K-Pop and breakdance power South Korean high-stakes presidential race
Dancers perform ahead of Lee Jae-myung's campaign event in Incheon on May 21. - Bloomberg
SEOUL: In South Korea's high-stakes presidential campaign, K-pop isn't just a cultural backdrop - it's a political strategy.
Both major parties are leaning on Korean pop hits to energise voters, blending choreography and catchy lyrics with political messaging. Among the favourites at campaign rallies: Kim Jong-kook's Lovable and Young Tak's Next Door Oppa, are now fixtures in events across the country.
But unlike the last US presidential election, where Kamala Harris secured endorsements from Beyoncé and Taylor Swift, South Korean artists have shied away from direct campaigning, which risks alienating fans.
The opposition Democratic Party has deployed a 48-member "Shouting Korea' team, which travels nationwide in mobile units designed to create festive, street-level rallies. Their goal is to produce crowd-friendly events using choreography and classic Korean pop songs before and after the party nominee Lee Jae-myung takes the stage.
The conservative People Power Party has taken a similar approach, with candidate Kim Moon-soo's campaign team choosing retro hits like Lovable, over songs by current idols.
"Kim's frequent use of heart gestures inspired us to highlight a 'lovable' image, playing on the song's message to enhance his public appeal,' Kim Dong-hwan, a PPP campaign official, said.
South Koreans head to the polls Tuesday (June 10) after six months of political turmoil, hoping a new leader can begin to heal a fractured nation. The snap vote comes after impeached former President Yoon Suk Yeol was removed by the Constitutional Court in April for his abrupt decision to declare martial law.
The state of the economy and fighting US President Donald Trump's tariffs are among the hot topics for voters, according to recent opinion surveys. Lee had 49 per cent support while Kim trailed with 36 per cent in a survey of 1,005 people commissioned by local media News 1 and released this week.
"This election follows a period of martial law and impeachment,' said Kim Dae-young, a Democratic Party official. "There were debates about including strong political messages, but we decided instead to build a space where people could gather naturally - through music, dance, and video.'
The campaign's setlist draws heavily on late-1990s and early-2000s pop acts chosen for their energy and broad appeal. They include Koyote's Pure Love, from 1999, diva Uhm Jung-hwa's Festival from the same year.
Professional dancer Yim Young-hwan, who was hired by the liberal party to join the campaign, has choreographed several of the performances. The dance routines are deliberately simple, with occasional flourishes to grab attention, and to make it easy for people to follow. "We wanted people to say, 'Wow,' when they saw us,' Yim said.
Lyrics are often adapted to highlight the candidate's character or policy goals. And choosing older tracks instead of licensing new idol music from the big K-pop companies such as SM Entertainment Inc. and Hybe Co. reduces costs, according to Kim, the PPP campaign official. Licensing fees per song could reach around three million won (US$2,170) to tens of million won, depending on its popularity.
While TV and radio still play a role, Kim noted that digital content now dominates political engagement. Candidate Kim has appeared on major YouTube shows and launched a dedicated channel featuring a 13-song playlist to court online audiences.
Yet despite the digital pivot, the energy of in-person street performances still resonates with many voters.
