canada after exemptions are accounted for. A number of exemptions have since been carved out. Canada, like the U.S., has exempted goods that are compliant under the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, which has been in effect since July 1, 2020. For example, this would include much of the auto sector. A 25-per-cent tariff remains on non-USMCA compliant automobiles and auto parts. There are a further set of exemptions, too. The first is an exemption for some auto manufacturers that continue to produce vehicles in Canada and carry out planned corporate investments. This represents a $35.6-billion exemption, analysis suggests. The second, writes Tony Stillo of Oxford Economics, is for 'manufacturing, processing, and food and beverage packaging, and on those used for public health, health care, public safety, and national security.' This, likely worth a bit more than $20 billion, includes some steel and aluminium. This exemption will run for six months, from mid-April to mid-October 2025. 'A lot of those intermediate goods that go into manufacturing, food packaging and things of that nature, are eligible for relief,' said Stillo in an interview. Yes. 'There's still a degree of uncertainty about what qualifies for exemption,' said Stillo. There are several exemption categories that are less clear. This includes the public health, health care, public safety and national security products, which Stillo estimates are worth around $3.2 billion. While it's tough to say exactly why some decisions were made by the federal government, Stillo has a hunch: There are some goods that are easily replaced. For example, Canadians can buy Canadian chicken instead of American chicken. Or chicken could be sourced from other countries. This is similarly true with all sorts of food and all sorts of cosmetics and clothing. However, there are some goods and materials moving through North America's heavily integrated supply chain that can't easily be swapped out. 'What the government's trying to do, and I think this is really a good plan, is we realize that it's going to be tough for a lot of our manufacturers to source from non-U.S. sources, and they're giving them time to find an alternative source,' said Stillo. 'I think the Canadian government appreciates the damage that a trade war can inflict, and they strategically aim to target counter tariffs that would be more harmful to the U.S. and Canada.' Well, it means fundamentally that some goods cost more in Canada now than they would without tariffs. And it means some are less expensive because they aren't tariffed. It also means that, fundamentally, the United States has an effective tariff rate of 14.1 per cent on Canadian goods, while Canada's effective tariff rate is more like 2.8 per cent, if you account for all the tariff relief. 'We're less than proportional, for sure,' said Stillo. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .

Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs
Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs

Edmonton Journal

time20 minutes ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs

Article content There are a further set of exemptions, too. The first is an exemption for some auto manufacturers that continue to produce vehicles in Canada and carry out planned corporate investments. This represents a $35.6-billion exemption, analysis suggests. Article content The second, writes Tony Stillo of Oxford Economics, is for 'manufacturing, processing, and food and beverage packaging, and on those used for public health, health care, public safety, and national security.' This, likely worth a bit more than $20 billion, includes some steel and aluminium. This exemption will run for six months, from mid-April to mid-October 2025. Article content 'A lot of those intermediate goods that go into manufacturing, food packaging and things of that nature, are eligible for relief,' said Stillo in an interview. Article content Yes. 'There's still a degree of uncertainty about what qualifies for exemption,' said Stillo. Article content Article content There are several exemption categories that are less clear. This includes the public health, health care, public safety and national security products, which Stillo estimates are worth around $3.2 billion. Article content Why are some things tariffed and others not? Article content While it's tough to say exactly why some decisions were made by the federal government, Stillo has a hunch: There are some goods that are easily replaced. For example, Canadians can buy Canadian chicken instead of American chicken. Or chicken could be sourced from other countries. This is similarly true with all sorts of food and all sorts of cosmetics and clothing. Article content However, there are some goods and materials moving through North America's heavily integrated supply chain that can't easily be swapped out. Article content 'What the government's trying to do, and I think this is really a good plan, is we realize that it's going to be tough for a lot of our manufacturers to source from non-U.S. sources, and they're giving them time to find an alternative source,' said Stillo. 'I think the Canadian government appreciates the damage that a trade war can inflict, and they strategically aim to target counter tariffs that would be more harmful to the U.S. and Canada.' Article content Article content What does this all mean? Article content It also means that, fundamentally, the United States has an effective tariff rate of 14.1 per cent on Canadian goods, while Canada's effective tariff rate is more like 2.8 per cent, if you account for all the tariff relief. Article content

'Apoplectic:' Competition Bureau drops probe into U.S. company's sightseeing dominance in Banff/Jasper
'Apoplectic:' Competition Bureau drops probe into U.S. company's sightseeing dominance in Banff/Jasper

Calgary Herald

time20 minutes ago

  • Calgary Herald

'Apoplectic:' Competition Bureau drops probe into U.S. company's sightseeing dominance in Banff/Jasper

A federal competition regulator's decision to drop its probe into an American company's dominance of the Banff-Jasper sightseeing market appears to be Canada caving to the U.S. amid an ongoing tariff war, says a businessman who pushed for the investigation. Article content The Competition Bureau of Canada last year launched an investigation into Colorado-based VIAD's acquisition of the Jasper SkyTram that was approved by Parks Canada in the summer of 2024. The purchase pushed the company's market share of the sightseeing sector in Banff and Jasper National Parks to more than 90 per cent. Article content Article content Article content In a letter to Adam Waterous, owner of Mt. Norquay ski resort, the bureau said it could find no evidence that the acquisition noticeably exacerbates domination of the privately-operated tourist attraction in Canada's two most-visited national parks. Article content Article content 'Based on the information obtained by the Bureau, it does not appear the acquisition has resulted or is likely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition,' states the April 30 letter. Article content 'Accordingly…I am writing to inform you that the commissioner has discontinued the inquiry.' Article content VIAD through its subsidiary Pursuit operates the Banff Gondola at Sulphur Mountain, Lake Minnewanka Cruise, Columbia Icefield Adventure, Jasper's Maligne Lake Cruise and the Columbia Icefield Skywalk, which comprise the lion's share of that market of paid attractions. Article content It owns Brewster Express bus line and 10 hotels throughout those parks (two are in Banff), while also operating the iconic Prince of Wales Hotel in Waterton Lakes National Park. Article content Article content Since 2011, Parks Canada has approved VIAD's applications for one new sightseeing attraction, an expansion of a tourist venue, eight hotel purchases and one hotel construction, which had boosted the company's share of the market from 50 per cent to 85 per cent, said Waterous. Article content At the same time, Parks Canada has repeatedly turned down Norquay's bid to build a gondola from the Banff townsite to its ski hill, insisting the plan was 'found not to be feasible due to non-conformance with key park policy and legislation.' Article content Waterous said the competition bureau's refusal to address what he calls an obviously unfair and detrimental monopoly is an abdication of its role and smacks of Ottawa seeking to avoid inflaming a trade war instigated by U.S. President Donald Trump. Article content 'Canadians are going to be apoplectic that the federal government is not prepared to challenge an American monopoly in the national parks,' Waterous said Monday, adding the move is akin to Ottawa's decision last month to nix its digital sales tax (DST) at the insistence of the U.S. amid tariff wrangling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store