NESARA Eco-Mini-City: A New Vision of Sustainable Living Rising in Lombok, Indonesia
A New Destination for a New Era
As the Western world grapples with growing political unrest, economic volatility, and expanding government control, many citizens from Australia, Europe, and the United States are looking for alternatives—places where freedom, peace, and prosperity still thrive. Indonesia, and particularly Lombok, has quickly emerged as one of the most attractive relocation destinations, thanks to its natural beauty, affordability, welcoming culture, and pro-investment policies.
NESARA City is being developed with these global trends in mind. Set against a backdrop of turquoise waters, lush tropical landscapes, and panoramic mountain views, it aims to become a thriving eco-conscious community built for the 21st century—designed for expats, digital nomads, retirees, and forward-thinking investors seeking a better way of life
What is NESARA Eco-Mini-City?
NESARACity.com outlines a vision that blends innovation, sustainability, and serenity. The development will feature: Eco-friendly villas and residences built with sustainable materials and energy-efficient designs Organic farms and local food markets promoting self-sufficiency and health Wellness and retreat centres, spas, and natural healing clinics Remote work-friendly infrastructure, including co-working hubs and high-speed internet Educational and cultural centres focused on holistic learning, sustainability, and creative arts Recreation zones, nature parks, and scenic walking trails to promote a harmonious lifestyle
More than just a residential hub, NESARA City will foster a vibrant community of like-minded individuals prioritizing freedom, wellness, and conscious living.
A Natural Complement to Marina Bay City
Located near MarinaBayCity.com, a groundbreaking $6 billion mixed-use coastal project already under construction, NESARA City complements its larger neighbour by offering a quieter, greener alternative focused on personal wellness and sustainability. Where Marina Bay City is envisioned as a global tourism, hospitality, and commerce magnet, NESARA City provides a peaceful sanctuary for those who want to live, not just visit.
Together, the two developments are expected to create a powerful regional growth corridor in Southern Lombok, attracting foreign capital, top-tier talent, and international residents.
Why Lombok, Why Now?
Indonesia, and especially Lombok, has seen a wave of interest from global investors and expats disillusioned by rising costs and declining freedoms in the West. Unlike Bali, Lombok remains less crowded, more pristine, and offers greater development potential.
Furthermore, Indonesia has positioned itself as a neutral, stable nation that embraces entrepreneurship, family values, and civil liberties—traits increasingly sought after by those looking to escape the overreach of Western governments.
Final Words
As the world undergoes a seismic shift in lifestyle values and geopolitical alignment, NESARA Eco-Mini-City represents more than just a real estate project—it embodies a movement. A movement toward sustainable living. A movement toward personal freedom. And a movement toward building communities of purpose, peace, and prosperity.
For those looking to be part of this new paradigm, NESARACity.com will soon open its doors for pre-registrations, land allocations, and founding memberships.
For more information, visit: www.nesaracity.com
Live free. Live well. Live NESARA.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
13 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Putin says he hopes to meet Trump as the White House presses for a peace deal on Ukraine
Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday he hopes to meet next week with U.S. President Donald Trump, possibly in the United Arab Emirates. The news came on the eve of a White House deadline for Moscow to show progress toward ending the 3-year-old war in Ukraine. Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov had said earlier a summit could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided 'in principle.' Ushakov brushed aside the possibility of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy joining the summit, something the White House had said Trump was ready to consider. Putin has spurned Zelenskyy's previous offers of a meeting to clinch a breakthrough. 'We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive,' Ushakov said, adding that U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff's suggestion of a meeting including Ukraine's leader 'was not specifically discussed.' Putin made the announcement in the Kremlin after his meeting with Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the UAE. There was no immediate comment Thursday from the White House and it was unclear how the announcement of the meeting would affect Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. Asked who initiated the meeting, Putin said that didn't matter and 'both sides expressed an interest.' Speaking of the possible involvement of Zelenskyy in future talks, Putin said he has mentioned several times that he wasn't against it, adding: 'It's a possibility, but certain conditions need to be created' for it to happen. Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund who met with Witkoff on Wednesday, said a Trump-Putin meeting would allow Moscow to 'clearly convey its position,' and he hoped a summit would include discussions on mutually beneficial economic issues, including joint investments in areas such as rare earth elements. The meeting would be the first U.S.