logo
Tulsi Gabbard used the same easily cracked password for years for different online accounts, report says

Tulsi Gabbard used the same easily cracked password for years for different online accounts, report says

Yahoo07-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard used the same password across separate online accounts for years, according to a new report.
Before becoming the head of the intelligence community, Gabbard used the same password for multiple email addresses and online accounts while she served in Congress, including while working on the House Committees for Armed Services and Homeland Security, Wired reported. The revelation suggests Gabbard, who now oversees 18 intelligence organizations, was not adhering to simple online security best practices for years.
The report comes months after it was disclosed that she was one of the Trump officials involved in the so-called Signalgate group chat in which U.S. military strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen were discussed. Signal is not approved by the Pentagon for discussion of sensitive information.
The Independent has reached out to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for comment.
Gabbard served as a Democratic congresswoman of Hawaii from 2013 through 2021. She appeared to have used the same password from 2012 through 2018 for her Gmail, MyFitnessPal, LinkedIn and other personal accounts, tranches of breached records published within the period show, Wired reported. This password does not appear to have been used with her government accounts.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency recommends using long, random and unique passwords on all personal and business accounts, stressing that each password should be 'used for one and only one account.'
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reportedly used the same password for her personal accounts for years while she served in Congress (AP)
The password includes the word 'shraddha' – a term that has come up in previous reporting related to Gabbard's alleged involvement with a cult: the Science of Identity Foundation, an off-shoot of the Hare Krishna movement in which Gabbard was raised, the Wall Street Journal reported in January.
Former Science of Identity followers told the Journal they believed that Gabbard had been initiated and given the name 'Shraddha Dasi.'
After the Journal reported Gabbard's link to the group, her team accused the newspaper of spreading 'Hinduphobic smears and other lies.' But this week, Gabbard spokesperson Oliva Coleman denied the association with the Science of Identity and noted that any data breaches occurred ages ago.
'The data breaches you're referring to occurred almost 10 years ago, and the passwords have changed multiple times since,' Coleman told Wired.
'As our deputy chief of staff has already made clear on a number of occasions, the DNI has never and doesn't have affiliation with that organization. Attempting to smear the DNI as being in a cult is bigoted behavior,' she added.
Gabbard's chief of staff also doubled down on the denial of her association with the group, telling the outlet: 'Your bigoted lies and smears of a cabinet member and your story fomenting hinduphobia is noted.'
When grilled by Congress about her participation in the Signal group chat, she refused to say whether she used the app on her personal phone.
'I won't speak to this because it's under review by the National Security Council,' Gabbard said. She insisted that no classified material was shared in the chat.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ohio Democrats select former state rep Kathleen Clyde as new state party chair
Ohio Democrats select former state rep Kathleen Clyde as new state party chair

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio Democrats select former state rep Kathleen Clyde as new state party chair

Ohio Democratic Party Chair Kathleen Clyde. (Photo provided.) Former state Rep. Kathleen Clyde has been elected as the next Ohio Democratic Party chair. Clyde was elected Tuesday night by members of the party's State Executive Committee. 'I'm grateful to Ohio Democrats for putting their trust in me during this critical election cycle, and I'm looking forward to getting to work,' Clyde said in a statement. 'With every statewide office and a U.S. Senate race on the ballot, Ohio has key opportunities to elect Democrats who actually work for Ohioans and get our state back on the right track.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Current chair Liz Walters announced last month she will step down from the role no later than June 30. Walters, who was appointed chair in 2021, will be the new CEO of TargetSmart, a Washington, D.C.-based Democratic political data analysis firm. She was the first woman to be Ohio Democratic Party chair. Former U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown endorsed Clyde for party chair. Brown lost to Republican Bernie Moreno in the 2024 election. Brown has yet to announce if he is running for office in 2026. Clyde served in the Ohio House of Representatives from 2011 to 2018. She ran for Ohio Secretary of State in 2018, but lost to Republican Frank LaRose. In December 2018, she was appointed to the Portage County Commission. She ran for a full term as commissioner in 2020 but was defeated by Republican Tony Badalamenti. Ohio state Sen. Bill DeMora, D-Columbus, and Greene County Democratic Party Chair Kim McCarthy both dropped out of the race to be state party chair last week. Ohio Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Brunner is the only Democrat currently holding any statewide office in Ohio. Republican incumbent Ohio Supreme Court Justice Patrick Fischler is challenging Brunner for her seat in 2026, unable to pursue another term in his own seat due to age restrictions. Republicans currently control the state high court 6-1. All four statewide executive offices of governor, attorney general, auditor, and secretary of state are up for open election in 2026, with all of the current Republican incumbents term-limited out of running for the same positions again. Former Ohio Health Department Director Dr. Amy Acton is currently the only Democratic candidate running for Ohio governor. Republican candidates include businessman Vivek Ramaswamy and former Morgan County school board president Heather Hill. Current Republican Ohio Auditor Keith Faber is running for attorney general in 2026; current Republican Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague is running for secretary of state in 2026; and current Republican Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose is running for auditor in 2026. Current Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost had been running for governor, but recently dropped out of the race after the Ohio Republican Party endorsed Ramaswamy. Bryan Hambley, a cancer doctor with University of Cincinnati Health, is the only announced Democratic candidate for Ohio Secretary of State. No other Democrats have yet announced their candidacy in 2026 for Ohio auditor, treasurer, or attorney general. Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, announced last week she is stepping down from her leadership role at the end of the month, but she has not said whether she will seek a statewide office. The last time any Democratic candidates won any of Ohio's statewide executive offices was in 2006, when Ted Strickland was elected governor, Marc Dann was elected attorney general, Rich Cordray was elected treasurer, and Jennifer Brunner was elected secretary of state. They were all swept out of office in the 2010 cycle. Also in 2006, Democrat Sherrod Brown was elected to his first of three terms in the U.S. Senate, defeating then-incumbent U.S. Senator and now-incumbent Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, before being defeated himself in 2024. Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DNC votes to oust David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta
DNC votes to oust David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta

Axios

time25 minutes ago

  • Axios

DNC votes to oust David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta

DNC members voted Wednesday to vacate the elections of DNC vice chairs David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta. Why it matters: The vote was based on a technical complaint, but it comes as Democrats have expressed fury with Hogg for simultaneously serving as a top party official while supporting congressional primary candidates. Hogg announced in April that his group Leaders We Deserve would spend $20 million trying to oust Democratic incumbents in safely blue districts. The organization on Tuesday endorsed 37-year-old Virginia state Del. Irene Shin in the open primary for the late Rep. Gerry Connolly 's seat. What happened: The Wednesday afternoon vote was decisive, with 75% of the 393 participating DNC members voting to vacate the election and 25% voting against doing so. Hogg and Kenyatta will now face off for a single vice chair position in an election that will span from Thursday to Saturday.

N.C. bill gives big energy users a break — at the expense of households
N.C. bill gives big energy users a break — at the expense of households

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

N.C. bill gives big energy users a break — at the expense of households

Residential customers of Duke Energy in North Carolina could pay $87 million more per year for electricity under a proposal rocketing through the state legislature, a new study shows. The figure represents about a 4% jump in household bills. The legislation, Senate Bill 266, would change how Duke distributes the cost of electricity it buys to supplement generation from its own power plants — significantly hiking the share paid by residential consumers and cutting the portion paid by industrial electricity users, like chemical manufacturers and textile mills. The analysis shows the legislation is a better deal for industrial customers than the status quo, said Will Scott, Southeast climate and clean energy director for the Environmental Defense Fund. 'They will pay less to use the same amount of energy, and residential ratepayers will pay more,' he said. SB 266 is the latest version of a Senate-passed measure that would unravel the state's climate targets. It was publicly unveiled moments before it was debated and approved by the House Energy and Public Utilities Committee last week, and received fulsome praise from Duke, industrial groups, and others in testimony. On Tuesday, despite protests from clean energy advocates and some Democratic lawmakers, the bill easily cleared the Republican-controlled House and now returns to the Senate, also run by the GOP. The study, conducted by independent analysis group EQ Research, has a narrow scope, homing in on the ramifications of just one section of the 30-page bill — the part that covers how purchased power is billed to customers. 'We were pretty laser-focused,' said Justin Barnes, president of EQ Research, 'because that's the analysis we could do with readily available information quickly.' While Duke generates much of its own electricity from a fleet of fossil fuel and nuclear plants, it also contracts to buy some of its solar power from independent producers and purchases energy from other generators under certain conditions, such as when demand spikes. Under current law, the entire cost of this purchased power is passed on to customers annually along with a charge for natural gas and other fuels. The utility divvies up the costs of this fuel "rider" between residential and industrial customer groups based partially on their peak electricity demand and partially on their overall energy use. According to EQ's analysis of Duke's latest filings with regulators, the fuel rider totals about $2.75 billion for the company's two North Carolina entities, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas. The purchased power portion is around $1.1 billion. Of the purchased power portion, residential customers currently pay about 41.2%, and use just over 40% of the energy. SB 266 eliminates any weight given to overall energy use in allocating purchased power costs, according to EQ, shifting charges from large industrial users of electricity to residential consumers. The result is that households would pay just under 49% of those costs while using the same 40% of energy, the group's study found. 'It is not going to be a savings for us ratepayers,' said Rep. Pricey Harrison, a Guilford County Democrat, speaking against SB 266 on the House floor. 'It is going to be an increase.' The EQ study does not incorporate the potential effects of other parts of the bill, including alleged savings from eliminating a 2030 deadline by which Duke must cut its carbon pollution, and the impact to customers of allowing the utility to recoup some costs for power plants not yet delivering electricity. Rep. Dean Arp, the Union County Republican championing SB 266, said last week in committee that erasing the 2030 climate target would save all customers a total of $13 billion by 2050. He said allowing Duke to recover plant-construction financing costs early would net them another $1.4 billion. He echoed those claims Tuesday on the House floor, rounding up the total savings by over half a billion dollars. 'A vote against this legislation is a vote to make all ratepayers pay $15 billion more in electricity costs,' Arp said. But opponents of the bill reject the allegation that striving for more wind and solar energy in the near term will contribute to rising rates, an assertion stemming from an elusive study from the state-sanctioned customer advocate, Public Staff, that hasn't been provided widely to legislators or members of the public. Clean energy advocates say the Public Staff analysis considers only the cost of building new power generation, not the rising price of fossil fuels. And they continue to question the wisdom of allowing Duke to charge consumers for costs related to nuclear and gas plants that may never come online. Perhaps above all, EQ's findings show why more time is needed to vet the bill with all interested parties, including clean energy and consumer advocates, not just Duke and large industrial customers, critics contend. 'When we rush processes like these and don't include all the stakeholders, we can end up with results that unfairly burden North Carolina households,' said Scott with the Environmental Defense Fund. 'I hope that we can slow down and make the adjustments we need so that this bill doesn't cause unnecessary pollution or unnecessary costs.' But the House's public deliberation of the measure has been anything but slow. In less than a week, it cleared two committees and two required floor votes. It could appear on the desk of Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, as soon as this week. 'There are all kinds of reasons to vote no on this bill,' Harrison said to the full House on Tuesday, including its treatment of residential customers, its abdication of climate targets, and the process by which it was rushed through the chamber. As the House prepared to vote around 7 p.m., she said, 'It's not clear why we're doing this tonight.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store