Timeline: Gender identity in Maine's Human Rights Act
2013: The Maine Principals' Association adopts a policy allowing transgender athletes to participate in school sports consistent with their gender identities, establishing a waiver process that included a hearing before a Gender Identity Equity Committee.
2014: Citing the Maine Human Rights Act, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court rules that a school district in Orono discriminated against a transgender student by not allowing her to use a restroom consistent with her gender identity.
2016: North Carolina passes a bathroom ban, saying that people could only use bathrooms consistent with their sex assigned at birth. The bill sparked national outrage and boycotts. The restriction was repealed the following year.
2019: Maine lawmakers remove gender identity from the definition of sexual orientation and give it its own, distinct definition in the Maine Human Rights Act. "Gender identity means the gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, regardless of the individual's assigned sex at birth."
2021: Lawmakers change the Maine Human Rights Act to expressly prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in the policy statement of the law.
2024: The Maine Principals' Association changes its rules to no longer require transgender athletes to go through a waiver process, which advocates said was unnecessarily intrusive. The updated rule allows transgender athletes to declare with their local district that they want to participate, and local school administrations make the final decision on access.
Copy the Story Link
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump administration partially retreats from a takeover of Washington's police. Here's what to know.
Federal troops are patrolling the National Mall and neighborhoods across Washington while President Donald Trump's administration exerts extraordinary power over law enforcement in the nation's capital. But the administration backed down from an attempt to take over the city's police department by installing its own emergency police commissioner after a federal judge indicated she would rule against it. The partial retreat interrupted one aspect of the most sweeping uses of federal authority over a local government in modern times. How it will play out and whether the federal government will use this experience as a potential blueprint for dealing with other cities remains up in the air. Here's what to know about the situation and what might come next: The Republican president this week announced he's taking control over Washington's police department and activating National Guard troops to reduce crime, an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. But District of Columbia officials say the action isn't needed, pointing out that violent crime in the district reached historic 30-year lows last year and is down significantly again this year. D.C.'s status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump a window to assert more control over the district than other cities. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn't offer much resistance at first, allowing city workers to clear homeless encampments and work closely with federal immigration agents. But on Friday, the heavily Democratic district asked for an emergency court order blocking Trump officials from putting a federal official in charge of D.C. police. The Trump administration on Friday agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department. That came one day after Attorney General Pam Bondi said the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration would take over the police chief's duties, including authority over orders issued to officers. The two sides sparred in court for hours before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes after the city sued to stop the order. The judge indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. She pushed the two sides to compromise, promising to issue a court order temporarily blocking the administration from naming a new chief if they couldn't agree. But while Attorney General Pam Bondi agreed to leave the police chief in charge, she directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The showdown in Washington is the latest attempt by Trump to test the boundaries of his legal authority to carry out his tough-on-crime agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. About 800 National Guard troops are being activated, with Humvees parked along the Washington Monument and near Union Station. Troops have been spotted standing outside baseball's Nationals Park and neighborhood restaurants. The White House says guard members aren't making arrests but are protecting law enforcement officers who are making arrests and helping deter violent crime. Trump says one of the objectives will be moving homeless people far from the city. Trump has the authority to do this for 30 days and says he might look into extending it. But that would require congressional approval. Whether Republicans in Congress would go along with that is unclear. Some D.C. residents have protested against the increased police presence. For some, the action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint predominantly Black cities with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify police action. Washington is very different from any other American city, and the rules that govern it give the federal government much more control than it would have anywhere else. Whether Trump is using this as a blueprint for how to approach cities — largely Democratic cities — that he wants to exert more control over remains to be seen.
an hour ago
Transgender runner Evie Parts sues NCAA and Swarthmore College for removal from track team
Long-distance runner Evie Parts sued the NCAA and Swarthmore College as well as members of its athletic department on the grounds they illegally removed her from the track team because she is a transgender athlete. Parts' lawsuit said the NCAA's ban on transgender athletes in women's sports did not have legal grounds because it's not a governmental organization and therefore does not have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or the Title IX federal statute. She was removed from the team on Feb. 6, the day the NCAA issued its new policy on transgender athletes. Swarthmore men's and women's track coach Peter Carroll, athletic director Brad Koch and athletics officials Christina Epps-Chiazor and Valerie Gomez also were named in the lawsuit. According to the complaint, they sent Parts into 'such a depressive state that she engaged in self-harm and in one moment told a friend that she wanted to kill herself.' 'We stand by the allegations in the complaint,' said Susie Cirilli, an attorney who, along with the law firm Spector, Gadon, Rosen and Vinci, represent Parts. 'As stated in the complaint, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a bigoted policy. Swarthmore College chose to follow that policy and disregard federal and state law.' Swarthmore did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The NCAA chose not to comment. The NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth. That change came a day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Pennsylvania's state Senate approved a bill by a 32-18 margin on May 6 to ban transgender athletes from competing in women's and girls' sports at the collegiate and K-12 levels. But the state's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives isn't expected to vote on the bill. Parts joined the Swarthmore track team in the fall 2020 before then taking off the following four winter and spring seasons. She went back to the Division III team in 2023 to compete in the indoor and outdoor track seasons and in cross country. When the NCAA issued its ban, the lawsuit states, Parts was told by Epps-Chiazor and Gomez that she could compete with the men's team or as an unattached athlete. She would only receive medical treatment, the complaint says, if she competed on the men's team. Also, according to the lawsuit, Carroll and his staff were not allowed to coach Parts, she could not travel with the team, was not allowed to receive per diem or food and had to pay her way into meets. Parts also couldn't wear a Swarthmore uniform. Swarthmore 'fully reinstated' Parts on April 11, the lawsuit says, and she competed on the women's team until graduating in May. Parts won the 10,000 meters in April at the Bill Butler Invitational.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage
We had to laugh when everyone present tried to spin this week's Brooklyn stop on Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour as a dramatic show of Democratic Party unity, when it was plainly nothing more than an alliance of convenience with the Kings County's most prominent Dems conspicuously absent. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams insisted that the media needed to 'understand what's going on right now, because I don't think this group of people agree about nothing' — yet they still don't. Williams and other radicals (including supposed reformers) were basking in the glow of fellow-traveler Mamdani's primary triumph, but the machine politicians like Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermalyne, the county Democratic boss, were just trying to make sure their bread will still be buttered. Bichotte Hermalyne and her allies had endorsed ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, obviously because he seemed the sure winner, but Andrew's political corpse wasn't even cold when she announced in a NY1 News interview her support for Mamdani in the general election. Beyond other patronage, she and her 'regular' Democrats are likely also hoping to cut some deal that nabs their faction the City Council speakership next year as a reward for jumping so quickly behind Mamdani. Not all pols are that squalid: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other notable Brooklyn Dems very much did not turn out for the 'unity' farce. Then again, Jeffries and Schumer are actually working ceaselessly to counter Trump, not just posturing about it so they can avoid addressing other issues. The point is that these politicians (like others across town) are 'uniting' behind Mamdani because it serves their factional interests, not because they think he'll be good for the city. The Democrats who truly care about New York are conspicuous by their silence.
