Very solemn moment for the nation, says Ramaphosa
Ramaphosa, accompanied by a military parade, escorted the remains of his former deputy, David Mabuza, into the funeral ceremony.
Mabuza's coffin, draped in the South African flag, was surrounded by family members who were visibly moved as his remains arrived.
Ramaphosa said while this is indeed a sombre moment for the nation, Mabuza leaves behind a legacy worth honouring.
"It's a very solemn moment for all of us. we are here to hobour and bury a person I worked with very closely as my deputy president. but it's also a moment to celebrate his life. he made a huge contribution to the development of our democracy.
Ramaphosa commends Mabuza for championing unity instead of factional politics within the ANC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SAPS turmoil another test for a dithering Commander-in-Chief
Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi (left), President Cyril Ramaphosa and Police Minister Senzo Mchunu at the inaugural Policing Summit held at the Emperors Palace Convention Centre in Gauteng April 08, 2025. Recent revelations made by General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi are damning. While these allegations are yet to be tested, verified and authenticated, they paint a dark picture about the top brass at SAPS, says the writer. Image: GCIS Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu When President Ramaphosa ascended to power in 2018, he punched above his weight by making huge promises that would propel South Africa to stardom. He promised to correct what he called 'nine wasted years' under President Jacob Zuma, whom he deputised in the ANC and government. He also promised to deliver 'The New Dawn.' Once the wheels started rolling, they quickly fell off and sent the car in all directions. One of the areas where challenges have been witnessed is the security cluster, which was accused of dropping the ball in the Nkandla matter. The expectation was that the security cluster would install security features at Zuma's private home in line with its mandate. Later, it was discovered that many things went wrong. Zuma was accused of squandering public funds instead of blaming the security cluster for failing to execute its mandate. Under Ramaphosa, in July 2021, KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng went ablaze as public protests engulfed these provinces following Justice Sisi Khampepe's emotional ruling that Zuma must be incarcerated for 15 months at the Estcourt prison. The security cluster could have prevented the riots, which had devastating effects from which people have not fully recovered. Many lives were lost, people lost jobs, and several businesses closed. This led to a trust deficit between the public and the security cluster. Worried about potential public backlash and determined to redeem the image of the cluster, Ramaphosa made some changes in the security cluster. Among them was the removal of Minister Ayanda Dlodlo from her position, while others were left untouched. Ramaphosa was indeed hailed by some for taking action to address the embarrassment. But others blamed him for not being decisive and doing enough to curtail future occurrences of something similar. Continuing challenges in the South African Police Service (SAPS) have been a cause for concern. Some police members are arrested for criminal activities, accused of contaminating crime scenes, not treating complainants properly, raping some of the complainants, opting to ridicule those who come to open cases, accused of making dockets disappear and either protecting or working with criminals. Such stories have been in the public domain. While the incidents do not involve all SAPS members since others are honest and professional, they do tarnish the image of the service. The country's defence force has also been in the media for the wrong reasons. Reports of defence force members killing their colleagues or being implicated in other wrongdoings, either individually or collectively, are concerning. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Immigration is another sector where problems have occurred. Apart from complaints about long queues, which could be avoided, there are other serious matters. Reports about bribery have been in the media. The miraculous exit of Shepherd Bushiri back to Malawi while he was facing charges, together with his wife, raised eyebrows. The increasing number of illegal immigrants raises concerns. This has in the past triggered Afrophobia, which was wrongly dubbed xenophobia. In a nutshell, the security cluster has been receiving bad publicity. This is not to say that there are no honest and professional South Africans in these units. Sadly, their good work is overshadowed by the wrongs of their colleagues. As the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the president (whoever it may be) is inevitably drawn in. Ramaphosa is the incumbent. Therefore, the buck stops with him. What has he done to protect the image of the security cluster? If he has not done enough, why is that the case? Importantly, how does his inaction breathe life into the 'New Dawn' promise? Recent revelations made by General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi are damning. While these allegations are yet to be tested, verified and authenticated, they paint a dark picture about the top brass at SAPS. What makes these allegations plausible is that they speak to some of the concerns the public has expressed in the past. Since assuming his current position, Mkhwanazi has been accused of leading gun crazy police officers. Some human rights groups even confronted him, arguing that the suspects have rights. Interestingly, they were silent about the police officers who were assassinated while on duty defending innocent South Africans. Putting SAPS protocol aside, Mkhwanazi has given the nation a taste of what could be happening behind the scenes. Given the seriousness of the allegations he made during the media briefing, the onus is on Ramaphosa to show astute and decisive leadership. The call is not for him to summarily dismiss those implicated in Mkhwanazi's public statements. What is expected from the president is to suspend those individuals pending the investigations. If it is true that people who are not members of SAPS have a say in what happens there, this would make a mockery of the accusations levelled against the Gupta family. What happened to the recommendations of the Sydney Mufamadi Report? Did Ramaphosa implement those? If nothing was done, what difference would it make to set up another investigation to verify the statements made by Mkhwanazi? In other words, has Ramaphosa demonstrated astute and decisive leadership in the past? If not, is this not an opportune moment for him to do so to regain public trust, both for his political image and that of the country? To what extent does his action and/or inaction impact the ANC's performance in the polls? These are very critical questions. Considering the above, if the security cluster is not performing at the expected level, where does that leave the DA's proposal about the devolution of powers to provincial governments? More importantly, what does that say about South Africa's status of being a unitary state as opposed to being a federal state? Should the country embark on a constitutional amendment to address weaknesses in the security cluster? In a nutshell, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's revelations have tacitly invoked important discussions about the state of our country's security. Implicitly, it implores the president to self-reflect on how he has performed his function as Commander-in-Chief. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
