British Minister Badenoch's ‘Not Nigerian' remark sparks widespread backlash
Kemi Badenoch stated she no longer considers herself Nigerian, expressing full identification with the UK.
Her comments sparked criticism from the Nigerian diaspora and political figures, highlighting the sensitivity of national identity.
The debate raises broader issues about diaspora identity, cultural heritage, and perceptions of national belonging.
Speaking on the Rosebud Podcast with Gyles Brandreth, Badenoch revealed that she hasn't renewed her Nigerian passport in over 20 years and now fully identifies with the United Kingdom, where she lives with her family.
'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents, but by identity I'm not really, ' she said, adding that, 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I am very interested in what happens there.'
The comment struck a nerve in Nigeria, where national identity and diaspora pride remain deeply significant especially when expressed by someone of Nigerian heritage in such a prominent international role.
As a beneficiary of automatic British citizenship by birth, Badenoch noted that she was one of the last individuals to receive this privilege before the policy was scrapped in 1981.
For her, discovering her British citizenship was a game-changer. ' Home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws ' she emphasized, also considering the British Conservative party as an integral part of her extended family.
Kemi Badenoch highlighted that her decision to relocate to the UK as a teenager was driven by her parents' concerns about Nigeria's unstable political and economic climate.
"I think the reason I came back here was actually a very sad one, and it was that my parents thought: 'There's no future for you in this country,'" she said.
Her remarks, including past claims about difficulty transmitting Nigerian citizenship to her children, have reignited debate over national identity, diaspora disconnection, and the cultural politics of belonging.
Former Senator Shehu Sani Leads Political Firestorm
The backlash to Kemi Badenoch's remarks intensified as prominent Nigerian voices, including former Senator Shehu Sani, publicly condemned her comments.
'If she has rejected Nigeria, she should at least return our name, ' Sani wrote on social media, referring to her Yoruba first name, Kemi.
He questioned why Badenoch, who claimed she cannot transmit Nigerian citizenship to her children, would seek rights from a country she has disavowed.
Badenoch made the citizenship claim during an earlier CNN interview, remarks that have since been widely countered.
Sani responded sharply: ' Why should Kemi Badenoch be bothered about getting Nigerian citizenship for her offspring from a country she rebuked and rejected? She should just enjoy her adopted home and leave us alone in our father's home. '
In further posts, he accused Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefiting from its cultural visibility. He also countered her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not bar women from passing on nationality to their children.
He doubled down in subsequent posts, accusing Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefitting from its visibility.
' Enjoy your adopted home and leave Nigeria alone, ' he wrote, reflecting frustration over her repeated efforts to distance herself from the country of her ancestry.
Sani also challenged her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not discriminate against women in passing on nationality.
You're right to question that phrasing. Since your original sentence is in the past tense, the refined version should maintain that. Here's the corrected version, keeping your tense and structure:
Presidential aide, Dada Olusegun, also criticised the United Kingdom's Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, over her comments on Nigerian citizenship.
Reacting to the claim in a post via his X handle, Olusegun accused Badenoch of deliberately misrepresenting Nigeria's laws.
' Aunty @KemiBadenoch, why do you continue to lie against your motherland? Why this continuous, dangerous, and desperate attempt to malign Nigeria? ' he wrote.
He added: 'Chapter 3, Section 25(1)(c) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution states that if the Nigerian woman is a citizen by birth, her children, whether born in Nigeria or abroad, are Nigerian citizens by descent, automatically under Section 25 of the Constitution.
'This holds regardless of the father's nationality. You do not need to apply for registration or naturalisation for her child to be a citizen. '
Legal Pushback
Prominent human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) echoed this constitutional clarification. According to Section 25 of Nigeria's 1999 Constitution, a child born to either a Nigerian father or mother is entitled to citizenship by birth.
' Badenoch's claim that her children can't obtain Nigerian citizenship because she's a woman is legally incorrect and misleading,' Falana said in a televised interview.
He argued that such a statement reflects ignorance of Nigerian law and risks misinforming the public, especially those in the diaspora.
A Divisive Pattern
This is not the first time Badenoch has come under fire for comments on race, identity, or heritage. Her positions on issues ranging from colonialism to Black Lives Matter have frequently drawn criticism for catering to right-wing audiences.
Her latest remarks have only deepened the divide.
As diaspora voices grow louder and Nigerian officials demand greater respect from their global descendants, Badenoch faces increasing scrutiny, not only over what she said, but why she felt the need to say it at all.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
After blacks in Cincinnati beat white adults, why was there no nationwide, racial outrage?
