Global Interoperability Gaps Revealed in 2025 Healthcare Connectivity Rankings
LONDON, UK / ACCESS Newswire / April 24, 2025 / A newly released international research by Black Book ranks the digital interoperability performance of healthcare systems worldwide, spotlighting major disparities in health data exchange capabilities and system integration across 18 high-income countries. The study-based on verified usage data, government platform metrics, and over 2 million stakeholder surveys-highlights Estonia as the global benchmark in EHR connectivity, achieving a 99.1% national interoperability rate.
The study arrives as countries push to modernize healthcare through digital tools that improve patient outcomes. Black Book's multi-year survey data shows that true interoperability leads to better care coordination, faster diagnoses, fewer medical errors, and reduced costs for both patients and systems. In top-ranked countries, providers report stronger continuity of care, improved patient safety, and less duplication of tests, clear evidence that when health data flows freely, patients benefit the most. These systems also support more proactive care, enabling clinicians to identify risks earlier and respond with timely interventions. Ultimately, fully connected health infrastructure gives patients greater control over their health and delivers a more efficient, personalized care experience.
What Is the Interoperability Rate?
Black Book's global interoperability ratings are based on feedback from nearly two million healthcare professionals and stakeholders who participated in surveys between 2020 and 2025. Respondents were asked to evaluate how well their electronic health records or national health data systems shared patient information and supported full, real time connectivity across care settings. Black Book defines the interoperability rate as the percentage of healthcare providers such as hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, laboratories, and general practitioners actively exchanging patient data through standardized digital systems. These ratings are calculated using a combination of reported integration metrics from national health platforms and direct survey responses, offering a comprehensive view of how connected and effective each country's digital health infrastructure really is.
Top-Ranked Countries in Healthcare Interoperability (Q2 2025)
Estonia (99.1%) - Estonia leads globally with near-universal data sharing among providers. Its centralized governance through the Estonian Health Information System (EHIS) and secure, real time exchange via the national X-Road platform allow for seamless clinical coordination, real time access to complete patient records, and high provider satisfaction with system usability and reliability.
Finland (98.9%) - Finland's national Kanta Services platform sets a high standard for digital health integration, backed by mandatory participation, strong regulatory enforcement, and widespread adoption of HL7 FHIR protocols. Survey respondents consistently noted improvements in care quality, timely diagnostics, and reduced duplication of tests as a result of the system's consistent data availability.
Denmark (98.2%) - Denmark's success is rooted in robust national mandates and the Sundhed.dk portal, which enables real time access to unified clinical data across public and private care settings. Providers reported high confidence in system accuracy, ease of use, and support for cross-sector collaboration.
Sweden (95.4%), New Zealand (90.3%), and Singapore (90.1%) - These countries have achieved high interoperability through national strategies that prioritize data standards, patient-centered platforms, and public-private collaboration. New Zealand's Health Information Standards Organisation (HISO) and Singapore's national electronic health record system were specifically highlighted in surveys for their responsiveness and efficiency in clinical workflows.
Netherlands (88.9%) and Norway (87.3%) - Both countries benefit from strong digital health infrastructure and increasing FHIR adoption, though survey data revealed that regional variation and administrative complexity can occasionally impact full data consistency. Norway's central eHealth governance is making progress, but some stakeholders noted slower adoption in rural areas.
Australia (85.7%) - Australia continues to advance through its National Healthcare Interoperability Plan (2023-2028), but faces integration hurdles at the state level. Despite its My Health Record platform, providers surveyed cited uneven digital maturity and variable system engagement across regions as key challenges to achieving full connectivity.
Lower Performing Nations and Interoperability Challenges
United Kingdom (80.5%) - While NHS Digital has driven major interoperability initiatives, disparities between regions and digital system maturity persist. Black Book survey feedback pointed to variable experiences across care organizations, particularly between urban and rural NHS Trusts.
Canada (74.6%) - Canada's interoperability progress is shaped by provincial autonomy and decentralized digital strategies. While the Pan-Canadian Interoperability Roadmap offers national guidance, survey respondents reported inconsistent data-sharing capabilities and gaps in cross-jurisdictional access.
Germany (70.2%) - Germany has invested heavily in digital health through the electronic patient record (ePA) and Medical Informatics Initiative, but complex federal governance and regulatory delays have slowed adoption. Providers in multiple Länder noted limitations in cross-provider record visibility and inconsistent standards implementation.
