logo
Duke of Kent represents King in Germany on 80th anniversary of Dresden bombing

Duke of Kent represents King in Germany on 80th anniversary of Dresden bombing

Independent13-02-2025
The Duke of Kent is representing the King at commemorations marking the 80th anniversary of the Allied bombing of Dresden.
Edward, the late Queen's 89-year-old cousin and the oldest working member of the royal family, has travelled to Germany for the solemn ceremonies.
Around 25,000 people were killed in the firestorm and much of the historic baroque city was razed to the ground when British and American bombers launched the devastating aerial raid three months before the end of the Second World War.
The duke will join a human chain around the old town, where hundreds of people stand hand in hand each year to form a protective ring in remembrance of those who died.
He will also attend the official commemoration event in Dresden Town Hall and take part in a moment of reflection at Frauenkirche – the Church of Our Lady – which was destroyed during the assault and later reconstructed.
The church was left in ruins as a memorial to the conflict for more than half a century, representing, for some, a symbol of the aggression of the Allied forces.
It was completely renovated and finally returned to its former glory in 2005 with support from the Dresden Trust.
The rebuilt cross and orb which sits on top of the church's dome was a gift from the British people to Dresden.
The duke, who has visited the city many times, served as royal patron of the Dresden Trust since it was set up in 1993 to help rebuild the city and build bridges between the UK and Dresden.
He has also been patron of the British German Association since 1994.
The devastating two-day attack by RAF Bomber Command began on February 13 1945 and saw 4,000 tonnes of bombs dropped in the attack.
It has become one of the most controversial Allied acts of the war.
In previous years, the anniversary has been used by far-right groups to stage rallies in the city, which in turn has prompted anti-extremist demonstrations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive poll: Labour voters are rallying to Jeremy Corbyn
Exclusive poll: Labour voters are rallying to Jeremy Corbyn

New Statesman​

timean hour ago

  • New Statesman​

Exclusive poll: Labour voters are rallying to Jeremy Corbyn

Photo by. The new left-wing party in the process of being launched by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana might lack a name, a leader, and a policy platform beyond tackling 'the crises in our society with a mass redistribution of wealth and power' and 'campaigning for the only path to peace: a free and independent Palestine'. What it doesn't lack is potential supporters. New polling by Ipsos, seen exclusively by the New Statesman, finds that one in three people who voted Labour in 2024 would consider voting for the new Corbyn-Sultana initiative. That figure rises to nearly half (46 per cent) among 2024 Labour voters who would consider voting for an alliance between this new party and the Greens. The new outfit says that over 700,000 people have already signed up on the 'Your Party' website to register their support. For context, Reform UK made national headlines by claiming to have surpassed the Conservatives' membership numbers by hitting 130,000 members last December. Of course, registering for Your Party is free, while there are fees for becoming actual members of political parties (£35 a year for Reform, £39 for the Conservatives, and £70.50 for Labour at the standard rate). But the scale of interest in the new venture is striking, even when virtually nothing is known about it six weeks after Sultana dramatically announced she was quitting Labour for good to set up some kind of alternative. The potential for a left-wing option for those dismayed by the direction Keir Starmer's government has taken in its first year has long been discussed. In June, before Sultana's announcement, George Eaton reported new polling from More In Common which suggested a 'new Corbyn-led party' would win 10 per cent of the vote. Nearly two months later, Ipsos finds that has doubled: 20 per cent of voters consider themselves very or fairly likely to back the Corbyn-Sultana offering, rising to 33 per cent among voters aged 16-34. (A reminder: under government plans the voting age will be lowered to 16 at the next general election.) The big question mark – other than the party's yet-to-be-determined name – is how it interacts with the Green Party. The Greens are spending the summer engaged in a furious leadership contest, with MP duo Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay facing off against 'eco-populist' London Assembly Member Zack Polanski. (If you missed the debate between Polanski and Ramsay on the New Statesman podcast, check it out and watch the sparks fly.) As Megan Kenyon pointed out, Polanski has argued that 'the Greens should occupy a more progressive, populist space on the left in order to confront the infectious populism of Nigel Farage's Reform. He has called for a wealth tax, a better approach to net zero and a more robust left-wing position on immigration.' In vibe terms, that's very similar to the on offer from Corbyn and Sultana. Is there space on the left of British politics for two rival populist parties? Most pollsters and strategists are sceptical, which is why there has been so much talk of some kind of pact or alliance – informal or otherwise – between the two to avoid splitting the vote. The Ipsos polling finds that, while the public on the whole are unsure on the merits of a pact, there is widespread support among people planning to vote for either option: 70 per cent of people who say they would vote for the new left-wing party (it really needs to decide on a name, if only for the sake of word counts) would back an alliance, as would 60 per cent of Green Party supporters. This isn't surprising: an alliance is the best way of avoiding the left-wing vote being split and wasting a whole load of votes. But given how antagonistic the Green leadership contest has already become, plus how much debate and confusion there is over who will lead the new left-wing party, negotiations for how such a pact might work are unlikely to be smooth. Insurgent populism works best when there is a one big-name charismatic leader (just ask Nigel Farage). Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Nonetheless, almost a third of Brits – 31 per cent – would consider voting for a united ticket. That rises to 51 per cent for voters aged 16-34. 'These figures show that a new left-wing party led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana has the potential to shake up British politics,' says Keiran Pedley, director of politics at Ipsos. 'A significant number of younger people are at least prepared to consider voting for it and a majority of those aged under 35 say they would consider voting for some kind of alliance between the new party and the Greens. Clear policies around change, the NHS, poverty and wealth taxes could be popular.' That should sharpen minds in Downing Street: however chaotic the launch may have been, and whatever the fate of the last group of high-profile MPs who decided to start their own initiative (farewell, The Independent Group), the appetite for a challenger to the left of Labour is real. Related