-Russia summit since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone toward Trump's effort to end the war, although there's no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Next week is the target date for a summit, Ushakov said, while noting that such events take time to organize and no date is confirmed. The possible venue will be announced 'a little later,' he said. Months of U.S.-led efforts have yielded no progress on stopping Russia's invasion of its neighbor. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides as well as more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin previously has offered no concessions and will only accept a settlement on his terms. A meeting between Putin and Trump on the war would be a departure from the Biden administration's policy of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' — a key demand from Kyiv. At the start of his second term, Trump was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom he has long shown admiration, and even echoed some of his talking points on the war. But he recently has expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, criticizing the Kremlin leader for his unyielding stance on U.S.-led peace efforts, and has threatened Moscow with new sanctions. Zelenskyy said he planned calls with European leaders Thursday to discuss the latest developments amid a flurry of diplomatic activity. European countries must also be involved in finding a solution to the war on their own continent, he said on Telegram. 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war,' he added. A ceasefire and long-term security guarantees are priorities in potential negotiation with Russia, he said on social media. Securing a truce, deciding a format for a summit and providing assurances for Ukraine's future protection from invasion — a consideration that must involve the U.S. and Europe — are crucial aspects to address, Zelenskyy said. He noted that Russian strikes on civilians haven't eased off despite Trump publicly urging Putin to relent. A Russian attack Wednesday in the central Dnipro region killed four people and injured eight others, he said. A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 620-mile front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about seven in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Putin, but his overture was rebuffed. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about seven in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
CNBC's Inside India newsletter: India's oil options in a post-Russia world
If refineries are the oil industry's children, India's got plenty of mouths to feed — and U.S. tariff threats over Russian crude are imperiling a distinctly affordable meal ticket. This week, U.S. President Donald Trump slapped an additional 25% of levies on New Delhi's exports to the U.S., bringing total duties to 50%, citing India's purchases of Russian oil. The White House leader flagged the issue in a CNBC interview on Tuesday: "They're buying Russian oil, they're fueling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then… then I'm not going to be happy." Despite Trump's tone, "while the U.S. is asking India to put pressure on Russia, it is following a soft approach," Mukesh Sahdev, chief oil analyst at Rystad Energy, told CNBC by email. "What we're seeing is that geopolitical pulls are going against oil fundamentals." After all, India's Russian purchases are neither sanctioned, nor new: New Delhi previously enjoyed the White House's blessing to access Western shipping and insurance tools for crude bought under a price cap that the G7 imposed to simultaneously avoid global supply shocks and dwindle Moscow's war coffers. Facing international criticism, Indian officials have repeatedly defended the country's intake as a matter of national interest. "We will buy from wherever we can. Our commitment is to the Indian consumer," Indian Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri told CNBC's Dan Murphy in July, noting that back when buying seaborne Russian crude was sanctioned in G7 countries in response to the war in Ukraine, "we were advised, including by our friends in the United States, to please Russian oil, but within the price cap." He added: "In effect, by buying from Russia, we will [be] helping the global economy [stabilize] prices, and therefore, we contributed to global stability in oil prices." If India were to halt Russian crude purchases today, "global crude prices could jump to over $200 per barrel for all global consumers," a source within the Indian petroleum sector told CNBC's Emma Graham. India, the world's No. 3 oil importer, boasts a refining capacity of around 5.2 million barrels per day — including 1.24 million barrels per day at just its Jamnagar plant — and the International Energy Agency expects the country to add another 1 million barrels per day of demand over a forecast period to 2030. Those are some big numbers, so let's dive into the nitty gritty. While refineries can switch their slates to maximize output of a particular oil product — think gasoline, diesel, fuel oil — many Indian plants were optimized to process high-sulfur (so-called "sour") crude, such as the supply from the nearby Persian Gulf… and Russia's Urals. But Russia's sour crude is loaded in far-away ports in the Baltic and Black Seas, making it a less advantageous long-haul arbitrage purchase in the era preceding the war in Ukraine. India still took the occasional Russian sour cargo — but compare the average 100,000 barrels per day it imported in 2021 to the 1.796 million barrels per day in 2025 to date, according to data and analytics provider Kpler. The deal discounts offered by Russia, as its traditionally European client base for seaborne crude significantly diminished, made Moscow's supply virtually irresistible. In addition, where most Middle Eastern barrels come with year-long commitments, tied to fixed regional monthly sale