Bolsonaro denies coup plot, admits post-election power talks
BRASILIA, June 10 -(reuters) Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro denied that he led an attempt to overthrow the government after losing the 2022 election during his trial before the country's Supreme Court on Tuesday, but acknowledged taking part in meetings aimed at reversing the outcome.Bolsonaro said he and senior aides discussed alternatives to accepting the electoral results, including the possibility of deploying military forces and suspending some civil liberties, but he said those proposals were soon dropped.advertisement"The feeling was that there was nothing else we could do. We had to swallow the election results," the ex-president said.
"I never acted against the Constitution," Bolsonaro added, holding a copy of the country's 1988 charter that re-established democracy after two decades of military rule.In March, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case against Bolsonaro and seven other people, including several military officers, who were charged with plotting a coup to stop Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva from taking office in January 2023.The charges stem from a two-year police investigation into the election-denying movement that culminated in riots by Bolsonaro supporters in the capital in early 2023, a week after Lula took office.Bolsonaro, who was the sixth defendant to testify in the case, spent several minutes of his two hours of testimony defending his administration's achievements and his criticism of the country's electoral system.advertisementDozens of witnesses were previously heard by the court, an indication that the case is moving swiftly and could be concluded by the end of the year, avoiding overlap with campaigning for the 2026 presidential election.Bolsonaro has insisted he will run in that campaign, despite an electoral court decision barring him from seeking public office until 2030.On Monday, Bolsonaro attended the trial to watch testimony from Mauro Cid, his former aide turned whistleblower, and then shook his hand.Cid told the court that the former president reviewed a draft decree that was central to the coup plot and made changes, while keeping a section that ordered the arrest of Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is now overseeing the case against Bolsonaro and his allies.On Tuesday, the former president said he only briefly saw the draft decree and never edited it. He also apologized for making unfounded corruption allegations about Supreme Court justices."Forgive me," he told Moraes.A final ruling on Bolsonaro's case is expected by October.Must Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions
Mumbai, The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted an interim stay on the Maharashtra government's mandate to minority educational institutes to reserve seats for Schedule Castes/Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes for first-year junior college admissions. A bench of Justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar passed the order on a bunch of petitions filed by some minority institutions, challenging the May 6 resolution issued by the government's school education and sports department applying the constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. The high court said it found substance in the petitioners' arguments and hence the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable for Class 11 admissions in minority educational institutions. The HC bench said it was granting a stay on the clause of the resolution that included minority educational institutes for the reservation. It directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the matter for further hearing on August 6. The high court on Wednesday questioned the government's rationale behind the resolution and asked if it was willing to withdraw the same or issue a corrigendum clarifying that minority institutes would not be included in the reservation. On Thursday, government pleader Neha Bhide told the court that she has no instructions from the government to withdraw the resolution or issue a corrigendum. As per the pleas, Article 15 of the Constitution excludes minority educational institutes, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. The petitions claimed that under Article 30 , the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the institution. A similar GR was issued in 2019 but it was withdrawn after petitions were filed then, they said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
With Trump as ally, El Salvador's President ramps up crackdown on dissent
Days before his arrest outside his daughter's house in the outskirts of San Salvador, constitutional lawyer Enrique Anaya called Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele a dictator and a despot on live TV. This week, lawyer Jaime Quintanilla stood outside a detention facility in El Salvador's capital with a box of food and clothes for his client, unsure if Anaya would ever be released. The Saturday arrest of Anaya, a fierce critic of Bukele, marks the latest move in what watchdogs describe as a wave of crackdown on dissent by the Central American leader. They say Bukele is emboldened by his alliance with US President Donald Trump, who has not only praised him but avoided criticising actions human rights defenders, international authorities and legal experts deem authoritarian. Authorities in El Salvador have targeted outspoken lawyers like Anaya, journalists investigating Bukele's alleged deals with gangs and human rights defenders calling for the end of a three-year state of emergency, which has suspended fundamental civil rights. Some say they have been forced to flee the country. They're trying to silence anyone who voices an opinion professionals, ideologues, anyone who is critical now they're jailed. Quintanilla said. It's a vendetta. Bukele's office did not respond to a request for comment. 'I don't care if you call me a dictator' Observers see a worrisome escalation by the popular president, who enjoys extremely high approval ratings due to his crackdown on the country's gangs. By suspending fundamental rights, Bukele has severely weakened gangs but also locked up 87,000 people for alleged gang ties, often with little evidence or due process. A number of those detained were also critics. Bukele and his New Ideas party have taken control of all three branches of government, stacking the country's Supreme Court with loyalists. Last year, in a move considered unconstitutional, he ran for reelection, securing a resounding victory. I don't care if you call me a dictator," Bukele said earlier this month in a speech. "Better that than seeing Salvadorans killed on the streets. In recent weeks, those who have long acted as a thorn in Bukele's side say looming threats have reached an inflection point. The crackdown comes as Bukele has garnered global attention for keeping some 200 Venezuelan deportees detained in a mega-prison built for gangs as part of an agreement with the Trump administration. 