United States (59.8%) - The U.S. continues to face significant structural challenges. Fragmented EHR systems, voluntary participation in health information exchanges, and inconsistent compliance with federal interoperability rules hinder widespread data sharing. Surveyed providers expressed concerns over administrative burden, limited patient record portability, and insufficient cross-platform compatibility - even within the same state or hospital network.
Vendors Driving Interoperability in Top-Performing Nations
Countries leading in healthcare interoperability - such as Estonia, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and New Zealand - have advanced far beyond foundational EHR adoption. Their success is powered in part by interoperability-focused technology vendors delivering the infrastructure for real-time, standardized health data exchange.
In Estonia, local firms like Nortal and Helmes have built core national platforms, including the X-Road framework and Estonian Health Information System (EHIS). Finland and Sweden rely heavily on vendors such as Tietoevry and Cambio Healthcare, which offer openEHR and HL7 FHIR-compliant solutions across regional and national care networks.
InterSystems and Orion Health provide enterprise-level interoperability platforms in countries like Denmark, New Zealand, and the Netherlands, supporting unified patient records and population health initiatives. Meanwhile, Graphnet Health and Philips continue to shape data sharing in the UK and continental Europe through advanced care coordination and diagnostic integration platforms.
These vendors offer scalable, vendor-neutral architectures and are instrumental in transforming interoperability from aspiration to reality - laying the digital foundation for connected, patient-centered care.
Estonia: A Case Study in National Digital Infrastructure
The report includes a deep-dive into Estonia's ecosystem, highlighting the country's legal mandate for provider participation, seamless national ID integration, and centralized patient record architecture. In a Q1 2025 Black Book survey of 128 Estonian providers:
96% expressed high satisfaction with overall data-sharing effectiveness.
98% agreed that cross-institutional record access improved care coordination
89% rated the system's usability as excellent and also, 89% believed digital infrastructure investments produced measurable ROI.
The Estonian model demonstrates the power of unified health IT policy, not just product deployment. In countries where interoperability is optional or overly fragmented, the patient experience suffers and clinical decisions are delayed. Estonia is showing what true digital maturity looks like in healthcare.
'Interoperability works best when it's built into the foundation, not added later,' said Doug Brown, Founder of Black Book Research. 'We're seeing that real progress happens when countries align governance, adopt shared standards like FHIR, and enable transparent, real-time access across systems-without locking providers or patients into closed ecosystems.'
Countries like Germany (70.2%), the UK (80.5%), and Canada (74.6%) are making progress through national roadmaps and investments, but continue to face challenges such as provincial fragmentation, legacy systems, and regulatory delays.
About the Report
The 2025 International Interoperability and Health Data Connectivity Rankings is an independent global study developed by Black Book Research. It evaluates comparative EHR utilization, national infrastructure maturity, and real-time health data exchange effectiveness across 18 high-income countries, using both quantitative data and stakeholder sentiment. The 2025 Black Book of Global Healthcare IT is a 600 page resource offered to the industry without charge at https://blackbookmarketresearch.com/register-for-the-black-book-of-global-healthcare-it-2025-report Black Book also offers another complimentary report on global opportunties for openEHR at https://blackbookmarketresearch.com/the-black-book-global-growth-opportunities-for-openEHR-adoption-in-2025-2026
About Black Book Research
Black Book Research is a global market intelligence firm recognized for its independent, vendor-agnostic evaluations in healthcare technology. Since 2004, Black Book has surveyed millions of healthcare professionals, executives, clinicians, and patients to assess software, services, and digital transformation initiatives across the care continuum.
