
Not Elon Musk, but THIS man would have become world's richest person with Rs 103896000000000 if he kept…, not Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Zuckerberg, name is…
Not Elon Musk, but THIS man would have become world's richest person with Rs 103896000000000 if he kept..., not Bezos, Mukesh Ambani, Zuckerberg, name is...
The net worth of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, the fourth richest person in the world at present. He is often known for his philanthropy. But do you he could have accumulated assets and had worth money which would have been more than what Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos had combined. Yes, its true.
Bill Gates would have accumulated three times Elon Musk's current wealth, if Bill Gates had held on to his Microsoft shares and not devoted to philanthropy. Musk is currently valued at $409 billion, according to Forbes.
Bill had once owned 11.2 million shares
Before Microsoft went public in 1986, Bill owned 11.2 million shares, representing nearly 49% of the company, worth around $200 million at the time. If he had kept all his holdings, those shares would have grown through stock splits to 3.2 billion, giving him and Melinda a 43% stake in the company today, worth an estimated $1.4 trillion.
Not just this, Melinda French Gates, Bill's former wife and co-founder of the Gates Foundation, would also rank as the world's third-richest person with a projected net worth of $300 billion.
Gates promised to donate 99% of income in philanthropy
However, according to Forbes, the couple could have collected roughly $100 billion in after-tax dividends over the decades. This amount alone would have made Bill wealthier than all but the top 18 of the world's more than 3,000 billionaires.
In May, Gates pledged to donate 99% of his more than $100 billion fortune over the next 20 years to accelerate his philanthropic efforts through the Gates Foundation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
All can see transformation under PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi busy undermining India's progress: BJP
The BJP on Saturday hit out at Rahul Gandhi, saying the Congress leader cannot see the transformation happening in the country under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership because he is too busy "undermining India's progress". This came after Gandhi launched a fresh salvo at Prime Minister Modi, and said he has mastered the "art of slogans" but offered no solutions, claiming that India's manufacturing was at a record low despite the 'Make in India' initiative. Hitting back, BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari wrote in a post on X, "Rahul ji, everyone in India can see the transformation, except you. Maybe because you're too busy undermining India's progress to notice it." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Operation Sindoor is the latest and "landmark example" of India's manufacturing prowess where India's indigenous developed drones destroyed Chinese drones, he added. Citing various data indicating progress made under the 'Make in India' initiative of the Modi government, BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said Rahul Gandhi's narratives are "outdated, misinformed, and disconnected from reality". Live Events "India is building. India is growing. India is leading," he said in a post on X. Under PM Modi, India has transformed from an importer to a global manufacturing powerhouse, Malviya added. Bhandari said since 2014 under PM Modi's leadership, engineering exports have surged by 60 per cent while defence exports "skyrocketed from just Rs 686 crore to over Rs 23,000 crore". "From importing 70 per cent of our defence equipment, India now manufactures 65 per cent of its needs domestically. PMI is at a 10-month high, signalling industrial strength," he said. Bhandari said India under Modi's leadership supplied 60 per cent of the world's COVID-19 vaccines, becoming the "pharmacy of the world". India is now the second largest mobile phone manufacturer globally, he added. "While Indian startups and entrepreneurs were burning the midnight oil to build a world-class drone industry, you (Rahul Gandhi) were busy endorsing Chinese drones and promoting Chinese brands on Indian soil," the BJP spokesperson charged. Bhandari said Gandhi never believed in 'Make in India' because 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' doesn't align with his "imported ideology." "What was there in that secret MoU which you signed with the Communist Party of China," Bhandari asked. Malviya, in his post on X, said "Let's bust the myths - with facts". He said the PLI scheme, which Gandhi claimed had failed, has led to cumulative investments of Rs 10,905 crore, total production worth Rs 7.15 lakh crore and exports of Rs 3.9 lakh crore. "Electronics production value rose from Rs 18,900 crore (FY14) to Rs 4,22,000 crore (FY24). Mobile phone exports surged 77-fold from Rs 1,566 crore (2014-15) to Rs 1.2 lakh crore (2023-24)," he said. He added that 99.2 per cent of mobile phones sold in India are now made in India, up from just 26 per cent in 2014-15. Malviya further said that under the PLI scheme for electronics alone, 1,39,670 direct jobs have already been created. As many as 1.8 lakh new companies were registered in 2023-24, marking a 16 per cent increase over the previous year, he said. "Electronics exports hit USD 38+ billion in FY24-25, a 32 per cent year-on-year increase," Malviya said. "PLI allocations for electronics rose from Rs 5,747 crore (FY24-25) to Rs 8,885 crore (FY25-26) - a clear signal of continued commitment," he added. Malviya said the government has approved landmark semiconductor projects worth Rs 1.52 lakh crore, "a critical leap into deep-tech manufacturing". Overall, electronics production is projected to reach USD 300 billion by 2026, he said.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Trump's visa crackdown is pushing 16 US colleges toward financial collapse
