Road schemes will ‘probably' be finished in under a decade
Heidi Alexander was unable to give a concrete timeline for when the schemes involving junction upgrades and dualling at key locations across Britain will be delivered, but said further details would be published in a strategy next March.
The Government on Tuesday announced the revival of major road and rail projects outside London and the South East, backed by £92 billion from last month's spending review.
Most have been in the works for several years and many have already received planning permission, but their future was thrown into doubt last year when Labour announced a review of transport infrastructure projects.
In a statement to Parliament, then-transport secretary Louise Haigh accused the Tories of leaving a £2.9 billion gap between improvements it had promised and what it had funded.
Almost a year after launching its internal review, the Government will now press on with five major road schemes, five rail projects and 28 smaller road schemes, which it says will cut journey times, ease congestion, create jobs and support new housing.
These include a widening of the A66 Trans-Pennine route, first proposed in 2016, the M54-M6 link, and junction improvements in places like Derby around the A38.
Asked whether the projects would be delivered within five years, Ms Alexander told Sky News most would 'start construction' within that period but take 'varying lengths of time.'
Pressed on whether they were in fact decade-long schemes, the minister replied: 'I don't believe that they will take a decade to deliver, no.
'I think they will be delivered more swiftly than that, but it is true to say that these are very significant schemes which will take a number of years to deliver, probably not stretching out as far as 10 years.'
She said estimates for when the three projects will finish are to be published when the Government releases its road investment strategy in March.
Preparatory work for some of the schemes has continued despite the pause, but Tuesday's announcement means they can now proceed in full.
The reopening of the railway between Portishead and Bristol, which has been the subject of a 25-year campaign, has also been given the green light.
The A66 upgrade was given planning permission in March 2024, but was delayed by an ultimately unsuccessful legal challenge and put on hold by the new Government's review.
Construction is now expected to start this winter.
Former prime minister Rishi Sunak, whose constituency is served by the A66, welcomed the announcement, saying it would improve 'journey reliability'.
The Portishead line, reopening a railway that was closed in the 1960s, was also thrown into question by the review, but then West of England mayor Dan Norris announced funding had been secured in February this year.
On Tuesday, the Government announced it would invest another £27 million in the project, which it said would 'connect an additional 50,000 people' and support 'a significant new housing development'.
Other major road schemes confirmed on Tuesday include the M54-M6 link, the M60 Simister Island junction near Manchester, the A38 Derby junctions and improvements to the A46 Newark bypass.
Both the Simister Island and Newark bypass projects are yet to receive planning permission.
The Government has also confirmed its commitment to build new stations at Wellington and Cullompton in the South West and Haxby in Yorkshire, which had all been part of the Conservatives' Restoring Your Railway project that was scrapped when Labour came to power.
Funding for the stations, along with the Midlands Rail Hub plan to add 300 trains a day to the West Midlands network, was previously announced at last month's spending review.
Other, smaller, schemes include improvements to the Middlewich Eastern Bypass, in Cheshire, and the A382 between Drumbridges and Newton Abbot, in Devon.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the investments were 'long overdue' and would 'transform local communities and improve living standards across the country'.
Ms Alexander said: 'Transport is the backbone of our economy, which is why we are giving them the record funding boost they need, putting taxpayers' money where it matters most and making everyday journeys easier.'
But the Conservatives accused the Government of using the announcement as a 'distraction tactic'.
Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: 'Labour are re-announcing projects that are already under way in order to distract from their failing economic strategy of high tax and high borrowing. They just don't have a plan.
'Rachel Reeves's catastrophic economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's total inability to control his own party has led to a string of unfunded U-turns, meaning that more tax rises are coming.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why has Kemi Badenoch fallen out with Liz Truss?
Dearie me, they're at it again. Former Tory leader Liz Truss and current Tory leader Kemi Badenoch are involved in another nasty spat, mainly about the infamous mini-Budget introduced by then Prime Minister Truss in September 2022. Badenoch has invoked that calamitous – and deeply Conservative – fiscal event in an otherwise routine attack on the government. Truss, ever ready to defend her record, because no one else will, has hit back and told Badenoch she's wrong and needs to do some more thinking, a particularly hurtful jibe when Badenoch thinks herself one of the brainier kids in the Westminster playground. Amusing and mildly diverting as it may be, this minor row also tells us some much bigger things about the Tory dilemma. What did Badenoch say? That Labour is even more incompetent than Truss was: 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-Budget and are making even bigger mistakes. They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Is that new? Not really. Only a few weeks ago, the shadow chancellor, Mel Stride, evicted from ministerial office by Liz Truss when she formed her short-lived government, laid into the mini-Budget and apologised for it. Badenoch, meanwhile, has said she doesn't know whether Truss is still in the Conservative Party, and implied she doesn't really care either way. She's long let it be known she'd prefer Truss to just go quiet for a while. Badenoch has also been disobliging about the Sunak administration 'talking right but acting left'. But Sunak, like Johnson, May and Cameron, has, so far, preferred to ignore the present controversies and policy shifts, such as Badenoch's 'net-zero sceptic' stance. What's the Truss defence? The usual – her supposedly brilliant plan to turbocharge the British economy was thwarted by a terrible econo-bureaucratic blob and those, to the visionary Truss, idiots at the Bank of England. But increasingly she is having to adapt her line because of attacks from her own party (if she is indeed still in it), which means slagging off the administrations that came before her – Cameron, May, Johnson – and after, Sunak and now Badenoch's performance as leader of the opposition: 'It is disappointing that instead of serious thinking like this, Kemi Badenoch is instead