"When young people perform like this, it lifts the older generation's spirits,' said Lee Soo-young, a Seoul resident, who joined Lee's campaign. - Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Hegseth wins praise but Asia still has strong doubts about Trump
SINGAPORE (Bloomberg): After US military allies in Europe were torched by Vice President JD Vance in March over military spending, free speech and the war in Ukraine, America's partners in Asia warily awaited Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's arrival at a security conference in Singapore. Turns out there was little reason to worry, apart from the perpetual anxiety over President Donald Trump's social media feed. While Hegseth delivered Trump's demands for higher security spending on par with Europe, he couched it as necessary to prepare for a potentially "imminent' Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The US wouldn't be pushed out the region, he said, nor let allies and partners "be subordinated and intimidated' - a commitment lauded by many in attendance. But in the hallways of the Shangri-La Hotel, Hegseth couldn't dispel concerns about the erratic policymaking of his boss. Many of the generals, defense ministers and intelligence officers from Asia and Europe - who are key to helping the US counter China - were still reeling from the shock of Trump's sectoral levies and "reciprocal' tariffs. Hegseth "offered a needed level of reassurance to allies and partners that the United States will remain present in the Indo-Pacific and committed to countering China's coercive threats,' said Rory Medcalf, head of the National Security College at the Australian National University. "But this message will remain discounted by the dysfunction we are seeing in Washington.' On his second trip to Asia since March, the Pentagon chief displayed some diplomatic nuance that surprised some officials who expected more grandstanding from the former television personality. Hegseth was also able to capitalize on a huge absence at the annual gathering: China didn't send a defense minister for the first time since 2019, putting Beijing's lower-level officials on the back foot. That void gave US officials space to set the tone and work the room, vowing greater cooperation with countries like Cambodia, Thailand and Indonesia. And it gave America's traditional partners even more room to criticize Beijing, despite their dependence on trade with China. Yet even if Hegseth was more reassuring than Vance, it still wasn't enough to overcome the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies. That's particularly the case in Southeast Asia, which was among the hardest hit by Trump's tariffs in April. "Trade is not a soft power indulgence - it is part of our strategic architecture,' Malaysia Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said, referring to Southeast Asia. "It must be protected, not from competition but from the onslaught of arbitrary imposition of trade restrictions.' Trump's barrage of tariffs and general volatility - he announced a doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs over the weekend - was the subject of much of the chatter on the sidelines of the annual conference, according to several officials who asked not to be identified, citing private discussions. The officials said they were unsure whether the US president would stand by their side in a moment of need and that any deal reached with him could unravel moments later in a social media post. That uncertainty appeared to be pushing Indo-Pacific nations and Europe toward each other in a stronger sense of shared security and free-trade opportunities based on longstanding global rules. It also sparked pushback against what several nations saw as efforts to establish "spheres of influence' where the US or China can dominate. "Our shared responsibility is to ensure with others that our countries are not collateral victims of the imbalances linked to the choices made by the superpowers,' French President Emmanuel Macron said at the conference's opening on Friday. Macron's words about "strategic autonomy' and his call for Europe and Asia to join forces to "de-risk' supply chains struck a chord with many attendees. Several countries in the region are already having similar debates in their own capitals, some of the officials said. Many governments in the region rely on China economically and on the US for security, and are keen to not antagonize either. However, there's also a desire to be more autonomous and less dependent on either of the world's two-biggest economies, opening up new space for middle powers in Europe and Asia to join hands. Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, made that pitch to Asian nations throughout the weekend. "If you reject unilateralism, bullying and aggression, and instead choose cooperation, shared prosperity and common security, the European Union will always be by your side,' she said. Amid the US-China turbulence, smaller nations sought to build ties. Japan's defense minister, Gen Nakatani, touted efforts to build closer relations with India and the Philippines. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Sunday that her country was working with partners in the region to counter Russian and Chinese cyber threats, as well as Beijing's dominance of drone manufacturing and ship building. Even one of America's closest partners in the region, Australia, signaled some independence from its ally. Hegseth's outreach to the region "is deeply welcome,' Australia's Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said. But he quickly added that "liberal trade has been the lifeblood of the Asian region, and the shock and disruption to trade from high tariffs has been costly and destabilizing.' During his remarks, Hegseth was pressed on the trade concerns and whether there was a contradiction in the Trump administration's message. He sidestepped the question with a smile, saying he was "in the business of tanks, not trade.' Last year, China's delegation surprised observers by repeatedly calling unscheduled press briefings. This year they surprised delegates by barely appearing at all. When they did engage, China's representatives pushed back at Hegseth's accusation that Beijing was destabilizing Asia and sparred with other speakers more broadly. The Pentagon chief