These House Republicans Want the Epstein Files Released
The dispute has opened a rare and unusually public rift within Trump's MAGA movement, as some of his most vocal allies accuse the Administration of falling short of its promises. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is leading a bipartisan effort with Democrat Ro Khanna of California to force a vote on legislation requiring the full release of Epstein-related government files. At least 10 other House Republicans have endorsed the measure, including longtime Trump allies Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert. That's enough Republicans to pass the bill out of the House if every Democrat supports it.
But Republican leaders are closing ranks behind Trump. On Monday, House Speaker Mike Johnson ruled out bringing Massie's bill to the floor before the upcoming August recess. 'There is no daylight between the House Republicans and the President on maximum transparency,' Johnson told reporters. 'He has said he wants all the credible files related to Epstein to be released... My belief is we need the Administration to have the space to do what it is doing.'
Pressed on whether the House would vote before recess, Johnson replied: 'No.'
Massie and others aren't backing down. Responding to a social media post from podcast host Theo Von asking why the bill can't be brought up now, Massie wrote: 'We should not punt this until after the 5-week recess, nor should we wait for my discharge petition to ripen and collect the required signatures to force the vote.'
Despite Trump's insistence that the issue is overblown, a recent CBS News poll found that 89% of Americans—including majorities across party lines—believe the Justice Department should release all documents related to Epstein.
These are the 11 House Republicans who have backed the resolution to compel the full release of Epstein-related documents:
Thomas Massie—Kentucky's 4th District
The libertarian from rural Kentucky has been a frequent foil to the Trump Administration, and he's leading the charge along with Democratic Rep. Khanna to force Congress to vote on publicizing Epstein-related records. 'We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes,' he wrote on social media. 'Americans were promised justice and transparency.'
After Bondi said on Thursday that the Justice Department would move to release grand jury transcripts, Massie said: 'Folks, Keep the pressure on, it's working. But we want all the files.'
Trump's allies recently launched a Super PAC to oust Massie, who is up for re-election next year and opposed the President's domestic policy bill.
Marjorie Taylor Greene—Georgia's 14th District
The firebrand Republican has been one of Trump's most ardent supporters on Capitol Hill since her election in 2021. But on Monday, she appeared to warn Trump that his supporters would no longer stand behind him if the Department of Justice does not release more information on Epstein.
'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' Greene posted to social media. 'If not,' she continued, 'The base will turn and there's no going back. Dangling bits of red meat no longer satisfies. They want the whole steak dinner and will accept nothing else.'
Tim Burchett—Tennessee's 2nd District
Burchett has continued to urge the Department of Justice to release evidence in the Epstein case. On Sunday, he called Trump's decision to direct the DOJ to unseal grand jury evidence 'a start' but warned the full truth may never come out. 'I don't think we're ever going to get to the bottom of … all of it, Ma'am,' Burchett said on ABC's This Week. 'You know, this town doesn't give up its secrets very easy.'
Asked if Bondi should resign over her handling of the Epstein case, Burchett said: 'I have a saying: It's not how you start, it's how you finish. If she finishes strong on this, then I'm all for it,' Burchett said. 'I'm sure the learning curve is steep, and I think she blundered in the beginning, I really do, as most Americans do.'
Eric Burlison—Missouri's 7th District
Burlison, a member of the House Oversight Committee, has urged Trump to go beyond releasing grand jury testimony, warning that such testimony may cover only a narrow slice of the case and omit critical evidence. 'He needs to direct Pam Bondi to release everything they possibly can,' Burlison said in an interview with the Daily Signal. 'And if you don't have the answers, go find them. Dedicate resources to investigate it.'
Burlison has also called for congressional hearings that give victims a platform and suggested Trump consider appointing a special prosecutor to probe the Epstein case.
On Monday, he posted on social media: 'From the JFK files to the Russian collusion hoax, it's clear the deep state likes to hide the truth from the American people. Uncovering the truth about Epstein needs to be a priority as well.'
Lauren Boebert—Colorado's 4th District
Boebert last week said that Trump should appoint a special counsel to investigate the Epstein case, suggesting that former House Republican Matt Gaetz should lead the investigation. 'I think moving forward, we need a special counsel,' Boebert said, offering up Gaetz's name. 'There has to be a special investigation into this if we aren't going to be provided information.' (Gaetz was Trump's original pick for Attorney General before his candidacy was marred by allegations that he had paid for sex with a minor, which Gaetz denies).
The White House on Thursday said that Trump did not support the appointment of a special counsel.
Jeff Van Drew—New Jersey's 2nd District
The former Democrat from New Jersey joined the Republican Party in 2019 during his first term in Congress. He has co-sponsored Massie's resolution calling for the release of Epstein records. 'The American people deserve full transparency,' Van Drew said in a post.
