
'Time to get serious on defense': A moment of truth for NATO as leaders seek unity on spending hike
It'll be a moment of truth for NATO on Wednesday when the Western military alliance releases a joint statement on a heavily pushed and previewed collective defense spending hike.
Allies have been corralled, cajoled and pressured to hike their defense expenditure from 2% to 5% of each member nation's gross domestic product by 2035, even as some have struggled to meet the lower target.
It's widely expected that the bloc's 32 member states will green light the hike on Wednesday — NATO ambassadors have already agreed in principle — but action, and the deadline, could still slip.
The U.S.' commitment to the alliance is also in focus, after years of U.S. President Donald Trump's frustration at Canadian and European allies not pulling their weight when it comes to defense contributions.
As he jetted into the summit late on Tuesday, Trump appeared to question NATO's central tenet of collective defense (Article 5) that states that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
"There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?" Trump told reporters on Air Force One. "But I'm committed to being their friends, you know, I've become friends with many of those leaders, and I'm committed to helping them."
The military coalition's Secretary General Mark Rutte has been looking to reassure allies that Washington won't abandon the bloc, telling the summit that "there is total commitment by the U.S. president and the U.S. senior leadership to NATO."
"However, it comes with an expectation. And the expectation is that we will finally deal with this huge irritant, which is that we are not spending enough as Europeans and Canadians," Rutte said Tuesday.
NATO members pledged back in 2014 to spend 2% of GDP on defense, but some countries, such as Canada and Spain, have struggled to meet that threshold.
Other member states, particularly those on the northern and eastern flanks of the bloc and closer to adversary Russia — such as Poland and Estonia — have far exceeded this target.
Spain, the lowest spender as a share of GDP in the alliance, has already stuck its head above the parapet to risk Trump's ire by saying a spending hike to 5% of GDP was "unreasonable," reportedly seeking an opt-out from the new target.
Madrid also wants more flexibility on how and by when it must raise its defense spending, as does Belgium, which hosts NATO's headquarters. Italy has also voiced skepticism over the new target, saying it will only reach 2% this year, after last week openly questioning the point of the alliance.
NATO's Rutte said he "was not worried" that the likes of Spain would scupper the summit's aims and his own considerable diplomatic efforts to persuade members to accept higher spending.
"Of course, these are difficult decisions, let's be honest about that. Seven or eight countries at the start of this year, were not even at the 2% target ...but now they've committed to doing it this year," he told CNBC's Steve Sedgwick at a press conference on Wednesday.
"But you're right, countries have to find the money. It's not easy, these are political decisions, but at the same time, there's absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given the threat from Russia, given the international security situation, there is no alternative."
Other heads of state, foreign and defense ministers told CNBC that they hoped allies would fall in line.
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof was in a bullish mood on Wednesday, telling CNBC that NATO "will deliver unity today," but other European leaders could not rule out the possibility of a lack of consensus on the ambitious spending target.
Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson told CNBC on Tuesday that he couldn't "rule out any kind of problem. I think you can't" although he added that "this is the time not to take chances. This is the time to get serious on defense."
"You can take for granted this unity. I say that there would be a value in itself with a very strong NATO unity on this, and this will absolutely be our, be our message on tomorrow's [Wednesday's] meeting," he told CNBC on the sidelines of the summit.
Meanwhile, Hanno Pevkur, Estonia's defense minister, said NATO's 32 members will have to find a compromise.
"I would say that the realistic result is that we will reach 5% by [20]35 and then we will have the capability target review [on resources] every year," he said. "The worst case scenario, of course, is that we will not reach a consensus. But I believe that this percentage, or this possibility, is very, very low," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
RNC senior advisor reacts to 'embarrassing' Iran strike leaks
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump's trip to the Netherlands for NATO Summit


The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Witkoff bashes ‘treasonous' leak of US intel assessment of Iran strikes
Steve Witkoff, President Trump's top envoy to the Middle East, blasted what he called 'treasonous' leaking of information after multiple media outlets reported that the administration's strikes on Iran only set its nuclear program back a few months. 'Well, it goes without saying that leaking that type of information, whatever the information, whatever side it comes out on, is outrageous,' Steve Witkoff told Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle' Tuesday night. 'It's treasonous.' 'So it ought to be investigated and whoever did it, whoever is responsible for it should have been — should be held accountable,' Witkoff said. 'It could hurt lives in the future. There is — leaking is a completely unacceptable thing.' CNN, The New York Times and other news outlets reported Tuesday that an internal government report found strikes on the three facilities over the weekend delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few months, despite initial assertions from Trump administration officials that those sites had been destroyed. The report also said Iran had moved much of its enriched uranium before the strikes, according to multiple outlets. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday at the NATO summit in the Netherlands that a leak investigation was underway, while Trump blasted the news outlets that reported on the internal assessment as 'scum.' Trump and other top officials have been adamant that the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated,' even as experts have said it would take days to determine the extent of the damage.


New York Post
36 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump reveals Israel sent agents to Iran's bombed nuclear sites to confirm their ‘total obliteration'
President Trump revealed Wednesday that Israel sent agents to Iran's bombed nuclear sites to confirm their 'total obliteration' — while insisting his surprise attack was too quick for Tehran to have removed its uranium. Trump was adamant the strikes wiped out Iran's nuclear facilities and set the program back decades — despite a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran could salvage it within months. 'Israel is doing a report on it now, I understand, and I was told that they said it was total obliteration,' Trump told reporters at the NATO summit in the Netherlands. 4 President Trump said he believed Iran's bombed nuclear sites were totally obliterated. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 4 A photo shows apparent holes from bunker bombs at the Fordow nuclear facility. ©2025 Maxar Technologies 'You know they have guys that go in there after the hit, and they said it was total obliteration,' he continued, adding 'I believe it was total obliteration.' He insisted Iran wouldn't have been able to remove the uranium being enriched at the sites before he gave the order to drop the barrage of massive bunker-buster bombs on the three sites. 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast. If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it,' Trump said. 4 A picture of the Fordow nuclear site appears to show damage, holes from bunker bombs. ©2025 Maxar Technologies 'Plus they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there.' He argued, too, that the strikes had set Iran's nuclear ambitions back 'basically decades.' It comes after the White House trashed a classified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) bomb damage assessment leaked to CNN that claimed Iran could bring back its nuclear program within months. 'This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X. 4 A B-2 bomber arrives at Whiteman Air Force Base Mo., Sunday, June 22, 2025. AP 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' she added. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.'