Tony Blair's staff attended meetings about barbarous ‘Gaza riviera' plan. That's too gross for satire
Donald Trump
posted a video to his social media accounts, an AI-generated depiction of a postwar
Gaza
, in which
Dubai
-style skyscrapers tower over palm-tree lined beaches, and superyachts glide through crystal blue coastal waters. The video was a kind of fever-dream emanation of the Trump id: a Vegas-style casino-hotel called 'Trump Gaza'; children, bathed in golden twilight sun, dancing on the beach as dollar bills rain down from the heavens; high end luxury cars; many golden statues of golden president himself.
And over it all a propulsive Eurodance track, likewise AI-generated, in which a voice rhythmically intones a series of Trumpian affirmations: 'No more tunnels, no more fear/Trump Gaza is finally here/Trump Gaza shining bright/Golden future, a brand new light/Feast and dance, the deal is done/Trump Gaza number one.'
With its queasily hyperrealist AI-slop aesthetic, its naked depiction of a programme of ethnic cleansing and its insistent repetition of Trump's graven image, the video amounted to a morbid document of our particular historical moment.
In recent days another, related, document has been brought to light, one which recalls the 'Trump Gaza' video in its vision for a postwar redevelopment of the Palestinian enclave. Last weekend, the
Financial Times published an investigative report
on a plan to build, out of the ruins of a destroyed Gaza, a Dubai-style dynamic trading and tourism hub; hundreds of thousands of Palestinians would be paid, via crypto tokens, to leave the enclave.
READ MORE
The plan is the work of a group of Israeli businessmen, with the involvement of the US consultancy company Boston Consulting Group (BCG). This is the organisation that helped establish the highly controversial and secretive Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which the Israeli government has contracted to run aid distribution centres in Gaza. The organisation has been condemned by the UN and humanitarian groups as running cover for the displacement of Palestinians. The
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
says more than 500 starving Palestinians have been killed near its aid distribution sites.
The development plan has been presented to the Trump administration for approval, and is clearly inspired by Trump's infamous proposal, announced off-the-cuff during a meeting with Binyamin Netanyahu last February, that the US would 'take over' Gaza and redevelop it into a 'riviera of the Middle East'.
[
'We'll own it': Trump's shocking plan to take over Gaza and displace two million Palestinians
Opens in new window
]
One notable aspect of the report is that the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), a neoliberal think tank founded by the former UK prime minister with funding from both the US State Department and the Saudi Arabian government, participated in meetings about the plan. (The FT reporters approached the Tony Blair Institute for comment, and were initially told the group had no involvement whatsoever in the preparation of the plan; when the reporters presented evidence that TBI staff were involved in discussions, a spokesperson said they were 'essentially in listening mode'.)
As a name, The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change – to give the think tank its full, inglorious title – has the feel of an overly broad satirical gesture. It's impossible to think of Blair, that is, without remembering the global change he instituted in fronting the invasion of Iraq, causing hundreds of thousands of deaths and ushering in an era of regional chaos whose consequences are still playing out.
Two TBI staff members reportedly participated in message groups and business calls on the project. 'One lengthy document on postwar Gaza, written by a TBI staff member, was shared within the group for consideration,' write the FT reporters. 'This included the idea of a 'Gaza Riviera' with artificial islands off the coast akin to those in Dubai, blockchain-based trade initiatives, a deep water port ... and low-tax 'special economic zones'.' The destruction of Gaza created, as the TBI document's authors put it, 'a once in a century opportunity to rebuild Gaza from first principles … as a secure, modern, prosperous society.'
The pitch deck laying out the plan contained such developments as 'The Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone', in what is now Beit Hanoun in the north of Gaza; a highway encircling the strip named 'The MBS Ring'; something called 'The American Data Safe Haven', in what is now Rafah, and 'the Gaza Trump Riviera & Islands', described as 'world class resorts along the coastline and on small artificial islands similar to the Palm Islands in Dubai'.
The slides are bedecked with the logos of corporations such as Tesla, Amazon Web Services, Ikea, and the IHG hotel group – companies the developers hope will be attracted to the new, ethnically cleansed and business-friendly Gaza, though there is no indication that the companies had any awareness of the project. The plan, the developers project, would 'increase the value of Gaza to [around] $324bn from $0 today.'