aimed to "provoke, divide, instigate confrontations, stir up the region,' said Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Another official, Senior Colonel Lu Yin, decried the atmosphere at the forum, saying that "labeling China, blaming China, verbally attacking China are politically right here.' In one of the sharpest exchanges of the weekend, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro had a testy exchange with two senior colonels in the People's Liberation Army, receiving applause after he thanked them for "propaganda spiels disguised as questions.' Referring to China, Teodoro said he couldn't trust a country that "represses its own people.' Yet although China's presence was diminished, most countries still wanted to balance ties between Beijing and Washington. "If we have to choose sides, may we choose the side of principles,' Singapore Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday at the final panel of the weekend. "Principles that uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must.' --With assistance from Alastair Gale, Courtney McBride and Alfred Cang. - ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Philippine Defence chief rips China officials in testy exchange
Philippine Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro said China's military was 'grabbing territory in the South China Sea'. - Photo: Bloomberg SINGAPORE: Philippine Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro engaged in a testy back-and-forth with Chinese officials at a Singapore security forum on Sunday (June 1), accusing leaders in Beijing of grabbing territory in disputed waters and repressing their own people. During a panel at the Shangri-La Dialogue, two senior colonels in the People's Liberation Army directed questions at Teodoro, asking whether the Philippines would serve as a US proxy in Asia or adopt a friendlier approach toward China. Teodoro thanked the pair for "propaganda spiels disguised as questions,' a line that received rare applause from those in attendance. He went on to lambast China's territorial claims in the South China Sea, saying a lack of trust in Beijing was "the biggest stumbling block' to resolving the dispute. "That deficit of trust, which I think any rational person - or any person that is not ideologically biased, with freedom of thought and freedom of speech - will agree with,' Teodoro said. He added that he couldn't trust a country that "represses its own people.' Tensions between China and the Philippines have escalated under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who has pushed back against Beijing's sweeping claims over the strategic waterway, leading to confrontations between their ships. Manila last month said China's Coast Guard fired a water cannon on a state fisheries vessel conducting research in Sandy Cay in the Spratlys area. "To envision a China-led international order, we only need to look at how they treat their much smaller neighbors in the South China Sea, which runs counter to the 'peaceful rise' they initially promised,' Teodoro said. China claims more than 80% of the South China Sea and backs this up with a 1947 map that shows vague dashes outlining its claims, which are disputed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei and Malaysia. In 2016, an international tribunal said China's sweeping claims have no legal basis, a ruling that Beijing rejects. In an interview with Bloomberg Television's Haslinda Amin later on Sunday, Teodoro said China's military was "grabbing territory in the South China Sea' and expanding its presence to the Arctic and off Australia. "For us, our biggest threat is China,' he said. "And on that, we converge not only with the United States but with other countries.' The Southeast Asian nation is on the frontlines of US-backed efforts to deter China in the region, with the long-time allies ramping up military drills to enhance interoperability. Apart from granting the US military access to more Philippine bases, including some in close proximity to Taiwan, Manila has also signed agreements on mutual military visits with Japan and New Zealand, and is in discussions on similar pacts with Canada and France. China has built artificial islands with military infrastructure in contested waters to bolster its expansive claims. The Philippines has a "variety of options' in the event Beijing seizes a reef that's close to Philippine shores. "We have to uphold our territorial integrity and sovereignty,' Teodoro said. "And we have devised options in our toolkit to deal with contingencies, and we plan for these and train for them accordingly.' - Bloomberg
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Australia calls US plan to double steel, aluminium tariffs "unjustified" act of "self harm"
FILE PHOTO: A giant kettle pours molten aluminum into moulds as an employee skims the skin off previously poured moulds at an Alcoa Inc. smelting plant at Point Henry, Australia, on Wednesday, July 30, 2008. Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell said the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs. - Bloomberg CANBERRA: Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell on Saturday (May 31) described US President Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel and aluminium as "unjustified" and an act of economic "self harm." Trump said on Friday that he plans to increase the tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the United States from 25 per cent to 50 per cent from June 4 to protect the domestic industry from foreign competition. Responding to the announcement, Farrell said in a statement that Australia's position has been "consistent and clear" and that the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs. "These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend," he said. "They are an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade." Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose Labor Party won a second term in government in a landslide at the May 3 election, in April described Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs as "not the act of a friend". The US administration in March decided against exempting Australia from the steel and aluminum tariffs. Albanese said at the time that the decision went against the "enduring friendship" of the two countries. - Xinhua