'Of course I'm scared' Anaya was detained by authorities on unproven accusations of money laundering. Prosecutors said he would be sent to relevant courts" in the coming days. Quintanilla, his lawyer, rejects the allegations, saying his arrest stems from years of vocally questioning Bukele. Quintanilla, a longtime colleague of Anaya, said he decided to represent his friend in part because many other lawyers in the country were now too afraid to show their faces. On Tuesday, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights expressed deep concern over Anaya's arrest. Anaya, 61, is a respected lawyer and commentator in El Salvador with a doctorate in constitutional law. He has criticized Bukele's crackdown on the gangs and Bukele stacking of El Salvador's high court. Last year, he was among those who unsuccessfully petitioned the country's top electoral authority to reject Bukele's re-election bid, saying it violated the constitution. Days before his arrest, Anaya railed on television against the detention of human rights lawyer Ruth Lopez, who last week shouted, They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial, as police escorted her shackled to court. Of course I'm scared, Anaya told the broadcast anchor. I think that anyone here who dares to speak out, speaks in fear. While some of Bukele's most vocal critics, like Anaya and Lopez, have been publicly detained, other human rights defenders have quietly slipped out of the country, hoping to seek asylum elsewhere in the region. They declined to comment or be identified out of fear that they would be targeted even outside El Salvador. Fear and an ally in Trump Last month, a protest outside of Bukele's house was violently quashed by police and some of the protesters arrested. He also ordered the arrest of the heads of local bus companies for defying his order to offer free transport while a major highway was blocked. In late May, El Salvador's Congress passed a foreign agents law, championed by the populist president. It resembles legislation implemented by governments in Nicaragua, Venezuela, Russia, Belarus and China to silence and criminalise dissent by exerting pressure on organisations that rely on overseas funding. Veronica Reyna, a human rights coordinator for the Salvadoran nonprofit Servicio Social Pasionista, said police cars now regularly wait outside her group's offices as a lingering threat. It's been little-by-little, Reyna said. Since Trump came to power, we've seen (Bukele) feel like there's no government that's going to strongly criticise him or try to stop him. Trump's influence extends beyond his vocal backing of Bukele, with his administration pushing legal boundaries to push his agenda, Reyna, other human rights defenders and journalists said. The US Embassy in El Salvador, which once regularly denounced the government's actions, has remained silent throughout the arrests and lingering threats. It did not respond to a request for comment. In its final year, the Biden administration, too, dialled back its criticism of the Bukele government as El Salvador's government helped slow migration north in the lead up to the 2024 election. On Tuesday, Quintanilla visited Anaya in detention for the first time since his arrest while being watched by police officers. Despite the detention, neither Anaya nor Quintanilla have been officially informed of the charges. Quintanilla worries that authorities will use wide ranging powers granted to Bukele by the state of emergency to keep him imprisoned indefinitely. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Entire country is witnessing a kind of tension and polarisation": Congress leader Ashok Gehlot
Udaipur (Rajasthan) [India], June 12 (ANI): Former Rajasthan Chief Minister and Congress leader Ashok Gehlot on Thursday said the country is facing growing tension and polarisation, which he called 'dangerous for democracy'. Gehlot added that democracy becomes strong only when all religions and castes move together. He said saving the Constitution is more important than just winning elections and added that the opposition plays a key role in protecting people's rights. Speaking to the mediapersons, Ashok Gehlot said, 'The entire country is witnessing a kind of tension and polarisation which is there for the first time in post-independent India. It's not in anyone's interest. Democracy becomes strong only when all religions and castes move together. Winning elections is one thing, but saving democracy is another thing. Slowly, democracy is being murdered, and the Constitution is in danger. Rahul Gandhi is repeatedly saying to save the Constitution. Opposition is important in democracy, and what is a government in a democracy without opposition?... Opposition raises voice for the people...' Earlier in the day, Congress leader Pawan Khera alleged that the BJP-led NDA government has restricted public access to election documents, just 11 days after a Punjab and Haryana High Court order demanding transparency. Khera, who is the Chairman of the the party's Media and Publicity Department, claimed that on December 9 last year, the Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Election Commission to share CCTV footage and Form 17C records from the Haryana elections, leading to the Election Commission of India (ECI) writing to the Law Ministry proposing changes to Rule 93 of the Conduct of Election Rules, arguing that allowing inspection of 'all other papers' created an 'administrative burden'. In a post on X, he further claimed that by December 20 last year, the rule was amended and notified. He said that the phrase 'all other papers relating to the election shall be open to public inspection' was replaced with 'all other papers as specified in these rules', quietly narrowing public access. 'The government has quietly restricted public access to election documents, just 11 days after a High Court order demanding transparency. On Dec 9, 2024, the Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the Election Commission to share CCTV footage and Form 17C records from the Haryana elections, he said on social media platform X, based on an article.' 'On Dec 17, the EC wrote to the Law Ministry proposing changes to Rule 93 of the Conduct of Election Rules, arguing that allowing inspection of 'all other papers' created an 'administrative burden'. By 10:23 PM on Dec 20, the rule was amended and notified. The phrase 'all other papers relating to the election shall be open to public inspection' was replaced with 'all other papers as specified in these rules', quietly narrowing public access,' Khera said. The Congress leader claimed that the amendment created a legal 'ambiguity' and contradicted the original intent of the rule in place since 1961. The amendment effectively blocks access to CCTV footage, video recordings, and other electronic records, none of which are 'specified' in the old rulebook. He said the amendment was done after the High Court ordered the release of those materials. 'The timing and speed, just 11 days from court order to notification, are notable,' Khera added.(ANI)
