logo
Flag blunder gives patriotic Akmal ammunition to position himself as an undisputed race, religion defender

Flag blunder gives patriotic Akmal ammunition to position himself as an undisputed race, religion defender

Focus Malaysia3 days ago
AS SOON as a politician opens his mouth to speak on any issue – big or small – the whole matter becomes politicised.
The latest storm to hit the headlines is the brouhaha over the national flag – the Jalur Gemilang – which was flown upside down at a Chinese-medium school.
DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke claimed that 'certain quarters' were trying to politicise the incident but by virtue of his party status, he laid himself opened to prompt retaliation.
UMNO Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh – the ever the party sentinel and warrior – returned fire, pointing out that Loke himself had politicised the issue by touching on the incident.
Both politicians are playing politics but the more controversial of the two is Akmal who is ever on the look-out for sensitive issues to exploit and play to the gallery.
True to form, Akmal went ballistic seeing the flag incident as a form of disrespect to your country. If you turned the flag upside down, it means you do not love your country. You have no fire of patriotism in your belly.
Patriotism is such a loaded word today for it can be used or misused to suit one's political purpose. In the Malaysian context, when you say you are a patriot, it means you are largely fighting for your race and religion.
Patriotic opportunist
But when you say you are not patriotic, it connotes that you do not want to defend your country with your life.
The argument can be further stretched to mean that you have no right to call Malaysia your home and must therefore be stripped of your citizenship or be treated like second-class citizens.
It is not too difficult to fathom what Akmal is really aiming at when he beat his breast and screamed: 'I am a patriot!'
The 'mistake' – accidental or not – happened in a Chinese-medium school and therein lies the crux of the matter: Akmal seems to be questioning the loyalty of an ethnic race, not just the students.
Although the Education Ministry has promised a tough response against SJKC Chung Hua in Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan where the incident took place, Akmal might have other ideas in mind.
He, too, wants stern action to be taken but what type of punishment can satisfy his political appetite?
Let's make an educated guess. At a time when the existence of Chinese-medium schools has always been questioned, Akmal perhaps wants to see all such schools transformed into national schools where, he believes, patriotism is deeply embedded.
Political mileage
If this becomes a reality, this UMNO tiger would receive a tremendous boost to his political ambition and could be well on his way to a higher rank in the party or even gets a shot at an important cabinet post in the future.
Akmal picks and chooses which topic can light up the country and in patriotism, not tariff reduction (a difficult subject), for he finds this is an ideal platform to whip up a perfect storm.
Like clockwork, the Barbarism SOP kicks in whenever we approach a 'sensitive' patriotic season.
Say the wrong thing, share the wrong post, blink in the wrong direction — and congratulations, you're suddenly 'anti-national.'
The witch hunt begins. Doesn't matter who you are, or… pic.twitter.com/v8g2iJkGSb
— Fahmi Yumi 🕊 (@kaiyumi42) August 6, 2025
Patriotism carries within it the seeds of race and religion and can readily catch the attention of the grassroots Malays when all this potent combination is exploited.
Patriotism also means you must defend king and country and a flag represents the fighting spirit of the citizens.
So, when Akmal sees a flag flying upside down, it is equivalent to burning it or stomping on it. And when the incident happened in a Chinese-medium school, it is unforgiveable because it seemingly calls into question the loyalty of the Chinese community.
Akmal's diehard fans may even postulate that Chinese schools do not teach patriotism or inculcate its spirit in their pupils and therefore they pose a threat to national security in the future.
This is a simplistic argument which does not carry much weight because the Chinese – and all the other ethnic communities for that matter – have always called Malaysia their home.
They have long ago planted the flag of patriotism in this native soil to which they will live, work and die in this tanaair kita (our motherland) – with or without Akmal. – Aug 7, 2025
Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jalur Gemilang - Symbol of country's dignity
Jalur Gemilang - Symbol of country's dignity

The Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Jalur Gemilang - Symbol of country's dignity