prices, Russian crude grades have typically been sold on a spot basis — leaving room to haggle on volume, delivery terms and price. "Operationally, Indian refiners have adapted their systems to accommodate these grades, especially at complex facilities designed to extract high yields from medium-sour crudes," Sumit Ritolia, lead research analyst for refining & modelling at Kpler, told CNBC in emailed comments. "Replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat — logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught," he added, noting that substitutes would squeeze refining margins and ultimately sting the bottom line. That's bad news in Mumbai, where the Reserve Bank of India has been attempting to stave off inflation without stifling economic growth. A spike in energy costs — the likes of which greatly afflicted European nations shortly after they decoupled from seaborne Russian supplies — could burden that mission. But the inconvenient isn't the impossible. Two oil trading sources, who spoke to CNBC anonymously because of the sensitivity of the matter, said Indian refiners have released a "flurry" of tenders to buy spot crude. A third trading source said that, when the incentive of Russian price discounts is this attractive, India and China are unlikely to give up the supply – and that, ultimately, Chinese refiners could absorb more of the Russian intake that India no longer consumes, in turn freeing up more West African crude for Indian refinery, redirecting flows. "It is important to note that crude from the Middle East is typically purchased on term contracts, hence there might not be much flexibility to purchase additional volumes on a prompt basis. As such, India could purchase more crude from West Africa (WAF) and South America," Ivan Mathews, head of APAC analysis at analytics firm Vortexa, echoed in emailed comments. "Given the escalating tariffs imposed by the U.S. on India, it remains to be seen whether India will import more crude from the U.S. as part of trade negotiations." Most U.S. crude, as it happens, is of the low-sulfur ("sweet") variety. India took about 285,000 barrels per day of U.S. oil over January-July, according to Kpler data. We're about to see whether India finds Trump's bite any more impressive than his bark and halt intake of Moscow's crude altogether — though an OPEC+ delegate, who spoke anonymously because of the sensitivity of talks, said a subset of eight members that recently decided on a September production hike counted potential Russian supply disruptions among the many lingering uncertainties in the oil market. "At present, supply-side risks are likely to outweigh demand-side pressures from tariffs. The U.S. appears to be entangling itself with multiple BRICS nations simultaneously — a strategy that may prove counterproductive in delivering the market stability and clarity typically expected from Washington," Rystad's Sahdev summed up. Trump told CNBC's "Squawk Box" over a phone conversation that the U.S. does "very little business with India because their tariffs are so high." India's former finance secretary Subhash Garg considers a trade deal between the U.S. and India unlikely, given their differing positions on key issues. He cautioned against negotiating from a position of weakness, and said that India should reconsider its economic engagement with China instead. Jurrien Timmer, director of global macro at Fidelity Investments, noted that Indian markets offer growth, and don't "really behave in the same way" as China's. Trump announced an additional 25% tariffs on India. This brings the total levies against Indian exports to the U.S. to 50%. The fresh tariffs are slated to start later this month, while the previously announced 25% tariffs are set to take effect on Thursday. Trump's higher duties on India follow accusations of the latter "fueling" Russia's war machine. Sources caution that calls for India to stop purchasing oil from Russia immediately could cause a spike in global crude oil prices. Trump's fresh tariffs on India could cost its economy multibillion dollars. Investment house UBS estimates that $8 billion worth of exports from the South Asian country are most vulnerable to the higher duties, even as only 2% of goods shipped out are U.S.-bound. Other experts caution that the higher tariffs may diminish the allure of Indian exports to the U.S. relative their peers in the markets appeared to shrug off the 50% tariff news on Thursday. Both the benchmark Nifty 50 and the BSE Sensex index ended the day 0.1% higher at 3:30 p.m. Indian Standard Time (6 a.m. ET). The benchmark 10-year Indian government bond yield had ticked down to trade at 6.391%. Aug. 12 : Consumer Price Index for July, construction firm Highway Infrastructure's IPO August 14: Wholesale Price Index for July, cement manufacturer JSW Cement's IPO, dehydrated vegetable products manufacturer Sawaliya Food Products' IPO, plastic houseware producer All Time Plastic's IPO, luxury cinema operator Connplex Cinemas' IPO
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Battery Scale: How The West Can Compete In A Market Built For Giants