repeating spurious narratives. I suspect she is doing this to divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.' Er... weren't they both members of these dreadful governments? Yes. Truss continuously from 2012 to her ousting in 2022, and Badenoch from 2019 to 2024. Indeed, it was Truss who promoted Badenoch to the cabinet as international trade secretary. Neither showed much dissent, publicly or privately. Why are they scrapping? Neither wants to take responsibility for their own failures as a party leader, and that can inevitably lead to blame throwing for their disastrous showing at the election, and subsequently. But all politicians in all parties who find themselves thrashed by the voters are faced with this excruciating dilemma as they enter the wilderness of life in opposition: Do they denounce the record and policies of the government they were apparently happy to be a part of? Or do they defend their record instead? Do they agree with the voters' verdict or not? And if they want to, or have to, admit 'mistakes', are they going to be big or smaller ones? How to play it? By ear – there are no hard rules. Back in the 1970s, Margaret Thatcher, as leader of the opposition, did well out of renouncing most of what the Heath government had done because it ended in such chaos, and Thatcher was (like Badenoch today) a relatively junior cabinet member who could claim some innocence. In due course, because public opinion had shifted during the Blair years, David Cameron found that he'd have to criticise Thatcher herself, so he declared that 'there is such a thing as society' and told his fractious party to 'stop banging on about Europe'. Ed Miliband, after Labour's defeat in 2010, never seemed able to make up his mind about whether the Brown administration (in which he served) had failed, and, if so, how and why. Try as he might, Nick Clegg could never grovel sufficiently for what he did on tuition fees in the coalition government, and the Lib Dems were so punished at the 2015 general election that they were left with eight MPs compared to the 56 elected in 2010. At the moment, the Conservative-led government of 2010 to 2024 has few friends and many critics, the most vociferous being some of its leading lights. In this respect, the party is behaving more like Labour traditionally does after a defeat. Thus, after the 1974-79 Labour government fell from power, it was attacked by the Bennites on the Labour left for being too right-wing, and by the social democrats on the right for being too left-wing. Eventually, the long passage of time made arguments about pay policy, union power and unilateralism irrelevant. One day, when people have forgotten who Truss and Badenoch were, they may be ready to give the Tories a hearing. But, with Farage on their right flank, with no qualms about slagging off the last government, the Conservatives may not have the luxury of time to settle their differences and focus their attacks on him.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Jersey's government reveals 25-year investment plan to fight culture of 'short-termism'
Jersey 's government has revealed plans to set aside around £80 million a year to invest in capital infrastructure. Ministers want to set up a dedicated fund, ringfencing money for planned projects over the next 25 years. They include building thousands more homes, a new college in the centre of St Helier, improved road and water infrastructure and upgraded sports facilities. If approved, the money would be siphoned off from next year and given legal protection against being spent elsewhere. Jersey's Chief Minister, Deputy Lyndon Farnham, adds: "Sometimes ministers have taken money from the capital expenditure where it is not immediately noticed. Doing that for years has led to a situation where some of our infrastructure is starting to show its age. "There's been no coordinated approach, there's not been one consolidated plan that looks right across the public sector to make sure we have a structured, properly-funded capital plan. "We also need to create a platform to rebuild hope and confidence." Highlands College would be refurbished and relocated under the plans, with an accessible, purpose-built campus for Further and Higher Education. Principal Jo Terry-Marchant says: "It's really important for Jersey. More modern, fit-for-purpose facilities will allow us to widen access and opportunity to all age groups. "What is refreshing about this is that they are looking at the interconnected nature of different priorities across the island ... We have needed this for probably more than a decade." Paul Wylie, Chief Officer of the Cabinet Office, adds: "We know Highlands College campus needs renovating, so we're exploring putting it in the town centre. "That brings young people into the town centre and it frees up amazing sites at the top of the hill for family housing." The public is not expected to pay for the projects with extra taxes. Instead, from next year, the Government's annual capital allocation - approximately £80 million - will be ringfenced in the new Jersey Capital Investment Fund. Where needed, money may also be reallocated from other areas or borrowed to support major infrastructure projects. Mr Wylie also believes a change of approach is needed for the island's housing. He explains: "Our partners in Andium Homes and States of Jersey Development Company will be prioritising family-size homes of three or four bedrooms, as opposed to flats as in the past." However, backbench politicians are already questioning whether the Government will have enough funds to pay for everything that is planned. Deputy Max Andrews says: "The money has to come from somewhere ... I can understand the reason behind the decision to bring forward this new fund, but with the number of properties the Government owns, we're talking about hundreds of millions of pounds of investment. "If we were spending our money more wisely, we wouldn't be in this position in the first place." Business leaders are also asking for more clarity on the plans for investment. Jersey's Chamber of Commerce President, Lee Madden, explains: "Ambition must be matched by delivery. Our members are asking the same questions the public will be: how will this be paid for, and will it be delivered on time?" Meanwhile, Jersey's Hospitality Association have thrown their support behind the plan, stating: "This is a long-overdue step in recognising that sustainable economic growth, particularly in the visitor economy, cannot happen without Government first delivering the essential infrastructure that enables it. "But words on a page are not delivery. While we strongly support this document's content and its direction, the success of this vision will depend entirely on competent, accountable leadership." The States will vote on whether to greenlight the Government's proposals later this year.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Jaguar Land Rover names P B Balaji as CEO, India's Tata Motors says
Aug 4 (Reuters) - British carmaker Jaguar Land Rover's (JLR) board has named P B Balaji as its next CEO, replacing Adrian Mardell, parent Tata Motors ( opens new tab said on Monday.