Media Contact:
Media Relations, Black Book Research
[email protected]
www.blackbookmarketresearch.com
8008637590
SOURCE: Black Book Research
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Oracle Unveils AI EHR to Accelerate Cloud Growth and Healthcare Reach
Oracle ORCL has launched its next-generation Electronic Health Record (EHR) system for ambulatory providers in the United States, marking its most significant healthcare product update since acquiring Cerner for $28 billion in 2022. The new Oracle Health EHR features voice-activated navigation and conversational AI capabilities, allowing clinicians to use voice commands to access patient information such as recent lab results and current medications. Built from the ground up on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, the platform represents a departure from traditional EHR systems by eliminating multiple screens and clicks in favour of an intuitive, voice-first interface designed to reduce administrative burden on healthcare AI-powered EHR launch represents a critical inflection point that could significantly impact the company's healthcare revenue trajectory, particularly as it seeks to justify its $28 billion Cerner acquisition. The rollout supports Oracle's strong revenue momentum demonstrated in its fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results, where total revenues reached $15.9 billion, up 11% year over year, indicating this healthcare innovation could further accelerate growth. The new EHR platform's voice-first approach aims to strengthen Oracle's competitive position in the healthcare market, building on cloud services and license support revenues of $11.7 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, up 14% year over year. Oracle's infrastructure subscription revenues of $6.7 billion, up 19% year over year, indicate strong cloud adoption that the AI-driven EHR could amplify by attracting healthcare customers seeking next-generation solutions. Competitive Landscape and Strategic Positioning The AI-powered EHR announcement positions Oracle to compete against established market leaders in healthcare technology. Amazon AMZN has been expanding its healthcare technology presence through AWS cloud infrastructure and HealthLake data analytics platform, positioning Amazon as both a cloud infrastructure competitor and a potential healthcare technology partner. The company's healthcare initiatives represent a significant competitive threat to Oracle's cloud infrastructure ambitions, as Amazon continues investing heavily in healthcare technology MSFT has emerged as a preferred cloud infrastructure partner for Epic customers, with health systems increasingly choosing Microsoft Azure for EHR migrations due to existing business relationships. Microsoft's positioning in the healthcare cloud space represents both an opportunity and a challenge for Oracle's infrastructure ambitions, as Microsoft continues strengthening healthcare technology partnerships. Additionally, Veradigm Inc. MDRX holds a significant position in the ambulatory EHR market, focusing on specialized solutions for smaller practices. Veradigm has been adapting its strategy to compete against larger players by targeting niche outpatient markets, though Veradigm faces increasing pressure from Oracle's expanded healthcare offerings. Investment Outlook: Positive Oracle's AI-driven EHR represents a strategic pivot that could reshape its competitive position in healthcare technology. The voice-first, AI-integrated approach addresses longstanding physician complaints about traditional EHR systems being cumbersome and time-consuming. However, success will depend on Oracle's ability to rebuild customer confidence following integration challenges post-Cerner acquisition. The healthcare technology sector's high switching costs suggest Oracle's new EHR must demonstrate substantial advantages to drive meaningful adoption and support its fiscal 2026 revenue guidance of over $67 billion. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Veradigm Inc. (MDRX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Oracle Corporation (ORCL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Oracle bets on agentic AI and voice commands to differentiate new EHR system
Oracle has launched a new cloud-based, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered electronic healthcare record (EHR) system for ambulatory providers to differentiate from its peers in the US EHR space. Oracle Health EHR is built on the US multinational company's Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Due to its AI underpinnings, healthcare providers (HCPs) can use voice commands with the new system, to call up information such as patients' recent lab results or current medications. Oracle said the AI agents embedded within its system can surface 'critical insights' and queue suggested actions for HCPs, thereby freeing them up to focus on their patients. According to Oracle, the system has been trained on clinical concepts, including conditions, lab results, and medications, meaning its embedded AI agents 'don't just interpret text', but also understand its clinical context.' The new system's rollout follows Oracle's $28.3bn acquisition of Cerner in 2021. Upon its acquisition, the Cerner held a 24% share in the US EHR market but was fast losing ground to its main competitor, Epic, which held a 45% US market share at the time. Seema Verma, executive vice president and general manager at Oracle Health and Life Sciences commented: 'When Oracle committed to transforming the healthcare industry, we knew we had to start with the EHR. 