
EU ignores ‘shocking' treatment of Moldovan church
Brussels is turning a blind eye to the treatment of the Moldovan Orthodox Church by the pro-EU government in Chisinau, Marina Tauber, a senior opposition MP, has told RT.
Her comments came after Moldova's border police blocked Marchel, the Bishop of Balti and Falesti, from departing the country to attend Easter celebrations in Jerusalem.
Marchel was due to participate in the Holy Fire ritual at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, traditionally held around midday on Holy Saturday. Police stopped him at Chisinau Airport on Thursday under the pretext of a routine search and withheld his passport until after the plane had departed. According to the cleric, airport police singled him out again on Friday, causing him to miss a second flight.
Ilona Railean, a Border Police spokeswoman, said the bishop had arrived late and was subjected to 'standard processing procedures.' Marchel accused the authorities of lying.
Tauber, the executive secretary of the opposition coalition Pobeda – Victorie, told RT on Friday that she was 'shocked' by the bishop's treatment. 'It's an outrageous situation,' she said, arguing that the authorities had failed to properly explain their actions.'We have never thought that something like this could happen to a clergyman on such sacred days.'
Moldova, a former Soviet republic, is home to two branches of the Orthodox Church: the Moldovan Orthodox Church, a self-governing arm of the Russian Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarchate, and the Metropolis of Bessarabia, aligned with the Romanian Orthodox Church.
Tauber accused Moldova's pro-EU president, Maia Sandu, of repressing the Moscow-affiliated church. 'What is Maia Sandu doing? She is trying to put pressure on our church and our religion,' she said.
'It is very surprising that the European Union is not reacting to what their representatives in Moldova are doing,' she added. 'Brussels is remaining silent.'
'We definitely need to think about what to do [next], because this has happened – and tomorrow, they [may] dictate which temple to go to, which faith is right, and which faith is wrong,' she said.
Moldova's former president, Igor Dodon, described the treatment of Marchel as 'an act of terror against our Orthodox faith,' claiming it was an 'act of revenge' against the bishop, a vocal critic of Sandu.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU allows members to spend Covid cash on arming Kiev
The European Commission has allowed member states to redirect funds they have struggled to claim from the joint pandemic recovery pot for national development projects into bloc-wide security and defense initiatives – with significantly less oversight and fewer bureaucratic hurdles. The EU established the €650 billion ($740 billion) Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) in 2021 to support green energy and growth-oriented projects in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. However, to receive the funds, member states must prove their projects meet specific benchmarks. Roughly half of the fund remains unspent, with the deadline to 'provide evidence' looming in September 2026, according to the Commission's communique on Wednesday. In order to 'easily secure' their share of the remaining funds before time runs out, countries can now instead channel RRF-backed money into various security programs, such as the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) or satellite communications initiatives, Politico reported on Wednesday. 'These alternatives could help the Recovery Facility to deliver additional important benefits from common European priorities, including in the areas of security and defense,' EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis said. The Commission's memo claimed that 'specific projects would subsequently be selected and supported under EDIP, for the benefit of the Member State concerned, with implementation occurring over a longer time horizon.' Kiev is specifically listed as one of the main beneficiaries of EDIP, an initiative designed to subsidize the bloc's defense industry and enhance 'joint procurement with and for Ukraine,' according to an EC factsheet. Originally a €1.5 billion program, EDIP also aims to 'use windfall profits from frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine.' Brussels has spent almost €50 billion supporting Kiev through various EU programs since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, in addition to billions contributed by individual member states, according to data from Germany's Kiel Institute. In March, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen presented a plan to mobilize up to €800 billion ($875 billion) in debt and tax incentives for the military-industrial complex to 'rearm' the bloc against the perceived 'Russian threat.' Last month, the Council of the European Union endorsed a €150 billion ($170 billion) militarization plan, dubbed SAFE (Security Action for Europe), to raise funds for military purposes without direct approval from the European Parliament. Russia has repeatedly dismissed claims it plans to attack Western Europe as 'nonsense,' accusing the West of using scare tactics to justify diverting public funds toward military spending. Moscow has warned that foreign involvement—including arms deliveries—will obstruct peace efforts and ultimately fail to stop Russia from achieving its military objectives. The Kremlin has also criticized the EU's militarization drive, warning it risks triggering a broader conflict in Europe.


Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
NATO summit to avoid Ukraine membership issue
NATO leaders convening for a key summit this month will deliberately avoid discussing membership for Ukraine, AFP reported on Wednesday, citing sources. The bloc's members are reportedly wary of raising the issue due to fears it could exacerbate tensions between the EU and US. Members of the US-led military bloc are highly likely to 'steer clear of its previous strong statements that Ukraine is on course to join the alliance' when the summit takes place in The Hague in late June, the agency said. One diplomatic source told AFP that the final declaration is expected to omit any mention of Ukrainian membership to maintain unity among member states. 'There will be nothing on that,' a NATO diplomat said. 'My expectation is we will be absolutely silent.' US President Donald Trump has expressed firm opposition to Ukraine's bid to join NATO. In February, he suggested that Ukraine 'can forget about NATO,' adding that Kiev's bid was 'probably the reason the whole thing started,' referring to the conflict with Russia. Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky is still expected to be present at the summit, but any formal talks between the bloc and Kiev are unlikely, AFP said. 'It will be a PR disaster if he's not there,' another diplomat told the agency. While NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has insisted that Ukraine remains a priority issue at the summit, AFP sources have painted a different picture. They suggested that the overwhelming emphasis will be on trying to satisfy Trump's demands that member states drastically ramp up their defense spending. It 'is the most important part and no one wants to jeopardize that,' the agency's source said. Russia has stated that NATO membership for Ukraine is a red line and one of the key reasons for the conflict, insisting that Ukraine adopt a neutral status as a key condition for a lasting peace. While Trump administration officials have described NATO membership as 'a bridge too far,' Kiev has refused to commit to neutrality or to refraining from hosting foreign troops on its soil, which Moscow also considers to be a red line.


Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Man arrested in EU state for providing Russian TV access
Latvian police have arrested a man accused of providing access to banned Russian television channels to more than 400 households across the country, according to local media reports. The 42-year-old technician is reportedly suspected of setting up a system that bypassed content protection technologies, allowing viewers to watch banned Russian channels that supposedly spread propaganda. The man allegedly created a scheme to share television signal access cards, enabling multiple households to use a single valid code, reported on Tuesday. The arrest took place at the end of May following a State Police investigation. If convicted, the suspect could face up to three years in prison, community service, or a fine. The European Commission barred several Russia-linked media outlets from operating in EU member states after the Ukraine conflict escalated in February 2022, accusing them of spreading propaganda. Sharing content from these outlets is also prohibited under EU law. Latvia, a former Soviet republic, has ramped up efforts to limit Russian influence, aligning closely with neighbors Estonia and Lithuania. All three Baltic states, which are among Kiev's strongest backers, have introduced broad restrictions on Russian nationals, including travel bans and mandatory language tests. In February, the Latvian parliament gave initial approval to a draft law that would prohibit citizens of Russia from acquiring real estate in the country. Russia has criticized the measures as part of an information war and accused the Baltic states of stifling dissent and discriminating against its Russian-speaking minorities. Ethnic Russians account for roughly a quarter of Latvia's 1.8 million population, according to official data. Latvia has seen a rise in arrests linked to providing access to Russian media. In April 2024, police raided border areas to block the broadcast of banned Russian channels. In November, another man was detained for installing equipment that enabled access to prohibited content for around 130 households. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova recently accused the Latvian authorities of 'blatant discrimination against Russians,' claiming many of their policies were openly Russophobic. She said anti-Russian sentiment had 'reached a new high' in the Baltics in recent years and warned that Latvia in particular could be brought to account at the International Court of Justice if it continued such practices.