UK charges exiled Myanmar ambassador with trespassing at diplomatic residence
LONDON (Reuters) - British police charged Myanmar's former ambassador to the United Kingdom with trespassing on a diplomatic residence in London that he has refused to leave since being ousted for opposing Myanmar's 2021 military coup.
Kyaw Zwar Minn was locked out of his embassy a few months after the February 2021 coup, and was later replaced by the junta's representatives, after calling for the release of Myanmar's civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
Since his protest, praised by the British government at the time, Kyaw Zwar Minn has stayed at the northwest London ambassador's residence, a mansion surrounded by razor wire and CCTV cameras. He has refused to hand it back to the embassy, which he says is now run by representatives of an illegitimate government.
London's police said Kyaw Zwar Minn was charged last week with trespassing on a diplomatic premises. He must appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on May 30, the police said.
Kyaw Zwar Minn declined to comment.
Britain's Foreign Office and Myanmar's embassy in London did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Britain has urged Kyaw Zwar Minn to leave the residence, citing pressure from the junta, Reuters has previously reported.
Chris Gunness of rights group Myanmar Accountability Project urged Britain's attorney general to intervene to stop the case.
"It is clearly not in our national interest to allow a junta which the UK has condemned and sanctioned to take over diplomatic property in London, not least because it undermines Britain's policy of supporting democracy in Myanmar," he said.
Britain is among several Western countries that have called for democracy to be restored in Myanmar and sanctioned members of Myanmar's military and some of its business interests.
Most democratic nations, including Britain, have not formally recognised the junta.
But in July 2021, Myanmar's junta appointed a new temporary head of its London embassy, a move which did not require the consent of the British government under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
France Launches Airdrop of 40 Tons of Humanitarian Aid Into Gaza
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. France began a large-scale airdrop of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip on Friday, deploying four flights from Jordan to deliver 40 tons of food and supplies as the international posture towards the spiraling humanitarian crisis shifted in the face of imminent famine. French President Emmanuel Macron announced the move as part of a plea for Israel to permit full humanitarian access, Reuters reported. The effort is the result of a multinational coalition including Jordan, Germany and the United Arab Emirates. Newsweek reached out to the foreign ministries of France and Israel outside of normal business hours on Saturday afternoon for comment. Why It Matters The French aid initiative comes amid escalating warnings from international organizations of severe malnutrition and starvation among Gaza's 2 million residents. Humanitarian corridors into Gaza remain largely restricted by Israel, with widespread reports of children dying from hunger-related causes. Efforts like France's airdrop highlight the international community's struggle to address what is widely described as a man-made famine, with much of the world's attention focused on blocked or limited ground aid routes. The airdrops follow France's announcement that it intends to formally recognize a Palestinian state, which drew condemnation from some U.S. officials, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, other European nations have discussed or announced intention to recognize a Palestinian state as well as a means of pressuring Israel to act. Israel, however, has repeatedly rejected claims of forced starvation in Gaza. In May, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied people are starving, saying Israel takes "thousands of prisoners" from Gaza and photographs them, and you "don't see one, not one, emaciated." Israel has repeatedly said that aid deliveries must be delivered in a "safe framework" that does not give supplies to Hamas and notes that the U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) is bringing food into Gaza. Israel has used aid restrictions as a pressure tactic to bring Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, to negotiate the release of hostages that were taken in its October 7, 2023, attack on the country. A picture taken in northern Gaza's Jabalia shows aid parcels parachuted down following an airdrop above the Israel-besieged Palestinian territory on August 1. A picture taken in northern Gaza's Jabalia shows aid parcels parachuted down following an airdrop above the Israel-besieged Palestinian territory on August 1. Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Macron confirmed the start of the operation on Friday, writing in a post on X: "Faced with an urgent humanitarian crisis, we just conducted a food airdrop over Gaza. I thank our Jordanian, Emirati, and German partners for their support, as well as our armed forces for their dedication. But airdrops are not enough. Israel must grant full humanitarian access to address the risk of famine." France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot added in an interview with a local French broadcaster that four flights, each carrying 10 tons of humanitarian supplies, were dispatched from Jordan. France previously participated in European humanitarian airlifts in October 2023 to provide aid to Gaza through Jordan and Egypt at the start of the conflict that erupted after Hamas launched an attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people. Israel retaliated with strikes on the enclave and then sent troops into the region as officials sought to eliminate Hamas. Many nations backed Israel's right to respond to Hamas' attack, but in recent months the growing humanitarian crisis has shifted opinion and prompted outcry over the deteriorating conditions facing civilians. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has simultaneously begun instituting a daily "tactical pause in military activity" for "humanitarian purposes" in the areas of Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Musawi. The practice, first declared last week, was said "to enable the safe passage of UN and humanitarian aid organization convoys delivering and distributing food and medicine to the population across the Gaza Strip." The IDF also said it would begin conducting aid airdrops into Gaza. Faced with an urgent humanitarian crisis, we just conducted a food airdrop over Gaza. I thank our Jordanian, Emirati, and German partners for their support, as well as our armed forces for their dedication. But airdrops are not enough.… — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) August 1, 2025 What People Are Saying President Donald Trump recently told reporters: "It's terrible what's occurring there. It's a terrible thing. People are very hungry. The United States gave $60 million for food and it's a shame, because I don't see the results of it. And we gave it to people that in theory are watching over it fairly closely. We wanted Israel to watch over it." A U.S. State Department spokesperson previously told Newsweek: "President Trump and Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio want a better life for the people of Gaza and are acutely aware of the dire humanitarian situation. We are supportive of creative efforts to relieve the humanitarian situation in Gaza." Israel's consul general in New York, Ofir Akunis, previously told Newsweek: "There is no deliberate starvation in Gaza, only a deliberate disinformation campaign orchestrated by Hamas and amplified by those who fail to act. Hamas doesn't care about the suffering of children, only about weaponizing their pain to spread hatred against Israel." What Happens Next? The French government and other European partners have signaled they will continue humanitarian airlifts and pressure Israel to open land routes. Macron and other Western leaders called for comprehensive humanitarian access beyond airdrops, which the French leader described as inadequate to alleviate famine risk.
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
British Minister Badenoch's ‘Not Nigerian' remark sparks widespread backlash
A recent statement by British Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch declaring that she no longer considers herself Nigerian has drawn sharp criticism from both the Nigerian diaspora and political figures. Kemi Badenoch stated she no longer considers herself Nigerian, expressing full identification with the UK. Her comments sparked criticism from the Nigerian diaspora and political figures, highlighting the sensitivity of national identity. The debate raises broader issues about diaspora identity, cultural heritage, and perceptions of national belonging. Speaking on the Rosebud Podcast with Gyles Brandreth, Badenoch revealed that she hasn't renewed her Nigerian passport in over 20 years and now fully identifies with the United Kingdom, where she lives with her family. 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents, but by identity I'm not really, ' she said, adding that, 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I am very interested in what happens there.' The comment struck a nerve in Nigeria, where national identity and diaspora pride remain deeply significant especially when expressed by someone of Nigerian heritage in such a prominent international role. As a beneficiary of automatic British citizenship by birth, Badenoch noted that she was one of the last individuals to receive this privilege before the policy was scrapped in 1981. For her, discovering her British citizenship was a game-changer. ' Home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws ' she emphasized, also considering the British Conservative party as an integral part of her extended family. Kemi Badenoch highlighted that her decision to relocate to the UK as a teenager was driven by her parents' concerns about Nigeria's unstable political and economic climate. "I think the reason I came back here was actually a very sad one, and it was that my parents thought: 'There's no future for you in this country,'" she said. Her remarks, including past claims about difficulty transmitting Nigerian citizenship to her children, have reignited debate over national identity, diaspora disconnection, and the cultural politics of belonging. Former Senator Shehu Sani Leads Political Firestorm The backlash to Kemi Badenoch's remarks intensified as prominent Nigerian voices, including former Senator Shehu Sani, publicly condemned her comments. 'If she has rejected Nigeria, she should at least return our name, ' Sani wrote on social media, referring to her Yoruba first name, Kemi. He questioned why Badenoch, who claimed she cannot transmit Nigerian citizenship to her children, would seek rights from a country she has disavowed. Badenoch made the citizenship claim during an earlier CNN interview, remarks that have since been widely countered. Sani responded sharply: ' Why should Kemi Badenoch be bothered about getting Nigerian citizenship for her offspring from a country she rebuked and rejected? She should just enjoy her adopted home and leave us alone in our father's home. ' In further posts, he accused Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefiting from its cultural visibility. He also countered her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not bar women from passing on nationality to their children. He doubled down in subsequent posts, accusing Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefitting from its visibility. ' Enjoy your adopted home and leave Nigeria alone, ' he wrote, reflecting frustration over her repeated efforts to distance herself from the country of her ancestry. Sani also challenged her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not discriminate against women in passing on nationality. You're right to question that phrasing. Since your original sentence is in the past tense, the refined version should maintain that. Here's the corrected version, keeping your tense and structure: Presidential aide, Dada Olusegun, also criticised the United Kingdom's Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, over her comments on Nigerian citizenship. Reacting to the claim in a post via his X handle, Olusegun accused Badenoch of deliberately misrepresenting Nigeria's laws. ' Aunty @KemiBadenoch, why do you continue to lie against your motherland? Why this continuous, dangerous, and desperate attempt to malign Nigeria? ' he wrote. He added: 'Chapter 3, Section 25(1)(c) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution states that if the Nigerian woman is a citizen by birth, her children, whether born in Nigeria or abroad, are Nigerian citizens by descent, automatically under Section 25 of the Constitution. 