'While our competitors seem content with bolting features onto antiquated technology, we took on the enormous and highly complex challenge of creating an entirely new EHR, built in the cloud for the agentic AI era.' The launch of Oracle's EHR preceded the company's forging of a deal with Google parent company Alphabet for the deployment of Google's Gemini artificial intelligence models through Oracle's cloud computing services and business applications. While it remains to be seen, the new partnership could influence Oracle's mooted plans to expand the functionality of its EHR system throughout 2026. EHR data is a vital source, yet in the US, access and application of the data has long been viewed as a challenge. This is mainly due to the fragmented nature of data sharing provisions across the broader US healthcare system. However, this may be due for a shakeup. The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS') announced plans to establish a framework to simplify the exchange of healthcare data between patients and providers in July. The healthcare agency said it plans to develop digital health ecosystem, the CMS Interoperability Framework, to 'improve patient outcomes, reduce provider burden, and drive value'. The CMS said it plans to outline criteria for a voluntary secure data exchange to establish the framework, which will be accessible to health information networks and exchanges, EHR providers, and technology platforms. "Oracle bets on agentic AI and voice commands to differentiate new EHR system" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Anti-vaccine myths surged on social media ahead of the CDC shooting
In the weeks and months before the Aug. 8 shooting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention headquarters in Atlanta, posts tying Covid vaccines to mental illness accrued millions of views online. Previously more tightly moderated, some of the world's largest social media platforms now operate with far fewer guardrails, allowing vaccine misinformation to flourish. On X, for example, verified accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers openly claimed in recent weeks that Covid vaccines act like 'chemical lobotomies,' which is false. On Facebook, health influencers with broad reach alleged that Covid vaccines cause severe brain damage or other severe side effects such as cancer, despite no scientific basis for those claims. And on TikTok, videos repeating the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism drew hundreds of thousands of views this year, spreading doubt to wide audiences. The posts are just one part of a now-chaotic information ecosystem that internet users navigate when they look for information about vaccines. In that environment, incomplete or out-of-context information is often snipped, packaged to fit predisposed narratives and then rapidly amplified across text, short-form video or audio content. In theory, interest in vaccines and the spread of related misinformation should have tapered off as the pandemic subsided, said Samuel Woolley, a tech and misinformation researcher at the University of Pittsburgh. But that hasn't happened, he said, in part because of the Make America Healthy Again movement and the mainstreaming of many of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s anti-vaccine ideas. 'It's arguably gotten worse,' Woolley said. The quality of information around vaccines came into the spotlight after the CDC headquarters shooting. The gunman, Patrick White, who shot nearly 200 rounds at the building and killed a security guard, blamed a Covid vaccine for his mental health issues, including depression. It's not known what the shooter's media diet was or whether he was aware of online conversations sowing doubt in Covid vaccines. The rhetoric was easy to find, though: Conspiracy theorists and anti-vaccine pundits command huge audiences online, and Kennedy himself has shared vaccine misinformation in office. HHS didn't respond to questions about Kennedy's past comments. In a statement, Communications Director Andrew Nixon said Kennedy 'has unequivocally condemned the horrific attack and remains fully committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of CDC employees.' White's previous statements align with growing online skepticism toward vaccines and the belief that they have a slew of unacknowledged side effects. A law enforcement official told NBC News that White, 30, had made suicidal statements in the past and recently attributed his health issues to the vaccine he received. And a neighbor told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that White 'was very unsettled, and he very deeply believed that vaccines hurt him and were hurting other people.' The newspaper also reported, citing police incident reports, that the shooter said something similar to police last year, when he was threatening to harm himself and officers went to his home. Online, vaccine skeptics have been met with less pushback from social media companies for sharing their beliefs than before or during the peak of the Covid pandemic. Under owner Elon Musk, X has stopped enforcing previous policies trying to control Covid vaccine misinformation. Musk himself said in 2023 that he had an adverse reaction to a Covid vaccine booster, but he doesn't appear to have elaborated on his symptoms or how long they lasted. His representatives didn't respond to a request for comment. In February, Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, ended its independent fact-checking program in the United States and announced a 'community notes' system, in which users can vote on fact-checks written by other users. By rolling back content moderation even for dodgy health claims, tech companies are harking back to an earlier, pre-pandemic era when they saw themselves as mostly neutral players in information wars. They briefly abandoned that idea of neutrality early in the coronavirus pandemic. 