Matthew Dawson | CEO, Elementium Materials. getty Over 30 years ago, the rapid commercialization of the internet led to the creation of a new industry, which became a cornerstone of the world's economy. Large amounts of capital flowed into this market during what was colloquially termed the 'dot-com boom,' totaling almost 40% of all venture capital investments in 1999. Years later, however, the market collapsed. The Nasdaq dropped more than 75% over 2.5 years, and more than half of the companies failed despite a promising outlook. However, when the dust settled, the companies that survived, such as Google and Amazon, became the backbone of the technology industry and the 21st-century economy. The energy industry now faces a similar situation, sitting on the precipice of a global shift with rapid economic growth, rising populations and explosive growth of new energy-intensive fields like artificial intelligence. Global electricity demand is expected to double by 2050 as the world rapidly shifts toward the electrification of traditional processes. The upcoming energy revolution will increase the need for more energy storage, with projections for annual battery storage manufacturing capacity exceeding 9 TWh by 2030. Corporate funding for energy storage companies reached $19.9 billion in 2024, supporting a sector that now hosts over 9,000 companies. As with the dot-com boom, the battery industry is saturated with as many promising technologies as it is bankruptcies, and it is unclear which companies will emerge as the future titans of the electrification industry. The Challenge Of Scaling Manufacturing The massive scale of the energy industry can be challenging to grasp. For example, reaching the 2030 goal of producing 9 TWh of battery capacity will require around 20 million tons of cathode material, 12 million tons of anode material and 6 million tons of electrolyte. That's because each kilowatt-hour of battery capacity uses about 4 kg of active materials. In total, the materials needed are similar in scale to the entire annual global production of copper, zinc and lead—highlighting just how massive the shift to electrification really is. Unfortunately, scaling up battery production in the Western world presents significant challenges. The time between a company's initial investments and first revenue, colloquially known as the 'valley of death,' is particularly difficult for the battery industry. At least half a dozen well-known battery companies with promising technological solutions filed for bankruptcy in 2024, citing supply chain issues, higher-than-expected capital costs or insufficient funds. While there was a boom of energy funding reaching record highs in recent years, many companies have begun to experience the bust end of the cycle. Domestically, American companies attempting to scale up their product face the chicken-and-egg challenge. Establishing robust manufacturing capabilities to scale up a product often requires significant capital. However, it's challenging to receive this capital without revenue from selling products, which by necessity must compete economically with incumbent solutions. This conundrum is especially difficult to overcome in the battery industry because of the dominant position of Eastern battery manufacturers. Explosive growth in supply and demand has allowed those who possess massive output capabilities to thrive with ever-thinning profit margins. Lithium-ion battery pack prices have dropped to a record low of$115/kWh in 2024, which is promising for driving greater levels of adoption. However, it presents challenges for smaller companies to break into the market. This is a pressing concern that the Western battery manufacturing world must overcome. Capital-Light Scaling And Strategic Partnerships It has become increasingly clear that battery companies must prioritize more rapid paths to commercialization. This requires designing with cost in mind from the beginning. Too many companies focus on technological breakthroughs while ignoring key factors like supply chain, safety and economics, thinking that all of these challenges will be solved with scale. However, companies must include these factors in their technological breakthroughs from the outset. For instance, new battery materials should rely on already existing, low-cost, mass-produced precursors with a diversified supply chain that mitigates geopolitical risk. Furthermore, companies that focus on capital-light scaling models—strategies that don't require heavy upfront investment in physical assets—much like the software industry, can better position themselves to achieve success. Utilizing alternative business models like focusing on core areas of expertise that provide a competitive advantage, coupled with toll manufacturing in noncore areas, can help rapidly scale while reducing the capital needs. While this business model may cut into margins, leveraging the knowledge of global titans with existing industry expertise could help accelerate the time to market and be the difference between zero customers and GWh-level production. On the customer-facing side, companies that focus on early adoption with low interference, low risk and low cost for customers will have the best chance of seeing mass adoption. Designing materials that fit into traditional customers' expectations without requiring additional steps during implementation lowers the barrier to entry. For example, battery electrolytes that are simply drop-in replacements to traditional liquid carbonate electrolytes, such as sulfonyl-based electrolytes—which I discussed in my previous article—will be more readily adopted than electrolytes that require changes to the cell manufacturing process. In addition, focusing on early adopters in niche markets facing major challenges can be a way to accelerate technology deployment and attract higher margins. Early success in these markets can bolster a company's financials while proving out the supply chain, positioning the company for larger market opportunities. These strategies are now being deployed to disrupt the highly competitive battery industry. The Western world has proven to be a leader in battery innovation, but the companies best positioned to be the titans of electrification will be those who solve the scale-up challenge, creating technologies and business models that allow them to compete with incumbents from day one. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
