Council approves purchase of more homes on Dreghorn Estate
The council's Finance Committee has approved spending £6.65 million to purchase 38 homes currently owned by the Ministry of Defence, bringing the total number bought in this development for rent by the council to 78.
The council says this action, unanimously approved on Monday morning, will prevent 15 civilian households becoming homeless, and will help the local authority deal with the housing emergency.
There was a lot of comment during the meeting on the positive way that the collaboration between council officers and the residents had been conducted. But one member of the committee, Cllr Simita Kumar, who leads the SNP group, said that she had to rely on social media for much of her information.
She said: ''Securing these 38 homes is a step forward for residents and local housing, but this is just the start of the process. The uncertainty tenants have faced shows the Council and Ministry of Defence must do much better on communication.
'As we await condition surveys, it's clear significant investment will be needed to make these homes safe, energy-efficient, and truly fit to live in.'
Cllr Watt said she and the officers had tried to be disciplined about communication but there were several stakeholders involved who had been quick to share information. As part of what was approved today the council officers will set up regular periodic calls with residents which councillors can join to receive the most up to date information.
At the meeting
Most councillors attended the Special Meeting online, as is usual for a special meeting, although Cllrs Simita Kumar, Joan Griffiths and Phil Doggart as well as the Convener Cllr Mandy Watt were in the Dean of Guild Court Room along with council officers. Local councillor Conor Savage also sat in the public gallery supporting the residents who were there to present a deputation.
Finance and Resources Convener Mandy Watt said: 'We're doing everything we can to make sure these residents will remain in their homes and to increase the amount of affordable and social housing we have in the city – and I know the residents are very grateful that this proposal has had so much support from councillors.
'Purchasing these homes is a sensible way to boost the housing we have, and Dreghorn is a community that provides a great place for council tenants to have a suitable, safe and affordable place to call home.
'Council colleagues have worked over many months to negotiate this purchase from the Ministry of Defence, listening to the concerns of Dreghorn residents at every turn and ensuring good value for the council. This is a huge step towards a positive outcome – a fantastic example of doing things differently to make sure we address our housing emergency.'
The financial details are set out in the council report:
6.1 The net purchase price of £6,650,000 will be funded with £3,289,000 from the
Scottish Government National Acquisition Fund grant delivered through the
Affordable Housing Supply Programme with the balance of £3,361,000 funded
through rental income and prudentially borrowed over a 30-year period.
6.2 In addition to the purchase price, additional capital works for asbestos removal,
lettable standard works, net zero carbon and lifecycle costs have been estimated at
£4,737,232 in total (£124,664 per unit).
6.3 The principal re-payment for the net purchase costs, asbestos removal and lettable
standard works, is estimated at £4,794,772 plus interest costs of £3,972,565 at
5.25% interest rate, a total loans charge cost of £8,767,337 over the 30-year period.
Annual average costs are £292,245.
6.4 The funding requirements for net zero carbon and lifecycle costs will be factored
into future years' HRA budgets and approved through the relevant annual budget
setting process.
6.5 The purchase of the 38 properties is estimated to generate additional net income to
the HRA of £135,522 by year 10, which increases to £1,967,023 by year 30. This
has been calculated using the same percentage rental income increase
assumptions as used in the 2025/26 HRA Business Plan.
Dreghorn residents
Deputation
Three of the residents from Dreghorn addressed the committee, and spoke of the uncertainty they were living under for the last six months.
Reident Mandy Burgen said: 'What sits before you this morning is a proposal that is a testament of determination and what can be achieved when we all work together collaboratively.
'It proves that solutions can be found and that circumstances can be changed. In March, we sat before you with the support of Living Rent and raised awareness of the desolate prospects that were evolving for the families of the Dreghorn Estate.
'Today proves you listened, and now we ask you to act and that our voices be heard again.
'Since November 2024 the families in the Dreghorn community have been no strangers to the feelings of dejection. Imagine feelings of deprived aspirations, a constant sense of futurelessness and having to hit the pause button on every aspect of your lives. It isn't about losing a house. It's about losing our homes, our family security and livelihoods and the fear of being ejected from our community connections on a micro and macro sociological level.'
Another resident, Amy Monaghan, explained that she is a worried single disabled mother of two children, both of whom are neurodivergent. She said: 'I work as a dinner lady at one of the schools local to Dreghorn Estate and also care for my autistic brother part-time. November of last year, I've been living under a cloud of constant fear and anxiety that I would lose my house, possibly lose my job because of it, and that my children will lose their friends and stability that's been hard earned over the past few difficult years.
