Former Baylor official placed nearly 3,000 impermissible fantasy bets, 113 involving the school
The NCAA says Sam Hancock, a former director of resource development at the Big 12 school, placed 2,950 impermissible bets totaling $45,979 on three different sports betting platforms from July 2019 through September 2024.
Advertisement
According to the NCAA case summary posted this month, Hancock acknowledged that he engaged in sports betting before his employment at Baylor and continued to do so after being hired, despite receiving rules education from the school and knowing that his conduct violated NCAA rules.
NCAA rules that went into effect last October allow sports betting violations that do not compromise the integrity of collegiate contests and/or involve lack of institutional oversight to be processed at different levels for the involved individual and school.
The case originated last August 31, when Baylor received notification that Hancock participated in impermissible sports betting activity through the daily fantasy betting website PrizePicks. The school self-reported the violations to NCAA enforcement staff after interviewing Hancock, who confirmed that he had placed impermissible bets.
Under the show-cause order that goes through April 9, 2027, any NCAA institution employing Hancock would have to require him to seek and participate in gambling counseling, and attend the annual NCAA regional rules seminal at his own expense. He would also have to be suspended for two weeks during the first year of his employment within the show-case period, when he could not participate in any athletics activities.
___
AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
4 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Police launch hate crime probe in Liverpool after fan's alleged racial abuse of Semenyo during game
LIVERPOOL, England (AP) — Police launched a hate crime investigation after ejecting a 47-year-old fan from Liverpool's stadium for his alleged racial abuse of Bournemouth forward Antoine Semenyo during the opening match of the Premier League season. The incident occurred Friday night at Anfield when Semenyo, who is Black, reported the abuse to referee Anthony Taylor in the first half with the score at 0-0. Play was briefly stopped while Taylor spoke to both coaches and team captains. 'Merseyside Police will not tolerate hate crime of any form,' said Chief Inspector Kev Chatterton, the match commander. The fan's identity was confirmed and he was removed from the stadium, police added. 'We take incidents like this very seriously, and in cases like this we will be proactively seeking football banning orders, with the club, against those responsible,' Chatterton said. Semenyo, who scored both of Bournemouth's goals in the 4-2 loss, later posted further racial abuse that he received online. 'When will it stop,' the 25-year-old Ghana international wrote on his Instagram account. Bournemouth players had consoled Semenyo and an anti-discrimination message was read out to the crowd inside Anfield after the halftime whistle. The Premier League also said it will investigate the incident and 'offer our full support to the player and both clubs.' In a statement, Liverpool said it was aware of the allegation and that it condemns 'racism and discrimination in all forms.' 'The club is unable to comment further as tonight's alleged incident is the subject of an ongoing police investigation, which we will support fully,' it added late Friday.
Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Suddenly Shifts With Gen Z
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has rebounded with Gen Z voters, according to a new poll. Trump's approval rating among the youngest voters remains underwater, but the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between August 9-11, shows Trump's net approval rating at -28 (33 percent approve, 61 percent disapprove), a 10-point jump from last month when it was -38 (18 percent approved and 66 percent disapproved). But his net approval rating remains far lower than it was in January, when it stood at +5 points. Why It Matters In the 2024 election, Trump made inroads with young voters, narrowing the Democrats' traditional lead among Gen Z—a group that has typically leaned left in recent cycles. According to AP VoteCast, voters ages 18 to 29 supported then Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump by just 51 percent to 47 percent. In 2020, Joe Biden carried the same age group by a much wider margin, winning 61 percent to Trump's 36 percent. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP What To Know Trump's standing with Gen Z voters has improved over the past month, with notable gains on the economy, immigration, and inflation, alongside modest increases in trust and confidence in his leadership, according to the polling. The August YouGov/Economist poll surveyed 1,635 adults and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percent. The July poll surveyed 1,680 adults and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percent. On the economy, approval rose from 30 percent in July to 36 percent in August, while disapproval fell from 64 percent to 54 percent. Meanwhile, approval of his handling of inflation jumped from 23 percent to 31 percent, with disapproval dropping from 72 percent to 60 percent. Inflation rose to 2.7 percent year-on-year in June, the highest reading since February, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Gen Z's view of economic trends also improved. In July, 12 percent said the economy was getting better, 27 percent said it was the same, and 58 percent saw it getting worse. By August, "better" climbed to 18 percent, "same" dipped slightly to 25 percent, and "worse" fell to 51 percent. But Trump's approval rating on the economy is still substantially lower than it was in January, when his net approval among Gen Z stood at +18 points. Job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added, far lower than expected. After last month's jobs report was published, Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. In a post, Trump accused McEntarfer—without offering evidence—of rigging the numbers to harm his administration. But that move by Trump was not popular among Gen Z voters, with only 13 percent saying the decision was justified—50 percent said they were not sure. Despite that, the latest poll shows small but measurable gains in