Israel's Ben-Gvir says he prayed at Al Aqsa mosque compound
Under a delicate decades-old "status quo" arrangement with Muslim authorities, the Al-Aqsa compound is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and Jews can visit but may not pray there.
Videos released by a small Jewish organisation called the Temple Mount Administration showed Ben-Gvir leading a group walking in the compound. Other videos circulating online appeared to show Ben-Gvir praying. Reuters could not immediately verify the content of the other videos.
The visit to the compound known to Jews as Temple Mount, took place on Tisha B'av, the fast day mourning the destruction of two ancient Jewish temples, which stood at the site centuries ago.
The Waqf, the foundation that administers the complex, said Ben-Gvir was among another 1,250 who ascended the site and who it said prayed, shouted and danced.
Israel's official position accepts the rules restricting non-Muslim prayer at the compound, Islam's third holiest site and the most sacred site in Judaism.
Ben-Gvir has visited the site in the past calling for Jewish prayer to be allowed there and prompting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to issue statements saying that this was not the policy of Israel.
Ben-Gvir said in a statement he prayed for Israel's victory over Palestinian militant group Hamas in the war in Gaza and for the return of Israeli hostages being held by militants there. He repeated his call for Israel to conquer the entire enclave.
The hillside compound, in Jerusalem's Old City, is one of the most sensitive locations in the Middle East.
Suggestions that Israel would alter rules at the compound have sparked outrage in the Muslim world and ignited violence in the past. There were no immediate reports of violence on Sunday.
A spokesperson for Palestinians President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Ben-Gvir's visit, which he said "crossed all red lines."
"The international community, specifically the U.S. administration, is required to intervene immediately to put an end to the crimes of the settlers and the provocations of the extreme right-wing government in Al Aqsa Mosque, stop the war on the Gaza Strip and bring in humanitarian aid," Nabil Abu Rudeineh said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Occupying Gaza would be a historic mistake for Israel
The Israeli media reports that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is about to push for Israel to occupy Gaza. This has been long in the offing. Some members of Netanyahu's government have, ever since the horrific terrorist atrocities on October 7 2023, talked about removing the entire population of Gaza and replacing them. An American plan – we don't know how serious – was to involve foreign occupation and the creation of an American-administered Mediterranean Riviera in Gaza. The leaders of the Israeli settler movement, meanwhile, have protested near the border with Gaza and demanded that they be permitted to settle the strip as they have settled in the West Bank. A groundswell of support in Israel – by no means a majority – considers the indefinite takeover of Gaza to be the only permanent solution to the war. I believe this is mistaken. Occupying Gaza is a terrible idea and would be a grave mistake if the Israeli government and Knesset agree to it. Occupation tends to create more problems than it solves; and it becomes an open wound, a staging post for all of a nation's domestic and foreign enemies. An occupation soon proves itself a point of vulnerability, not a demonstration of a nation's strength and resolve. It is no surprise that hundreds of retired Israeli security officials, including former heads of intelligence agencies, have recently issued a letter to Donald Trump and called on him to pressure Netanyahu to end the war rather than continue it indefinitely. Western countries know well the perils of occupation. After the September 11 attacks in 2001 – former president Joe Biden's favourite comparison for October 7 – the United States deposed the rulers of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam's Iraq and settled in for significant occupations of both countries. Initially at least, these were mounted with British and international help. In the realms of highest theory, these occupations might have borne fruit. The Afghan economy grew at a rate unseen since the 1970s. Infant mortality collapsed. The population doubled. The number of Afghans who were literate after twenty years without the Taliban in Kabul dwarfed the population who could read in 2001. Iraq nowadays is a very flawed democracy. Recent visitors to Baghdad tell me they cannot believe how prosperous and peaceful it seems. But the United States still lost those wars. It was still utterly humiliated and defeated. America, it turned out, simply wanted to rule Afghanistan less than the Taliban did, and to rule Iraq less than Iraq-based proxies with ties to Iran. There is no reason to think Israelis will be keener to rule Gaza in a decade than those who live there. Hamas's leadership has been devastated; the Palestinian Authority is led by 89-year-old Mahmoud