'For my family this house represents more than four walls to shelter in. We've built relationships within our community, discovered support systems, and adapted out lives around a space that is perfect for the complex needs of my children. Our neighbours have become our extended family through this ordeal and having the community is what has helped us cope – and beyond that will help us thrive.'
Catherine Lomax spoke on behalf of her daughter who is a disabled adult living independently in the Dreghorn Estate, but who has been affected by the threat of eviction. She said: 'The situation was hopeless, and Sarah was in the depths of depression and anxiety. The threat of eviction was devastating. She was desperately stressed and stopped doing all her normal activities as her mind was entirely focused on becoming homeless. Her coping mechanism was to run away and hide. Since then, the whole community has pulled together to support each other. Losing her home would be a terrible upheaval of her life, but now we have hope that she will keep it and as an added bonus, the campaign has resulted in deep friendships and support within the community.'
Cllr Kumar commented that the residents had painted a really positive picture of their dealings with the council officers and elected members, but wondered if they had an ask for what would happen now. The residents replied that the future of Dreghorn is to keep building the community and that working together is testament to the housing policy – and 'that we can make these things work'.
Cllr Younie also asked about the new residents association and what they would like the council to do to better support them moving forward. The reply was the same: 'Going forward it is about building sustainable communities. Through this we have bonded even tighter together.'
The Finance Convener asked what it would mean to the residents and Ms Burgen said that personally it would allow her to make plans again. She said: 'The incredible amount of work means security. When this news broke six months ago I was in America at my daughter's wedding. She wanted me to go and see her in August. I have had to hit the pause button on that as I didn't know – I could have been homeless going forward. When we saw this proposal today we were over the moon about it and we just ask everybody to pass this proposal today.'
Cllr Savage began his address to the committee with thank yous – particularly for council officers and councillors. He said: I want to thank the residents for their patience and engagement, especially given the pressure and uncertainty they've been under. I am confident the residents association will grow going forward.
'These are homes not just houses, and today we have a unique opportunity to save the community, tackle the housing crisis and homelessness in the city.'
Cllr Savage said to The Edinburgh Reporter after the meeting: 'I am incredibly happy. We heard from the deputation the impact this whole situation has had on them, so I am happy to see that the committee has approved this. There has been so much hard work done on this by council officers, by the council, other elected officials and as I said to the meeting the work done on collaborating and engaging has been absolutely essential.'
Asked about the unknown level of costs – which could be as much as £4.737 million to remedy asbestos in the properties and upgrade them to net zero carbon homes, Cllr Savage did not reply, saying instead: 'I think we have a unique opportunity to save a community to tackle the housing crisis in the city as well as homelessness, in what in my opinion is a good deal as well.'
Cllr Doggart asked for more clarity about the repairs needing done to these houses. He said: 'Are we buying properties that are not in a particularly good state at the moment?' He was assured by the council officers that there will be condition surveys carried out as part of the conditions of purchase. Council officers believe there will only be a little work required on the basis of the condition of previous homes purchased.
When the purchase is settled the existing leases will be terminated, and capital spending will afterwards be incurred on the repairs. Cllr Doggart asked about the future level of rents receivable. Council officers said that these would be individual conversations with tenants and so had not yet been finalised.
Cllr Doggart was assured the purchase price reflects current condition and an officer confirmed that when the houses are purchased – probably in September or October – any remedial works will then be scheduled.
Green councillor Alex Staniforth asked that the council maintains the green space around the development to a high standard. The council will become liable for a charge for this common area when they take over ownership, and this was agreed as part of the committee decision.
In summing up Cllr Watt said she was happy about the level of support this proposal has had, and this decision of the committee will be referred to full council next week for ratification.
