logo
SC pulls up Rahul for 'Chinese thrashing our soldiers' remark

SC pulls up Rahul for 'Chinese thrashing our soldiers' remark

Time of India15 hours ago
.
NEW DELHI:
Rahul Gandhi
, the leader of opposition in Lok Sabha, got a rap on his knuckles on Monday from the Supreme Court for his 2022 statement - Chinese are "thrashing our soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh" - while criticising the government for its handling of the Galwan Valley clash at the LAC.
"If you were a true Indian, you would not say all this," the apex court told him.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih lambasted Rahul for making allegations that China captured 2,000 sq km of Indian territory and asked him whether he was present there. It made it clear to him that as leader of opposition he cannot go on saying whatever he wants.
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, defended him saying, "if he cannot say these things which are published in the Press, he cannot be a leader of opposition".
However, he agreed that the statement could have been worded better.
SC's censure came during the hearing on Rahul's plea for staying a defamation case filed against him over his claim about Indian jawans having been walloped by the Chinese during the Galwan standoff. After the hearing, the court stayed the defamation proceedings against him but not before giving him an earful.
"Tell, Dr Singhvi, how do you get to know that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory was occupied by the Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material? Why do you make these statements without any...If you were a true Indian, you would not say all this if there is a conflict at the border," the bench said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament extends President's Rule in Manipur by six months
Parliament extends President's Rule in Manipur by six months

Scroll.in

time5 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Parliament extends President's Rule in Manipur by six months

The Rajya Sabha on Tuesday passed a statutory resolution to extend the President's Rule in Manipur by six months. The resolution, passed by the Lok Sabha on Thursday, was approved by the Upper House amid protests by Opposition MPs over the Election Commission conducting a special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls. The resolution, moved by Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai, was approved through a voice vote. President's Rule was imposed in the state on February 13, four days after Bharatiya Janata Party leader N Biren Singh resigned as the chief minister. His resignation came amid ethnic clashes between the Meiteis and Kuki-Zo-Hmar communities. At least 260 persons have been killed and more than 59,000 persons displaced since the violence broke out in May 2023. There were periodic upticks in violence in 2024. Singh resigned as chief minister amid allegations from Kuki-Zomi-Hmar groups that his response to the violence was partisan and that he had stoked majoritarianism. The BJP leader stepped down a day before his government was to face a no-confidence motion and floor test in the Assembly. The Opposition Congress had described Singh's resignation as belated and akin to 'shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted '. The last time President's Rule was imposed in Manipur was between June 2, 2001, and March 5, 2002, for 276 days due to political instability. President's Rule under Article 356 transfers the powers and responsibilities of the state government to the Union government and the functions of the state Legislature to Parliament for the duration of its enforcement. The only exception is the operation of High Courts, which are unaffected.

Kremlin slams Trump tariff pressure on India over Russian oil as illegal
Kremlin slams Trump tariff pressure on India over Russian oil as illegal

The Hindu

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Kremlin slams Trump tariff pressure on India over Russian oil as illegal

Russia accused the United States on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) of exerting illegal trade pressure on India after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened again to raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. "We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "We believe that sovereign countries should have and do have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners for trade and economic cooperation, and to choose for themselves the forms of trade and economic cooperation that are in the interests of a particular country." Mr. Trump has said that from Friday (August 8, 2025) he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end its 3-1/2 year conflict with Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin has signalled no change in Russia's stance on the war, despite the looming deadline. India has called Mr. Trump's threats "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two major economies. Two Indian government sources told Reuters on the weekend that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Mr. Trump's threats.

After Supreme Court censure, UP Govt says, Banke Bihari Temple Ordinance for ‘better facilities, administration'
After Supreme Court censure, UP Govt says, Banke Bihari Temple Ordinance for ‘better facilities, administration'

Indian Express

time5 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

After Supreme Court censure, UP Govt says, Banke Bihari Temple Ordinance for ‘better facilities, administration'

The Uttar Pradesh Government Tuesday informed the Supreme Court that the Ordinance to set up a trust for the Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan was only for the better administration of the shrine, and that it 'never intended nor intends to interfere with any of the religious rights of any of the parties.' Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj informed a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that the Ordinance will soon be placed in the UP Assembly for ratification. The bench was hearing petitions challenging the Ordinance, and the May 15 order of the SC allowing the state government to use the temple funds for buying land around it for a proposed corridor project. On Monday, the apex court questioned the 'tearing hurry' to bring the Ordinance, and the process which led to the May 15 order. The May 15 order had come on an interlocutory application filed by the state in a matter pertaining to the administration and safety of temples in the Braj region. During the hearing, the court said it intended to ask the petitioners to approach the Allahabad High Court challenging the Ordinance and that, in the interim, it will put in place a committee headed by a retired district or HC judge for its administration. Nataraj, while explaining how the Ordinance came about, said Tuesday, '…as a matter of fact, there was a PIL before the Allahabad HC…and the court issued some directions … The state never intended nor intends to interfere with any of the religious rights of any of the parties. It's only with regard to secular activity, that is, for better administration of the temple, that the Ordinance has been issued.' 'Like Ayodhya and Kashi, the government wants to develop this particular temple. It wants to infuse funds for the development of the infrastructure.' The law officer said the Banke Bihari Temple has a 'history', and around 20,000 to 30,000 devotees visit every day, and 2 to 3 lakh during the weekends. 'We require better facilities, better administration. We also have to prevent mismanagement of funds. These are all the different considerations that weighed on the mind of the government.' Appearing for the petitioners, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal said there is no allegation of mismanagement at any stage. To that, Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj said, 'Mismanagement means everybody is managing'. Justice Kant said, 'The local administration will have to be involved. That is the only way to get these things done.' 'We have no problem,' Sibal said, adding that there should be a notification that 25,000 people will be allowed for morning darshan and 25,000 in the evening so that rush can be controlled. Justice Kant pointed out that it will be very difficult to do so given that people visit from across the country. The court adjourned the hearing till Friday to enable the parties to recommend names for the committee it intends to put in place for administering the shrine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store