In India, Trump's tariffs spur calls to boycott American goods
India, the world's most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life.
India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta's WhatsApp and Domino's has more restaurants than any other brand in the country. Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts.
Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there's a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington.
McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon and Apple did not immediately respond to Reuters queries.
Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India's Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make 'Made in India' a 'global obsession,' and to learn from South Korea whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide.
'We have lined up for products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don't own, while our own makers fight for attention in their own country,' he said.
Rahm Shastry, CEO of India's DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn: 'India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB -- like China has.'
To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge.
Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients world over.
On Sunday, Modi made a 'special appeal' for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but 'now is the time for us to give more priority to India's needs.'
He did not name any company.
Don't drag my McPuff into it
Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday's opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and US embassy officials.
The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands.
'People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify,' Ashwani Mahajan, the group's co-convenor, told Reuters. 'This is a call for nationalism, patriotism.'
He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones.
On social media, one of the group's campaigns is a graphic titled 'Boycott foreign food chains', with logos of McDonald's and many other restaurant brands.
In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald's in Lucknow on Monday, said he wasn't concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money.
'Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: India hopes trade talks with the US will continue even as the US hiked tariffs on its exports to 50 percent due to New Delhi's purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, two lawmakers said on Monday, citing a briefing to a parliamentary panel on foreign affairs. Last week, President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods due to Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total duty on Indian exports to the US to 50 percent — among the highest of any American trading partner. 'Our relations with the US are multi-dimensional, and should not be seen only through the prism of trade,' one of the lawmakers said, citing the foreign secretary's briefing to the panel. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition Congress party leader, who heads the panel, said trade talks would continue. 'As of now, there is no change in the existing plans for the sixth round,' he said, referring to a scheduled visit of a US trade delegation to New Delhi from August 25. Earlier, junior finance minister, Pankaj Chaudhary told lawmakers that about 55 percent of India's merchandise exports to the United States would be covered by the new tariff. His estimate factored in the initial 25 percent levy, he said in a written response to a lawmaker's query. 'The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders' for their assessment of the situation, Chaudhary added. Goods trade between the United States and India — the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, respectively — was worth about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government estimates. The panel separately voiced concerns over Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's reported remarks on nuclear threats in South Asia during a visit to the US 'Nuclear blackmail will not work with India, and no party, or representative disagrees with this view,' Tharoor said, adding the external affairs ministry had condemned the comments.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Court of Arbitration's latest award on Indus Waters Treaty vindicates Pakistan's stance — FO
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Monday said the latest award on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), rendered by Court of Arbitration, is in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the treaty, which India has threatened to put in abeyance. India announced in April it was putting the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which ensures water for 80 percent of Pakistani farms, in abeyance a day after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan, an allegation Islamabad denies. Pakistan has previously said the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered 'an act of war.' The IWT grants Pakistan rights to the Indus basin's western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — for irrigation, drinking, and non-consumptive uses like hydropower, while India controls the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — for unrestricted use but must not significantly alter their flow. India can use the western rivers for limited purposes such as power generation and irrigation, without storing or diverting large volumes, according to the agreement. In a statement issued on Monday, Pakistan's foreign office said it welcomed the award rendered by the Court of Arbitration on Aug. 8 on issues of general interpretation of the IWT, explaining the designed criteria for the new run-of-river hydropower projects to be constructed by India on the western rivers of Chenab, Jhelum and Indus. New Delhi has not yet commented on the development. 'In a significant finding, the Court has declared that India shall 'let flow' the waters of the western rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. In that connection, the specified exceptions for generation of hydro-electric plants must conform strictly to the requirements laid down in the Treaty, rather than to what India might consider an 'ideal' or 'best practices' approach,' the foreign office statement read. 'The Court's findings on low-level outlets, gated spillways, intakes for the turbines, and free-board are in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Treaty. The Award also limits India from maximizing the pondage volume.' The South Asian neighbors have been arguing over hydroelectric projects on the shared Indus river and its tributaries for decades, with Pakistan complaining that India's planned hydropower dams will cut its flows. Notably, the Court observed that the awards of a Court of Arbitration are 'final and binding on the parties (India and Pakistan),' and have a controlling legal effect on subsequent Courts of Arbitration and neutral experts, according to the Pakistani foreign office. Recognizing Pakistan's vulnerability as the downstream riparian, the Court has further observed that the object and purpose of the Indus Waters Treaty, as it relates to the western rivers, is to de-limit the two states' respective rights and obligations, in conjunction with mutual cooperation and effective dispute resolutions procedures. 'The award carries special significance in the wake of India's recent announcement to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, and its earlier decision to boycott the proceedings of the Court of Arbitration. It is an endorsement of Pakistan's historical stance on the afore-stated issues,' the foreign office said. 'Pakistan remains committed to full implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty. It also expects India to immediately resume the normal functioning of the Treaty, and faithfully implement the award announced by the Court of Arbitration.'
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan denies India's ‘sabre rattling' allegations, vows ‘matching response' to aggression
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's foreign office on Monday rejected Indian allegations of 'sabre rattling' as misleading, promising a 'matching response' to any aggression by New Delhi. India's ministry of external affairs (MEA) accused Pakistan of 'sabre rattling' and 'irresponsibility' after media reports on remarks about nuclear threats in South Asia made by Pakistan's army chief while on a visit to the United States (US). Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir was said to have made the remarks at a black-tie dinner hosted by a Pakistani-origin businessman in Florida on Saturday, where he spoke to a crowd of more than 100 people. An excerpt of his speech shared by Pakistani security officials did not include such remarks, while the foreign office in Islamabad said the Indian MEA's statement was yet another demonstration of their 'chronic tendency to distorting facts and twisting statements out of context.' 'The Indian narrative of an alleged 'nuclear blackmail' is a misleading and self-serving construct,' it said in a statement. 'Pakistan remains firmly opposed to the use or threat of use of force. India's sabre rattling and war mongering, whenever confronted, invite unfounded allegations bereft of rationality.' India and Pakistan both possess nuclear weapons and fought their deadliest battle in decades in May, sparked by an attack on tourists the previous month in Indian-administer Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. 'Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade,' Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson of India's MEA, said, adding that it was regrettable that the reported remarks have been made while in a friendly third country. 'The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks.' In a version of the speech shared by Pakistani security officials, Munir said: 'The (Indian) aggression has brought the region to the brink of a dangerously escalating war, where a bilateral conflict due to any miscalculation will be a grave mistake.' The Pakistani army chief was on a visit to the US to attend a farewell event for General Michael Kurilla, the 15th commander of the United States Central Command. India previously lodged a private diplomatic protest with Washington when President Donald Trump hosted Munir for a lunch at the White House in June. In its statement on Monday, the foreign office said Pakistan is a responsible nuclear weapon state with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control, and it has always exercised discipline and restraint while dealing with the issues of such importance. 'The Indian MEA's spurious insinuations are irresponsible and without a shred of evidence,' it said. 'We also note with concern a pointless reference to the third countries, in a bid to exert pressure on Pakistan. This not only reflects India's lack of diplomatic confidence but also constitutes a futile attempt to unnecessarily involve other countries.' Some analysts believe that India's disagreement with Washington over the May 10 ceasefire with Pakistan, and Trump's renewed engagement with Islamabad, have contributed to a recent setback in ties between New Delhi and Washington under the Trump administration. Pakistan shall continue to act as a responsible member of the comity of nations, its foreign office reiterated. 'However, any act of Indian aggression or violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be met with an immediate and matching response,' it said. 'The onus of any ensuing escalation will rest squarely with the Indian leadership.'
