
5 Best Stocks for Options Trading in August 2025
Understanding Key Factors for Options Trading
Liquidity is King: Liquidity is one of the most crucial factors in options trading. High liquidity in both the underlying stock and its options indicates tighter bid-ask spreads, which facilitate efficient trade execution with minimal slippage. In this assessment, two key metrics, average daily trading volume and open interest in the options chain, play a vital role. Active traders often look for stocks with active options markets, as they offer more flexibility in entering and exiting positions.
Volatility for Opportunity: The essence of options trading lies in volatility. The more volatile the stock, the higher the amount of premiums, offering better substantial profit opportunities. When discussing volatility, it is essential to understand the distinction between historical volatility (HV) and implied volatility (IV). The former is backward-looking and reflects past price movements, while the latter is forward-looking and points towards future expected movements. When options trading is involved, implied volatility plays a crucial role. A balanced approach where IV is good enough to create a premium opportunity, but not so high that options become overpriced or vulnerable to a post-event IV crush, is favorable for traders.
Fundamental Strengths and Catalysts: Every trade that happens in the financial markets is somewhat linked with what lies at the company's core. A solid company foundation adds a layer of confidence, especially during volatile periods when maintaining positions is crucial. Options traders often overlook the importance of strong fundamentals; however, metrics such as revenue growth, industry leadership, and profit margins are crucial. In conjunction with fundamental matters, event-driven catalysts such as earnings announcements, product launches, regulatory changes, and macroeconomic trends play a crucial role in determining well-positioned options trading opportunities.
Technical Analysis for Timing: A smart trader should always know when to enter and exit the market. Technical charts become a trader's best friend in this context. Tools like moving averages help identify trends, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD) help confirm momentum and potential reversals. All this helps in recognizing support and resistance levels, which facilitates the effective implementation of options trading strategies.
Methodology for Stock Selection
The market is highly dynamic, and stock selections are made by combining fundamental analysis, technical analysis, current market sentiments, typical sector behavior, seasonal trends, and the likelihood of upcoming events, such as earnings or macroeconomic shifts. The selected five stocks stand out in terms of their combination of all parameters and thus provide a favourable opportunity for options trading.
The 5 Best Stocks for Options Trading in August 2025
NVIDIA Corp (NVDA)
NVIDIA, the GPU giant and epicenter of the AI revolution, has consistently been at the forefront of the data center sector. The U.S. chipmaker has recently become the most valuable company in the world, reaching a $4 trillion market capitalization and surpassing tech giants like Apple and Microsoft. This event in itself points towards a bullish wave for the stock. Moreover, its 30-day IV of 34.9, compared to its 20-day HV of 25 points, suggests future volatility. The stock is expected to have even a higher IV after the recent market capitalization landmark news, and this volatility is expected to continue as the earnings release is expected on 27th August 2025, making it an ideal stock for options trading in the upcoming month. Since the outlook is bullish, strategies such as bull-call spreads benefit options traders, as they help lower costs and capitalize on directional upside. While the stock has performed consistently over the years, one should be cautious of any regulatory ruling or macroeconomic slowdown that could derail the stock's upside movement.
Meta Platforms Inc (META)
The parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram – the holy trinity of social media, Meta Platforms, is always one of the top stocks in the list of all traders, specifically options traders, because of the highly associated volatility Recently Meta has been developing a series of products and is working on advancing its AI-driven innovations particularly metaverse. With a market cap of $1.8 trillion, a 30-day IV of 38.1, and a 20-day HV of 24.9, along with its earnings scheduled for July 30th, the stock is poised to experience decent volatility, providing options traders with opportunities to bet on it. Moreover, competitive pressures and regulatory challenges also make the stock volatile. Although the charts indicate an uptrend, the stock price movement appears speculative due to regulatory headlines. In such a scenario, a calendar spread would be an ideal strategy to adopt, maximizing the benefit from the IV rise.
Apple Inc (AAPL)
The tech giant, known for its electronics ecosystem and revolutionary products, has always been a solid performer, whether in equities trading or options trading. Apple Inc. has consistently delivered strong returns to its investors. With the planned 2026 launch of its innovative products – from the iPhone 17e to the MacBook Pro to the foldable iPhone - Apple seems to be unstoppable. With its earnings scheduled for 31st July and dividend date of 11th August, Apple, with a current 30-day IV of 28.1, which is slightly less, and a 20-day HV of 19.9, is expected to have a fast bullish crossover, suggesting the implementation of a call debit spread positioned for a modest rally ahead of the announcements. If some traders have a neutral view on the earnings, they can also use an iron condor for the range-bound movements of the $3.15 trillion company's stock.
Tesla Inc (TSLA)
The EV leader is one of the most active, liquid, and volatile stocks in the U.S. market, making it an ideal choice for options traders. Tesla Inc. is expanding its business geographically and is all set to commence deliveries in India by August, which is expected to be a good source of revenue for the company. This announcement led to a significant upward movement in the stock's price. The $982 billion company's 30-day IV stands at 54.7, and its 20-day HV stands at 58, indicating the extreme volatility the stock exhibits. The earnings scheduled for 23rd July, along with geographical market expansion, provide sufficient room for options traders to place their cautious bets on Tesla. Since Tesla's stock is associated with high unpredictability, a long put or bear put spread can be used if signs of weakening delivery growth emerge, or a long straddle can be implemented if a significant move is expected but the direction is uncertain.
Amazon.com (AMZN)
The global e-commerce behemoth, with a market capitalization of $2.39 trillion, is dominating the consumer market, holding significant stakes in cloud computing (AWS), logistics, and digital advertising. Amazon's strong fundamentals and its role in cloud growth, coupled with its high liquidity, a 20-day HV of 23.5 and a 30-day IV of 35, make it a must-watch for options traders. Historically, Amazon has exhibited significant price fluctuations in the days leading up to and following its earnings releases. As the earnings are scheduled for August 1st this year, volatility is expected to spike. As margin compression in the e-commerce industry continues and regulatory challenges escalate, this may limit upside. In such a scenario, traders who already hold the stock and seek income can implement a covered call.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
Published Jul 27, 2025 • 3 minute read U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as he plays a round of golf at Trump Turnberry golf course during his visit to the U.K. on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Photo by Christopher Furlong / Getty Images WASHINGTON — Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Read More The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Sports Columnists Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Story continues below advertisement Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. Story continues below advertisement George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Story continues below advertisement Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an event to announce new tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House, on April 2, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File) WASHINGTON — Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 27, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press