Rams, Vikings looking to have joint practices in 2025
Joint practices are a hotly debated topic for summer activities. Some teams love them, some teams hate them.
The Los Angeles Rams appear to be in the "love them" category after reportedly looking to hold joint practices with the Minnesota Vikings, according to The Athletic's Alec Lewis. The Rams and Vikings would be NFL approval first.
This wouldn't be a first for the Rams. They held three joint practices in 2024 with the Los Angeles Chargers, the Houston Texans and Dallas Cowboys.
The Rams last saw the Vikings in the NFC Wild Card round where L.A. handed Minnesota a 27-9 shellacking, so it would be quite the reunion for the two teams. Plus, Vikings head coach Kevin O'Connell is a former Rams assistant who runs a similar offense to the what Sean McVay does in L.A.
We're still far away from having team practices, but the prospect of even discussing practice means the 2025 season continues to get closer and closer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Should the Rams trade for Steelers OLB T.J. Watt? Here are the pros and cons
Pittsburgh Steelers edge rusher T.J. Watt could be on the trade block after some speculation from NFL media this week. While it's unclear if the Steelers would even deal their star player, the rumors are enough to kick up potential deals for Watt. One NFL analyst went so far as to propose the Los Angeles Rams as a trade partner, writing that general manager Les Snead could offer edge rusher Byron Young and one of the team's two 2026 first-round picks for Watt. Whether or not Snead and Sean McVay would entertain such a trade remains to be seen, but the idea is intriguing. Would a deal for Watt make sense, though? Let's take a look at the pros and cons. We won't look at it from the perspective of this trade idea, though. Pro: Add a true DPOY candidate Watt, who'll be 31 in October, won NFL Defensive Player of the Year in 2021 and finished top-five in voting in four of the past six seasons. He's also made seven Pro Bowls and four All-Pro teams in his eight NFL seasons. To put it bluntly: Watt is a game-wrecker. He has 108 career sacks and led the league in sacks in 2020, 2021 and 2023. Watt also has 126 career tackles for a loss and 225 quarterback hits. Even with emerging stars like Young and Jared Verse on the outside, Watt is one of the most-feared defensive players in the league. Con: Cost to acquire Watt would cost a lot for two reasons: The Steelers wouldn't give him up for nothing and he is seeking a lucrative extension. Elite edge rushers have cost teams anywhere from a third-round pick (Chase Young, Haason Reddick and Matt Judon) to a second-round pick (Montez Sweat and Khalil Mack) to as high as a first-round pick (Bradley Chubb) in recent years. The highest the Rams have paid for one is a second for Von Miller in 2021. Watt, meanwhile, would likely cost at least a first-rounder. Next comes the extension, which Watt may not necessarily want from a new team but easily could ask for if traded. While he may not get Myles Garrett money ($40 million AAV with $88.8 million guaranteed), Watt should get around Maxx Crosby or Nick Bosa money ($34 million to $35.5 million). The Rams simply cannot afford that at the moment. Pro: Tremendous depth at edge rusher Watt would be an immediate start on Chris Shula's defense and would give the Rams arguably the best pass-rush unit in the NFL. Watt, Verse, Young and Braden Fiske are four of the best in the league at the moment, and that's without including rookie Josaiah Stewart. It would be hard for any opposing offensive line to stop all of them throughout any given game. And it might be worth the cost when the second-half of the defense isn't so great. Con: Limited opportunities for young players The benefit of adding Watt could also be the detriment to the development of those aforementioned young players. Verse, Young and Stewart have a combined 51 games of NFL experience. They need reps to grow as players. And with all three still on their rookie contracts, the Rams will want to maximize their abilities now. Watt has played at least 73% of the Steelers' defensive snaps every season of his career, including at least 83% in each of the past two seasons for Pittsburgh. That. doesn't leave a lot of opportunities for the rest of that trio. Verdict: Go for it In an all-in season, these are the types of moves that turn good teams into bona fide Super Bowl contenders. Snead and McVay are known to wheel-and-deal, too, so adding a star like Watt shouldn't be off the table for them if the price is right. While it would take a lot (and likely one of their Young stars), they have the draft capital to pull off the move and make a true push for the championship in 2025. They would need to do some crazy salary cap shenanigans to pull off a long-term extension, though, or try to convince Watt to play on his current deal with the hopes he can take home a Lombardi Trophy.
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
How would the Rams look if they could draft from the entire NFL?