Out of all this emerges the form of a barbarous future, uncannily aligned with the blood-soaked history of Europe and its colonies. Its association with a former British prime minister is almost too on the nose. (The fact that that former PM is Blair, a man whose energy has somehow become even more ghoulish since he left electoral politics, feels entirely appropriate.) What we are seeing here cannot even properly be called neocolonialism, so naked is the exploitation, so grim the equation of stolen land and private wealth. It is really just good old fashioned original-style colonialism.
'There is no document of civilisation,' as Walter Benjamin famously put it, 'that is not at the same time a document of barbarism.' (Benjamin, a German Jew, wrote these words in Vichy France as he himself was fleeing a genocide; they were among the last he ever wrote.) He was referring primarily to those cultural artefacts whose creation and ownership is so often inextricable from violence and oppression – the Pyramids of Giza, the Colosseum of Rome, the entire contents and institutional history of the British Museum.
It's tempting to say that these documents imagining the future of Gaza – the AI video posted to Trump's social media, and the pitch for lucrative development of the enclave – are not documents of civilisation at all, but of barbarism alone. But it's the duality that is precisely the point. A document of barbarism is also a document of civilisation.
It seems unlikely that the Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone or the Gaza Trump Riviera and Islands will ever come to exist. Their construction would, in any case, surely necessitate an intensification of what is already a genocidal campaign against the Palestinian population. But the plan of which they are a part is itself a vital record of the endurance of the colonial imagination: a document of civilisation, written in blood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on starvation in Gaza: the world cannot look away
After 21 months of harrowing images from Gaza, photographs this week of emaciated children still have the power to shock. More than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have issued urgent warnings of mass starvation and called on governments worldwide to intervene. The United Nations and humanitarian agencies have warned that Gaza is on the brink of running out of specialised therapeutic food needed to save the lives of severely malnourished children. Meanwhile, Israeli forces continue to fire on Palestinian civilians who are desperately seeking food, killing hundreds. A fresh incursion by the Israel Defense Forces into central Gaza has wrought yet more destruction and death. Any prospect of an end to the violence remains elusive. Early hopes of a breakthrough in ceasefire talks, sparked by an initially positive Israeli response to the latest proposals from Hamas, were extinguished within hours when the US and Israel withdrew their negotiating teams from Qatar, saying Hamas was not acting in good faith. With reports of rising starvation in Gaza growing ever more urgent, a far-right minister in the Israeli government made a deeply disturbing statement on Thursday. Amichay Eliyahu declared that Israel had no duty to alleviate hunger in the territory and was actively seeking to expel its population. His chilling comparison that 'there is no nation that feeds its enemies' – adding that 'the British didn't feed the Nazis, nor did the Americans feed the Japanese' – displays a disregard for Palestinian lives as well as being a gross misrepresentation of the nature of the current conflict. READ MORE As an occupying power with total control over Gaza's entry points and overwhelming military dominance over its civilian population, Israel bears clear responsibility for what is happening there. Although Israeli military officials denied that Eliyahu's statements reflected their strategy in Gaza, Binyamin Netanyahu's government declined to rebut them. The contempt for human rights expressed by the minister lends credence to accusations that Israel is engaged in systematic war crimes and crimes against humanity. In a notable development on Friday, French president Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The decision was predictably condemned by the American and Israeli governments. But, coming from a major power, it marks a significant shift. Taoiseach Micheál Martin was correct, however, when he said last month that the inability of EU member states to come to a unified position on the issue was a 'stain' on the union. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza demands immediate action. The silence of some world leaders is dangerously close to complicity. It is no longer sustainable.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on handling Donald Trump: a lesson on how to respond