Abbas. Some Israeli policymakers might see a vacuum there to be filled with good foreign governance. But this would be false. The truth is that, in the modern world, no matter your reasons and no matter what you think you are doing for the territories under your occupation, the resentment and unhappiness of those living there will win out. We cannot forget that Israel occupied Gaza from 1967 to 2005. When that occupation ended, Hamas came to power on a tide of grievance and threats. The only alternative to the same result would be not just be a forever war but a forever occupation – a permanent Afghanistan, an eternal Vietnam. Every issue with the food supply, with electricity and water, would become Israel's problem. So would every unnatural civilian death. Most countries would not wish the administration of Gaza upon their worst enemies. Israel's leaders would be better not to take it on willingly.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel's security cabinet expected to meet to sign off plans for expanded Gaza operation – Middle East crisis live
Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:42:45.000Z Title: Israel's security cabinet expected to meet tonight to sign off plans for expanded Gaza operation Content: Israel's security cabinet is expected to meet on Thursday evening and sign off on plans for an expanded operation despite reported serious misgivings from senior military officers. Yesterday, the Israeli military put parts of Gaza City and Khan Younis under new enforced displacement orders. The move comes amid fears that the country's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is preparing to order the full occupation of the Palestinian territory later this week. Israeli online newspaper, the Times of Israel, citing various Hebrew media reports, added that the cabinet is expected to approve 'a phased plan to conquer vast new areas of the Gaza Strip, potentially over five months, newly displacing around a million Palestinians'. Additionally, it would aim to destroy Hamas and pressure the group to release all remaining hostages, the publication reported. Public broadcaster Kan also reported that mediators Egypt and Qatar were pressuring Israel, via the US, not to implement the plan, while also urging Hamas to resume negotiations. In other developments: The humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to be very severe, an EU official told Reuters after the EU's foreign policy and humanitarian arms updated member countries late on Wednesday on the status of an agreement reached with Israel last month on boosting humanitarian access to Gaza. Israel's destruction of Gaza has left starving Palestinians with access to only 1.5% of cropland that is accessible and suitable for cultivation, according to new figures from the UN. This is down from 4% in April, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), suggesting Israel has continued to target Palestinian farmland since initiating a complete blockade in early March. On Wednesday, Gaza's health ministry reported that five more people had died from starvation in the coastal strip, which has been plunged into a devastating hunger crisis owing to Israel's complete block on aid entering earlier this year. Jordan reported, on Wednesday, that an aid convoy of 30 trucks that had left for Gaza had been attacked by militant Jewish settlers on entering Israel. After the attack, the second in days, Jordan accused Israel of failing to act to prevent repeated assaults. Naomi Klein and Angela Davis are among dozens of international scholars and writers who have signed a letter to the Guardian calling on the UK government to reverse the ban on Palestine Action. Signatories from major academic institutions around the world also say they are 'especially concerned' about the ban's possible impact on universities across Britain and beyond. The UK prime minister Keir Starmer has been urged by Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, to call Donald Trump to encourage him to use his influence to block Israel's plans for a 'full occupation' of Gaza. In a statement, Davey said: '[Israeli PM Benjamin] Netanyahu's latest proposals for the occupation of all of Gaza are utterly horrifying.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
EU assessment finds significant obstructive factors undermine humanitarian operations in Gaza
BRUSSELS, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to be very severe, an EU official told Reuters after the EU's foreign policy and humanitarian arms updated member countries late on Wednesday on the status of an agreement reached with Israel last month on boosting humanitarian access to Gaza. The official said on Thursday that there were some positive developments regarding fuel delivery, the reopening of some routes, and an upward trend in the number of daily trucks entering the enclave and the repair of some vital infrastructure. However, the official added that "significant obstructive factors continue to undermine humanitarian operations and aid delivery to Gaza, notably the lack of a safe operating environment to allow the distribution of aid at scale."
