Hungary bans Irish rap group Kneecap from entering ahead of festival performance
The Belfast trio, scheduled to play on Sziget's closing day on Aug. 11, is known for anarchic energy, satirical lyrics and use of symbolism associated with the Irish republican movement, which seeks to unite Northern Ireland, currently part of the U.K., with the Republic of Ireland.
The group has faced criticism for lyrics laden with expletives and drug references and for political statements seeming to glorify militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Kneecap has accused critics of trying to silence the band because of its support for the Palestinian cause throughout Israel's war in Gaza and say they don't support Hezbollah and Hamas nor condone violence.
Hungary's immigration authority, the National Directorate-General for Aliens Policing, published decrees on Thursday declaring Kneecap members Naoise Ó Cairealláin, J.J. Ó Dochartaigh and Liam Óg ÓhAnnaidh would be banned from Hungary's territory for three years since their 'entry and stay constitute a serious threat to national security.'
Government spokesman Zoltán Kovács wrote on social platform X that the decision to ban Kneecap was due to 'antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah.'
Hungarian authorities and other groups had earlier pushed Sziget Festival to cancel the band's performance. Hungary's minister for European affairs, János Bóka, noted the government's 'zero-tolerance' policy toward antisemitism in a July 11 letter to the festival's organizers.
Hundreds of figures from Hungary's music and cultural community also have signed a petition calling for Kneecap's performance to be cancelled.
The group performed in April at the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in California, where they accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians enabled by the U.S. government. That sparked calls for the rappers' U.S. visas to be revoked and several Kneecap gigs have since been canceled as a result.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
‘Netanyahu has lost the plot': New Zealand PM Luxon says Gaza attacks ‘utterly unacceptable'
'I think he (Netanyahu) has lost the plot. What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable,' said Prime Minister Christopher Luxon As New Zealand weighs up whether to recognise a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Wednesday said that Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot'. Luxon condemned the lack of humanitarian aid, the forced displacement of civilians, and the annexation of Gaza as deeply appalling, stating that Netanyahu had gone far beyond acceptable limits. 'I think he has lost the plot,' Reuters quoted Luxon, who heads the centre-right coalition government, as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable,' he added. Earlier this week, Luxon said New Zealand was considering whether to formally recognise a Palestinian state. On Monday, close ally Australia announced it would support recognition at a UN conference in September, joining Canada, the UK, and France. Meanwhile, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached what several Western nations described as 'unimaginable levels.' In a joint statement on Tuesday, Britain, Canada, Australia, and several European allies urged Israel to allow unrestricted humanitarian aid into the conflict-ravaged enclave. Israel has rejected blame for the worsening hunger in Gaza, accusing Hamas of diverting aid shipments, an allegation Hamas denies. Meanwhile, ahead of Wednesday's parliamentary session, a small group of protesters gathered outside the national parliament, banging pots and pans in a show of dissent. According to local outlet Stuff, demonstrators chanted, 'MPs grow a spine, recognise Palestine.' Tensions inside the chamber were also high. On Tuesday, Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament after refusing to apologise for a remark suggesting government MPs lacked courage for not backing a bill to sanction Israel over alleged war crimes. Swarbrick was again ordered to leave the chamber on Wednesday for repeating her refusal to apologise. When she declined to comply, the government moved to formally suspend her. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Sixty-eight members of this House were accused of being spineless," House speaker Gerry Brownlee said. 'There has never been a time where personal insults like that delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House and I'm not going to start accepting it.' As Swarbrick left, she called out 'free Palestine.' With inputs from agencies
News18
7 minutes ago
- News18
Iran's Larijani in Lebanon Amid Hezbollah Disarmament Row, Beirut Slams Tehran's ‘Interference'
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun told Iran's visiting security chief on Wednesday (August 13) that he rejected any interference in the country's internal affairs, branding as "unconstructive" Iran's statements on plans to disarm Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani's visit comes after the Lebanese government ordered the army to devise plans by the end of 2025 to disarm the Tehran-backed militant group his arrival in Beirut, Larijani vowed that his government would continue to provide support, after it expressed opposition to the disarmament plan."We reject any interference in our internal affairs," Aoun said, adding that "it is forbidden for anyone... to bear arms and to use foreign backing as leverage," according to a statement from the Lebanese presidency posted on X. n18oc_world n18oc_crux0:00 INTRODUCTION2:34 LARIJANI 'CONVEYS IRAN'S POSITIONS' 5:00 LEBANON'S HEZBOLLAH PLAN5:54 'HEZBOLLAH DOESN'T NEED ANY GUARDIAN'6:38 LEBANON REPLACES INTEL CHIEF IN HEZBOLLAH STRONGHOLD
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zero tolerance for students breaking law, says Laura Williams: How America's immigration rules are redefining ‘law' for international students
