
Is Britain On The Brink Of Civil War?
According to David Betz, Professor of War in the Modern World at King's College London, many of the preconditions for civil war exist in Britain today.
Using academic studies on social cohesion, civil war causation theory and social attitudes surveys, he argues that the following preconditions are in place: elite overreach, factional polarization, a collapse in trust, economic pressures, and the perceived downgrading of the majority population in a previously homogeneous society, are all present in contemporary Britain.
The current dynamics, he continues, point to an emerging conflict between radicalized factions within the Muslim community and an incipient nativist white nationalism. Professor Betz goes on to claim – using the Maoist model that divides insurgencies into three phases – that the nativists are in phase one, the so-called defensive phase in which the group begins to organize, disseminate propaganda and build a conscious community of followers.
Islamists, on the other hand, are in phase two – when violent attacks occur on a semi-regular basis, a military structure is being developed, but they are not yet strong enough to challenge the state's monopoly on violence. (Professor Betz believes that, due to the absence of clear geographic divisions between the antagonists, Britain is unlikely to reach phase three – the offensive phase. This is when the insurgent groups are strong enough to challenge government forces.)
It is an arresting and troubling thesis. It is also convincing.
The preconditions outlined above undeniably exist in modern Britain.
There has been a collapse of public trust in the state, for example. The 41st British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) report, published on 12 June 2024, concluded 'that people's trust in governments and politicians, and confidence in their systems of government, is as low now as it has ever been over the last 50 years, if not lower'. Indeed, a record high of 45% 'almost never' trust governments of any hue (22 points above the figure recorded in 2020); 58% (another record high) 'almost never' trust politicians to tell the truth when they are in a tight corner, up 19 points on 2020; and a striking 79% of respondents said that the system of governing Britain could be improved 'quite a lot' or a 'great deal', matching a record high recorded during the parliamentary stalemate over Brexit in 2019 and up 18 points on 2020.
Professor John Curtice, the Senior Research Fellow at the National Centre for Social Research, the organisation that carried out the BSA survey, says: 'The government… will… need to address the concerns of a public that is as doubtful as it has ever been about the trustworthiness and efficacy of the country's system of government.' As Professors Curtice and Betz warn, public trust in governments of all stripes has collapsed and, with it, trust in the system of government that we have traditionally sacralised and encouraged others to adopt. That this trend, if left unchecked, could potentially shatter an already fragile social contract is a statement of the obvious. Trust in the state unites the disparate groups of a multicultural society, acting as what Professor Betz calls a kind of 'superglue'. Without it, the groups fracture and retreat into silos characterised by mutual suspicion and animosity.
Click here to read more…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
21-05-2025
- Daily Tribune
Bahrain participates in Middle East space law launch
The Bahrain Space Agency (BSA) participated as a keynote speaker at the launch of the Middle East Space Law and Legislation Committee, under the Arab Union for Astronomy and Space Sciences (AUASS), held under the patronage of Professor Hamid Majul Al Nuaimi, President of the Union. The event discussed the Middle East's role in global space governance, the potential of legal frameworks to support strategic opportunities, and the importance of space law in fostering international cooperation. Representing the agency, Rasha Al Emad, Head of Strategic Planning, delivered a presentation outlining the Kingdom of Bahrain's efforts in developing a national regulatory framework for space. She highlighted the importance of such frameworks in shaping Arab space governance and concluded with insights to support Arab countries in drafting their own national legislation. Awareness Mohamed Ibrahim Al Aseeri, CEO of the BSA, noted the agency's ongoing efforts to raise awareness on space law in the Arab world and to foster knowledge exchange in line with its strategic objectives. Al Emad added that the evolving global space sector now includes a wider range of actors beyond major powers, stressing that legal framework are central to innovation, investment, safety, and international cooperation. She highlighted Bahrain's progress, from the royal decree establishing the agency, to ratifying UN treaties, joining international agreements such as the Artemis Accords, and drafting national legislation.


Gulf Insider
13-05-2025
- Gulf Insider
Is Britain On The Brink Of Civil War?
