US and China to resume tariff talks in effort to extend truce
China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs.
Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100%.
The Stockholm talks, led by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meets Trump at his golf course in Scotland to try to clinch a deal that would likely see a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods.
Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year.
Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States.
So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include US complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth.
'Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of U.S.-China trade talks,' said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum.
Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into deals accepting higher US tariffs of 15% to 20%.
He said there was a 50-50 chance that the US and the 27-member European Union could also reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly'.
Two of Trump's top trade officials, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, will attend the Scotland talks and then travel to Stockholm.
Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time.
China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries.
In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October.
Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi.
'The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China,' said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the August 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145% on the US side and 125% on the Chinese side.
Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered US tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of US high-tech export controls, analysts said.
Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the US trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.
China is currently facing a 20% tariff related to the US fentanyl crisis, a 10% reciprocal tariff, and 25% duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term.
Bessent has also said he would discuss with He the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand.
The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending.
Michael Froman, a former US trade representative during Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of US policymakers for two decades.
'Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen,' said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
2 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
Netherlands bars Israeli ministers Smotrich and Ben-Gvir from entry
The Dutch government has issued a travel ban on two high-profile Israeli ministers, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, effectively preventing them from entering the Netherlands. The decision comes amid growing tensions surrounding their controversial political actions, which have sparked outrage among both international and domestic critics. This move is seen as part of a broader European response to the policies and rhetoric of the far-right figures within Israel's current government. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's Finance Minister, and Itamar Ben-Gvir, the Minister of National Security, have long been polarising figures in Israeli politics. Both ministers are affiliated with ultra-nationalist and right-wing ideologies that advocate for more stringent measures against Palestinians, including settlement expansion and military control over the West Bank. Smotrich has also faced backlash for suggesting that Palestinians should be resettled to other countries, while Ben-Gvir has been notorious for his inflammatory remarks against Arabs and his support for controversial policies such as the death penalty for Palestinians accused of terrorism. The Dutch foreign ministry's decision was grounded in the ministers' involvement in policies that clash with European values, including human rights and the rights of minorities. Smotrich and Ben-Gvir's stances on Palestinian issues, along with their divisive statements, have prompted concerns within the EU, particularly regarding the escalation of violence in the occupied territories. In recent months, Ben-Gvir's actions as National Security Minister, including overseeing the police force, have raised alarms over the use of excessive force against Palestinians and minorities. ADVERTISEMENT The ban has drawn both support and criticism across the political spectrum. Supporters of the move argue that it is a necessary response to the ministers' anti-Palestinian rhetoric and their policies that they deem to be in violation of international law. Human rights groups have long denounced the ministers for their advocacy of policies that critics argue may exacerbate tensions in the region and contribute to the destabilisation of the peace process. On the other hand, opponents of the ban claim that it is an infringement on diplomatic relations and an unwarranted interference in Israel's internal affairs. The move by the Netherlands also fits into a wider trend of European nations increasingly scrutinising Israel's far-right government. Over the past few years, there has been growing concern in Europe regarding the policies of the Israeli government, especially with the rise of right-wing politics in Israel. Several European countries have been critical of settlement expansions in the West Bank and the erosion of Palestinian rights under the current administration. This particular ban, however, marks one of the most direct actions taken by a European country against Israeli officials, highlighting the escalating tensions between Israel and some members of the European Union. The decision to bar the two ministers is also a reflection of broader international concerns about the trajectory of Israel's domestic policies. Critics argue that Israel's shift towards far-right politics, marked by the inclusion of extreme nationalist voices in the government, undermines efforts for peace and stability in the region. The Netherlands, along with other European nations, has been under increasing pressure to take a stand on Israel's policies towards Palestinians, especially as violence continues to rise in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's foreign ministry has expressed strong disapproval of the Dutch move, accusing the Netherlands of interfering in its domestic affairs. Israeli officials have repeatedly stated that their government is committed to defending its right to self-determination and security, including through the controversial policies of Smotrich and Ben-Gvir. The ban is unlikely to significantly alter Israel's position on these issues, but it does highlight the growing international divide over how to handle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Sharjah 24
