In a big bill that hurts clean energy, residential solar likely to get hit fast
'(The changes) would almost certainly include the loss of jobs on our team,' wrote Will Etheridge, CEO of Southern Energy Management in Raleigh. 'I'm telling you that because you deserve transparency and the truth — even if that truth is uncomfortable.'
The bill now in the House takes an ax to clean energy incentives, including killing a 30% tax credit for rooftop residential solar by the end of the year that the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act had extended into the next decade. Trump has called the clean energy tax credits in the climate law part of a 'green new scam' that improperly shifts taxpayer subsidies to help the 'globalist climate agenda' and energy sources like wind and solar.
Businesses and analysts say the GOP-backed bill will likely reverse the sector's growth and eliminate jobs.
'The residential solar industry is going to be absolutely creamed by this,' said Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, a business group that advocates for pro-environment policies.
President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' takes aim at renewables broadly, including phasing out tax credits enjoyed by utility-scale solar and wind. But cutting the residential solar credit will happen sooner.
Companies have announced more than $20 billion in clean-energy investments in North Carolina in recent years. Etheridge, whose company installs solar panels and helps ensure buildings are energy efficient, was among many in the sector to lobby Republican U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina for changes in the bill.
Tillis ultimately was one of three Republicans to vote against the measure, but in a sign of Trump's power over legislators to pass it, Tillis said he wouldn't seek reelection after Trump said he'd likely support a primary challenger.
Now, Etheridge says losing the tax credit will likely mean laying off 50 to 55 of his workers. He called the elimination of residential tax credits a 'bait and switch.'
'I made a decision from being an employee to taking out a loan from my grandmother to buy into my business and put my house on the line' in part because of the stability of the tax credits, he said. He said he'll scramble now to figure out ways to diversify his business.
'If you require a money-spigot from Washington to make your business viable, it probably shouldn't have been in business in the first place,' said Adam Michel, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
Michel said he doubted many clean energy companies would go out of business, but 'I think that they will be right sized for the market and that the people that are employed with them will find better jobs and more stable jobs in industries that are actually viable and don't require billions of dollars of federal subsidies.'
Even ahead of debate over the bill, experts at E2 said in May that $14 billion in clean energy investments across the country had been postponed or cancelled this year.
The bill the Senate passed Tuesday removes a tax on some wind and solar projects that was proposed in a previous version and gives utility-scale projects some time to begin construction before phasing out those tax credits.
Karl Stupka, president of Raleigh-based NC Solar Now that employs about 100 people, said the Senate's bill eased the impact on commercial projects 'while destroying the residential portion of the tax credits.' Roughly 85% of his business is residential work.
'They took it away from every average American normal person and gave it to the wealthier business owners,' he said.
Stupka said if the bill becomes law, companies will rush to finish as many solar jobs as they can before the credit ends. He expected to lay off half his employees, with 'trickle-down' job losses elsewhere.
'It would cause a pretty severe shock wave,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Traders Say It's Time to Buy the Dip in Momentum Stocks
(Bloomberg) -- Sharp losses in high-flying momentum stocks may present a dip-buying opportunity if history is any guide, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s trading desk. The traders cited rebounds after similar prior losses in Goldman's High Beta Momentum basket, coupled with the current technical setup. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan When the long-short momentum basket dropped 10% or more over a five-day span in the past, it proceeded to rise in the following week 80% of the time, the traders wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday. The median return was 4.5% in the next week and more than 11% in the next month. The sudden unwind in the momentum strategy, which focuses on buying recent winners and selling short those that are lagging behind, first came amid a rally in the basket's stocks meant to be shorted. But its declines this week were powered more by losses in the long leg of the basket 'as themes such as AI feel the pain of this rotation,' Goldman's traders wrote. The basket fell 13% from Aug. 6 through Aug. 19 after trading near an all-time high. The traders also parsed through technical charts for clues on what could stop the selloff in the momentum trade. The momentum basket is trading near an oversold territory and is approaching the bottom of its so-called regression channel, which is basically the lower boundary of an existing trend. The basket also fell below its 200-day moving average, the level that could serve as a major support. 'It could be a good entry point into the historically rewarded factor, unless tech earnings next week drive a prolonged AI selloff,' Goldman's traders wrote. Nvidia Corp., the biggest member in both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indexes, is scheduled to release its quarterly results on Aug. 27. Some of the stock market's biggest losers in the past three days include Palantir Technologies Inc., which fell 12%, and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Super Micro Computer Inc., which lost 6% or more. Nvidia fell just 2.8% during that time, but its heavy weighting in benchmark indexes made it a drag on the market. Those stocks 'were among the year's most crowded trades, built on optimism toward AI and speculative momentum, making them vulnerable to swift reversals,' Chris Murphy, co-head of derivatives strategy at Susquehanna International Group, wrote in a note. The selloff in the momentum factor, which includes high-flying AI stocks on the long side of the basket, comes amid a variety of concerns in the market including soaring valuations, stretched positioning and increasing competition from China. The Nasdaq 100 Index is trading at 27 times expected 12-month profits, almost a third above its long-term average. Meanwhile, China's warnings to tech firms to avoid one of Nvidia's chips and a drop in cloud-computing company CoreWeave Inc.'s shares after its earnings report were among other recent headwinds to momentum stocks. Another source of concern for tech investors cropped up this week as a Massachusetts Institute of Technology report found that most generative AI initiatives implemented to drive revenue growth are falling flat and only 5% of generative AI pilots are delivering profit. Still, this isn't the only stumble for Goldman's High-Beta Momentum basket this year: This is its fourth retreat of more than 10% in 2025. 'The recent decline in momentum is indicative of how the factor has been trading all year. It's been a frustrating and choppy trade through all of 2025,' said Bloomberg Intelligence's Christopher Cain. 'While the recent decline could be a tactical opportunity, we also point out that that high momentum stocks are showing some of the most expensive valuations compared to low momentum in history.' Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