Why 16 US colleges could collapse under Trump's foreign student visa crackdown As the Trump administration intensifies restrictions on international student visas, a growing number of financially vulnerable US colleges are facing a dire threat to their survival. The new policy measures, framed as a response to campus antisemitism and national security concerns, have halted key visa appointments and blocked access for students from more than ten countries, placing colleges heavily reliant on foreign tuition in an existential crisis. According to Forbes, 16 private nonprofit US colleges are particularly exposed. Each of these institutions enrolls at least one-third of their students from overseas and derives over half of their operating revenue from tuition and fees. Many already scored C+ or lower on Forbes' most recent financial health rankings, a signal that they were struggling even before the visa policy changes. Foreign students as a financial lifeline Colleges such as St. Francis in Brooklyn have turned to international enrollment as a revenue strategy. After years of deficits, St. Francis closed fiscal 2023 with $66 million in net income, largely from the $160 million sale of its main campus and deep budget cuts—including scrapping its Division I athletics program and laying off staff. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Still, auditors remain skeptical about its long-term viability, with an endowment of only $46 million, or $16,409 per full-time student, Forbes reported. In just one year, St. Francis nearly tripled its international student headcount—from 465 to 1,289—mainly through graduate programs. In a June 2024 audit, university officials stated that international enrollment had become 'a significant source of revenue growth," as quoted by Forbes. But with student visas now under strict federal control, this key strategy is in jeopardy. Colleges caught in a tightening policy vise The Trump administration's new executive order bans visa issuance to individuals from 11 countries including Iran, Libya, and Yemen. This comes alongside the State Department's recent pause in F-1 and J-1 visa appointments. The consequences could be catastrophic for institutions like Harrisburg University and Hult International Business School, where more than 75% of students are international. Both schools received a D in Forbes' 2025 Financial Grades. Other colleges like Manhattan School of Music and California College of the Arts, where over 40% of students are foreign, also risk severe enrollment shortfalls. At Campbellsville University, 83% of operational revenue comes from tuition, and nearly half of students are international. National impact and muted college response Foreign students contribute billions to the US economy and often remain in the country after graduation. Forbes cited a 2022 study by the National Foundation for American Policy showing that one-quarter of billion-dollar US startups were founded by international alumni. Despite this, all 16 colleges declined to comment, fearing retaliation. As Forbes noted, institutions that speak out risk being singled out by the Trump administration, as happened with Harvard University's Student Visitor Exchange Program, which was suspended before a court order intervened. For many of these schools, international students are not just an asset—they are a necessity. Without them, the lights may soon go out. 1. St. Francis College (Brooklyn, NY): A small private college with financial challenges, previously noted for budget deficits and layoffs. International students likely bolster its revenue, and visa restrictions could exacerbate existing issues. 2. Harrisburg University of Science and Technology (PA): Known for attracting international students, particularly in STEM fields. A significant portion of its revenue comes from international tuition, making it sensitive to visa crackdowns. 3. Hult International Business School (Boston, MA): A global business school with a large international student body (over 80% in some programs). Its business model heavily depends on foreign students, and visa restrictions could severely impact enrollment. 4. Manhattan School of Music (NYC, NY): A specialized institution with a notable international student population. Arts schools often rely on international talent, and visa limitations could reduce enrollment and revenue. 5. California College of the Arts (CA): Another arts-focused institution with financial dependence on international students. Its small size and high tuition costs make it vulnerable to enrollment drops. 6. Campbellsville University (KY): A private Christian university with a significant international student population, particularly in graduate programs. Visa restrictions could strain its budget. 7. University of Bridgeport (CT): A private university with a history of financial struggles, recently acquired by Goodwin University. International students are a key revenue source, and visa policies could threaten stability. 8. New York University (NYU): With one of the highest international student populations (over 20% of enrollment), NYU was mentioned as vulnerable to visa crackdowns due to its reliance on international tuition. 9. Columbia University (NY): Also noted for a large international student share (around 30%) and targeted visa revocations, such as the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate student arrested for pro-Palestinian protests. 