João Peglow scores first 2 MLS goals, DC United beats Red Bulls 2-1
HARRISON, N.J. — João Peglow scored twice in the first half, his first two goals in MLS, to help D.C. United beat the New York Red Bulls 2-1 on Saturday to snap a four-game losing streak.
D.C. United (2-4-3) — which went into the game with a minus-9 goal differential, tied with CF Montreal for worst in the Eastern Conference, and winless in five straight — won for the first time since 2-1 home victory over Sporting Kansas City on March 8.
Luis Barraza played a long goal kick to the attacking third, where Peglow flicked a header forward to himself and beat goalkeeper Carlos Miguel Coronel from the center of the area to give D.C. United a 1-0 lead in the 35th minute. It was Barraza's second career assist and his first since the 2021 season.
David Schnegg chipped a cross from the left side to the back post, where Aaron Herrera played a header high into the air before Peglow put away a bicycle kick to make it 2-0 in the 44th.
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting scored for the Red Bulls in the 57th minute to cut their deficit to 2-1 when his shot deflected off defender Lukas MacNaughton and ricocheted off the crossbar before settling into the net.
New York (3-3-3) lost for just the second time since a 1-0 defeat at the hands of Cincinnati in the season opener.
Carlos Miguel Coronel had three saves for the Red Bulls.
Barraza, acquired from New York City FC via trade in December, made his second consecutive start for D.C. United and finished with two saves. Kim Joon-Hong, a 21-year-old in his first MLS season, started the first seven games and conceded 19 goals, including six in a loss to San Jose on April 6.
___
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/soccer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Big clubs hover as forward Jonathan David adds to his Canadian record goals total
TORONTO - Good strikers know where to go, to find a crease in the opposition defence, to create an opportunity. And then the great ones finish. Witness Jonathan David's second goal in Canada's 4-2 win over Ukraine on Saturday at the Canadian Shield Tournament. The play started in the Canadian end after a Ukraine miscue. One pass later and the ball found its way to Tajon Buchanan, who beat one would-be tackler, and raced towards the Ukraine goal. David, to his left, matched him stride for stride. As Buchanan neared the penalty box, David altered his run and, on an angle, headed to the goalpost nearest Buchanan. The change of direction took him away from goal, but it also gave him position on the Ukraine defender waiting to handle the expected cross. Instead David nipped in front and when the ball arrived, dipped his head and flicked it backwards, looping the ball into the far corner past the rooted Ukrainian goalkeeper. 'He's a special player,' said Canada midfielder Stephen Eustaquio. 'Probably one of the best players Canada's ever produced. We all are waiting for his next move. I think he has the ability to play in a top-five team, to be honest. So let's see. I'm very happy for him and I hope everything turns out.' Goals No. 33 and 34, adding to his Canadian men's record total, likely did not go unnoticed. Out of contract at France's Lille, David is in demand from big clubs. Comfortable in his own skin, David is a cool customer. Former coach John Herdman dubbed him the Iceman. The 25-year-old from Ottawa lives up to that handle when it comes to the question mark over his football future. 'No list of preferred destinations,' he said after Saturday's win. 'It's always to look at the sporting project, where I can keep getting better.' 'It's exciting, of course, but I'm very calm about it,' he added. 'Just waiting for the moment.' With captain Alphonso Davies recovering from knee surgery and vice-captain Eustaquio headed to the FIFA Club World Cup, David will lead the team at the Gold Cup later this month. But wearing the captain's armband or not, David is key to Canada. The two-time Canada Soccer Player of the Year can score goals and make them, with 16 assists in his 62 appearances. He has played in all 16 of Canada coach Jesse Marsch's games in charge, with eight goals and three assists. 'He's the smartest player I've ever coached,' said Marsch, whose resume includes stops in MLS, England, Austria and Germany. 'And so his understanding of what's happening in the game and how to move around to find the game in the right way, to help the team, I think is at a really high level. 'And the team knows that getting him in the match is really important for us.' Herdman saw his potential early. 'He's a special talent,' Herdman said in 2019. 