KUALA LUMPUR: Any dissatisfaction or discontent with the country is not a licence or permit to insult the national flag. Legal and constitutional expert Associate Professor Datuk Dr Shamrahayu A. Aziz said public awareness of the correct and respectful use of the Jalur Gemilang must be strengthened to safeguard the country's dignity and sovereignty. She said the adult generation must serve as role models for the young, as reflected in the saying 'bapa borek, anak rintik', where good practices in handling and displaying the flag become a legacy for future generations. 'In recent years, we have seen various mistakes made by our people when using or hoisting the flag, for example, flying it upside down, darkening its colours, displaying flags with the wrong number of stars or points, and so on. 'When such errors occur, they reflect the identity of Malaysians themselves,' she told Bernama recently. Shamrahayu added that the improper use or display of the flag not only tarnishes the country's image but can also undermine the nation's dignity. Although there is no specific constitutional provision on national symbols, Shamrahayu said government guidelines regarding the flag should be more widely publicised, and if offences become frequent, formal regulations could be developed based on the principles of the Rukun Negara and the Constitution. 'If we find that offences relating to the flag and national symbols are occurring often, then perhaps we should formalise guidelines based on the Rukun Negara and the Constitution to ensure proper and respectful use of the Jalur Gemilang,' she said. Shamrahayu emphasised that the Jalur Gemilang is not merely a piece of coloured cloth, but a symbol of national sovereignty and identity. She urged Malaysians to understand the meaning behind each colour and symbol, and to fly the flag with pride, not only during Merdeka celebrations, but throughout the year. Meanwhile, Chairman of the Centre for Development, Social and Environmental Studies at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Prof Dr Novel Lyndon, said that the act of flying the national flag reflects a person's level of respect and love for the country. 'This act is a symbol of patriotism that appreciates the services of freedom fighters and the history of building a sovereign nation,' he said. He said the act of hoisting a flag that is worn, torn or not in accordance with the rules gives the impression that some people are less sensitive to the symbols of the nation, thus affecting the image of the country in the eyes of the local and international community. Such attitudes, he warned, could weaken national identity and erode patriotic spirit among the young generation. To address this, Novel proposed strengthening patriotic education from the school level through history and civics lessons, while using mass media, community programmes, and National Month celebrations to foster love for the nation. 'Without this awareness, the flag will only be seen as a piece of cloth, no longer a symbol of dignity, pride, and the spirit of the struggle for independence,' he stressed. – Bernama