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
22 minutes ago
- The National
It's not enough for SNP to occasionally say ‘independence'
Moving from local to national, there was a call for a constitutional convention from Councillor Murray in The National on Saturday. On the same day in the same paper, Gordon Macintyre-Kemp (Believe in Scotland) called for a new national conversation through a citizens convention. Independence Forum Scotland's Summer Convention on Scotland's Future will take place in Perth this Saturday. It will be their second this year. The grassroots took root, sheltered immediately after 2014, and the movement well continued. And thank (supply your own deity or whatever) for that. It's still the same message from across that movement: independence. It's sad, then, that political parties such as the SNP haven't moved on in tandem with us. The independence message has been diluted, and looking at the most recent rejection last week, it's more a case that the message was missing, again. John Swinney is quoted after the latest failure as saying: 'I thought the SNP was best placed to see off Reform because of the scale of collapse in the Labour vote.' Is it too much to believe (as I have done til now) that the SNP would see off Reform and the other pro-Unionist parties not by asking for a vote just to keep someone else out, but with their laid-out vision for independence? It is their raison d'etre after all. Not heart before head, but by taking the abstract notion of independence and translating that into the positive. It's not enough for the SNP to occasionally say 'independence' like some now tired mantra. Or expect me to click my heels and wish, Dorothy-like. Where is the plan, the strategy, the tactics? Where, when are we reminded of the changes to date that have had a positive impact? The likes of additional child payments, free bus passes, achieved through our government, our parliament, albeit hamstrung via the clever trap that is devolution. Where, when is the current highway robbery situation explained, as energy flows out of Scotland only to be returned at an increased cost to households? Westminster seems to have imposed a tariff on Scotland, having robbed us first! I think even Trump would be impressed with that one! There's no room to say that as this was a local election, indy shouldn't feature. These are all 'local' issues across the 'nation'; indy should always feature. Then to all politicians who say they believe in independence: you need to be connected with the grassroots movement, you have to heed what we say, see what we're doing, realise the strength, the numbers. You need to be prepared to tell folks if it's change you want, then change you'll get with independence, and here's how, here's the plan. The clock is ticking down to 2026. Selma Rahman Edinburgh WHY oh why can't we have simple literature telling the general public that with INDEPENDENCE we will be THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS better off and rid of THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS from Westminster that is making us worse off? Ken McCartney Hawick
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'We are the party of the union who stand up for Scots and want to fix our NHS and schools - NOT Reform,' says Scots Tory leader Findlay
After a bruising by-election result last Thursday, Russell Findlay faces a big week as he attempts to start the fightback for next year's Holyrood elections. The vote in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse showed the scale of the challenge for the Scottish Conservatives, with the party finishing fourth and picking up just six per cent of the vote - a lower vote share than the party even had in the constituency on its darkest night in 1997 when it was wiped off the electoral map north of the Border. The fact that Reform secured more than a quarter of the votes and finished narrowly behind Labour and the SNP worsened the blow.. But the former journalist is now preparing for one of his biggest set piece events since becoming Scottish Tory leader by 'playing Murrayfield' this weekend. He won't quite have the same audience that Oasis will command later in the summer, but the Scottish Conservative conference at the national rugby stadium will be his opportunity to respond to the twin threats of Nigel Farage 's insurgent Reform UK party and an SNP which has been in power for nearly two decades But the former journalist is now preparing for one of his biggest set piece events since becoming Scottish Tory leader by 'playing Murrayfield' this weekend. Mr Findlay, who become leader last September, acknowledges that his party was 'crowded out' in the by-election but insists that a focus on 'common sense' policies and fixing fundamental problems created by 'two decades of SNP misrule' can allow the Scottish Tories to bounce back and help remove John Swinney from office next year. Despite the SNP now being regarded as the Establishment in Scotland following 18 years in power and Reform benefiting from an anti-Establishment backlash, Mr Findlay insists that both are similar in their attempts to capitalise on the same brand of divisive nationalist politics. He said: 'Nigel Farage is just like Swinney and Sturgeon - he's a populist, he will agitate and he will seek to inflame differences between people. 'We've lived with the SNP for decades and we know their tactics, we know what they are up to: they try to pit Scot against Scot and this is what Farage is doing; he's trying to sow division.' Reflecting on the causes of the rise of Reform from nowhere to 26 per cent of the vote in last week's by-election, Mr Findlay accepts that it was partly down to many voters being 'still in no great mood to hear from our party' because 'there is a lot of disappointment with what we got wrong over our time in government' - and also cited frustration at the 'absolute chaos' of the early days of the Labour government. 'I think it has fed this sense that politics is broken, politicians are all the same, and people feel just completely scunnered and I completely get that', he said. 'I see Nigel Farage as a complete and utter chancer but I can see why people think that the parties - my party and other parties - have let them down. 