For Donald Trump, the truth, more often than not, is beside the point. So powerful is the US president, and so accustomed are his interlocutors to his casual relationship with facts, that he is rarely challenge as he makes his long and rambling public pronouncements. So it was refreshing to see Jerome Powell, the chair of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve Board, shake his head and publicly correct the record in real time as he stood alongside the president at an event on Thursday. The backdrop was a lengthy campaign by Trump to force the Fed to lower interest rates and his outspoken attempts to try to get Powell to quit. As part of this campaign, the administration has weaponised a renovation programme at the Fed, which it claims is running way over budget. Standing beside Powell in his hard hat, Trump theatrically produced a piece of paper which he said showed that the $2.7 billion bill was now set to be $3.1 billion. Powell calmly studied the note and pointed out that this included the cost of another building that was already completed. 'It's a building that's being built, ' Trump responded. 'No, it was built five years ago,' said Powell. The exchange underlined how seldom Trump's 'facts' are challenged in public by those around him. Everyone wants to humour the unpredictable president. The irony is complete when he publishes posts on his 'Truth Social' channel, a name which carries echoes of the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's 1984. READ MORE World leaders face the same dilemma as Powell did when they stand beside Trump. Most choose to grin and bear it. This is what the EU appears to have done in trade talks with the US, as they face Trump's chaotic mixture of fact and fiction. As the talks come to another crunch – and with the need for support on the Ukraine war in the background – the EU may concede Trump's call for 15 per cent tariffs. When you lead the world's biggest economic and military power, sometimes you get to choose your own facts. A quiet-spoken bureaucrat just gave the world a lesson in how best to respond.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump and von der Leyen to meet in effort to land trade deal
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and United States President Donald Trump are to meet in Scotland on Sunday, in an effort to get a deal on tariffs over the line. The planned meeting followed a phone call between the head of the EU's executive and the US president, after several days of intense negotiations between officials to hammer out an agreement that would head off a trade war. 'We have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations and how we can keep them strong,' Dr von der Leyen said in a post on X. EU negotiators have been pushing to finalise a deal that would avert higher rates of import duties which Mr Trump has threatened on goods coming from Europe. READ MORE Speaking before departing for a golf trip to Scotland, Mr Trump said there was a '50-50″ chance a deal would be agreed. 'I would say that we have a 50-50 chance, maybe less than that, but a 50-50 chance of making a deal with the EU,' Mr Trump told reporters on Friday. The US president said negotiators from both sides were working 'closely' together. 'I think the EU has got a pretty good chance of making a deal,' Mr Trump said. The current outline of a draft agreement would see the EU accept blanket tariffs of 15 per cent on future trade with the US, up from a 10 per cent levy Mr Trump introduced in early April. Speaking earlier on Friday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said an EU-US tariff deal would 'hopefully be signed off before the weekend is over.' Work was continuing to get a 'framework agreement' over the line, which would comprise the broad outline of a tariff deal, allowing further details to be worked out later. [ What would a 15% tariff deal mean for Ireland? Opens in new window ] 'We're certain there will be detailed discussions afterwards in respect of line by line, in terms of many, many products. And so this will continue notwithstanding a framework agreement, [which] hopefully will be signed off before the weekend is over,' he said. 'Part of the reason for the intensity of those negotiations is to try and tie up as much as we can,' he said. The current outline of a draft agreement would see the EU accept blanket tariffs of 15 per cent on future trade with the US, up from a 10 per cent levy Mr Trump introduced in early April. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 The European Commission, the EU's executive arm leading the negotiations, wants any future tariffs on pharmaceuticals to be capped at that level. The EU is also seeking to have higher 25 per cent tariffs the US has put on EU-made cars to be reduced to that rate. National governments appear willing to stomach an across-the-board tariff of 15 per cent, to end the uncertainty Mr Trump's threats of potentially much higher levies has caused the European economy, or an escalating trade war if no deal is agreed. 'There has been a degree of volatility in all of this, which has been unsettling for investment and that's a concern I have,' Mr Martin said. The EU wanted to secure some 'certainty' around US tariffs targeting specific sectors, outside of the blanket rate, he said. The EU was not anxious to have to turn to possible retaliation, such as counter-tariffs on US products, he said. Speaking in Luxembourg, the Fianna Fáil leader said he hoped 'sense will prevail' in the ongoing negotiations concerning pharmaceutical products. The sector has avoided US tariffs to date, though Mr Trump previously promised they are coming in a bid to force companies to relocate manufacturing capacity and jobs to the US. Getting a deal on pharma products was 'of equal significance' to the US side, he said. Any 'significant disruption' of the heavily intertwined pharma supply chains would be damaging to the US, and potentially lead to shortages of medicines, Mr Martin said. Access to the European market had been of huge benefit to US pharma multinationals, he said. 'It's a two-way street ... unilateral action on the part of one [side] could ultimately damage the companies themselves and patients and consumers,' he said. Europe had to look at what it could do to increase trade within the bloc, to compensate for the knock-on impact of US tariffs on transatlantic trade, he said.
