South Korea expressed concern over Chinese structure in disputed area of sea
The South Korean government's concerns were conveyed to Chinese officials during a maritime dialogue between the two countries in Seoul on Wednesday.
The Chinese side during the meeting had explained that the structure was fish-farming equipment and had nothing to do with territorial rights, the South Korean foreign ministry said in a statement on Thursday.
The structure in a disputed area of the Yellow Sea, known in South Korea as the West Sea, has raised alarm bells in Seoul over concerns China could be seeking to stake claims in the Provisional Maritime Zone, where the countries' exclusive economic zones overlap.
Both sides agreed to continue communication and with the understanding that the issue should not hinder bilateral relations, the ministry said.
China and South Korea agreed to continue strengthening communication and properly manage maritime differences, according to China's foreign ministry statement.
'Through diplomatic channels at various levels, it was decided to closely discuss the stable management of the maritime order in the West Sea and the expansion and deepening of tangible cooperation,' the South Korean foreign ministry statement said.
South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul told a parliamentary committee on Wednesday that Seoul was considering its response, including proportional countermeasures.
'The structure is within both Chinese and international law and does not violate the China-South Korea fisheries agreement,' the Chinese embassy in Seoul said in a statement last month.
Wednesday's bilateral meeting on maritime cooperation was attended by officials from the foreign ministries of both countries alongside other officials.
Kang Young-shin, South Korea's Deputy Director-General for Northeast Asian Affairs, and China's Director-General for Boundary and Ocean Affairs Hong Liang represented each side, according to Seoul's ministry. (Reporting by Joyce Lee and Hyunsu Yim in Seoul; Additional
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
28 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Flag blunder gives patriotic Akmal ammunition to position himself as an undisputed race, religion defender
AS SOON as a politician opens his mouth to speak on any issue – big or small – the whole matter becomes politicised. The latest storm to hit the headlines is the brouhaha over the national flag – the Jalur Gemilang – which was flown upside down at a Chinese-medium school. DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke claimed that 'certain quarters' were trying to politicise the incident but by virtue of his party status, he laid himself opened to prompt retaliation. UMNO Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh – the ever the party sentinel and warrior – returned fire, pointing out that Loke himself had politicised the issue by touching on the incident. Both politicians are playing politics but the more controversial of the two is Akmal who is ever on the look-out for sensitive issues to exploit and play to the gallery. True to form, Akmal went ballistic seeing the flag incident as a form of disrespect to your country. If you turned the flag upside down, it means you do not love your country. You have no fire of patriotism in your belly. Patriotism is such a loaded word today for it can be used or misused to suit one's political purpose. In the Malaysian context, when you say you are a patriot, it means you are largely fighting for your race and religion. Patriotic opportunist But when you say you are not patriotic, it connotes that you do not want to defend your country with your life. The argument can be further stretched to mean that you have no right to call Malaysia your home and must therefore be stripped of your citizenship or be treated like second-class citizens. It is not too difficult to fathom what Akmal is really aiming at when he beat his breast and screamed: 'I am a patriot!' The 'mistake' – accidental or not – happened in a Chinese-medium school and therein lies the crux of the matter: Akmal seems to be questioning the loyalty of an ethnic race, not just the students. Although the Education Ministry has promised a tough response against SJKC Chung Hua in Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan where the incident took place, Akmal might have other ideas in mind. He, too, wants stern action to be taken but what type of punishment can satisfy his political appetite? Let's make an educated guess. At a time when the existence of Chinese-medium schools has always been questioned, Akmal perhaps wants to see all such schools transformed into national schools where, he believes, patriotism is deeply embedded. Political mileage If this becomes a reality, this UMNO tiger would receive a tremendous boost to his political ambition and could be well on his way to a higher rank in the party or even gets a shot at an important cabinet post in the future. Akmal picks and chooses which topic can light up the country and in patriotism, not tariff reduction (a difficult subject), for he finds this is an ideal platform to whip up a perfect storm. Like clockwork, the Barbarism SOP kicks in whenever we approach a 'sensitive' patriotic season. Say the wrong thing, share the wrong post, blink in the wrong direction — and congratulations, you're suddenly 'anti-national.' The witch hunt begins. Doesn't matter who you are, or… — Fahmi Yumi 🕊 (@kaiyumi42) August 6, 2025 Patriotism carries within it the seeds of race and religion and can readily catch the attention of the grassroots Malays when all this potent combination is exploited. Patriotism also means you must defend king and country and a flag represents the fighting spirit of the citizens. So, when Akmal sees a flag flying upside down, it is equivalent to burning it or stomping on it. And when the incident happened in a Chinese-medium school, it is unforgiveable because it seemingly calls into question the loyalty of the Chinese community. Akmal's diehard fans may even postulate that Chinese schools do not teach patriotism or inculcate its spirit in their pupils and therefore they pose a threat to national security in the future. This is a simplistic argument which does not carry much weight because the Chinese – and all the other ethnic communities for that matter – have always called Malaysia their home. They have long ago planted the flag of patriotism in this native soil to which they will live, work and die in this tanaair kita (our motherland) – with or without Akmal. – Aug 7, 2025 Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Modi to visit China for first time in 7 years as tensions with US rise