'We quit US for country 5,000 miles away due to Trump and were blown away by experiences'
'We quit US for country 5,000 miles away due to Trump and were blown away by experiences'

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

'We quit US for country 5,000 miles away due to Trump and were blown away by experiences'

A family who moved from the USA to the popular Spanish city of Barcelona have spoken glowingly about the joys of reduced gun violence and a better healthcare system A family of three who moved from the United States to Spain because of their dislike of President Donald Trump have been blown away by their experiences in their new home. ‌ Benjamin Gorman, a former schoolteacher turned author, his wife Chrystal, and their daughter Franke, moved 5,000 miles across the Atlantic to live in the popular Spanish city of Barcelona. ‌ Benjamin said that he originally considered the move after he received 'very scary' death threats following his decision to sign a pledge to teach American history accurately. ‌ When he received backlash for this, he asked a friend of his from the FBI whether he could report the death threats if Trump were to win a second term, to which his friend said no. He claimed: 'He told me, 'You would basically be calling the Proud Boys for help.' So I knew that, if Trump won, I would have to get out.' After debating over which country to move to, the family eventually decided on Spain, in part because Benjamin speaks fluent Spanish and the family knew Barcelona well. Following their move, they have spoken glowingly about their decision and the benefits of living in Europe compared to the USA. Among the benefits are the improved healthcare system, and dramatically reduced danger of gun violence. Benjamin explained: 'The healthcare system is so much better that when we explain the American system to professionals here, they are gobsmacked by how ridiculous it sounds. 'Similarly, not having the constant threat of gun violence improves culture in so many ways. The way the police interact with people here is so positive. They're constantly de-escalating situations and working to protect people's dignity.' ‌ Whilst they are glad not to have to worry about gun violence or an incredibly expensive healthcare system, the family admitted there are some parts of home they miss dearly, most notably their family and friends. They also miss some sweet treats from home. Benjamin said: 'We've found a handful of specific products we can't get our hands on here in Spain. 'For example, we have chocolate M&M's and peanut M&M's here, but no peanut butter M&M's, which are absolutely the best kind.' ‌ Benjamin and his family aren't the first Americans to leave their homeland since the return of Trump to the White House, with others also fleeing to Canada or other parts of Europe. This includes Robert Apgar-Taylor who moved with his husband Robert Taylor to Canada. Speaking to CBC, he described the moment they stepped over the border. He told the broadcaster: 'We took a picture at the border. It was winter. We wore our plaid shirts and hats, and showed our immigration papers with the moving truck behind us. We were so excited.'

Trump says he wants to get to heaven but is at the bottom of the totem pole
Trump says he wants to get to heaven but is at the bottom of the totem pole

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Trump says he wants to get to heaven but is at the bottom of the totem pole

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump is trying his best to be a middleman for peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Although talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin were fruitless, the US leader still has hope he can stop the bloodshed – and joked it could get him into heaven. Speaking to Fox and Friends, Trump said: 'If I can save 7,000 people a week from being killed, I think that's pretty good. 'I want to try to get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I'm really at the bottom of the totem pole. 'But if I get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' He also referenced his 'intervention' to stop a potential war between India and Pakistan, saying he 'saved a lot of lives'. Trump added, 'They were going at it. Planes were being shot down. That was going to be maybe a nuclear war.' His remarks came after Trump said US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Trump added that Ukraine's hopes of joining NATO and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. When asked by Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' But he would have no control over the US military after his term ends in January 2029. The president also said that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but said Ukraine will not keep Crimea or join NATO. As for Putin, he's hoping for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. After rambling about his path to heaven, Trump wrote on Truth Social about how museums throughout the nation's capital and all over the country are the 'last remaining segments of WOKE'. He's focusing his efforts on the Smithsonian. In a statement to NPR, the White House said: 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable. 'He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there.' The White House previously said it plans to audit eight Smithsonian museums to 'ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' Trump added: 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.' Talks of a potential meeting between Putin and Zelensky are also in the works, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Trump himself said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelensky, Putin and himself. More Trending But after speaking to Putin, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelensky and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. Zelensky and Putin last met in person in 2019, speaking about how to stop fighting in eastern Ukraine, where Russian troops had been trying to take land since 2014. Then, the pair met in Paris, but the meeting didn't lead to any long-term peace in the regions. The stakes have never been higher after Russia illegally invaded Ukraine in February 2022, sparking a war which has killed more than 70,000 Ukrainian civilians. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Zelensky should never have to hand over land to Putin MORE: Five key takeaways from Zelensky's crunch talks with Donald Trump at the White House MORE: Fact check: Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store