Recently, a large group of black youths began pummeling white adults in downtown Cincinnati. The original altercation apparently broke out between a black and white male in he-said/he-said fashion. But that dispute soon turned into a virtual free-for-all. Numerous male and female black youths sucker-punched a middle-aged woman. Others continued to kick or body slam the victims. There were many disturbing aspects to the beat-downs. One, the violence broke out along racial and age fault lines. After the initial dispute, groups of black youths swarmed solitary older white bystanders to pound them. Two, the surrounding assembled group of black youths not only failed to intervene to restrain the bullies. They also recorded the beatings for social media and were heard cheering on the one-sided violence. Three, there was neither a police presence nor any timely Good Samaritan interventions. Four, oddly few of the usual black spokespeople who habitually comment on interracial violence were to be seen. During the fake Jussie Smollett attack, self-appointed leaders from Al Sharpton to Kamala Harris immediately issued warnings about so-called systemic white racism that had reared its ugly head to victimize Smollett. Yet when it was revealed Smollett had concocted the entire charade — and even hired his own assaulters — there were few if any retractions from those once so eager to shout 'racist!' Such demagoguery is a well-known pattern dating back to the days of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax, the Duke Lacrosse charade, the Covington kids ruse, the Michael Ford 'Hands-up-Don't Shoot' fabrication or the NASCAR noose fable. Racialists too often concoct white racist attackers and go silent when the evidence proves fabricated — only to be primed to manipulate the next hoax. Five, the media and authorities did their best to either hide or play down the violence. City leaders, the chief of police and the media variously blamed the mass black-on-white violence on 1) social media, 2) the original dispute, 3) alcohol, 4) the lack of civilian intervention to stop the violence and 5) a festival atmosphere — anything except endemic racial hatred shown toward whites from the crowd of black youths. Six, had a gang of white toughs beat middle-aged African-Americans senseless, recorded it and cheered on the violence, there would have been immediate national outrage. Nor did anyone wish to raise the taboo topic of inordinate black crime rates, disproportionate to respective demographic realities. In rare interracial violent crimes, the asymmetrical ratio of black-on-white versus white-on-black assaults ranges from three to five times greater. Seven, the quiet of the left-wing media to the reprehensible violence stands in marked contrast with their usual rush-to-judgment racialism in two near-simultaneous incidents. When a shooter entered a New York City corporate headquarters last week and executed four innocents, CNN falsely raised the speculation that a 'white male' was perhaps responsible — despite the photograph of the suspect, who was as clearly male as he was not white. Media and municipal officials jumped to explain the violence as due to the killer's alleged past traumatic brain injury or because of his access to a semi-automatic weapon — or anything other than his hate-filled plan to murder an NFL executive. Actress and model Sydney Sweeney just cut a jeans commercial in front of a poster that said, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes' — with 'genes' crossed out and replaced with 'jeans.' Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The left then exploded, alleging the ad was a supposed Hitlerian reference to white eugenics. Yet the eugenics movement in America was mostly a product of left-wing progressives, from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger to Democratic President Woodrow Wilson. And the ad's sponsor, American Eagle, had previously used all sorts of models from all racial backgrounds. All might agree that the ad simply shows both tight, sexy jeans and a naturally attractive wearer — period. The country is descending into a tribal morass of double standards and racial fixations. The diversity/equity/inclusion industry, the defund-the-police madness and the perpetual left-wing hunt for 'white racism/white privilege/white rage' — from the prior Pentagon hierarchy to the lunatic fringe of Jasmine Crockett, Joy Reid and Zohran Mamdani — have all legitimized double standards while lowering the bar of the once unacceptable. When our careerist left-wing elites seek to divide us by race and make it essential, not incidental, to our identities, that tribalist message filters throughout communities. The ensuing signal is that 'payback' violence is OK — on the expectation that there are no consequences for interracial violence — as long as the victim is white and the assaulter is not. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Goldberg on potential Harris 2028 run: ‘I don't see how she's a solution to anything'
Bernie Sanders adviser Faiz Shakir and CNN Political Commentators Kate Bedingfield, Brad Todd, and Jonah Goldberg join CNN's Kasie Hunt to respond to Kamala Harris' reemergence on the scene as Democrats grapple with who can win in 2028.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
‘The climate has always been changing': EPA chief defends push to roll back climate regulations
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin joins CNN's Kasie Hunt to discuss the Trump administration's push to reverse a landmark scientific finding that planet-warming pollution harms human health.
