Transformative vision: multi-use precinct plans unveiled for Strand Street quarry
Image: supplied
Plans to redevelop the Strand Street Quarry into a multi-use community precinct have reached the public feedback assessment phase, following the closure of the official comment period on 30 May 2025.
The proposed redevelopment—initially presented for public comment on 17 April 2025—aims to transform the site at the corner of Strand and Hudson Streets, and 101 Vos Street, into a hub of sports, tourism, and community activity. The plans include a multi-purpose practice sports field and additional sports courts, the reconfiguration of Metro Police facilities, new tourist attractions such as markets and restaurants, and associated parking infrastructure.
The proposal stems from a vision that has been developed in consultation with the community and local stakeholders since 2023.
Eddie Andrews, the City's Deputy Mayor and Mayoral Committee Member for Spatial Planning and Environment, said: 'Currently, the Strand Street quarry is underutilised, and in fact, often occupied by illegal dwellings and used for anti-social behaviour. Thus, the proposed development will in fact improve the general surroundings in terms of safety, cleanliness, aesthetics, and so forth.
'The intention is to transform the quarry site into a multi-use community precinct that integrates sports, culture, economic activities and tourism in a unique setting. Once fully developed, the site must benefit the local communities and Capetonians for generations to come.'
Andrews confirmed that the project is still in its early planning stages. 'We are not nearly at this point yet,' he said in response to questions around the budget.
The land use application includes the consolidation, subdivision, and rezoning of certain City-owned erven to obtain the necessary development rights. The City will now assess the comments received in terms of the Municipal Planning By-law (MPBL) and relevant policy.
'The comments received will now be assessed in terms of the Municipal Planning By-law (MPBL) and relevant City policies, and if there are objections, a report will be compiled for consideration by the Municipal Planning Tribunal,' Andrews explained.
'Save to say, the application makes provision for phased implementation over time, and by different role-players.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Andrews added that residents and stakeholders have been involved in the process for over two years: 'Residents and stakeholders have been engaged for over two years, and participated in several forums.'
Ahead of the public comment period, the City undertook a series of public engagement and regulatory steps, including:
A due diligence and concept design process initiated in March 2023 in partnership with local representatives and stakeholders.
Public advertising of the first draft concept in November 2023.
Environmental and heritage assessments, including a Heritage Impact Assessment tabled with Heritage Western Cape in January 2025.
A Living Heritage investigation conducted in unison with the concept design, recording oral histories and the cultural connections of Bo-Kaap residents to the site.
'The application is still being assessed. The City will be able to provide more information once the application process has been concluded in terms of the MPBL,' Andrews concluded.
Ossie Shabodien, former chairperson of the Bo-Kaap Ratepayers Civic Association, acknowledged the potential benefits of the redevelopment but raised questions about implementation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Next Denza? Less hardcore Fangchengbao Ti7 enters production
Fangchengbao's fourth model could, possibly, become the next export market Denza product, however, noting has been confirmed. BYD-owned Fangchengbao has officially started production of its fourth domestic market model called the Ti7. Fitting in Set to be positioned between the Bao 5 and Bao 8, the Ti7 follows the naming example of the brand's smallest model, the Tai 3, not to adopt the repeated Bao moniker, which translates as Leopard in Mandarin. ALSO READ: Report: Denza tipped to bring flagship B8 SUV to South Africa The brand's name, therefore, meaning Formula Leopard and its pair of products as Formula Leopard Leopard 5 and Formula Leopard Leopard 8, the Ti7 joins the Tai 3 as part of the Tia/Ti range seemingly aimed at less strenuous off-road usage. The fundamentals This being enforced by its use of a unibody platform rather than the body-on-frame Dual Mode Offroad that underpins the Bao 5, Bao 8 and BYD Shark bakkie, the Ti7 has reported measurements of 4 999 mm in overall length, a wheelbase of 2 920 mm, height of 1 865 mm and width of 1 995 mm. Ti7's profile has been likened to the Defender 110. Image:: Providing seating for five, again similar to the Tai 3, the Ti7 continues with the usage of a plug-in hybrid powertrain, albeit under the designation DMS. As with the Bao 5 and Shark, this consists of a 1.5-litre turbocharged petrol engine working in conjunction with a 26.6-kWh battery pack powering a single electric motor, and a bigger 35.6-kWh module motivating two electric units. The Tai 3 is currently Fangchengbao's entry-level product in China. Image: Fangchengbao China While no combined power and torque figures have so far been revealed, Fangchengbao does report an all-electric range of between 100 to 130 km based on China's CLTC measurements. Next Denza, and a first? Reported to have a price tag of between 250 000 to 300 000 yuan, which amounts to R615 628-R738 754 when directly converted, and without taxes, the Ti7's significance lies in it being, potentially, rebadged under Denza name for export markets. Similar to the Bao 5 and Bao 8 that go under the nomenclatures Denza B5 and B8, the Ti7 could be renamed T7 in the event of it being approved for markets outside the People's Republic as the third Denza badged Fangchengbao product. For the moment, this is purely speculative and not confirmed by either Fangchengbao or Denza. As a reminder, the latter, a once joint venture between BYD and Mercedes-Benz, will make its South African market debut in 2026 with the B5, and, if recent reports are to be believed, with the B8 a short while later. Additional information from NOW READ: Denza's entry: Two additional models South Africa could get