perceptions of Trump's character and leadership. In August, 22 percent described him as honest, up from 20 percent in July, while the share saying he is not honest fell from 67 percent to 57 percent. But overall, Trump's honesty rating has fallen to its lowest point since he reentered the White House, with just 31 percent of Americans viewing Trump as trustworthy as he has recently faced mounting criticism for his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Billionaire Elon Musk has urged Trump to "just release the files as promised," while author Michael Wolff has speculated that Trump may be seeking major distractions to shift attention away from the Epstein fallout. Victims and advocacy groups remain adamant that all records be made public, arguing that the current handling of the case "smacks of a cover-up." Public discontent is also reflected in the polls. On the Jeffrey Epstein case, only 13 percent of Gen Z voters approve of Trump's handling, while 69 percent disapprove. And 44 percent believe he knew "a lot" of Epstein's crimes before investigations began—and 32 percent think he knew "some." Trump has said that he had no knowledge of, or involvement, in Epstein's crimes. What Happens Next The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the DOJ for its files on Epstein, with a deadline of August 19 to hand them over, suggesting the issue isn't going away for the president anytime soon. And Trump's new nominee to run the BLS hinted at suspending the monthly release of jobs data. August's numbers are due to be published in the first week of September.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is a show-cause order? Explaining NCAA's Michigan penalties
The NCAA announced Friday it was handing out four different show-cause orders to the four people most involved in the University of Michigan football team's sign-stealing scandal in 2023. But what is a show-cause order? And who is it affecting? The NCAA's announcement on Aug. 15 of sanctions against the Michigan program included penalties for four people associated with the scandal: Connor Stalions, the former Michigan defensive analyst who orchestrated much of the illicit "off-campus, in-person scouting scheme;" Jim Harbaugh, former Michigan head coach and current Los Angeles Chargers head coach; Denard Robinson, former assistant director of player personnel for Michigan; and Sherrone Moore, Michigan's active head coach. Here's what to know about the show-cause orders imposed on each of them: NCAA PUNISHMENT: Explaining former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh's sanctions Who was penalized by the NCAA for Michigan's sign-stealing scandal? The NCAA announced its sanctions for Michigan's illicit activities in the 2023 season on Friday. Here are the four active or former personnel members of the Michigan football program hit with sanctions for their involvement in the Wolverines' sign-stealing scandal and what their penalties are, per the NCAA: Former defensive analyst Connor Stalions: Eight-year show-cause order Former head coach Jim Harbaugh: 10-year show-cause order, which begins Aug. 7, 2028 after the conclusion of a current, four-year show-cause order from a previous rules violation. Former assistant director of player personnel Denard Robinson: Three-year show-cause order Current head coach Sherrone Moore: Two-year show-cause order, plus a three-game ban. Michigan self-imposed a two-game ban for Moore during the 2025 season, which he will serve in Weeks 3 and 4 (vs. Central Michigan, at Nebraska) this year. The NCAA also imposed its own one-game ban for the Wolverines' first game in the 2026 season (vs. Western Michigan in Germany). MICHIGAN SIGN-STEALING PUNISHMENT: NCAA suspends Sherrone Moore, show-cause for Connor Stalions All three former members of Michigan's football program are not currently employed by a college football program and are restricted "from all athletically related activities during the show-cause period." Moore, who is Michigan's active head coach, did not receive the same prohibitions. The football program as a whole also received its own list of penalties. They include four years' probation, a "multimillion-dollar fine" and certain prohibitions on recruitment: "a 25% reduction in football official visits during the 2025-26 season" and "a 14-week prohibition on recruiting communications in the football program during the probation period." SHERRONE MOORE SUSPENSION: Is Michigan head coach suspended for Week 1? What is a show-cause order? A show-cause order is essentially a college football-wide ban on hiring a person to join their coaching staff. If Michigan or any other college football program wanted to hire Stalions, Harbaugh, Robinson or Moore (or any other person with an active show-cause), it would have to appear before the NCAA's committee on infractions and make a strong case for why it specifically wants to hire one of them. The name "show cause" comes from the case that the prospective employer must make to the NCAA, showing cause for why previous infractions will not happen again if a previous offender is hired at a new program. Show-cause orders are a somewhat common penalty imposed on coaches or other personnel found to have violated major rules. DAN WOLKEN: Divided opinions on Michigan sign-stealing scandal just part of college football tribalism Other recent/active show-cause orders in college athletics Here are a few other examples of recent or active show-cause orders in college sports: Kelvin Sampson, 2008: The former Indiana head basketball coach and current Houston head coach received a five-year show-cause for NCAA violations during his time at Indiana, including impermissible calls to recruits. Bruce Pearl, 2011: The former Tennessee head basketball coach and current head coach at Auburn received a three-year show-cause for lying to the NCAA about hosting a recruit during a cookout at his home. Jim Tressel, 2011: The former Ohio State head coach received a five-year show-cause for failing to report NCAA violations involving his team's players. Jeremy Pruitt, 2023: The former Tennessee head football coach received a six-year show-cause for providing impermissible benefits to recruits during his time coaching the Volunteers. Pruitt's show-cause is still active and runs through July 13, 2029. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Show-cause order, explained: What Michigan's NCAA penalties mean