'The really manipulative, clearly malicious stuff needed to be taken down. Today that's not really happening,' Woolley said. TikTok, which bans misleading information about vaccines in its community guidelines, removed three videos that falsely said vaccines cause autism after NBC News asked about them. The company didn't respond to questions about why its systems didn't catch the posts earlier. A spokesperson for Facebook, which also says it prohibits vaccine misinformation in its community guidelines, had no immediate comment. X, which doesn't prohibit misinformation about vaccines or any other topic, didn't respond to a request for comment on the posts on its platform. Kari Bundy, an anti-vaccine health influencer with 212,000 followers on Facebook, wrote in a post after Friday's shooting that she understood where the gunman was coming from even while she condemned the shooting. 'His unhinged behavior mirrors the anguish of those who, after being injured, are gaslit and dismissed, driving some to desperate, unconscionable acts,' she wrote on Facebook. She declined an interview request. Experts say there's no clear evidence that vaccines cause depression. And the CDC doesn't list depression among the side effects for Covid vaccines. But for more than a year, anti-vaccine activists have argued on social media that there is a link. The narrative gained traction in February after prominent anti-vaccine figures seized on a preprint paper from Yale University researchers examining potential vaccine side effects, including depression. Preprint papers haven't been peer-reviewed or published in medical journals, which is the gold standard for reliable scientific research. The preliminary paper didn't show cause-and-effect or a correlation between vaccination and depression, but it quickly caught the attention of high-profile figures such as Musk and podcaster Joe Rogan, who pointed to it as evidence of the hazards of Covid shots. The preprint paper 'feeds into a narrative that's been around for years, that the Covid vaccine is spilling out these spike proteins that are poisoning people's bodies, and that happens to coincide with a conspiratorial political framework that's been around for a while,' said Dr. Adam Gaffney, an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. That narrative, though, is not correct. The paper identified lingering amounts of spike protein — a component of the coronavirus that helps it invade cells — in some people's blood samples. But its authors have said vaccines themselves aren't likely to be the cause. The spike-protein mRNA they contain degrades after a few days and is not itself infectious. Fears that vaccines are dangerous and that doctors are covering up the side effects have also drawn interest on Capitol Hill. In July, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., held a hearing with testimony from people who said vaccines injured them or their loved ones, and clips from the hearing spread on Facebook and other platforms. Representatives for Johnson didn't respond to a request for comment on the CDC gunman. CDC Director Susan Monarez pointed to the harms of misinformation at an agency all-hands meeting Tuesday that addressed the shooting, according to a transcript obtained by NBC News. 'We know that misinformation can be dangerous. Not only to health, but to those that trust us and those we want to trust. We need to rebuild that trust together,' she said. Dr. Dan Barouch, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, said he's not aware of evidence that depression is a side effect of vaccination. 'Depression is very common, and the vaccine is common, and so it's not clear … whether there may be a causal association,' he said. 'The questions about either mental health or post-vaccine syndrome, those deserve to be studied. More data is better, and data should lead the way as opposed to speculation,' he said. Kennedy once called the Covid vaccine 'the deadliest vaccine ever made,' despite data showing it's safe, though he doesn't appear to have linked Covid shots specifically to depression. Kennedy has, on multiple occasions, tried to draw a connection between depression and a different vaccine, the one designed to protect against the human papillomavirus, or HPV. In a post on X in 2019 and in a 2020 podcast episode with anti-vaccine activist Del Bigtree, Kennedy asserted without evidence that the HPV vaccine, which can prevent 90% of cervical cancers, was responsible for depression among teenagers in the United States. Kennedy has also helped organize litigation over the HPV vaccine, but a federal judge ruled against the plaintiffs in March, saying their evidence was 'lacking'; the plaintiffs are appealing. The CDC says the HPV vaccine is safe and effective. It lists common side effects as arm pain, fever, headache, nausea and muscle or joint pain. While Covid vaccines have saved many lives, they and all other medical treatments have some risk of side effects. A small number of people, disproportionately young men, develop a form of heart inflammation known as myocarditis after having gotten the shot, although Covid itself is likelier to cause heart problems, including myocarditis. In a 2021 study, the CDC reported fewer than 41 cases of myocarditis per million vaccine doses among boys and men ages 12 to 29. In a 2022 paper from CDC researchers published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, young people who developed myocarditis after Covid vaccinations often reported depression, with 46% of myocarditis patients surveyed saying they had it. A study published in the journal npj Vaccines in July, whose release coincided with a spike in online searches for 'vaccine depression,' found a similar rate of depression among young people with post-vaccination myocarditis. It's not known whether the CDC shooter had