'But a cold analysis of the facts show that we are the party that stands up for the Union, we are the party that stands up for hard-working Scots, we are the ones that want to fix Scots' broken education system and indeed the NHS, not Reform.' In a full throttle attack on the Reform leader, he said Mr Farage 'seems to be more friendly with Vladimir Putin than he is towards the sanctity of the United Kingdom'. 'You just have to look at the chaos engulfing that party to see that it really is a one-man ego trip,' he said. 'He is not remotely interested in Scotland. 'When his deputy (Richard Tice) turned up at a Glasgow chippy and couldn't even tell us the name of the two defectors from our party, I think that was indicative of the complete disinterest they have in Scotland. 'There are also candidates as we know at the general election who were pro-independence, there were candidates who were anti-monarchy. 'Even Nigel Farage can't work out what he is - one minute he's a free market conservative of sorts, the next minute he is a free-spending Corbynite. 'He is essentially the same as the SNP - they are both populists, they will both say anything to anyone and they will blame someone else for their own problems. It has worked for John Swinney for decades and that is what Nigel Farage is doing.' He also criticised the current push from Reform to consider whether there needs to be a ban on wearing the burqa, which engulfed the party in another major row and more infighting. Mr Findlay said: 'It really isn't a very conservative policy to start trying to tell people what they can and can't wear - I mean maybe Nigel Farage will try to ban the kilt next. 'I understand the many circumstances where face coverings are problematic, we've seen that in some of the demonstrations for example, but I think police already have the powers in place to deal with that. 'This call that his new MP (Sarah Pochin) made perhaps betrays the reality of some of the thinking within Reform. It is pretty illiberal to start dictating what you can and can't wear on the streets of Britain - we are a free country. 'It appears to have been policy made up on the hoof, it resulted in the party chairman exiting it seems, and then apparently coming back, but it is something that does not sit at all comfortably with me.' Mr Findlay said he remained largely silent as a race row erupted over Reform UK's advert claiming that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar would 'prioritise the Pakistani community', saying he didn't want to do anything to 'amplify' its video message, but believes it highlighted Reform have 'nationalist, divisive and unpleasant individuals'. Despite the significant challenge from Reform, he still believes his party can perform well in key target constituencies and on the regional list across Scotland and says he is 'fully committed in 2026 to getting the SNP out and giving Scotland the change it needs'. He rejected claims from Reform defector Thomas Kerr that the Scottish Tories are no longer interested in the central belt, saying it is 'nonsense', and vowed to start winning back voters who have stopped supporting the party. He said: 'The worry I have is that Scotland might seesaw between one form of inefficient wasteful socialist government coloured yellow to one coloured red. We really can't afford to keep putting into power these high-tax parties who have no interest in aspiration and don't have the wherewithal to stand up to the vested interests in the trade unions, for example, whether on education, health and justice. 'We need to show the people of Scotland that there is an alternative way, it doesn't have to be like this, we don't have to accept this miserable mediocrity inflicted on Scotland by the SNP. 'So many people in Scotland are conservative with a small c - they like our policies, we just need to persuade them that putting their cross in the ballot box beside our name is in their best interests.' He also railed against the 'lanyard class' who have dominated Scottish politics, saying he wants to get Holyrood working for the public rather than the politicians. With pressure already growing on the party's leader Kemi Badenoch, he insisted he still has full confidence in her leadership as they both attempt to 'reset' the relationship with the public as part of a major rebuild. While some Tory leaders have at times stayed clear from Scotland during Holyrood election campaigns, Mr Findlay insists Ms Badenoch will 'play a part' even though he will be the 'main focus' leading the push for votes. In a warning shot to plotters at Westminster or Holyrood, he said: 'I think if anyone thinks that further internal plotting is in any way helpful to our party they need their heads examined. 'We need to unite. People are not interested in politicians' or political parties' internal grievances and egos and personalities. It's about putting your shoulder to the wheel and working together to help deliver the results that we need in Holyrood next year and indeed in the next general election.' He concedes that, with the election now less than a year away, a key challenge will be getting himself known - and persuading the public he is different to the other leaders. Until 2021, he was 'deliberately anonymous' as a journalist investigating organised crime, and in 2015 he had acid thrown in his face on the doorstep of his Glasgow home by a hired hitman carrying a knife, in an attack witnessed by his young daughter 'I'm not yet a household name,' he said, although he joked: 'I have been subject to some squirmingly awful BBC parodies so maybe I've reached a sufficient level of fame in the bubble to qualify for acknowledgement.' Although he would rather the focus was on what his party stands for and would rather levels of fame or recognition were not a factor, he accepts it is 'part of modern politics' - and will try to use his own unique selling point of having had a career outside of politics to differentiate him from the other leaders and appeal to those disgruntled voters who want change at Holyrood. Mr Findlay said: 'I'd like to think that me not being a career politician is perhaps a good thing because I can see things from the perspective of ordinary people who are sick and tired of the way Holyrood doesn't address their interests or doesn't seek to fix the problems in their lives.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Labour are still in deep trouble despite by-election win