Have you ever played the Madden video game franchise mode where you can draft a roster from the entire NFL? It's quite the exercise and can create some exciting new rosters. Chad Reuter did something similar ahead of the 2025 season to see how teams would shake out through seven rounds of drafting. He based the order on each team's original 2025 draft selections, so every team finished with seven picks. Here's how the Rams' roster shook out, and Reuter's reasons for each pick. Round 1, Pick 26: WR A.J. Brown "Brown is a force when healthy, scoring seven or more times in five of his six years in the league." Round 2, Pick 39: QB Sam Darnold "The Rams gamble that Darnold's renaissance in Minnesota is more than a one-year peak." Round 3: DT Zach Allen "Allen's pass-rush acumen makes him a nice fit on the outside of the Rams' three-man front." Round 4, Pick 103: OT Dion Dawkins "Dawkins doesn't get the credit he deserves from casual fans for his efforts, but the eight-year starting left tackle has made the Pro Bowl four straight seasons." Round 5, Pick 154: EDGE Rashan Gary "After taking Zach Allen in Round 3, the selection of Gary gives the Rams a formidable front on defense." Round 6, Pick 167: CB DaRon Bland "Bland only played seven games last year, but the Rams hope he returns to his 2023 form, when he scored five touchdowns on nine interceptions for Dallas." Round 6, Pick 218: TE Evan Engram "Engram joins A.J. Brown as the top targets for Sam Darnold in this exercise. The former Giant and Jaguar signed with Denver in March as he looks to rebound from an injury-shortened 2024 season." This is an interesting mix of players. The Rams get a stable offensive attack with Darnold, Brown and Engram as well as an anchor on the offensive line, but no running back. And on defense, the roster has a penetrating defensive line and one good cornerback. Ironically, this is kind of similar to the team's current breakdown. It helps, too, that the Rams would still have head coach Sean McVay leading the charge with the rest of his staff. OK, but where did the team's actual players go in this draft? They were scattered throughout all seven rounds in the order you'd expect them to go:
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Rams named as potential landing spots for two defensive free agents
With training camps drawing nearer, teams will once again look at free agency to shore up any positions of need. The Los Angeles Rams should be no different, especially on defense. Much has been written about the Rams' lack of depth at key defensive positions this offseason, and there are a few solid players left on the open market. Bleacher Report's Matt Holder went through some of the top names and listed the Rams as a potential suitor for two of them — one cornerback and one edge rusher. CB Rasul Douglas "Douglas is a long cornerback who uses his limbs well to make plays on the ball. The eight-year pro has racked up 19 interceptions and 79 pass breakups during his tenure in the NFL. "However, he's coming off one of the worst years of his career with no picks and just five pass breakups, which is tied for a personal low and the second-fewest of his career, respectively. The former Buffalo Bill also allowed a 123.7 passer rating when targeted and posted a 58.9 coverage grade last season, per Pro Football Focus. "Combine that with his age, and it makes sense why Douglas is available. Still, plenty of teams could use some help at cornerback and would benefit from at least bringing him into training camp. "After missing out on the Ramsey sweepstakes, the Rams could still use some help at cornerback as they make another Super Bowl push with the aging Matthew Stafford at quarterback." OLB Jadeveon Clowney "While Jadeveon Clowney never developed into the sure-fire Hall of Famer many expected him to be coming out of college, he has put together a long career as a solid all-around edge defender. "The 2014 No. 1 overall pick has racked up 58 sacks and 108 tackles for loss over the last decade-plus, and he was a decent contributor for the Carolina Panthers last year. He posted 5.5 sacks and nine TFLs to go along with 44 total pressures and 24 "defensive stops," according to Pro Football Focus. "However, Clowney missed three games due to injury in 2024, which has been a consistent theme throughout his career. He's only played in a full season's worth of games twice in 11 years. "That, combined with being on the wrong side of 30 years old, is likely why the Panthers let him go during free agency and is part of the reason he's still unsigned. But a team looking for help on the edge should at least give the veteran a call. "While Los Angeles has a couple of promising young edge defenders in Jared Verse and Byron Young, the position group and defensive line are young as a whole. The veteran could be a good depth piece and voice in the meeting room as the team looks to make a Super Bowl run." Both of these players would be sound additions, but neither is a game-changer. Douglas would just be a depth player in a position group that already isn't flashy. Clowney is also great depth, but he would be a situational player that might not be very cost-effective considering his past contracts. However, if the Rams are truly going all-in, then signing either or both of these veterans would just continue to support their Super Bowl push. The price would have to be right, though, as the Rams have about $20 million in salary cap space left.
