logo
24 Pre-Smartphone Experiences Gen Z Will Never Have

24 Pre-Smartphone Experiences Gen Z Will Never Have

Buzz Feed20-07-2025
Recently, Reddit user KidBaj asked, "For people who grew up before smartphones, what is something that the newer generation won't get to experience?"
People had A LOT to say — the post had over 15,000 comments! Here are some of the best and most interesting replies:
"A life that's not recorded. The ability to make mistakes and not have them follow you online for the rest of your life. Kids today will never grasp the level of anonymity we enjoyed as a society."
—Personal_Might2405
"Crank calls."
"Calling a boyfriend/girlfriend and having to awkwardly converse with their parent before getting to talk to them."
"Carrying around a dozen or more phone numbers in your head or Rolodex."
—NewsboyHank
"Boredom. It sounds like a bad thing, but it actually isn't."
"Going to make a call at the pay phone and finding change in the coin return!"
"Getting on your bike and just riding to your friend's house without knowing if they're home or not."
—Thepuppeteer777777
"Reading a shampoo bottle while you're taking a dump."
"Memorizing directions for how to get somewhere without GPS."
"Having a massive book mailed and dropped on your porch with everyone's phone number and address. All public information!"
—updatelee
"Your parents shouting at you to get off the phone because they're expecting a call."
"Having fun arguing about daft things that you could easily solve now by Googling. 'Who was the actress in such-and-such?' 'What year did that happen?' I miss those silly pub chats."
"In the '90s, it was socially acceptable to 'disappear' for a day. If someone couldn't get ahold of you, they just shrugged and dealt with it. You can still do that today by leaving your phone at home, but it's not really socially acceptable. If someone wants to reach you while you're away from your phone, you'll return to piles of texts and voicemails because people assume you're dead."
"The shift from people assuming you're unavailable and feeling lucky if they managed to connect to assuming you're available and being offended or worried if they can't connect is a truly massive change in how humans interact with each other."—IJourden
"The satisfaction of slamming the phone down when hanging up on someone!"
"You could go to the record store, shop for music, and talk to other people there who liked the same music as you. Now the record store is on your phone, and there is nobody in there to talk to."
"Getting an actual letter from someone. Especially love letters."
—lisago911
"The joy of leaving your house in the morning with a pocket full of coins and the knowledge that your parents couldn't find you — even if they wanted to."
"I was born in '78. Before smartphones, breaks at work would be fun. You'd talk with coworkers or read a magazine, and everyone always had a book on hand."
—supergooduser
"Your boss couldn't get ahold of you if you didn't want them to, and that was perfectly acceptable because it was the norm. These days, many employers expect someone to be available by phone 24/7. That's BS."
"Watching a big season/series finale at the exact same time as everyone else and talking about it the next day at school or work."
—lucy_in_disguise
"That rush when your favorite song finally comes on the radio, so you'd vault over your bed to press record on your tape recorder. Then every track on your mixtape would begin with '…only on Q101!'"
"Wrapping the phone cord multiple times around your little brother until your mom yelled at you to stop."
"Using encyclopedias to do homework."
—OldSchoolPrinceFan
And finally, "The general lack of social pressure. I was a teen in the '80s. I wish my teens could experience one summer in 1986, just so they could know what life is like without the contestant firehose of social media posts, ads, messages, and expectation that you have to constantly post about your life."
H/T r/AskReddit
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out
Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out

This "Jeopardy!" champion is speaking out about the shocking end of his 16-game winning streak. Who is … Scott Riccardi? On July 25, the engineer from New Jersey lost on the game show after 16 consecutive wins due to a surprising miss on Final Jeopardy! Riccardi subsequently took to Reddit to explain what happened, after some on social media who'd claimed he lost on purpose. The clue that Riccardi answered wrong was in the category of 20th Century Names. "According to one obituary, in 1935 he owned 13 magazines, 8 radio stations, 2 movie companies & $56 million in real estate," it read. The correct response was William Randolph Hearst, but Riccardi incorrectly guessed "Who is Howard Hughes?" Riccardi was in the lead going into Final Jeopardy!, but his opponents both gave the correct response, including Jonathan Hugendubler, who came from behind with the win after wagering $9,601. Some "Jeopardy!" fans expressed surprise that Riccardi didn't respond correctly. As is often the case when a winning streak ends, there were even claims that he threw the game because he was tired of being on the show. "Does anyone think he lost on purpose because he didn't want to come back next season?" one commenter on Instagram read. Did Scott Riccardi's 'Jeopardy' winning streak continue? But on the "Jeopardy!" Reddit, Riccardi chimed in to explain the thought process behind his answer. "My mind unfortunately went straight to Howard Hughes, mostly due to overestimating the importance of the movie companies part of the clue; any previous FJs that had come to mind immediately had worked out, so I trusted my initial response on this," he wrote. Ken Jennings on 'Jeopardy!' Tournament of Champions, 'misogynistic' Mayim Bialik critics Riccardi continued that Hearst "wasn't on my mind at all," adding that "several information near-misses and a poor understanding of the timeline in the clue really piled up to prevent me from getting what I now understand to be a very gettable clue." Some defended Riccardi by arguing the clue was worded in a confusing way and could have been read to mean that the obituary was written in 1935, which would rule out Hearst. Hugendubler appeared as surprised as anyone by his win, with host Ken Jennings remarking, "He can't believe it!" A visibly stunned Hugendubler immediately walked over and shared a hug with Riccardi, who finished his run on the show with a hefty $455,000 in winnings. Riccardi, who will return in the "Jeopardy!" Tournament of Champions now ranks number eight on the game show's all-time leaderboard in terms of highest winnings in regular-season play. With $2,520,700, Jennings, who competed on "Jeopardy!" in 2004 before becoming the show's host, remains number one.