FOR a man whose party had just won a by-election, it was widely expected to lose, Anas Sarwar is not at all a happy bunny. His aggressive and angrily needy behaviour while being interviewed by Martin Geissler on the BBC Scotland Sunday Show will remind fans of RuPaul's Drag Race of the iconic droll comment made by contestant Trixie Mattell when a competitor had a very public and furious temper tantrum after being put through to the next round by the judges but failing to make the top three: "I think that's a lot of emotion for safe." For those not familiar with the show, the comment was a pointed reference to the fact that although the contestant in question had survived that particular episode, the temper tantrum was due to their awareness that they were not on track to win the contest, and as it transpired, they were eliminated not long afterwards. Likewise, the anger displayed by Anas Sarwar was due to his awareness that despite this by-election win, his party remains in deep, deep, trouble, and that trouble is largely of Labour's own creation. Whatever you might think of the SNP's decision to focus its attacks on Reform UK during the by election campaign - and spoiler alert I think it was tactically a disaster - it's pretty rich of Anas Sarwar to go on the BBC, of all media platforms, and accuse John Swinney of running a "dishonest and disgraceful" campaign which pushed voters to Reform UK. Rarely has psychological projection been so manifest in a political interview. READ MORE: Scotland's top doctor warns of climate and pollution public health emergency It doesn't push voters to Reform when you do as the SNP has done and complain loudly that Reform is running an overtly racist campaign. What pushes voters to Reform is when you do what the Labour party and the BBC have been doing, which is to ape Reform's policies, thus legitimising and mainstreaming them, and to give Reform's leader a platform out of all proportion to his political success. The rise of Reform has nothing to do with the SNP, and everything to do with the Labour and Conservative parties and the anti-independence British media, above all the BBC. Of course, Anas Sarwar knows that, he's not a stupid man. He is, however, a politically dishonest man. The very last thing he can do in public is to admit the responsibility of his own party or that of a publicly owned broadcaster to which his party is linked by an umbilical cord in facilitating , encouraging and normalising racist far-right Anglo-British nationalism. Blaming far-right Anglo-British nationalism on the SNP is a new low, even by the base standards of the Labour Party in Scotland. Talking of pandering to the far right, the BBC has revealed that it has drawn up plans to "regain the trust" of Reform UK voters. The plans reportedly include changing news and drama content in order to make the broadcaster's output more appealing to the kind of people who have no problem at all with Doctor Who being a shape shifting near immortal alien who can cross time and space while fighting all sorts of trans-dimensional alien threats and sentient dinosaurs, but who complain it becomes unbelievable when the Doctor regenerates into a woman or a gay black Scotsman. Minutes of a meeting of the BBC's Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee in March, which has been seen by Byline Times, show that BBC News CEO Deborah Turness gave a presentation in which she discussed plans to alter 'story selection' and 'other types of output, such as drama' in order to win back the trust of Reform voters. One of the key members of the BBC's Editorial Guidelines Committee is former GB News executive Robbie Gibb, an arch-Brextremist who was appointed to the board by Boris Johnson in 2021. In 2022, former BBC presenter Emily Maitlis described Gibb as an 'active agent of the Conservative party.' Gibb was Theresa May's Downing Street Director of Communications between 2017 and 2019. (Image: House of Lords) Expect more news reports on immigration and greater prominence given to uncritical coverage of Reform UK politicians. They should just go the whole hog and rebrand BBC Question Time as 'An Evening with Nigel Farage'. Gibb was also previously the director of The Jewish Chronicle. Gibb fronted a consortium of worthies who 'rescued' the paper in 2020, but who claim either not to know, or are not saying, who put up the cash. In his November 2023 BBC Declaration of Personal Interests, Gibb stated that he was the 100 per cent owner of the Jewish Chronicle. After Gibbs' departure in August 2024, the newspaper was forced to apologise for publishing a series of fabricated pro-Israeli stories about the Gaza war. In drama, you can now look forward to cosy murders set in English country villages where everyone is white and heterosexual, and period dramas about a plucky colonial doctor, who repeatedly references how Scottish he is despite his upper class English accent, serving in one of the British Empire's African possessions, where over the course of a six episode story arc he rescues the benighted natives from their pagan superstitions and Arab slave raiders and eventually succeeds in winning the heart of a beautiful English rose, the daughter of a wealthy duke who heads a household of forelock tugging salt of the earth servants. I should stop here in case the BBC thinks this is a story pitch. Compare and contrast, surveys have shown that the BBC has lost most public trust in Scotland, in no small measure due to the Corporation's blatantly one-sided coverage of Scotland's constitutional debate, but the BBC shows no interest in trying to win back the trust of Scotland's independence-supporting viewers and listeners. The reason for that is that, despite his constant claims to be 'anti-elite,' Farage and his ilk pose no threat at all to the British establishment, they are merely the latest iteration of that establishment's attempts to subvert and control impulses to push back against it.
