
Where is scrutiny of UK's nuclear submarine plans?
This scrutiny is especially necessary given that the Pentagon this week announced a review of its commitment to the agreement, raising questions about whether the billions of pounds committed by the UK Government are destined for the drain.
The Aukus agreement's main aim is the material support of the Australian Navy in the Indo-Pacific, primarily by providing it with eight nuclear-powered submarines of the kind announced in the SDR. This means several of the 12 nuclear submarines will probably end up lurking around in the South China Sea, contributing nothing to the defence of the UK and raising regional tensions.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn says police 'picked on him' as Gaza protest case dropped
No mainstream journalist or news organisation has questioned the Government over whether this is a sensible use of public resources or even a rational 'defence' strategy in any meaningful sense of the word.
There has been no coverage of the fact the Government's watchdog the Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) recently declared the manufacture of nuclear reactors to power the new Dreadnought submarines 'unachievable'. It gave the nuclear reactor project its lowest rating of 'red' in January of this year, as reported by The Ferret in February.
While the IPA assessment rated the delivery of the new Aukus-class submarines as 'amber' ('facing significant issues requiring management attention'), it is widely assumed that the same nuclear reactors will power both the prospective nuclear-armed Dreadnought and Aukus submarines.
In short, the Government's own infrastructure office just this year assessed that an indispensable component of all these submarines is not deliverable. This was hardly given a moment's airtime during the media furore on the SDR.
(Image: PA)
This alone is a serious indictment of Britain's elite journalists and indicates that their role has not been to question the Government's obscene military spending plans but rather to promote them. It therefore falls to citizens and civil society to raise the questions over serious doubts about the Government's costly nuclear plans.
The Pentagon's review of its commitment to Aukus to determine if it aligns with the new administration's 'America First' agenda carries a weight of irony. Less than two weeks ago, UK Defence Secretary John Healey was espousing the supposed great benefits of the 'special relationship' with the US in terms of military co-operation and trade.
Wednesday's development highlights just how little the UK gains from obsequiously aligning with US geopolitical interests, such as attempting to corral China in the Indo-Pacific.
The unreliability of this relationship should compel a total reassessment of the predominant ideology about UK security, which currently prioritises being an arm of the US military in far-flung corners of the world over genuine domestic security.
UK CND recently published an Alternative Defence, focusing on strengthening domestic social investment and a programme for common international security. The full report is on the UK CND website.
The UK Government's irrational and incoherent military spending plans come at a time when the current generation of submarines based at Faslane are in an increasingly atrocious state of disrepair. Serious radioactive risk incidents at the naval base are increasing.
The Vanguard nuclear-armed submarines are going on record-long assignments while their substitutes sit rusting in the repair docks. Crew are likely enduring awful conditions during six-month stints underwater, with some reports saying they ran out of food during the last assignment.
Meanwhile, the Dreadnoughts that will supposedly replace these ailing vessels are unlikely to enter service for 10 years at least – if the reactors to power them can be built at all.
The UK's nuclear superpower farce is unsustainable and a disaster waiting to happen. Those of us who understand this in Scotland must support the parties which oppose nuclear weapons in the run-up to the 2026 election, and keep up the pressure on Scottish parliamentarians to support the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
Samuel Rafanell-Williams is Scottish CND's communications officer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
12 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Scots benefitting from 'economic strength' of UK as public spending remains higher north of the Border
The annual GERs report warned overall public finances in Scotland are "weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue". Scotland continues to enjoy higher spending on public services than other parts of the UK, an annual assesment of the nation's finances has found. The Government Expenditure and Revenue (GERS) figures for 2024-25 show Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head of additional spending compared to the UK average. But it also warned "overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. The report is published by economists at the Scottish Government every August and is meant to enhance public understanding of fiscal issues north of the Border. The figures are regularly seized upon by both pro-UK and pro-independence supporters to justify their respective stances on the constitution. Last year, £91.4 billion in tax receipts was raised in Scotland through devolved and reserved taxation - compared to £117.6 billion in public spending. That works out to eight per cent of UK revenue and nine per cent of spending. The figures also reveal the country's notional deficit, or net fiscal balance, grew to around £26.5 billion, or 11.7 per cent of GDP, more than double the UK deficit of 5.1 per cent of GDP. This is an increase of £5.1 billion on the previous year. Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, said the figures proved the SNP's desire for full fiscal autonomy - which would hand Holyrood full powers of taxation - would cause "turbo-charged austerity". "These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK," he said. "By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. It also means that Devolved Governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions. "That means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas. People in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes. "These figures also underline that the Scottish Government's policy of full fiscal autonomy would mean turbo-charged austerity and economic chaos for Scotland. That's why the UK Government will stand up for the pooling and sharing resources across the UK as part of our Plan for Change - to grow the economy and put more money in working people's pockets." Shona Robison, the SNP Finance Secretary, said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East." However, the veteran Nationalist added: "Being taken out of the EU, against the will of the people of Scotland, has also hit Scotland's revenues by £2.3 billion and the higher cost of UK Government debt adds £500 million to the deficit. 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security."