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
All Gupta mansions sold at nearly half its combined worth
Park Village Auctions has confirmed the sale of all three notorious Gupta-owned mansions in Saxonwold for a combined R34.5 million, almost half their original valuation. As reported by BusinessTech , the properties at 3, 5, and 7 Saxonwold Drive, along with their contents, were initially valued at R64.5 million. The final sale price represents a 47% discount, or R30 million less than their combined pre-sale worth. The sales form part of the business rescue process for Confident Concept (Pty) Ltd, one of several Gupta-linked companies mired in legal and financial trouble. The company was in dispute with the City of Johannesburg over unpaid rates and taxes amounting to R726 695 in 2022, while facing other litigation alongside related entities. A Supreme Court of Appeal ruling ordered that Confident Concept's assets go under the hammer. Only one of the three mansions, No. 3 Saxonwold Drive, sold at the public auction in July, fetching R3.3 million, 40% below its R5.5 million valuation. The other two properties failed to attract buyers at auction and were later sold privately. Park Village Auctions confirmed that the Business Rescue Practitioners (BRPs) have accepted the final offers, with all securities in place. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
R2 Billion for Joburg, Zero for Cape Town's Poor: A Shameful Betrayal of Local Dignity and Economic Justice
The City of Cape Town has reportedly awarded a R2 billion tender for cleaning and security services across the city's transport hubs. Image: Melinda Stuurman "We live here, we clean here, we protect here why then must we watch outsiders get paid to do what our people are desperate to do for survival?" When the City of Cape Town awarded a R2 billion tender — yes, two thousand million rand — to a Johannesburg-based company for cleaning and security services across our transport hubs, it didn't just overlook a few local businesses. It slammed the door shut on thousands of unemployed Capetonians, on hundreds of community-based enterprises, on our own city's dignity and economic sovereignty. Let's call this what it is: A disgraceful betrayal. A moral failure. A neoliberal procurement racket dressed up as efficiency. The Facts That Should Enrage Every Capetonian The awarded tender reportedly spanning eight years goes to CBRE Excellerate Facilities, headquartered in Johannesburg, not Cape Town. The value? R2 billion. No mention has been made of how many jobs will go to Capetonians, if any. No commitments to local subcontracting. No transparency around local bids rejected. The work? Cleaning, security, and maintenance at MyCiTi and other city transport hubs. Tasks our local cooperatives, NGOs, FBOs, CBOs, youth enterprises, and SMMEs are more than capable of performing. We are not asking to clean skyscrapers in Sandton. We are asking to clean and guard our own streets. And we're being denied. Where is the Local Economic Development Agenda? This is not just a missed opportunity. It is a policy sin against our poor. Let's do the math: If even R1 billion of this was ring-fenced for local small contractors, Cape Town could have: Created at least 5,000 sustainable local jobs. Enabled 100+ small cleaning or security firms to build capacity, up-skill workers, and support families. Built inclusive ecosystems around faith-based organisations (FBOs), civic bodies, cooperatives, and unemployed youth. Instead, the City outsourced our livelihoods to a faraway corporate behemoth whose executives may not even know where Delft is, or what Khayelitsha needs. Excuses Will Be Made. None Will Be Justified. We've heard it all before: "They scored highest on compliance." "The tender was open and fair." "Local firms didn't meet the requirements." Well, who sets the requirements? Who designs the procurement processes? Who decides what 'capacity' mean? Let's not pretend this isn't systemic gatekeeping. This is economic apartheid by spreadsheet. A democracy that denies economic participation is not a democracy at all. Imagine a Cape Town That Trusted Its People Imagine if that same R2 billion had been: Split across 24 wards, each given R83 million to form local cooperatives for maintenance and security. Linked to skills training for young people. Monitored by ward committees, CBOs, faith leaders, and local oversight forums. Required 60% of all jobs to be drawn from within a 10km radius of each site. This is not utopia. It is called community wealth building and it is being done in Barcelona, Cleveland, Manchester, and other progressive cities. Why not here? Why not us? What This Tender Reveals About the City's Priorities This R2 billion scandal must be seen for what it is: Evidence of Cape Town's anti-poor bias. A deep structural betrayal of local economic justice. A deliberate sidelining of community capacity in favour of corporate control. It is part of a broader pattern: Gentrified housing projects that displace the poor. Privatised public spaces. Red-tape strangling informal traders. And now, billion-rand contracts shipped out of town. A Call to Action for All Capetonians We must not let this pass must raise our voices. 1. Demand transparency: What were the local bids received? Why were Cape Town-based companies rejected? Who scored the bids and with what criteria? 2. Demand justice: The City must ring-fence 60% of this contract for local subcontractors. Civil society, unions, religious councils, and civic forums must unite to call for a full audit of this and all major outsourced contracts. 3. Demand a new procurement policy: Local first. Poor first. Community first. Legislation and bylaws must be reformed to prioritise transformative local procurement not neoliberal compliance fetishism. Final Word: Cape Town is Not for Sale Capetonians built this city. We clean it. We guard it. We carry its burdens. Now we are told we are not good enough to serve it? This is not just about one tender. It is about a broken system that rewards the powerful and penalises the poor. We must stand up. Speak out. Organise.