Eli Crane—Arizona's 2nd District
Crane, who has served in the House since 2023, also signed onto the resolution forcing the Epstein files to be released, telling Axios that it's 'something that I've supported from day one.'
'I think there needs to be transparency, and I'm glad to see that this is bipartisan because it should be,' he said.
Cory Mills—Florida's 7th District
Mills, an Army Veteran who joined the House in 2023, co-sponsored the resolution last Wednesday, but has not publicly commented on the Epstein case.
Tom Barrett—Michigan's 7th District
The Michigan Republican said that he co-sponsored the resolution because 'there are too many questions and not enough answers about the Epstein files.'
'I agree that it's time to release them, which is why I put my name on a resolution to force their release and give the American people the transparency they deserve,' he wrote on X.
Max Miller—Ohio's 7th District
Miller, who has served in the House since 2023, said he co-sponsored the resolution because 'I believe in transparency and delivering the truth to the American people.'
Nancy Mace—South Carolina's 1st District
The South Carolina Republican, who is considering a run for governor, gave a speech on the House floor in Febraury accusing four men—including her ex-fiancé—of rape, sex trafficking and other sex crimes against her. She has said she wants the Epstein files to be released and called on 'any one who raped underage girls [to be] in handcuffs and behind bars.'
'I've always been an advocate for women and children,' she said in a social post. 'The Jeffrey Epstein case is no different. I want to see arrests.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer to convene urgent Cabinet meeting on Gaza to set out pathway to peace
Sir Keir Starmer will convene an urgent Cabinet meeting on Tuesday as he seeks to set out a pathway to peace in Gaza. The Prime Minister will call senior ministers in during the summer recess for the meeting on Gaza on Tuesday afternoon, the PA news agency understands. Sir Keir shared plans he is working on with France and Germany to 'bring about a lasting peace' with US President Donald Trump when they met in Scotland, Downing Street said. And he plans to share details with Arab states and other key allies in the coming days. Sir Keir is facing mounting calls to recognise Palestinian statehood immediately. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'This week, the Prime Minister is focused on a pathway to peace to ensure immediate relief for those on the ground, and a sustainable route to a two-state solution. 'We are clear that the recognition of the Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if, but it must be one of the steps on the path to a two-state solution as part of a wider plan that delivers lasting security for both Palestinians and Israelis.' Amid international alarm over starvation in Gaza, Israel announced at the weekend that it would suspend fighting in three areas for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. The UK confirmed it was taking part in airdrops of aid into the territory. Aid agencies have welcomed the new measures but said they were not enough to counter the rising hunger in the Palestinian territory. Sir Keir said that the British public is 'revolted' at the scenes of desperation in Gaza as he appeared alongside Mr Trump at his Turnberry golf course on Monday. 'It's a humanitarian crisis, it's an absolute catastrophe. 'Nobody wants to see that. I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screens, so we've got to get to that ceasefire.' The US president hinted at sticking points in US-led negotiations over a peace deal, saying Palestinian militant group Hamas had become 'very difficult to deal with' in recent weeks. He suggested this was because they only held a small remaining number of Israeli hostages. Sir Keir has likened the plan he is working on with France and Germany to the coalition of the willing, the international effort to support Ukraine towards a lasting peace. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the plan would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'. Sir Keir is meanwhile facing calls from a growing number of MPs to recognise a Palestinian state immediately. More than 250 cross-party MPs have now signed a letter calling for ministers to take the step, up from 221 on Friday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds on Monday dismissed the idea that there is a split at the top of Government over when to recognise a Palestinian state, saying 'we all want it to happen'. Health Secretary Wes Streeting is among those to have signalled a desire for hastened action, calling for recognition 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise', while Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the Government wants to recognise a Palestinian state 'in contribution to a peace process'.
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump is right to move up his too-generous peace deadline for Putin
Kudos to President Trump for realizing that his 50-day deadline for Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal with Ukraine was far too generous — and wholly unnecessary. On Monday, the prez told reporters he's giving the Kremlin just 10 to 12 more days to agree to a cease-fire — or face real consequences. 'There's no reason to wait' the full 50 days before pummeling Russia with sanctions, potentially including a whopping 100% tariff on countries that import Russian goods, Trump declared. Advertisement He's right. As we've pointed out, his original deadline of Sept. 2 just gave Russia more time to stack up more dead bodies. Putin's goal was never peace; it is and has always been the total obliteration of Ukraine. Mad Vlad has openly operated in bad faith, telling the president what he wants to hear in one-on-one calls and then unleashing hell on Ukrainians right after. Advertisement That was exactly Putin's response to Trump's original 50-day deadline: Hours after the threat, Russia hit civilian sites in Ukraine. The message was clear: You keep giving me more string, and I'll keep stringing you along. Moscow has played tough, with one top Russian official brushing off Trump's sanctions threat as 'a theatrical ultimatum.' Advertisement But the Kremlin should worry; Russia's economy is a house on wobbly stilts. Its population is shrinking, inflation is skyrocketing and Putin has poured at least 40% of the national budget into his war machine, even as his people struggle to buy basic goods. Russia's Minister for Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov is warning that the country is facing a recession. Meanwhile, China has been propping up Russia since the start of the war, buying hundreds of billions in goods and shipping in products of its own. India, too, imports Russian oil. Advertisement The threat of steep tariffs on these countries could get them to do business elsewhere. And that could deal a devastating blow to Russia. It's that logic that has fueled not only Trump's secondary-sanctions threat but a bill by Sen. Lindsey Graham that would slam buyers of Russian oil with a 500% tariff. Fact is, if Putin has his way, the war won't be over until Ukraine is entirely under his control. And hundreds of thousands more lives are lost. It's long past time for the West to ratchet up the pressure and make the war too costly for Putin to keep it going. Trump has no choice but to make the Russian strongman feel some real pain. And now's the time to do it.