Daily Mirror
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Pensioners being sent DWP letter in post over £150 cost of living payments
The Warm Home Discount is a one-off payment of £150 to help with energy bills over the winter months - and the DWP will be sending letters to those who are eligible Low-income state pensioners may soon receive letters confirming an extra payment to support their cost of living - but only those who are eligible will receive the payment. Energy companies are set to apply the Warm Home Discount to over six million qualifying households, including those on the Guarantee Credit portion of Pension Credit and Universal Credit recipients. The discount, which reduces energy bills by a one-off £150 during the winter months, typically applies between November and March, enabling low-income households to make significant savings on energy costs. In other news, Martin Lewis warns 'nothing to do with me' after complaints from money savers. DWP Universal Credit eligibility rules in full as one million more people now claim British Gas recently informed customers that the Government would be writing to eligible individuals to explain the process, reports Birmingham Live. They stated: "If you qualify for the winter 2025/26 payment, you will have your one-off £150 discount applied between November 2025-March 31, 2026 at the latest, with most customers receiving their WHD before January 26." "The Government website has specific details about which benefits qualify and who could receive the discount. In England and Wales the Government will write to you to confirm if you are eligible," it continued. READ MORE: Millions urged to check name on energy bill before deadline to get £150 This year, the discount is being expanded to assist around three million more homes on Universal Credit and certain other benefits. British Gas added: "The discount will be added to your electricity account as a credit. And if you're on pay as you go, we'll send you a voucher you can use to top up your meter at a Post Office." "If you're one of our Pay As You Go smart meter customers, we'll even send it directly to your meter as a credit and send you an email to let you know it's on there." Who is eligible? If you live in England and Wales: If you receive the Guarantee Credit element of Pension Credit If you are on a low income and have high energy costs If you live in Scotland: If you receive the Guarantee Credit element of Pension Credit If you are on a low income in Scotland and meet your energy supplier's criteria for the scheme Unfortunately, the Warm Home Discount scheme isn't available in Northern Ireland. For other alternatives, click here to find out about the Affordable Warmth scheme.


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Military sees a surge in female recruits under Trump's presidency
The Pentagon has seen a surge in female military recruits this fiscal year. Recruitment figures show that nearly 24,000 women have enlisted since the start of FY2025, a Department of Defense official confirmed to the Daily Mail. That's up from 16,725 female recruits during the same period the prior fiscal year, representing over a 30 percent increase year-over-year, according to Fox News. The dramatic increase in female recruits comes after the Army announced it exceeded its recruitment goals in June with months to spare. The branch announced at the time it had contracted over 61,000 recruits, a 10 percent increase from the 2024 recruitment target of 55,000. A Pentagon official celebrated the recruitment and praised Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's (pictured) leadership. 'The media's narrative that the female recruitment numbers have either fallen or stayed the same under Secretary Hegseth and President Trump is 100% Fake News,' a Pentagon official told Fox News. 'Leadership matters and women are excited to serve under the strong leadership of Secretary Hegseth and President Trump.' The Pentagon did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment. A Pentagon survey found this year that three out of four of potential recruits were worried about physical injuries that could result from joining the military. Two thirds of the respondents expressed concern over the emotional impacts of enlisting. Recent Defense Department polls show that just 11 percent of American youth have a propensity to serve, according to the Pentagon. The increase in signed contracts is welcome news for the Pentagon after it has warned for years that American youth are increasingly less inclined to join the armed services. 'Just about a year ago, it was a big story, front page of every paper all over the world, that nobody wanted to enlist in our military,' Trump said in May. 'After years of military recruiting shortfalls, enlistments in the U.S. armed forces are now the highest in 30 years because there is such an incredible spirit in the United States of America,' Trump added. The military did not actually hit record lows during President Joe Biden's tenure, but armed service recruitment during the last administration did fail on several occasions to hit expected goals. Recruitment has remained an issue in recent years. Upon his arrival, Hegseth vowed to return the 'warrior ethos' to the Pentagon and so far he claims it is helping the department pad its numbers. 'They call it the "Trump Bump,"' Hegseth has said about the increase in recruitment. 'It's the commander-in-chief first and foremost. He's got the backs of our war fighters and they know it. And so, the young men and women of America are prepared to stand up,' the defense secretary said in May. Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna (pictured), a Air Force veteran, also praised the president and Hegseth for 'empowering women who want to serve.' 'There's a reason why female service member recruitment is at all-time high. As a former United States Air Force veteran, I can tell you that overall morale, the commander-in-chief, and his chosen leadership at the Pentagon make a huge difference, especially in recruitment and retention,' she posted on X.