What we reported 60 years ago
What we reported 60 years ago

Daily Express

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Express

What we reported 60 years ago

Published on: Sunday, August 10, 2025 Published on: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 By: Patrick J Killen Text Size: Daily Express front page on Aug. 10, 1965. Kuala Lumpur: Singapore today seceded from the two-year old Federation of Malaysia and announced it would like to settle any differences with Indonesia if the agreement would 'not endanger us' (In Jakarta, Indonesian leaders hailed the breakup of the Federation as a victory for Indonesia's campaign against Malaysia. Foreign Minister Subandrio said Indonesia probably would recognise Singapore and continue to seek the complete destruction of Malaysia.) Advertisement Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew said after announcing his government's secession: 'We want to be friends with Indonesia. We would like to settle any differences with Indonesia, but we must survive. 'We must be sure that we cannot be overrun or invaded by an army or rockets or missiles. It is important that we want to be friends in spite of all that had happened.' A few hours after Lee announced secession, Kuala Lumpur's Federal Parliament passed a constitutional amendment making Singapore independent as of today. Advertisement It was announced that Bri-tain's important military bases on Singapore would remain intact, as would those of Malaysia, pending a new agreement among the three governments. Malaysia reserved the right to take action if Singapore engaged in activities which threatened Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul. Rahman stressed that potential racial trouble was the major reason for Singapore's separation during his speech to Parliament and a news conference seven hours later. He said there were two courses open: Singapore's withdrawal or 'repressive measures' against Singapore leaders. In the end, he said, repressive measures might not solve the problem and Malaysia's thousands of students abroad would be 'fed with all kinds of propaganda against the Central Government.' He said he had decided on severing relations with the 'State Government that has ceased to give even measure of loyalty to Malaysia.' Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, acting on the permission of the King, signed the amendment into law, making the separation of Singapore legal and complete. Singapore and Malaysian leaders agreed on the surprise moves on Saturday, after a series of secret meetings. Under the pact, Malaysia and Singapore agreed to co-operate in External. Defence, Trade and Commerce. Although Singapore was free, it agreed not to under-take foreign treaties to the detriment of Malaysia. Tunku Abdul Rahman made clear at a news conference Malaysia reserved the right to take action if Singapore engaged in activities which threatened Malaysia. This included establishing relations with Communist China and Indonesia. The Tunku said he had decided to seek Singapore's withdrawal because he feared the continuing differences might lead to Malay-Chinese racial trouble. He said he hoped for the 'closest co-operation' bet-ween an independent Singapore and Malaysia. He said Malaysia would sponsor Singapore's admittance to the United Nations and the Commonwealth. The Prime Minister was anxious after the press con-ference this evening to know about the people's reaction to the separation. He asked newsmen how the people had received the news and whether there had been any violent demonstrations. On being told there has been no incidents he said, 'Well I am happy to hear had to do this.' Alliance and some opposition members of the Parliament said in the lobby this had to be done. However, members of the Sarawak and Sabah Alliance Party on being approached for comment on the matter said, 'no comment. We will make a statement later perhaps.' However they voted for the motion. The Tunku's relaxed mood and ready smile at the news conference was in sharp contrast to that of Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. At a Singapore news conference, Lee broke down and wept while speaking of the breakup. Lee said he met the Tunku last Saturday and was unconvinced Singapore's withdrawal from Malaysia was necessary. 'I believed there were still other ways to reduce communal tensions in Malaysia. After what he told me I realized there was no other way. We had to leave Malaysia.' 'I knew from what he said that we would all be in. for communal trouble if we insisted on remaining in Malaysia.' Describing it as a 'moment of anguish,' the 42-year-old Prime Minister told, newsmen: 'The whole of my adult life I have believed in merger and unity of these two countries.' Under the new arrangement Malaysia would continue as a Federation of 13 states including the Borneo Territories of Sabah and Sarawak. Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak—all British dependencies—merged with the Federation of Malaya on Sept. 16, 1963 to form Malaysia. Singapore as an independent island state 26 miles long and14 miles wide has a population of 1.7 million. Malaysia's population was reduced to about 8.5 million. Addressing parliament earlier today, the Tunku said the situation had reached a point where it was no longer worth having Singapore in the Federation. At his news conference, he said when Malaysia was formed he had hoped to prevent Singapore from becoming a 'second Cuba,' a communist island Just south of the Malay Peninsula. But, he said, the Singapore leaders were too involved in. politics to co-operate and work for a successful Malaysia. The Tunku said the foreign nations closest to Malaysia—Britain, Australia and New Zealand—had shown 'great disappointment' in the move. 'But,' he said, 'we have got to think what's best for the country and not what's best for our friends.' The Tunku said he had considered the problems of Malaysia while recovering from an attack of shingles or herpes in London last month. He said during this time Deputy Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak and Lee met in Kuala Lumpur but were unable to agree on any points. The Tunku returned to Malaysia after a 54-day absence on Thursday. He said he got a thorough briefing of the situation at that time. The matter was discussed at an emergency cabinet meeting on Friday. On Saturday, the Tunku reached his decision that Singapore must go and conveyed his thoughts to Lee. After some reluctance, the Singapore leader and his nine cabinet ministers all signed the agreement. Five Federal cabinet ministers signed for Malaysia. The decision was kept secret until today when it was to be released at 10 a.m. local time (0230 GMT). The Tunku said, however, Lee broke the news of Singapore's independence three hours earlier. Singapore's new status took most of Malaysia's 10.2 million people by complete surprise. Reaction was slow because of the shock effect. Singapore was reported quiet with troops patrolling predominant Malay areas where race riots broke out last year. The Tunku called on the people to remain calm. He said those persons who wanted to come to Malaysia would be provided land in Johore State, just to the north of Singapore. The Minister of Sarawak Affairs, Dato Temmenggong Jugah told Parliament Sarawak would never withdraw from Malaysia. There was no immediate reaction from Sabah. Although the Singapore and Central Governments had many differences, neither had directly called for a break-up of Malaysia. Both the Tunku and Lee were regarded as the fathers of Malaysia and pushed for its inception. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store