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.
Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.

This "Jeopardy!" champion is speaking out about the shocking end of his 16-game winning streak. Who is … Scott Riccardi? On July 25, the engineer from New Jersey lost on the game show after 16 consecutive wins due to a surprising miss on Final Jeopardy! Riccardi subsequently took to Reddit to explain what happened, after some on social media who'd claimed he lost on purpose. The clue that Riccardi answered wrong was in the category of 20th Century Names. "According to one obituary, in 1935 he owned 13 magazines, 8 radio stations, 2 movie companies & $56 million in real estate," it read. The correct response was William Randolph Hearst, but Riccardi incorrectly guessed "Who is Howard Hughes?" Riccardi was in the lead going into Final Jeopardy!, but his opponents both gave the correct response, including Jonathan Hugendubler, who came from behind with the win after wagering $9,601. Some "Jeopardy!" fans expressed surprise that Riccardi didn't respond correctly. As is often the case when a winning streak ends, there were even claims that he threw the game because he was tired of being on the show. "Does anyone think he lost on purpose because he didn't want to come back next season?" one commenter on Instagram read. Did Scott Riccardi's 'Jeopardy' winning streak continue? But on the "Jeopardy!" Reddit, Riccardi chimed in to explain the thought process behind his answer. "My mind unfortunately went straight to Howard Hughes, mostly due to overestimating the importance of the movie companies part of the clue; any previous FJs that had come to mind immediately had worked out, so I trusted my initial response on this," he wrote. Ken Jennings on 'Jeopardy!' Tournament of Champions, 'misogynistic' Mayim Bialik critics Riccardi continued that Hearst "wasn't on my mind at all," adding that "several information near-misses and a poor understanding of the timeline in the clue really piled up to prevent me from getting what I now understand to be a very gettable clue." Some defended Riccardi by arguing the clue was worded in a confusing way and could have been read to mean that the obituary was written in 1935, which would rule out Hearst. Hugendubler appeared as surprised as anyone by his win, with host Ken Jennings remarking, "He can't believe it!" A visibly stunned Hugendubler immediately walked over and shared a hug with Riccardi, who finished his run on the show with a hefty $455,000 in winnings. Riccardi, who will return in the "Jeopardy!" Tournament of Champions now ranks number eight on the game show's all-time leaderboard in terms of highest winnings in regular-season play. With $2,520,700, Jennings, who competed on "Jeopardy!" in 2004 before becoming the show's host, remains number one.

Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet
Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet

Newsweek

time8 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When a family welcomed their new puppy, Lieutenant Ripley, into their home, they believed they were adopting an American Pit Bull Terrier. She was rescued from a shelter specializing in pit bulls, but as the weeks passed and Ripley began to grow at an astonishing rate, her features sparked curiosity and a DNA test—which ultimately revealed an unexpected genetic makeup, shocking viewers in a post to Reddit. In the post, the owner shared their story along with a plethora of photos of the pup. A woman holds her Pitbull close to her. A woman holds her Pitbull close to her."Adopted Lt. Ripley at 15 weeks old from a dedicated Pitbull rescue," they wrote. "They listed her as American Pit Bull Terrier. With her long snout and body type and coloration, we figured she was more hound than anything. I was thinking Plott Hound. Some people were saying Greyhound or Whippet." Their initial guesses proved far from the mark when the DNA results came back: Ripley is a striking 50.8 percent Great Dane and 49.2 percent German Shepherd. The revelation immediately captivated Redditors, who found the mix surprising and fascinating. "Okay that is hilarious. I love her," one user commented. Another added, "That is such a neat mix! I'd guessed Sighthound/[German Shepherd] but I guess the lanky-ness I was seeing was the Dane!" The dog's distinctive ears also provided a clue to some. "It's those ears, OP!" one person wrote, adding, "The 'weird/goofball floppy triangle' on top of the head—like they want to stick up, but have a mind of their own, and may just decide to walk off entirely one day' thing is 100 percent a [German Shepherd] thing!" The owners, who were fully intending to adopt a Pitbull, embraced the surprise with open arms. The decision to adopt a new puppy came at a significant time for the family, as their beloved pit bull/Staffordshire Bull Terrier mix had recently passed away from cancer, and they were expecting their first child. "We were hoping [our dog] be here to help raise our son," the owner shared in a comment. "It was a difficult decision to get a new puppy and try to train it in the short amount of time we have, but growing up with a dog is such a beautiful thing." Ripley has already shown incredible progress in her new home. "She has taken to our own training pretty seamlessly and is very intelligent," the owner wrote. Ripley is actively socialized, joining her owner for skateboarding sessions and runs at the local park where she interacts with other dogs. Despite being initially "highly skeptical of other humans," regular park visits have significantly helped her social skills. But ultimately, Ripley's size has become the constant discussion point. She gained "40 pounds in two months and is around 60 pounds now," the owner wrote, leaving them to wonder "how much larger she'll get now that we know her actual breed mix." Despite the initial breed assumption, the family is thrilled with their intelligent and rapidly growing gentle giant. Newsweek reached out to u/pleasedtomichu for comment via Reddit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store