30 minutes ago
- Sharjah 24
EU car industry sees relief - and pain - in US trade deal
German auto companies in particular were in for a great deal of export pain, as their share prices indicated. Shares in Porsche, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes-Benz all lost more than three percent in trading Monday. The agreement eases "the intense uncertainty surrounding transatlantic trade relations in recent months", Europe's main auto group, the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA), said in a statement welcoming the deal "in principle". But it noted that the 15 percent US tariffs imposed on EU goods including cars "will continue to have a negative impact not just for industry in the EU but also in the US". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country's economy -- the biggest in Europe -- would face "substantial damage" from the US tariffs agreed in the deal. But, he said, "we couldn't expect to achieve any more". The United States is a key market for European automakers, which last year sent nearly 750,000 of its cars to it, representing nearly a quarter of the sector's overall exports. While the 15 percent rate is less than the 27.5 percent tariff US President Donald Trump imposed in April, it is far higher than the 2.5 percent levy European car manufacturers faced before Trump's return to the White House. A German analyst, Stefan Bratzel, said it could be expected that US consumers would pay two-thirds of the price hike caused by the tariff, while car exporters would probably swallow the other third. For those companies, "we might have to see whether it is possible for cost-cutting somewhere else," he said. The 15 percent rate was similar to one reached in the deal the United States struck with Japan, another major car-exporting country. Will cost industry 'billions' For German carmakers, the United States represents around 13 percent of their exports. In the short term, a 15 percent tariff will cost them "billions each year", said Hildegard Mueller, head of the national automobile manufacturers' association VDA. The situation has forced all the automakers to lower their 2025 profit forecasts and to look for ways to alleviate the pressure. BMW boss Oliver Zipse suggested in June that Europe could get rid of its own tariffs on imported vehicles made in the United States. That could benefit his company, which last year exported 153,000 vehicles from the Americas, and imported into Europe 92,000 cars that were assembled in the United States. Similarly, Mercedes is looking for help from the national or EU level. "The deal reached between the EU and the US is a first, important step that needs to be followed by other measures," a company spokeswoman told AFP. "Politicians need to keep working to get rid of obstacles getting in the way of free trade. We are counting on the EU and US to continue their constructive dialogue in the future," she said. Volkswagen is also facing tariff hardship for vehicles it makes in Mexico for the US market, announcing that its first-quarter results had been shaved by around 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) from a year earlier. Its Porsche and Audi cars are also exposed as they have no production factories in the United States. On Monday, Audi cut its revenue and profit targets for this year, though it said it expects them to rise next year. Volkswagen CEO Oliver Blume has suggested reaching a side deal with the United States that would take into account investments his company could make in that country. Volvo Cars, the Swedish carmaker owned by China's Geely Holding, has announced steep second-quarter losses because of tariffs. The European auto sector is now lobbying the European Commission to delay the timetable for making the European car market go all-electric, and to provide some sort of industry stimulus. With no help, European car factories, already facing uphill challenges, "will have to reduce production," said Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, director of the Center for Automotive Research. That, he said, could affect up to 70,000 jobs in Germany alone.
Sharjah 24
an hour ago
- Sharjah 24
Trump slams London mayor again on UK visit
Asked by a reporter if he intended to come to London in September during a state visit, Trump responded affirmatively but then clarified: "I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job." "The Mayor of London... a nasty person," he added. The comments prompted Starmer to state: "He's a friend of mine, actually." But doubling down on his view of Khan, Trump went on: "I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London." There is no love lost between Trump and Khan, like Starmer a member of the Labour Party. In January, on the eve of Trump's return to the White House, Khan penned an article warning of western "reactionary populists" posing a "century-defining challenge" for progressives. During his first term in power, Khan also became embroiled in a war of words after speaking out against a US travel ban on people from certain Muslim countries. Trump then accused Khan, the first Muslim mayor of a Western capital when he was first elected in 2016, of doing a "very bad job on terrorism", calling him a "stone cold loser" and "very dumb". In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election on November 5, 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of the colour of his skin. "He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion," he said. But in a interview with AFP in December, Khan said the American people had "spoken loudly and clearly" and "we have got to respect the outcome of the presidential elections". In a statement later Monday, a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was "delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world". "He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer," he added.