There is no link between the name ‘Azania' and the indigenous people of South Africa
Kenneth Mokgatlhe | Published 22 minutes ago We should be asking ourselves where the word 'Azania' originates from, which language, and how it is related to the people of South Africa. There are no cultural, historical, linguistic, or political connections to the name, says the writer. Image: Picture: Henk Kruger/ Independent Newspapers The proposal of constitutional amendment by the African Transformation Movement (ATM) to change the name of South Africa to the 'Republic of Azania' is nonsensical, unnecessary, and irrelevant to the inhabitants of this place. We should be asking ourselves where the word 'Azania' originates from, which language, and how it is related to the people of South Africa. There are no cultural, historical, linguistic, or political connections to the name. It was during my time as a young and vibrant activist within the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) that I was firmly convinced that South Africa should be renamed 'Azania'. I had been persuaded by the existing argument that 'South' was merely a geographical direction and therefore did not have substantive cultural and historical connections befitting a nation's identity. However, I later realised that my comprehension of the term 'Azania' was very limited to its use within Pan Africanist and Black Consciousness discourses. Never mind my strong ideological conviction and commitment, I was unable to intellectually express a clear historical or cultural justification for the adoption of the name, nor could I trace its relevance in juxtaposition to the people, history, and identity of the country. It is important to note that the name 'Azania' has no historical or cultural connection to my people. It was never part of our vocabulary or identity. The term did not exist in our oral traditions or historical records, and my community had never encountered it before modern political movements began to invoke it. It is important to note that the pre-colonial South African society was home to various independent kingdoms and queendoms, each governed by its rulers. I descend from the Bahurutshe, one of the largest sub-groups of the Batswana people, who previously occupied the area now known as the Marico region or Zeerust. Our ancestors referred to their kingdom as Kaditshwene (a place of baboons) and Tshwenyane (a little baboon), an ancient twin-city settlement that thrived between 1300 to 1884. Like many other indigenous polities, it functioned as a sovereign polity, free from foreign or external domination. There was a dramatic shift in the geopolitical landscape after the Berlin Conference of 1884, where European powers gathered to partition Africa among themselves, which laid the foundation for the modern nation-states we recognise today. As a result, we — descendants of various kingdoms — were forced to adapt to these new political realities and form countries under Western-imposed frameworks. A country known as the Union of South Africa was established in 1910, led and governed by white minority rule. A referendum was held in 1960, where white South Africans decided to leave the Commonwealth, became independent, and referred to themselves as the Republic of South Africa on 31 May 1961. While the name 'South Africa' is descriptive of a geographic location, the name gives a strong cultural, political, and historical connection. It reminds us of different epochs in our history and how we interacted with other countries. The name South Africa is not unique in the world, as other countries have historically adopted names which are geographically descriptive of their land, such as South Sudan, Central African Republic (CAR), North and South Korea, North Macedonia, and East Timor. My discomfort at the term Azania was vindicated after I came across one of the compelling writings of South African freedom fighter and journalist Paul Trewhela, who is now based in the United Kingdom. Through his sharp historical analysis, he provides a well-substantiated account of the origins of the name 'Azania', demonstrating that it was a term imposed by slave traders/masters to demean the Black Africans in some parts of East Africa. Trewhela contends that the name 'Azania' does not bear any link to the indigenous peoples of South Africa and carries connotations or implications of oppression rather than liberation. His esteemed scholarship helped clarify that the name 'Azania' lacks authentic historical, cultural, political, or linguistic connections to South Africa and its people, reinforcing my earlier doubts about its relevance and appropriateness as a national name. 'The name 'Azania' celebrates the centuries of enslavement of black Africans by Islamist Arab imperialism down the east coast of Africa. It is a disgrace for reactionary ideologists to be using this concocted name to replace the name South Africa,' he remarked. This name, 'Azania,' is primarily used by individuals who identify themselves as revolutionaries or radicals within South Africa's academic, political, and social spheres. It is largely preferred by black radicals in academia and by political formations considered to be on the far left, such as the PAC, the Azanian People's Organisation (AZAPO), the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), and trade unions affiliated with the National Council of Trade Union (NACTU), among others. Like I once did in the past, many of these individuals adopt the term 'Azania' as a symbolic rejection of apartheid and white supremacy. Their chief motivation emanates from a desire to eliminate any association with the apartheid regime, including the name 'South Africa', which they regard as a legacy of colonialism and racial oppression. Mokgatlhe is a political analyst and consultant.