According to David Betz, Professor of War in the Modern World at King's College London, many of the preconditions for civil war exist in Britain today. Using academic studies on social cohesion, civil war causation theory and social attitudes surveys, he argues that the following preconditions are in place: elite overreach, factional polarization, a collapse in trust, economic pressures, and the perceived downgrading of the majority population in a previously homogeneous society, are all present in contemporary Britain. The current dynamics, he continues, point to an emerging conflict between radicalized factions within the Muslim community and an incipient nativist white nationalism. Professor Betz goes on to claim – using the Maoist model that divides insurgencies into three phases – that the nativists are in phase one, the so-called defensive phase in which the group begins to organize, disseminate propaganda and build a conscious community of followers. Islamists, on the other hand, are in phase two – when violent attacks occur on a semi-regular basis, a military structure is being developed, but they are not yet strong enough to challenge the state's monopoly on violence. (Professor Betz believes that, due to the absence of clear geographic divisions between the antagonists, Britain is unlikely to reach phase three – the offensive phase. This is when the insurgent groups are strong enough to challenge government forces.) It is an arresting and troubling thesis. It is also convincing. The preconditions outlined above undeniably exist in modern Britain. There has been a collapse of public trust in the state, for example. The 41st British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) report, published on 12 June 2024, concluded 'that people's trust in governments and politicians, and confidence in their systems of government, is as low now as it has ever been over the last 50 years, if not lower'. Indeed, a record high of 45% 'almost never' trust governments of any hue (22 points above the figure recorded in 2020); 58% (another record high) 'almost never' trust politicians to tell the truth when they are in a tight corner, up 19 points on 2020; and a striking 79% of respondents said that the system of governing Britain could be improved 'quite a lot' or a 'great deal', matching a record high recorded during the parliamentary stalemate over Brexit in 2019 and up 18 points on 2020. Professor John Curtice, the Senior Research Fellow at the National Centre for Social Research, the organisation that carried out the BSA survey, says: 'The government… will… need to address the concerns of a public that is as doubtful as it has ever been about the trustworthiness and efficacy of the country's system of government.' As Professors Curtice and Betz warn, public trust in governments of all stripes has collapsed and, with it, trust in the system of government that we have traditionally sacralised and encouraged others to adopt. That this trend, if left unchecked, could potentially shatter an already fragile social contract is a statement of the obvious. Trust in the state unites the disparate groups of a multicultural society, acting as what Professor Betz calls a kind of 'superglue'. Without it, the groups fracture and retreat into silos characterised by mutual suspicion and animosity. Click here to read more…


Gulf Insider
03-05-2025
- Gulf Insider
German Spy Agency Formally Classifies AfD Party As "Right-Wing Extremist", Same Week As They Top Polls
Probably just a coincidence… Just days after Germany's 'Alternative fur Deutschland' (AfD) party topped the polls… Germany's domestic intelligence agency has formally classified the party as a right-wing extremist movement, granting authorities enhanced powers to monitor the party as a potential threat to democracy, due to the 'extremist character of the entire party.' As Reuters reports, the BfV agency's finding, based on a 1,100-page expert report, that the AfD is racist and anti-Muslim allows the authorities to increase surveillance of the party, including by recruiting confidential informants and intercepting communications. 'Key to our assessment is the AfD's ethnic-based understanding of the people, which devalues entire population groups in Germany and violates their human dignity,' they added. 'This is reflected in the party's overall anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stance.' The AfD has 'defamed and vilified' individuals and groups, stirring up 'irrational fears and hostility toward them,' it added. Here's the image that Reuters chose to run alongside this story… One of the key factors that the BfV is attempting to use to justify the designation is the AfD's alleged position on 'ethnic Germans.' 'The ethnic-descendant understanding of the people prevailing in the party is not compatible with the free democratic basic order,' reads the statement from the BfV. 'The AfD, for example, does not consider German citizens with a migration history from predominantly Muslim countries to be equal members of the German people, as ethnically defined by the party.' The BfV, which has been led by a Christian Democrat for years who was rabidly opposed to the AfD, a rival party, further writes: 'The BfV reached this conclusion after an intensive and comprehensive expert review. Following its statutory mandate, the BfV was required to assess the party's actions against the central fundamental principles of the constitution: human dignity, the principle of democracy, and the rule of law. In doing so, in addition to the federal party's platform and statements, the statements and other behavior of its representatives, as well as their connections to right-wing extremist actors and groups, were examined in particular.' The BfV is no longer led by Thomas Haldenwang (CDU), but here he is discussing the AfD during his tenure. Haldenwang gave up his position to run as an MP but he lost his seat. 🇩🇪❌Will Germany's AfD party be banned?@Dieter_Stein, the editor-in-chief of @Junge_Freiheit, discusses how the German establishment's strategy is designed to create a toxic atmosphere around the anti-immigration AfD party, with Stein describing it as a "war of attrition." — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) May 6, 2024 In the party's first response to the report, the leader of a regional parliamentary group, Anton Baron, said: 'It is sad to see the state of democracy in our country when the established parties now resort to the most politically questionable means to act against the strongest opposition party.' The outgoing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has called the assessment 'clear and unambiguous' and insisted that the agency operates independently, 'There was no political influence whatsoever on the new report,' she added. 'The new assessment will certainly be subject to judicial review as well. In a constitutional state, independent courts ultimately make the decisions.' The AfD has denounced the move as a 'severe blow to German democracy' and vowed that the party 'will continue to defend itself legally against these defamatory statements.' 'The AfD, as an opposition party, is being publicly discredited and criminalized shortly before the change of government,' AfD co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla said in a joint statement. 'The associated, targeted interference in the democratic decision-making process is therefore clearly politically motivated.' The classification could reignite attempts to get the AfD banned, but Germany's outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz, whose Social Democrats will be the junior partner in Merz's new coalition, advised against rushing to outlaw the AfD. 'I am against a quick shot, we have to evaluate the classification carefully,' he said on Friday at a church convention in the northern city of Hanover. Additionally, the intelligence decision comes days before conservative leader Friedrich Merz is due to be sworn in as Germany's new chancellor and amid a heated debate within his party over how to deal with the AfD in the new parliament. Previous attempts to ban the far-right NPD, which took some notably extremist stances, were unsuccessful, with the top court arguing that the party was not large enough to represent a serious threat to the democratic order. There were also questions about the excessive number of informants, making it difficult to ascertain how much of the extremism in the party was due to informants versus the party's own members.