Increased shark sightings may scare swimmers, but scientists say that's good news for conservation
That's why CBS News Miami went out on the water to learn why we see sharks so often and what it means for our ecosystem.
A shark reeled in miles off the coast of Fort Lauderdale in May and just weeks later, a little girl was bitten off the Gulf Coast. Shark stories are everywhere.
"The thing we like to say is that if you're in the water and it's salty, there's probably a shark nearby," said Catherine MacDonald, the director of the University of Miami's Shark Research and Conservation program.
For MacDonald and her team, that's exactly what they are hoping for.
This nurse shark was one of many they caught on their trip.
"We take a few small tissue samples, blood samples and measurements that we use to study the health of sharks here," she said.
Here in Biscayne Bay, it's a perfect place for researchers to monitor shark populations over the long term.
In 2024 alone, UM's Shark Research and Conservation program reeled in and tagged over 550 sharks. The bay is perfect for these species to have and raise their young, but it's changing.
"Because the estuary is warming 6.9 times faster than the ocean, there is reason to be concerned that, between human impact and warming, we may see this habitat become less good for them as time goes on," MacDonald.
For Delaney Reynolds, preserving this habitat is a calling and has been a longtime goal of hers.
"I went on my first shark tagging trip with the University of Miami in high school, and I knew the second I stepped on the boat that this was something I wanted to do," she said.
Reynolds has been doing that for years now as a PhD student at UM. She is seeing how the changing water is affecting the sharks.
From that first tagging trip to now this, Reynolds — now the teacher for current high school students — may be the future for these summer scholars taking part in their first shark tagging trip.
"You get an adrenaline feeling when they come on board, you get those lines in and it's exciting," said UM summer scholar Sam Lambert.
High school students come to South Florida from across the country to explore firsthand with the research team.
"We don't have an ocean in Chicago — we have a lake," said Camila Johnson, another summer scholar. "I wanted to explore the exotic wildlife [and] learn more."
Excitement was felt four times when three nurse sharks and a black tip shark were reeled in and tagged.
"Every time we see a shark, it's not the summer scholars that are excited but my team as well," MacDonald said.
So no matter what the species, the students and researchers like what they see today.
Researchers told CBS News Miami that the number of sharks here is mostly stable, or even increasing slightly, which is good news for South Florida's environment.
"Sharks being present in the ecosystem is a good sign for how well it is functioning and sharks being absent means there are more problems with the system itself, or it has become so damaged that sharks have moved," MacDonald said.
A good sign so far, but something these current and potential future scientists will continue to monitor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardized, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus,' the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost,' Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. 'It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day.' John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard,' she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
From one Dragon to another as SpaceX Crew-10 prepares to return to Earth
NASA astronaut Anne McClain and three of her colleagues are spending their last evening aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after a five-month stay in orbit. McClain, fellow NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers, Japanese astronaut Takuya Onishi of JAXA, and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov of Roscosmos, are part of SpaceX's Crew-10 and are set to return to Earth inside Crew Dragon Endurance shortly after midday on Thursday — assuming the weather conditions are suitable at the splashdown site off the coast of Florida. Recommended Videos McClain and her Crew-10 colleagues have spent the last week showing the ropes to Crew-11, who arrived aboard another Crew Dragon spacecraft. The American astronaut posted a striking image on X on Wednesday, taken from one of the Dragon spacecrafts and showing the other one, with Earth directly below and an aurora in the far distance. 'Dragon Endurance and Crew-10 are settled in for our last night aboard the Space Station,' McClain wrote in her post. 'When there are two crews aboard during handover, we get this unique view from the zenith-docked Dragon looking down at the forward-docked Dragon. Tomorrow, Crew-10 will strap ourselves into this Dragon and head home. But tonight, one more breathtaking view.' Dragon Endurance and Crew-10 are settled in for our last night aboard @Space_Station. When there are two crews aboard during handover, we get this unique view from the zenith-docked Dragon looking down at the forward-docked Dragon. Tomorrow, Crew-10 will strap ourselves into this… — COL Anne McClain (@AstroAnnimal) August 6, 2025 In another post on X, McClain said she found it hard to believe that her time in orbit was 'coming to a close already,' adding, 'What a great trip this has been.' In their five months aboard the ISS, Crew-10 spent much of their time conducting science research in microgravity. The work included an investigation into how radiation and gravity environments at different orbital altitudes affect plant growth — important for future long-duration crewed missions to deep space — and a look at how cells sense gravity, with the findings possibly leading to therapies for treating muscle and bone conditions. They also captured images of simultaneous lightning events at the top of two thunderstorms, with scientists using such data to study various weather conditions in Earth's upper atmosphere. The research can help to better protect communication systems and aircraft while improving atmospheric models and weather forecasts.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New ‘Vulcan' rocket to fly first military mission next week
United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rocket is scheduled to fly its first military space launch next week. Pending range approval, the mission is slated to lift off Aug. 12 from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, carrying Space Force satellites destined for geosynchronous orbit, about 22,000 miles above Earth. The milestone is a long time coming for ULA, the Defense Department's longtime launch provider, which started developing its Vulcan rocket in 2014. The vehicle — which is replacing the company's legacy workhorse, Atlas V — flew two demonstration missions last year and achieved its required military certification from the Space Force in March. ULA and SpaceX are the only companies with rockets certified to fly National Security Space Launch (NSSL) missions. For years, prior to the certification of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, ULA was the sole provider of military launch services. In 2020, SpaceX won a 40% share of those missions slated to fly between fiscal years 2022 and 2027 with ULA maintaining the remaining 60%. In April, the Space Force awarded SpaceX, ULA and national security launch newcomer Blue Origin a combined $13.5 billion for missions that will fly between fiscal years 2027 and 2032. Under the deal, SpaceX will receive $5.9 billion to fly 28 missions, ULA $5.3 billion to launch 19 and Blue Origin $2.3 billion to conduct seven. The Space Force mission set to fly on the rocket next week, USSF-106, was originally set to launch in 2022. After being rescheduled as a Vulcan mission in 2023, the satellites have been grounded for two years as the rocket faced delays. The mission includes an experimental spacecraft built by L3Harris called Navigation Technology Satellite-3, or NTS-3, that will demonstrate capabilities to augment the Space Force's GPS constellation or support a future program. That effort, led by the Air Force Research Laboratory in partnership with Space Systems Command, will test technologies like steerable beams to provide regional coverage, a reprogrammable payload that can receive upgrades in orbit and protections against signal jamming. Once NTS-3 is in orbit, AFRL will experiment with those capabilities over a one-year period, exploring how new satellite configurations could strengthen the Space Force's positioning, navigation and timing, or PNT, capabilities. That could mean integrating new capabilities onto the Space Force's GPS IIIF satellites, which are built by Lockheed Martin, and approaching initial production. The service may also funnel relevant technology into other positioning, navigation and timing programs, including an effort called Resilient GPS, which is meant to augment the larger constellation with a fleet of small, lightweight, lower-cost satellites. NTS-3 is the Air Force Research Laboratory's first major PNT demonstration in nearly a half century. The last NTS satellite flew in 1977 and proved out capabilities that ended up being integral to the GPS program. Solve the daily Crossword