The U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Hyderabad hosted the 2025 EducationUSA University Fair on Monday, drawing a large turnout of students eyeing degrees in America. The fair—part of a nationwide tour through eight Indian cities including Chennai, Bengaluru, New Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, and Hyderabad—runs until August 17. Speaking to attendees, U.S. Consul General Laura Williams underscored Washington's hardening stance on compliance. 'Qualifying for a U.S. student visa includes demonstrating an intent to comply with U.S. laws. The United States has zero tolerance for people, including students, who violate the law ,' she said. Her warning comes against a sharp backdrop: More than 1,800 international students have lost their F-1 or J-1 status in 2025 alone, thanks to immigration crackdown and alleged antisemitism, reports Inside Higher Ed . The figures reflect a year in which visa enforcement has increasingly intersected with campus speech and digital conduct, reshaping the stakes for those planning to study in the United States. Cases in point: Visa crackdowns on international students In 2025, the United States is still a magnet for students from across the globe. But alongside its world-class universities and promises of academic freedom, a different reality is taking root — one where immigration enforcement bleeds into campus politics, and where speaking out can cost you not just your reputation, but your legal right to remain. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income SpellRock Undo A series of high-profile arrests and visa revocations this year has sent an unmistakable message to the international student community: dissent comes with a price. In mid-March, Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, was detained outside his home in Rosslyn, Virginia. His visa had been revoked days earlier after immigration officials accused him of 'spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism' on social media and pointed to his marriage to a relative of a senior Hamas adviser. Suri had no criminal record, and his lawyers argued that his online posts — expressions of solidarity with Palestinians and criticism of U.S. foreign policy — were protected speech, not evidence of extremism. Three days later, a federal judge blocked his deportation, restored his right to work, and granted temporary status to his family. Georgetown publicly defended him, stating he had done nothing illegal. Eight days later, on March 25, Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish PhD student at Tufts University, was confronted by masked Homeland Security agents outside her Somerville, Massachusetts home. Her SEVIS record showed she was in good standing, but her F-1 visa had been abruptly cancelled, reportedly over an op-ed she co-authored in The Tufts Daily criticising the university's response to the Israel–Gaza conflict and calling for divestment. Federal officials claimed her words could have 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.' In May, U.S. District Judge William Sessions III ruled her detention unlawful, noting that the government had presented no evidence beyond the op-ed itself, and warned that such actions risked chilling speech among 'millions and millions' of non-citizens. She was released on bail, her case still pending. For each of these students, the official accusations varied — from alleged extremist propaganda to 'foreign policy consequences' to unspecified security risks. But the pattern is unmistakable: Visa revocations and detentions have become a tool for policing political boundaries on US campuses. Social media and the activism test Under recent rules, consular officers are required to review student visa applicants' social media and online activity. Posts that appear politically controversial, critical of U.S. policy, or connected to protest movements can be flagged and used as grounds to deny or revoke a visa. Applicants are required to keep their profiles public during the process; sudden deletion or privatization of accounts can itself be treated as suspicious. This policy shift is amplified by the 'Catch and Revoke' program, introduced in Donald Trump's second term, which uses artificial intelligence to scan students' digital footprints for signs of activism or support for causes deemed controversial — from Palestinian human rights to political reform in China. Advocacy groups say hundreds of students, particularly from India and China, have already been affected. Broader discretion for revocation If the arrests of students like Badar Khan Suri and Rümeysa Öztürk show the human cost of visa crackdowns, the machinery driving those cases is equally alarming. One of the most consequential changes for international students in 2025 has been the expansion of what the US government considers a legitimate reason to revoke a student visa. According to an Associated Press report, new directives from the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security now allow consular officers and immigration enforcement agents to run names through the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database as a primary screening tool. The problem, immigration lawyers told AP, is that NCIC does not distinguish between serious convictions and far more minor or irrelevant records — it can include arrests where charges were dropped, decades-old misdemeanors, minor traffic violations, and even mistaken identity entries. In the past, such low-level incidents would rarely, if ever, have triggered a visa review — let alone immediate cancellation. But in 2025, any 'flag' in NCIC can be treated as grounds for action. That has meant students losing their F-1 or J-1 status over infractions as trivial as a speeding ticket from years earlier, a dismissed shoplifting charge from adolescence, or being wrongly listed as a 'person of interest' in a police database. What makes the system more troubling is its lack of nuance. Once a student is flagged, their SEVIS record — the database that underpins legal student status in the US can be terminated automatically, often without the student being told in advance or given the chance to explain. For many, the first warning came not from a university adviser but from discovering mid-semester that their SEVIS record was marked 'terminated' and that they were suddenly subject to removal. From visa revocation to SEVIS termination The structural rules governing student status have also been rewritten. Previously, only Designated School Officials (DSOs) at universities could terminate a student's SEVIS record, and only for clear-cut violations such as unauthorized employment, criminal convictions, or a breach of visa terms. In 2025, new guidelines gave US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the power to terminate SEVIS records directly if a student's visa is revoked — even if no actual legal violation is found. That change is not just bureaucratic; it is immediate and devastating. Termination of a SEVIS record strips a student of work authorization, blocks re-entry to the US, and can trigger deportation proceedings. Bottom line For a country that sells itself as the global gold standard for academic freedom, America is becoming remarkably creative in defining the boundaries of that freedom. The new playbook doesn't just punish those who break the law — it decides what the 'law' is on the fly, folding in social media posts, decades-old misdemeanours, or a protest placard into the same category as actual crimes. For international students, the message is clear: in the land of the free, your right to speak, study, and stay is only as secure as the politics of the moment. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