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
The arrogance of terrorism needs to be condemned
L Oosthuizen | Published 46 minutes ago As sympathy is demanded for the Palestinians by the likes of E Essa and Alaa Nassar, I fail to understand how, when Hamas attacks Israel at a music festival, any sane person would demand such undeserved grace for the people of Gaza. Israel gave the Gazans multiple chances before for the acceptance of democratic autonomy, but they blew it by electing the bloodthirsty Hamas Neanderthals who would act as proxies for the IRGC. It is well documented that since 1979, the Iranian leader Ali Khamenei, always had one agenda in mind: suppression of his people, especially the women, and the destruction of Israel and so-called Zionism. I am sorry, but reading some of the disturbing doctrine written by the Islamic government of Iran, involving young babies and the overall treatment of women, regarding sex-related dos and don'ts, shocked me to my core! It is no wonder that this ideology is causing so much havoc around the globe! This government cannot even honour its people! It is much like the ANC of South Africa! It doesn't hesitate to oppress. It only seeks its ideological advancements. It thrives on the demise of its people. It forges ahead with reckless abandon. You only need to consider the ICJ case brought forward by none other than self-proclaimed Islamist, Naledi Pandor! What we see happening now in the UK, with so many Islamic ministers taking charge, is a full-on assault on Western civilisation. The recent success of Zohran Mamdani in New York sends shivers down the spines of freedom-loving Americans, and so it should! Trump calls Mamdani a '100% Communist lunatic", and I am not surprised! Radical Islam, coupled with ongoing terror attacks on innocent civilians, should be a serious wake-up call to all who love freedom. The longer we sympathise with false pro-Palestine propaganda, the further away we will find ourselves from the truth! Terror acts committed by the Proxies of Iran should be called out for exactly what it is: terrorism! We must stop fooling ourselves by trying to sympathise with a people who have little or nothing to do with South African people! The mere fact that there are rumblings about the ANC having been compensated by either Iran or Qatar for taking Israel to court leaves a very bad taste in our mouths! Not to mention the changing of a street name in Sandton to some terrorist who is only celebrated by those who value acts of terror. When are we going to learn that siding with terror and hiding behind the mask of a cause so falsified by socialist and Marxist tendencies only brings us pain and division? The ANC couldn't care less about Palestinians, but for the sake of its relationship with Iran's terror axis, it will pretend to care for as long as it benefits the status quo. There has always been a golden thread running through and connecting nefarious characters through Marxist, socialist, and communist values. The ANC and Iran are no exception! It doesn't mean you have to blow up a building to be a terrorist, but if you are happy, as a government, to continually oppress and socially divide your citizens according to either a racist or Apartheid-driven agenda, in my opinion, you are a Dystopian, Draconian empire! Be careful of those who accuse you of Apartheid crimes, for too often, the accuser poses as the accused, and the oppressor poses as the oppressed. Is this what we are seeing with the pro-Palestine mobs who reside in South Africa? Do you feel any better displaying your red, black, white and green sticker on the back of your Fortuner, as you speed arrogantly passed several respectful road users? I have news for all those who chant death to the Jews, and disguise it as 'Free Free Palestine'- your time is running out, and the chickens for Justice are coming home to roost! The recent strength shown by Trump and the IDF was a warning to Draconian Radicalised governments that we won't give up the fight against terror just yet! I may not be a Jew, nor am I a Zionist, but I still know the difference between right and difference between propaganda and difference between truth and lies. I refuse to accept this narrative of Israel committing a 'Genocide', as what we saw on October 7th, 2023, was a mini Genocide, funded by Iran and backed up by ANC support! Enough is enough! Let's fix SA before we say anything further about 'Freeing Palestine" L Oosthuizen Durban