'This holds regardless of the father's nationality. You do not need to apply for registration or naturalisation for her child to be a citizen. ' Legal Pushback Prominent human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) echoed this constitutional clarification. According to Section 25 of Nigeria's 1999 Constitution, a child born to either a Nigerian father or mother is entitled to citizenship by birth. ' Badenoch's claim that her children can't obtain Nigerian citizenship because she's a woman is legally incorrect and misleading,' Falana said in a televised interview. He argued that such a statement reflects ignorance of Nigerian law and risks misinforming the public, especially those in the diaspora. A Divisive Pattern This is not the first time Badenoch has come under fire for comments on race, identity, or heritage. Her positions on issues ranging from colonialism to Black Lives Matter have frequently drawn criticism for catering to right-wing audiences. Her latest remarks have only deepened the divide. As diaspora voices grow louder and Nigerian officials demand greater respect from their global descendants, Badenoch faces increasing scrutiny, not only over what she said, but why she felt the need to say it at all.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Arab nations are getting wise to Hamas — even as others foolishly squeeze Israel
Most media ignored last week's most important Middle East development: Arab nations for the first time publicly slammed Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, massacre and demanded the terrorists surrender power, disarm, and release their hostages. OK, it's a low bar. But it's progress, and a lot more meaningful than British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's threat to recognize a Palestinian state or the other maneuvering over Gaza's food crisis. The landmark demands came in a seven-page declaration Tuesday by 17 countries, plus the European Union and the entire 22-member Arab League, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar. Advertisement British Foreign Secretary David Lammy embraces Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa after Lammy spoke at a United Nations conference on July 29, 2025. AFP via Getty Images They reflect a willingness — finally! — to publicly acknowledge that Hamas' ouster is necessary to end the war in Gaza and thus ease the suffering of its civilians. Hallelujah: We've stressed since Day 1 that the conflict can't end with Hamas in power; the group, after all, openly vows to keep attacking the Jewish state until Israel is destroyed. Advertisement Perhaps the Gaza food shortages got the Arabs' attention — even if most reports misled readers by tacitly (or even openly) blaming Jerusalem for them. Bigger picture: Nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, egged on by President Donald Trump, are now eager to normalize relations with Israel, though they want the Gaza fighting to end first. Sadly, other parts of Tuesday's statement are as misguided as ever, calling for Hamas to 'hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State.' Advertisement With Gaza then seeing 'the deployment of a temporary international stabilization mission upon invitation by the Palestinian Authority and under the aegis of the United Nations.' The Palestinian Authority? The United Nations? Neither is fit for real responsibilities: The PA is nothing but an autocratic kleptocracy that uses international-aid funds to enrich its leaders and to pay terrorists to kill Israelis; even clueless President Joe Biden insisted it would have to be 'revitalized' before it could play any role in Gaza. UN peacekeepers, meanwhile, have never managed to keep peace anywhere in the Middle East; instead, the world body's presence — e.g., via groups like the UN Relief and Works Agency — has only fueled violence in the region. Advertisement Even more brainless is Starmer's threat to recognize a Palestinian state, along with France and Canada's plans to do so next month, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a cease-fire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.' Why no threats to Hamas if it keeps preventing food from reaching ordinary Gazans? How about insisting that it hand over its remaining Israeli hostages? Look: Israel has already taken 'substantive steps' to aid Gaza's civilians, and has already agreed to numerous cease-fire plans. Hamas rejects any cease-fire unless Israel agrees to let it keep power in Gaza, even as the terrorists block the peaceful distribution of food aid. It also refuses to release the remaining hostages, knowing that if it did, it would be its last act before total annihilation. As for a 'two-state solution,' Israelis backed it (until Oct. 7, anyway); the problem is finding Palestinian leadership to agree to a deal that doesn't put Israel's future at risk. So why is Starmer threatening Israel? Advertisement Oh, and here's a reality check: The outside world can't actually summon a state into existence; citizens of a would-be nation must create it on their own. Fact is, neither Britain, France, nor any other country can truly claim to care about Gazans unless they focus solely on the heart of the problem: Hamas. That Arab nations are at last starting to admit that it is the most hopeful sign yet for peace.
