Eskom shells out R12m in board fees, R3bn in overtime in 2023/24
Eskom board members were paid a total of R12.1m in annual board fees between April 1 2023 and 31 March 31 2024, minister of electricity and energy Kgosientsho Ramokgopa said.
This is contained in a written reply to MPs released to the media on Tuesday.
EFF MP Mandla Shikwambana asked the minister about the annual expenditure on overtime for Eskom employees and the circumstances under which overtime is paid.
He also asked whether, according to the 2024 Eskom annual report, the board held 22 meetings, averaging two meetings per month, if the meetings were pre-planned and why those that were unplanned occurred.
'Based on the principle of a board of directors functioning as one unit, a collective assessment approach is in place. The last collective performance assessment of the board was undertaken in the financial year 2024, and the outcomes of this assessment were shared with the shareholder representative,' Ramokgopa said in the written reply.
Eskom board chair Mteto Nyati and non-executive directors Fathima Gany, Tryphosa Ramano, Claudelle von Eck and Clive le Roux were all paid more than R1m in board fees during the period. Non-executive director Rod Crompton earned the lowest quantum in board fees among listed board members at R676,000.
'During the reporting period, a total of 22 board meetings were held. Of these, 10 meetings had been pre-scheduled in the annual board calendar.
'In accordance with the approved fee structure, non-executive directors had not been paid per meeting but had received a fixed annual fee based on their committee allocations.'
The minister said this fixed fee had implicitly covered participation in up to eight scheduled board meetings. The remaining 14 meetings, which had exceeded the planned schedule, had not attracted any additional fees.
'The additional meetings had been convened on an ad hoc basis to address urgent and time-sensitive matters that had required the immediate attention of the board. Several of these engagements had been necessitated by unforeseen and evolving developments.'
Ramokgopa said the additional meetings primarily dealt with the group CEO recruitment process, recruitment for the National Transmission Company of SA and other unbundling matters.
The minister said in addition to the fixed fee they received, non-executive directors were reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the execution of their duties.
In the same written reply, Ramokgopa told Shikwambana that Eskom spent R3.03bn paying staff overtime between April 1 2023 and March 31 2024.
Ramokgopa said this was in instances where work beyond the hours stipulated for staff typically included an emergency during a standby period, breakdown of plant, pre-arranged plant maintenance, or commissioning of plant.
Other instances were authorised construction work on site, preventive and protective services, staff emergencies during continuous shift work, abnormal emergency services, special tasks on a one-time basis, exceptional cases when set target dates could not be met, and critical personnel shortages only for short periods not exceeding one month.
'About 92% of the workforce is eligible for overtime.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Court rejects Standard Bank's bid to foreclose on Zwelinzima Vavi's home over loan arrears
A High Court judge has slammed Standard Bank for its 'disproportionate' attempt to foreclose on the home of union leader Zwelinzima Vavi, even as he was consistently paying off the arrears on his home loan. The Johannesburg High Court has ruled against Standard Bank in its legal bid to foreclose on the upmarket Sandton home of South African Federation of Trade Unions general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi. The bank sought a money judgment and permission from the court to execute against Vavi's primary residence, because he and his wife had fallen behind on their home loan repayments. However, what is curious about Standard Bank's legal bid is that the arrears date back three years, and Vavi and his wife had not only kept up with their bond repayments but had also worked to reduce the arrears from R170,000 to R85,000. In handing down his judgment on Tuesday, Judge Stuart DJ Wilson rebuked the bank for seeking an execution order when the Vavis' repayment over the last 18 months showed 'an apparently perfect adherence to the Vavis' obligations to pay their monthly instalments'. 'Standard Bank has placed nothing before me that explains why execution against the Vavis' home is a proportionate means of recovering the arrears,' Judge Wilson said. The court, referencing the Constitutional Court's stance in Gundwana v Steko Development CC, emphasised that the value or location of a property does not diminish the need for proportionality when a bank seeks to take away someone's home. 