myocarditis. A different study last year looked at mental illnesses among Covid patients. The paper, which British researchers published in JAMA Psychiatry, found that depression and other mental illnesses were elevated for up to a year in people with severe Covid who hadn't gotten a Covid vaccine. And in the Yale preprint paper, posted on an online platform where researchers can share and receive feedback about unpublished work, researchers outlined what they called a 'post-vaccination syndrome,' a collection of various symptoms that they said resembled long Covid. The report looked at 64 people — 42 with the proposed syndrome and 22 without — and found that participants with the syndrome reported depression at higher rates than other vaccinated people. The aim of the report wasn't to find out whether Covid vaccines were linked to depression, nor did it establish such a link. Instead, it examined how people's immune systems reacted to the shots. One of the paper's lead authors, Akiko Iwasaki, a Yale professor of immunobiology, cautioned in The New York Times that the report was 'still a work in progress.' Two of the co-authors, but not Iwasaki, belong to an advocacy organization for people who believe they were injured by Covid vaccines. The group is involved in litigation demanding compensation for vaccine injuries and challenging federal officials for labeling their claims as 'misinformation.' One author, Brianne Dressen, is suing AstraZeneca over her participation in its Covid vaccine trial, claiming the company failed to appropriately compensate her after she developed nerve damage that she attributes to the vaccine. AstraZeneca has said it isn't liable, citing an act that protects pharmaceutical companies from financial risk during public health emergencies. Gaffney, of Harvard Medical School, said some of the preprint paper's authors are 'very serious scientists and people held in high esteem,' but he called the symptoms branded as 'post-vaccine syndrome' in the paper 'disparate.' 'We should just think twice before we enshrine new diagnoses that are premised on a cause-and-effect relationship that may be tenuous,' he said. Vaccine opponents and skeptics have taken the research and run with it, stretching the limits of what experts say is accurate. After the Yale preprint paper was published, Rogan mentioned the research on his show. Rogan, the No. 1 podcaster in the country by some charts, generally referred to vaccine side effects in the segment and said the findings in the preprint paper — which he referred to as a 'study' without noting that it hadn't yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal — were evidence of a massive cover-up. 'Everyone's covering up, and people are lying about [it], and everyone's trying to obfuscate, and doctors are trying to sweep things under the rug because they don't want to be in trouble for mandating these things and telling people to get these things,' he said, referring to Covid vaccines. In 2023, Rogan interviewed an anti-vaccine doctor who said on the show that a Covid vaccine led to his own clinical depression and suicidal ideation. Representatives for Rogan didn't respond to a request for comment Tuesday. Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones also jumped on the Yale preprint paper, posting a video about it on X that drew more than 10 million views. Alex Berenson, an anti-vaccine writer, got more than 7 million views for a post on X in which he called the preprint report 'very, very worrisome.' And Musk shared a post about it on X, boosting the idea of 'vaccine injury.' Representatives for Jones and Musk didn't respond to requests for comment. In an email Tuesday, Berenson said he doesn't have a view on whether vaccines can cause depression, but he noted the link between the Covid vaccines and myocarditis and said that could be a potential mechanism that ultimately leads to depression. He said he stood by his X post in February and called the Yale preprint paper 'highly concerning.' He also said it would be foolish to blame vaccine skeptics for the CDC shooting. Similar ideas had been bubbling in anti-vaccine circles for a while before the Yale preprint report. At least two other posts on X alleging vaccines cause depression got more than 1 million views, both citing a study out of South Korea last year that suggested an increased risk of depression after Covid vaccination but a decreased risk of other psychiatric conditions. The study, which didn't prove causation, was based on data from South Korea's national health insurance system. The authors said Covid infections were also associated with depression and cognitive impairment. A large study published in July found that the pandemic generally had adverse effects on brain health. Woolley said people are more prone to gravitate toward conspiracy theories during emergencies like the Covid pandemic because they are scared. 'When crises happen — whether it's the Covid pandemic or an earthquake — we see spikes in the spread of misinformation and disinformation,' he said. For some people, pandemic lockdowns worsened an ongoing loneliness epidemic that has yet to subside, especially among young people. An NBC News Stay Tuned Poll from April found that nearly a third of U.S. adults under 30 are feeling lonelier and more anxious about the future than their elders. And a Gallup Poll from May found that young men were particularly vulnerable to loneliness. That loneliness is now paired with social media recommendation algorithms designed to push persuasive or addictive content, often regardless of whether it's accurate. 'Not only are you super scared, but the algorithms have a track record of pushing more and more extreme and conspiratorial content the deeper you go,' Woolley said. This article was originally published on