'I think he's got big things coming.' Born in Brooklyn, David was three months old when his family moved to its native Haiti and six when the family came north to Ottawa. He played for Gloucester Dragons Soccer, Ottawa Gloucester SC and Ottawa Internationals Soccer Club, representing Canada at the under-17 level. A trial with KAA Gent came in 2017 after a scout saw him on video. He went to Belgium twice that year, spending time with the second team before earning a full-time invitation. After high school in Ottawa, he returned to Europe to focus full time on his soccer. He joined Lille in 2020 and went on to score 109 goals in 231 games, including 25 in 48 appearances this season. David made his senior international debut in September 2018 in an 8-0 CONCACAF Nations League qualifying win over the U.S. Virgin Islands. Thirty-two minutes later, he was the youngest Canadian male to score on debut. Five minutes later, he was the fifth player to score twice in his Canada debut. David lived up to his nickname again with his fourth-minute opener against Ukraine. With the defence ball-watching or worrying about the immense frame of fellow forward Promise David, no relation, an unmarked David ghosted in and headed the ball at goal. A defender made a desperate goal-line clearance but the ball went right back to David, who controlled his body and knocked it home. David was reminded after the game that he didn't need to be here, given the risk of getting injured without a contract. 'I love playing soccer,' he said. 'Obviously there is still a risk but in my head I'm not really thinking about that. I'm just trying to enjoy my football, to stay fit and when the moment comes, I'm ready.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Baltimore Ravens out to make AFC North division history this season
Baltimore Ravens out to make AFC North division history this season a Ravens division title in 2025 brings with it another inherent reward- bragging rights over the arch-rival Steelers The Baltimore Ravens are back-to-back AFC North division champions, and obviously, they're looking to three-peat in 2025. If they do so, they'll become the first team to accomplish this feat since divisional realignment occurred in 2002. That season saw the NFL expand to 32 teams via the introduction of the Houston Texans. Their arrival led to the league reformatting into four divisions (each with four teams) in both conferences, instead of three. So the AFC North has been in its current iteration for 22 years. The cute cartoon graphic below illustrates how many times each of the four teams has won the division crown since 2014 (sorry, Cleveland fans). Can we make it 5 this upcoming season? — RavensMuse (@Ravensmusee) June 7, 2025 Next, we factor in (you were never "told there would be no math") the number of division titles won since the format began up until a decade ago (2014). The Bengals won three more, bringing their total to six. The Steelers add five more division crowns, which raises their total to eight. And four more for the Ravens, which means their sum is now also at eight. The Browns add 0 to their other 0, and the only thing we can say for Cleveland is, well, hey, the Cavaliers have won the Eastern Conference four times since 2015! More importantly, a Ravens division title in 2025 brings with it another inherent reward- bragging rights over the arch-rival Steelers. Baltimore would become the first AFC North team to win the division nine times.
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
NBA Finals Game 2 Betting Odds, Picks, Best Bets: OKC Heavy Home Favorites
After a stunning comeback win in Game 1, the Pacers are once again heavy underdogs vs. the Thunder in Game 2 of the NBA Finals on Sunday night. After a stunning comeback win in Game 1, the Pacers are once again heavy underdogs vs. the Thunder in Game 2 of the NBA Finals on Sunday night. Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Pacers continued their remarkable run of dramatic upsets this postseason on Thursday night in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. On the road against a Thunder team that has been heavily favored to win the NBA Finals for months, Indiana trailed 94-79 with just under 10 minutes to play in Game 1. But the Pacers once again refused to quit, and they ended up outscoring the Thunder 35-25 in the fourth quarter. When Tyrese Haliburton's game-winning jumper ripped the net with 0.3 seconds remaining, Indiana had completed its fourth historic comeback of the playoffs. The Pacers also stunned Milwaukee in the first round, Cleveland in the Eastern Conference semis and New York in the Eastern Conference Finals with furious late rallies. NBA Finals Game 2 Odds: Spread, ML, Total Despite their Game 1 collapse down the stretch, the Thunder are favored by even more in Game 2 than they were in Game 1. On one hand, that makes plenty of sense to anyone who watched OKC bounce back from a similar Game 1 loss at home to Denver in the second round with a 149-106 win in Game 2 of that series. On the other, betting against Haliburton and the Pacers has proven costly throughout these playoffs. DK FD bet365 IND spread +11 (-112) +11 (-110) +11 (-110) OKC spread -11 (-108) -11 (-110) -11 (-110) IND ML +390 +410 +425 OKC ML -520 -560 -575 Total 228.5 (o-112; u-108) 228.5 (o-114; u-106) 228.5 (o-110; u-110) How to Watch NBA Finals Game 2: Pacers vs. Thunder Tipoff: 8 p.m. ET Channel: ABC NBA Finals Series Winner Odds: OKC Remains Heavy Favorite Oklahoma City's odds to win the Finals are much shorter than they were prior to Game 1, but the Thunder remain heavily favored in this series. DraftKings : OKC -300; IND +245 FanDuel : OKC -330; IND +265 bet365 : OKC -330; IND +265 NBA Finals Game 2 Betting Picks, Analysis Why The Thunder Could Win (And/Or Cover) The Thunder lost Game 1 largely because they went cold (7-for-19, 0-for-5 from 3 in the fourth quarter) while allowing the Pacers to get hot at the wrong time (4Q FG shooting: 12-for-24, 6-for-10 3pt). OKC had a number of other issues in Game 1, though, but those problems should be fixable for a team that has been