'Cases in which it would be disproportionate to authorise execution of a proven mortgage debt against such a property are likely to be rare. This is such a case,' the judgment noted. What raised eyebrows was Standard Bank's demand for more than R160,000 in legal costs – almost double the outstanding arrears. The court found that the bank had effectively tied the settlement of the dispute to the payment of these costs, suggesting that the Vavis may have hesitated to pay legal fees that far exceeded their actual arrears. The broader problem Standard Bank's case against Vavi is not unique. Across South Africa, banks have been criticised for using aggressive tactics to address home loan arrears. These include: Initiating legal action for repossession even when homeowners are actively reducing their arrears; Imposing excessive legal costs that quickly outpace the actual debt; and Failing to engage meaningfully with customers before resorting to court action. In 2024, Judge Wilson came down on Standard Bank for using 'high-handed' tactics by taking a Meyersdal couple to court over home loan arrears on which they had managed to catch up a few months before the matter was set down to be heard. Earlier this year, the bank attempted to take the home of a Roodepoort homeowner who was attempting to catch up on arrears, but the case was dismissed with costs. If the court had granted Standard Bank's order against Vavi, it would have given the bank the power to foreclose on the house and potentially sell it at a fraction of its value to recoup the R85,000 that it is owed. This has happened to countless South Africans over the years. However, a R60-billion class-action suit against South Africa's leading banks – Standard Bank, Absa, FirstRand and Nedbank – is seeking to address this issue. Led by Advocate Douglas J Shaw, the lawsuit highlights systemic issues with how banks handle mortgage arrears. Despite a 2017/18 legal victory that forced banks to set reserve prices at sheriff auctions – preventing sales at rock-bottom prices – Shaw reports that many homes continue to be sold for only 50% to 70% of their true value, and in some cases as low as 10%. Former owners often remain liable for the outstanding bond balance while being left homeless and destitute for years. Shaw further alleges that banks frequently proceed with sales even when foreclosure is not a last resort, such as when homeowners have regained employment, can rent out their properties or could subdivide them to meet obligations. 'We often see banks act in a manner we consider irresponsible. You cannot trust them to do what most people would see as 'the right thing',' Shaw said. This ongoing class action underscores the concerns raised by the Vavi case – namely, that banks sometimes resort to heavy-handed enforcement tactics without adequately considering proportionality or alternative solutions. It also highlights the broader call for stricter regulation and more ethical conduct in mortgage enforcement practices across South Africa.


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The R440bn private transmission gamble that could finally end load shedding
Government fast-tracks private sector participation in grid infrastructure while the national transmission company prepares for a competitive electricity market by April 2026. South Africa's electricity salvation is called the Independent Transmission Projects (ITP) Programme – a joint venture between Kgosientsho Ramokgopa's Department of Electricity and Energy and Enoch Godongwana's National Treasury – and it's racing the clock to unlock billions in private investment and build the 14,000km of new transmission lines needed to connect renewable energy projects and end the country's electricity crisis. Speaking to the parliamentary committee on electricity and energy last week, Minister of Electricity and Energy Ramokgopa painted a picture of a country on the cusp of an energy revolution, but one that required unprecedented national rewiring coordination between government, the private sector and state-owned entities to succeed. Ramokgopa knows the stakes. It was his Integrated Resource Plan that estimated a desperate need of more than 14,000km of new transmission lines and 170 transformers over the next decade – requiring a minimum of the N1 road length from Joburg to Cape Town's worth of new lines annually – South Africa's current grid expansion pace is 'wholly inadequate', according to government briefings. Private sector rush The appetite for private sector involvement is clear. Between December 2024 and February 2025, the government conducted a request for information that received more than 130 formal responses from local and international developers, financiers, operators and equipment manufacturers. More than 44% of local participants indicated they intended to partner with international entities, suggesting the scale of investment required exceeds domestic capacity alone. The feedback was instructive: the industry reported a need for stable regulatory frameworks and a programmatic roll-out for pipeline predictability, while also flagging permitting, right-of-way acquisition and supply chain constraints as key risks requiring proactive mitigation. The government listened. First came the ministerial determination, gazetted on 28 March 2025, designating the Department of Electricity and Energy as the procurer and the National Transmission Company South Africa (NTCSA) as the buyer under Transmission Services Agreements. The determination defines Phase 1 scope as 1,164km of 400kV transmission lines across the Northern Cape, North-West and Gauteng. Expropriation trump card Next came the Draft Electricity Transmission Regulations, on 3 April, with public consultation closing on 22 May. The IPP Office will run the Phase 1 procurement, with pre-qualification tenders expected by end-July and requests for proposals by November. A persistent obstacle that the NTCSA inherited from Eskom is the complexities of securing land for its transmission lines. Ramokgopa confirmed that expropriation with