10. Johns Hopkins University (MD): Has a significant international student population (around 25%) and relies on their tuition and research contributions. Visa restrictions could disrupt its financial model. 11. Carnegie Mellon University (PA): Known for a high proportion of international students (over 20%), particularly in STEM fields, making it susceptible to visa policy changes. 12. Northeastern University (MA): Frequently cited for its large international student body and reliance on their tuition. Visa crackdowns could impact its financial stability. 13. Boston University (MA): Another institution with a high international student share, noted as potentially affected by tightened visa controls. 14. University of Southern California (USC): A major destination for international students, particularly from China (over 15% of enrollment). Visa revocations targeting Chinese students could hit USC hard. 15. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (IL): A public university with significant international enrollment (over $500 million in tuition revenue from foreign students in 2023-2024). 16. Arizona State University (AZ): Another public institution generating substantial revenue ($545 million in 2023-2024) from international students, making it vulnerable to enrollment declines. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Sebi plans overhaul of mutual fund rules to aid investors and industry
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is undertaking a comprehensive review of mutual fund regulations to make them more investor-centric and industry-friendly, a senior official said on Saturday. "We are reviewing the entire mutual fund regulatory framework to enhance ease of doing business for all stakeholders, including the regulator," SEBI executive director Manoj Kumar said at the 17th Mutual Fund Summit organised by the Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) here. Existing regulations governing the sector are among the lengthiest and require simplification to keep pace with evolving investor needs and industry innovations, stakeholders said. "The process has started and soon we will come out with draft regulations for feedback and consultation process before it is finalised," Kumar said without giving any timeline for the rollout of the new rules. Kumar outlined the regulator's strategic roadmap to strengthen India's securities market, with mutual funds positioned as a critical pillar in fostering inclusive financial growth and investor protection. A consultation paper on regulations which governs advisory functions in mutual funds is also in the pipeline. Addressing the event, Kumar said India has undergone major market transformations under SEBI's stewardship. These include the shift to an electronic trading ecosystem in 1998, followed by achieving 100 per cent dematerialisation of shares, making India the only jurisdiction globally to do so. "The third transformation is unfolding now through the mutual fund revolution," he said, calling it a cornerstone of SEBI's "optimum regulation" approach, one that seeks balance among the interests of the regulator, the industry, and investors. While India's mutual fund industry has crossed Rs 72 lakh-crore in AUM and monthly SIP contributions have touched Rs 28,000 crore, the investor base remains limited to just five crore in a population of 140 crore, Kumar pointed out. SEBI is also actively reviewing scheme categorisation norms to make them more intuitive for investors, while ensuring all offerings remain "true to label" to prevent mis-selling. To offer wider choice to investors, SEBI has approved a new product category, referred to as SIF, aimed at investors with ticket sizes between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 50 lakh. Mutual funds were selected to manage these products given their established governance and handling of retail flows. Parallelly, SEBI has opened faster registration windows for Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) with similar offerings. Addressing industry concerns over stress test disclosures for mid- and small-cap funds, Kumar reaffirmed SEBI's disclosure-based regulatory model, stressing that informed investors are central to market resilience. While he acknowledged that some disclosure requirements may seem burdensome, he assured stakeholders that SEBI remains open to feedback and streamlining processes. He urged the industry to avoid situations that warrant regulatory intervention, saying, "Our goal is not to disrupt but to allow business to thrive." Highlighting the untapped potential in eastern India, Kumar said SEBI views West Bengal and the Northeast as strategic regions for mutual fund expansion, underscoring the need for targeted penetration efforts. Echoing this vision, AMFI chief executive V N Chalasani said India is transitioning from financial inclusion to financial well-being, where saving smartly and investing wisely will enable sustainable wealth creation. He cited the exponential growth of mutual funds post-2017, following SEBI's investor education mandate, which helped expand the investor base and improve financial awareness. However, Chalasani pointed out that India's mutual fund AUM still forms only about 20 per cent of GDP, compared to a global average of 65 per cent. He stressed the need for deeper financial literacy, especially in Tier 3 and 4 cities, where AMFI is focusing through school and university programmes, distributor expansion via India Post, and new product innovations aimed at mid-income investors. "Every Indian can evolve from a saver to an investor and ultimately a wealth creator," he said, calling for sustained collaboration between regulators, industry, educators and investors to build an empowered, financially resilient India.