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's trade wins shock the experts — who are blind to business reality
If America is in the midst of a trade war, the question we have to ask is: Are we tired of winning yet? President 'Donald Trump reaps $50bn tariff haul as world 'chickens out,'' reads the Financial Times headline. 'Only China and Canada have retaliated against US president's tariff war,' its subhead adds. 'In the Trump-dominated global economy, the US gets plenty but gives nothing in return,' reads a rueful post on X from Axios — another publication with an upmarket readership — promoting an article titled, 'Trump trade deals prove access to the US still matters above all else.' Populist publications have a different take on Trump's spate of trade victories. 'Trump's trade deal bloc — let's call it The Free World — now encompasses 57% of global GDP . . . 40% of total global trade in goods,' and '18% of the world's population,' according to Breitbart's John Carney. The president has only been in office six months, and his tariffs haven't even been in place that long, but already the results are undeniable. At a time when there otherwise seems to be no end to federal deficits, Trump's trade policy put the federal government in the black for the month of June, with a $27 billion surplus — and, as it happens, about $27 billion in tariff revenue. It's one thing that Trump so often surprises political opponents who underestimate him at election time and can't understand the root of his appeal. What's more remarkable is Trump seems to defy the very laws of economics — or rather, the law as laid down by economists. Other social sciences have lately lost credibility thanks to a 'republication crisis' that shows how the results reported in leading journals of psychology and other fields all too often fail to be repeated when experiments are conducted anew and data are re-examined. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Will the economics profession — whose mainstream is fervently in favor of free trade and is convinced tariffs are madness — face a similar reckoning for getting this test wrong? Trump can do things the economists say can't be done because he approaches trade the way he conducts his real-estate business: It's a negotiation, and leverage is what counts. Precisely because the United States has such an enormous trade deficit with the rest of the world — amounting to more than $918 billion in 2024 — other nations depend on access to our market as an outlet for their goods. The size and wealth of the American consumer base is unmatchable, and countries that get cut off from it can't easily make up the difference by selling more goods and services somewhere else. Whole industries in Europe and Asia would collapse without access to the American consumer. Trump is willing to give them access — for a price. Instead of using punitive tariffs to exclude foreign goods altogether, Trump is willing to strike a deal with anyone to allow goods to be sold in America at a price that makes the trade worthwhile for Americans and foreign companies alike. The hitch: The deal must be on terms favorable for American workers and industry. The president's arrangement with the European Union levies a 15% tariff on most EU goods — but that's peanuts compared to the 30% Trump was threatening if Europe didn't cooperate. The deal calls for new European investments of $600 billion in America, as well as for EU members to buy more energy and military equipment from us. The 15% tariff is higher than what European producers were paying before Trump returned to the White House — high enough that American producers will get some protective advantage, but not so high that foreign companies won't be able to compete. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters That's crucial because competition is what keeps prices down for American consumers. Foreign firms can't easily 'pass on' a tax on their goods — which is what a tariff is — to the Americans who buy their products when those same Americans can choose from domestic producers instead. The modest protection a 15% tariff affords gives more investors at home a reason to put their capital into American companies — which is good for our workforce and consumers alike. It means more jobs and more goods; more money in Americans' pockets and more stock on the shelves, which keeps prices down. There's risk in all this, but the upside opportunity is much greater, as entrepreneurs here and abroad recognize. For the Europeans, it's a no-brainer: The American market is so rife with profit possibilities that a 15% access fee is a very modest cost of doing business. American businesses should recognize their opportunity as well — they're native to a market the entire world is desperate to be in, and they should use that advantage to the fullest, investing at home and making the sales that foreign firms are so eager to make here. In this trade war, all Americans are winning — except, perhaps, the overeducated prisoners of the Ivory Tower. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.