compensation would be used 'as a final instrument' after exhausting other engagement options. For ITP projects, the government aims for 'late-stage tender' – resolving land acquisition, environmental impact assessments and statutory authorisations before developers take over execution, de-risking projects for private investors. Some discussions have stretched over four years without resolution, but the NTCSA says it is committed to meticulously adhering to proper procedures to mitigate the risk of litigation as it navigates these challenging negotiations. The R440bn funding puzzle The Transmission Development Plan requires R440-billion over the next decade. Ramokgopa was blunt about the funding reality: 'The sovereign balance sheet cannot provide a blanket sovereign guarantee for this investment, nor are Eskom's or NTCSA's balance sheets strong enough alone.' The government's solution is a 'bespoke financing instrument' backed by a Credit Guarantee Vehicle (CGV) developed with the World Bank. The CGV will be incorporated as a private non-life insurance company in South Africa and is expected to become operational in 2026. For the first five years, R155-billion will be spent on transmission infrastructure, with R30-billion expected from third-party debt by 2028. NTCSA's board has increased its five-year budget by about R40-billion to R130-billion, with 76% allocated for network expansion. A R219-billion provision from Budget 3.0 (part of the R1.03-trillion medium-term expenditure framework) was noted for strengthening the electricity supply network, from generation to transmission and distribution. Supply chain nationalism Ramokgopa pointed to the government's intention to build local industries on the back of energy investments rather than 'exporting opportunities'. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition is coordinating interventions to ensure local production of Class 4 transformers and steel. The progress is evident: 22 factories have been accredited for various transformer classes, while five of six identified steel tower suppliers have been certified. Eskom announced a panel of transformer suppliers in June 2024 to address demand for 101 large transformers over the next decade. Racing against time With the competitive electricity market targeted for April 2026 and the Credit Guarantee Vehicle becoming operational the same year, timelines are tight. The NTCSA is simultaneously developing market codes, managing infrastructure roll-outs and preparing for its role as market operator once the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act is passed. The South African Wholesale Electricity Market School will launch at Wits Business School to build market participant capabilities, while synchronous condensers are planned to strengthen grid stability as renewable penetration increases. That said, for the first time in years, South Africa has a comprehensive plan, committed funding mechanisms and private sector interest to transform its electricity system. Whether it can execute fast enough to meet the 2026 competitive market deadline – and finally end load shedding – remains the R440-billion question. DM


Eyewitness News
8 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
EFF says 'there's nothing that has improved' under GNU, which is a govt of convenience
Babalo Ndenze 15 June 2025 | 9:14 Government of national unity (GNU) Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) FILE: Newly sworn-in Cabinet ministers pose for a photo with Chief Justice Raymond Zondo and President Cyril Ramaphosa on 3 July 2024. Picture: GCIS CAPE TOWN - The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) say the Government of National Unity (GNU) has been a partnership of convenience and has failed, as the multi-party coalition enters a year since its establishment. This weekend marks a year since the GNU's statement of intent was signed by 10 parties to form the new government arrangement. While some consider the last 12 months year as being relatively stable, parties like the EFF are not happy with its performance, citing poor economic growth, growing unemployment and the delays in passing the recent budget. ALSO READ: • DA's Steenhuisen admits being in govt harder in reality than it appears from opposition benches • Steenhuisen says biggest surprise of past year is how well GNU partners stuck together • GNU at 1: Analysts believe not enough has been done to transcend party lines The GNU was formed in June last year after the May general election could not find a clear majority winner. The GNU, while still intact, has seen clashes over government policies like BBBEE and the Expropriation Act and the parties have still found no consensus with legal challenges before the courts. The EFF, which is not part of the GNU, said that the coalition of unlikely partners had been nothing but a series of failures. Spokesperson Sinawo Thambo: "Unemployment has increased, economic growth has stagnated - just now in the first quarter of 2025, the economy grew by 0.1% - there was a loss of 291,000 jobs and crimes statistics are continuously going up. So, there's nothing that has improved under the GNU government." He said that the recently passed budget, which was delayed by months due to disagreements over a value-added tax (VAT) and fuel levy increase, illustrated that it was nothing but a "government of convenience". "And the EFF is vindicated for that, and hopefully the people of South Africa will remember."