Narendra Modi will head to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. (AP pic) NEW DELHI : Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said today, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the US rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on Aug 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after president Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10% tariff on imports from members – which include India – of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for 'aligning themselves with Anti-American policies'. Trump said today his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions. Meanwhile, India's national security adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named. Doval is likely to address India's defence cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defence system, and a possible visit by president Vladimir Putin to India. Doval's trip will be followed by foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come. Export impact US and Indian officials told Reuters a mix of political misjudgement, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over US$190 billion. India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about US$64 billion worth of goods sent to the US that account for 80% of its total exports, four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment. However, the relatively low share of exports in India's US$4 trillion economy is expected to limit the direct impact on economic growth. Today, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5% and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties. India's government assessment report has assumed a 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total US tariff to 35%, the sources said. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said. India exported goods estimated at around US$81 billion in 2024 to the US.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Seoul proposes law to protect steel industry
Tough times: Steel coils at a port in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. The country's steel industry is caught between the global push for carbon neutrality, cheap Chinese imports and steep tariffs from the United States, lawmakers say. — AFP SEOUL: South Korea is launching an aggressive policy push to rescue its steel industry from mounting global pressure, unveiling a bipartisan bill aimed at helping domestic producers hit hard by a 50% US tariff and a surge of low-cost Chinese products. Announced on Monday by 106 lawmakers from both ruling and opposition parties, the proposed 'K-Steel Act' outlines a long-term industrial strategy that frames steel as a vital base for national security and economic resilience. 'South Korea's steel industry has grown rapidly since 1970. But today, it faces an unprecedented crisis, caught between the global push for carbon neutrality, a flood of cheap Chinese imports and steep tariffs from key trading partners,' lawmakers said in explaining the purpose of the bill. They warned that failure to act would leave South Korea exposed on multiple fronts. A shrinking domestic steel base could ripple across its broader industrial ecosystem, threatening other sectors from shipbuilding to electric vehicle development. 'This bill is about both survival and transformation,' said Representative Eoh Kiy-ku of the ruling Democratic Party and co-chair of the National Assembly Steel Forum. 'With bipartisan support, we plan to pass this bill quickly and follow up with additional legislation if needed.' Steel remains a pillar of South Korea's manufacturing economy, accounting for 4.8% of national output and supporting more than 430,000 jobs. But that foundation is under threat. Despite a recent South Korea-US tariff deal lowering duties on most goods to 15%, the United States will maintain a 50% tariff on South Korean steel. At the same time, the European Union's (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, set to be launched next year, will impose extra costs on South Korean steelmakers exporting to the EU unless they decarbonise fast. South Korea's push comes as other major economies, including the United States, EU and Japan, have already begun ramping up public support for their own steel sectors. From the US Inflation Reduction Act to EU climate subsidies, governments are blending industrial policy with climate action in a bid to secure supply chains, while hitting net-zero targets. The K-Steel Act lays out a comprehensive policy framework that would give the government a more direct role in shaping the industry's future. Central to the proposal is the creation of a presidential committee tasked with crafting five-year master plans and annual action roadmaps to steer the steel sector through economic and environmental challenges. To support the industry's green transition, the bill includes a wide range of financial incentives. These include subsidies, low interest loans, tax breaks and production cost support for companies investing in hydrogen-based and other low-emission technologies. It also introduces 'green steel zones' – designated areas where permitting and regulatory processes would be streamlined to encourage investment and innovation. The legislation also strengthens South Korea's defensive trade measures. It calls for tighter rules of origin, curbs on low quality steel imports and expanded authority for the government to counter unfair trade practices. In cases where market-driven restructuring proves insufficient, the government would be authorised to step in with financial and regulatory support, including temporary exemptions from antitrust laws for mergers deemed necessary to stabilise the industry. — The Korea Herald/ANN