President Putin Must Return Ukraine's Children
Last week's much-hyped Trump–Putin summit ended in a cloud of deliberate vagueness: no communiqué, no substantive briefing, no clear commitments. Monday's meeting in the White House with President Volodymyr Zelensky along with some of our most powerful European leaders was far more promising, but time will tell if peace between Russia and Ukraine is possible in the near future. That makes this precisely the moment for Vladimir Putin to demonstrate that he is serious about ending the war in Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, imagine if the Russian leader were to announce not only a commitment to peace but also an unconditional pledge to return the 20,000 Ukrainian children his forces have illegally abducted since the full-scale invasion of February 2022. And while reporting on the meeting in Alaska made little mention of the illegally abducted children, demands that they be located and returned to Ukraine have been unwavering and essentially universal, crossing the political spectrum in the U.S. from Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) to Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa); from Representatives Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) to Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Just this month, a coalition of 38 countries plus the Council of Europe issued a powerful statement calling on the Russian Federation to "facilitate the return of all unlawfully deported and forcibly transferred Ukrainian children." The fate of these children, dispersed and unable to communicate with their families in Ukraine, is deeply disturbing to me, as a pediatrician—and especially as a parent and grandparent. Most of the older children have been sent to so-called re-education camps scattered throughout Russia, where they are subjected to relentless propaganda aimed at erasing their Ukrainian identity. Younger children have been placed with Russian families, renamed, stripped of their language, and put on a path toward permanent adoption. These acts are not only morally reprehensible but also flagrant violations of international law. That is why, in March 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Putin, charging him with war crimes, including the deportation of children. Having traveled to Ukraine multiple times, representing our organization, the Ukraine Children's Action Project, my wife, Karen Redlener, and I have witnessed firsthand the heartbreak of these abductions. The knowledge that tens of thousands of children have been stolen deepens despair for parents across Ukraine. A credible promise to bring them home could help make the idea of other sacrifices during peace negotiations less intolerable for Ukrainians. Meanwhile, the slow grind of lethal combat and unrelenting attacks on civilian targets have left the most vulnerable—the elderly, people with disabilities, and especially children—bearing the heaviest burdens. Children in particular have endured devastating losses. At least 2,500 have been killed or injured. At least 1.5 million children are now at risk of developing mental health problems. Some 2 million school-age children have had their education upended. And beyond the numbers lies the loss of normalcy: classrooms, friendships, sports, the arts—the everyday fabric of childhood is disrupted by war. During war, children dash to bomb shelters at school, study by candlelight when power fails, use tablets and cell phones when schools have been destroyed, stay indoors for safety, watch their parents grieve the loss of loved ones, and, in the frontline communities, they prepare to flee advancing enemy troops at any hour of the day or night. No child should live like this. And there must be no ambiguity: A credible peace agreement requires the unconditional return of every abducted child. Anything less would legitimize kidnapping as an instrument of war and set a grotesque precedent. To allow these children to remain in Russia under the guise of "integration" or being assimilated into "new families" would make world leaders complicit in cultural erasure on a staggering scale. Some may argue that this demand could complicate peace talks. That is precisely the point. If the futures of stolen children are negotiable, then the peace being crafted is already corrupt. The United States, Europe, and every nation that claims to stand for law and justice must continue to insist on the return of abducted children as a nonnegotiable precondition for any settlement. Ukraine can rebuild its cities, its infrastructure, and its economy. What it cannot do is reclaim the lives lost or undo the profound scars left on its youngest generation. Putin must return Ukraine's children. This may be his best shot at convincing the world that he is serious about ending a war that has already cost too many young lives—Russia and Ukraine's alike. Dr. Irwin Redlener is the co-founder of the Ukraine Children's Action Project, The Children's Health Fund, and is on the faculties of Columbia University and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Zelenskyy says he wants 'strong' US reaction if Putin not ready to meet
KYIV, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv would like a "strong reaction" from Washington if Russian President Vladimir Putin was not willing to sit down for a bilateral meeting with him. President Donald Trump is seeking to broker peace between the two warring countries but has conceded that Putin, with whom Zelenskyy has sought a one-on-one sitdown, may not be willing to make a deal. "I responded immediately to the proposal for a bilateral meeting: we are ready. But what if the Russians are not ready?" Zelenskyy said in comments released on Thursday from a briefing with reporters in Kyiv a day earlier. "If the Russians are not ready, we would like to see a strong reaction from the United States." More: Ukraine's Zelenskyy avoids Trump mauling at White House. Will he get Putin meeting? Despite a flurry of diplomacy in recent days between Trump and his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, the path to peace remained uncertain as Washington and allies worked out what security guarantees for Kyiv might look like. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and now holds just under 20% of its neighbour, making gradual advances in the east of late though the conflict has become largely attritional. Zelenskyy said it was unclear what concessions regarding territory Moscow was willing to make to end the war. Trump has previously said Kyiv and Moscow will both need to cede land. "To discuss what Ukraine is willing to do, let's first hear what Russia is willing to do," Zelenskyy said. "We do not know that." More: Amid Putin, Zelenskyy talks, several Trump approval polls dropped. Here's what they say. Responding to a question about the Hungarian capital Budapest serving as a potential location for future Ukrainian-Russian talks, Zelenskyy said it would be "challenging". Hungary, Russia's closest ally in the European Union, has twice offered to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Thursday. (Reporting by Anastasiia Malenko and Yuliia Dysa; writing by Dan Peleschuk; editing by William Maclean and Mark Heinrich)