dominant throughout the regular season and playoffs. First of all, the Thunder allowed the Pacers to grab 13 offensive rebounds on just 43 missed shots in Game 1. That includes nine OREBs by Indiana on just 23 missed FGs in the second half. On the other end, the Thunder recorded just 10 offensive rebounds on 59 missed shots The Pacers were 29th in the league in offensive rebounding rate in the regular season, so it's hard to imagine OKC losing this battle throughout the series. In Game 1, Indiana not only got big rebounding nights from bigs Myles Turner (9 boards, including 5 offensive) and Pascal Siakam (10 rebounds, including 4 offensive), but also forward Aaron Nesmith (12 rebounds) and Haliburton (10 rebounds). The turnover battle will be the bigger talking point tonight. Though they already pulled it off once, the Pacers are (obviously) unlikely to upset OKC again if they regularly turn the ball over. But my question is about what OKC does with those Pacers TOs. In Game 1, Indiana survived its 24 turnovers largely because the Thunder only turned those into 11 points off turnovers. Will OKC be able to take better advantage of the turnovers it forces tonight? The last reason to like the Thunder tonight (and in this series) comes with a caveat. If we assume Jalen Williams (17 points on 6-for-19 shooting) and Chet Holmgren (6 points on 2-for-9 shooting, including an abysmal 2-for-8 from within 4 feet of the rim) will play as well as they're capable of playing throughout the rest of this series, OKC should have too much firepower for the Pacers. Related: as a team, the Thunder shot just 22-for-47 (46.8 percent) from less than 10 feet in Game 1, per Indiana went 15-for-29 on its shots from less than 10 feet. On the other hand, if this proves to be a bad matchup for both Williams (20.2 ppg on 44.8 percent FG shooting in the playoffs) and Holmgren (15.8 ppg on 47.7 FG shooting in the playoffs), the Thunder could be in real trouble. Why The Pacers Could Win (And/Or Cover) The case for Indiana starts with the fact that right now, Haliburton and Co. are terrifying if it's close in the closing minutes. Regardless of what happens in the rest of this series, Indiana has already put together a historically good run of clutch play this postseason. From an X's and O's standpoint, a strength throughout the playoffs for Indiana has been not only its 3-point shooting in general, but its ability to create and knock down open corner 3s. In Game 1, OKC's aggressive perimeter defense did force a slew of turnovers. Unfortunately for the Thunder, that aggression was also a big reason why the Pacers were able to shoot 10-for-16 on corner treys. Going forward, whether OKC can limit those looks will be one of the most interesting and significant questions of this series. Indiana's success on that front shouldn't have shocked anyone who watched the Pacers' run through the East. The play of the Indiana bench, however, was a pleasant surprise in Game 1. For all of the Thunder's star power, they were (and still are) so heavily favored in this series partly because of the perceived depth advantage they have. Few would argue that Cason Wallace (who started Game 1 but typically comes off the bench), Alex Caruso, Isaiah Joe and Aaron Wiggins give OKC one of the best bench units in the NBA. But in the series opener, the Indiana bench outscored OKC's 39-28 thanks to a 17-point night by Obi Toppin. The former Knick bounced back in a huge way after turning it over three times in the first quarter. He finished with five made 3-pointers and a game-high plus/minus of +13 in 25 minutes. Toppin played over 20 minutes just twice in the first 15 games of the playoffs. But dating back to Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals, he has now scored 35 total points over 50 minutes of action in Indiana's last two games on 13-for-20 FG shooting (7-for-12 3pt). NBA Finals Game 2 Best Bets: Will OKC Bounce Back? I'm going to resist the urge to take the Thunder to win big in this series until at least Game 3. Indiana is just too deep, and too well-coached, for me to rule out another fourth-quarter rally, even if OKC jumps out to a big lead. The Pacers were efficient when they weren't turning the ball over in Game 1. In fact, they finished with a much better assist rate than OKC (61.5 compared to 33.3 for OKC), and they also won the true shooting (60.8 percent to 50.7) and effective field goal percentage (58.5 to 45.4) battles convincingly. As concerning as it was for Indiana backers to see this team turn it over 19 times in the first half, the fact they only turned it over 5 times in the second half provided reason to believe they won't be overwhelmed by the Thunder's ball pressure throughout the series. The best Pacers vs. Thunder ATS bet tonight is the Thunder to start off hot and cover the first-half spread. I also like the Over, as I expect a faster pace tonight after the Pacers seemed to realize after halftime of Game 1 that shorter possessions were better for their chances of not only A) avoiding turnovers, but also B) generating quality looks. Thunder alt 1H -7.5 (-112 at FanDuel) -- 1 unit Over 228.5 (-110 at bet365) -- 1 unit Newsweek may earn an affiliate commission if you sign up through the links in this article. See the sportsbook operator's terms and conditions for important details. Sports betting operators have no influence over newsroom coverage.
