ActionSA enters Phala Phala battleground
Image: Ayanda Ndamane
THE fight to hold President Cyril Ramaphosa accountable over the Phala Phala saga appears far from over as ActionSA has now set its sights on having access to the information that led to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate's (Ipid) report being shelved from the public.
The investigation relates to the alleged cover up of the theft of hundreds of thousands of US dollars in cash from Ramaphosa's couches on his Phala Phala farm, in Limpopo in 2020.
Despite there being no police case opened, state resources including sophisticated machines used to intercept devices were used to track down the suspects who stole the cash. Once found, among them in Cape Town, the suspects were allegedly assaulted to disclose the whereabouts of the remaining cash. Some of it had already been spent on high end vehicles, jewellery and property in Namibia.
In 2022, the African Transformation Movement (ATM) wrote to Ipid requesting an investigation into the alleged police cover-up. However, in a written reply to a parliamentary question by ATM leader Vuyo Zungula in February, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, said the report related to the investigation was "top secret" and would not be made public, sparking public outcry.
ActionSA weighed in on the matter on Tuesday by confirming that it recently submitted an application, in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA), to obtain the Ipid report.
In response to the Cape Times' questions, Ipid confirmed they received the application but maintained the report remained classified.
'IPID received a request for information from ActionSA on April 22, 2025. Their request was acknowledged on April 23, 2025 and (they) were advised to provide more detail on their request as well as to use the correct form, which was emailed to them. 'In terms of PAIA, our turnaround time to respond to any requests for information is 30 days. It should also be noted that the Phala Phala Report remains classified,' said Ipid spokesperson Lizzy Suping.
ActionSA national chairperson Michael Beaumont has maintained that despite several reports, the public still 'does not have access to the information it rightfully deserves'.
Classifying a report top secret according to parliamentary policies was only applicable to information that could lead to the declaration of war, the severing of diplomatic ties between states, significant damage to inter-institutional operations, or the disruption of strategic information planning qualifies for such a classification, said the party.
'It must be stressed that a Cabinet policy is subordinate to higher legislation, including the Promotion of Access to Information Act and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The filing of this PAIA application is a fulfilment of our promise to demand transparency from the grand coalition government and to ensure that its leaders act with ethical consideration. ActionSA will continue to serve as an uncompromised, unofficial opposition, filling the void left by former opposition parties that stampeded for power last year. Transparency is not optional. It can never be subjected to political compromise, and it is needed now more than ever, with a colossal GNU constituting 70% of the South African Parliament. South Africans deserve answers on Phala Phala, and ActionSA's application is one step towards ensuring those answers are delivered," Beaumont said.
The party was also willing to take the matter to court if necessary.
Reacting to ActionSA's application, Zungula, who has also called for the report to be made public, said: 'This is a good move in the fight for accountability and the rule of law. People occupying public office must know they will be held accountable and their actions will be scrutinised even if they attempt to conceal wrongdoing. Transparency is critical to ascertain which public institutions acted in violation of law. The PPS unit attached to the President is still operating yet they were involved in a police cover-up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
30 minutes ago
- eNCA
Trump orders space regulations eased in win for Musk
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday easing regulations for the private space industry, including eliminating some environmental reviews, in a move likely to please his erstwhile advisor Elon Musk. The executive order, which said it aimed to "substantially" increase the number of space launches in the United States, was described by an environmental group as "reckless." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has talked up several space missions including sending humans to the Moon and Mars. The Moon and Mars missions are planned to get a ride on the massive Starship rocket of Musk's private firm SpaceX. However, Starship has had a series of setbacks, with its latest routine test ending in a fiery explosion in June. AFP/File | TIMOTHY A. CLARY SpaceX dominates the global launch market, with its various-sized rockets blasting off more than 130 times last year - and that number looks set to rise after Trump's executive order. "It is the policy of the United States to enhance American greatness in space by enabling a competitive launch marketplace and substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence" by 2030, the order read. The change could well benefit Musk, who has long advocated for deregulation of the space industry. The world's richest man was previously a close advisor to Trump before the pair had a dramatic, public falling out in July. The executive order also called on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy - who was at the signing and is currently NASA's administrator - "to eliminate or expedite the Department of Transportation's environmental reviews" for launches. SpaceX has been repeatedly criticised over the environmental impact at the sites where Starship, the largest and most powerful rocket in history, blasts off. The US-based nonprofit Centre for Biological Diversity said Trump's new executive order "paves the way for the massive destruction of protected plants and animals." "This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas," the centre's Jared Margolis said in a statement. Musk's dreams of colonising Mars rely on the success of Starship, and SpaceX has been betting that its "fail fast, learn fast" ethos will eventually pay off. The Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in annual Starship rocket launches from five to 25 in early May, stating that the increased frequency would not adversely affect the environment.
eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
We need to make water investment a priority
CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa hopes the water summit taking place in Cape Town will mobilise global leaders to lend a hand in improving Africa's water security. The three-day summit which sees the African Union promote the Continental Africa Water Investment Programme.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
What role, if any, is South Africa playing in Ukraine peace efforts?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been in direct telephonic contact with all the main players, but it is unclear just how significant a role South Africa can, or will play. Before the big Ukraine war peace summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, 15 August 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa had phone calls last week with the three key players, Putin, Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky – who is, inexplicably, not invited to the Alaska meeting. Were Ramaphosa's calls an indication that he and South Africa have a role to play in trying to end Russia's brutal war on Ukraine, now in its 42nd month? Or was this merely some sort of diplomatic name-dropping? It's clear from the statement by his office that Ramaphosa and Trump mainly discussed tariffs and other aspects of the fraught South Africa-US relationship. Whether they also talked about Trump's peace efforts in Ukraine is unclear. But peace was, of course, the main focus of Ramaphosa's calls with Putin on Thursday, 7 August and Zelensky on 8 August. The Kremlin statement said Putin had shared with Ramaphosa the main results of his conversation the day before in Moscow with Trump's special envoy on the peace process, Steven Witkoff. Putin also complimented the African Peace Initiative, the delegation of Africans which Ramaphosa led in June 2023, meeting Zelensky in Kyiv and Putin in St Petersburg. Ramaphosa's office later said Putin had asked to brief the President on the peace process and had 'expressed his recognition and appreciation for South Africa's involvement in advancing a peace process between Russia and Ukraine'. Call with Zelensky, cryptic statements A day later, Zelensky posted on X that his call with Ramaphosa had been 'a friendly and candid conversation about how to achieve real peace and stop the killings'. He said Ramaphosa had shared details of his conversation with 'the Russian side' (Putin) and was adamant that 'the path to peace must begin with a ceasefire'. Ramaphosa's office said Zelensky 'expressed his appreciation for South Africa's continued support in finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. These statements were rather cryptic. Zelensky and Putin are poles apart on how to end this vicious war, yet both expressed appreciation for Ramaphosa's contributions to peace efforts. So what did Ramaphosa say, what advice, if any, did he give? No one who really knows seems to be saying. Jalel Harchaoui, a political scientist at the Royal United Services Institute, said he believed 'Ramaphosa couldn't possibly have said anything of relevance' in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin. And Ramaphosa's conversations with Zelensky and Putin were probably 'just standard fare', underlining his general narrative that he wants a ceasefire. 'And that does not mean over-concern about Ukraine's territorial integrity or the status of the occupied territories,' said Samuel Ramani, lecturer in politics and international relations at Oxford University (and author of the book, Russia in Africa). 'Moreover, South Africa wants to be seen as supportive of a key Trump initiative to help it deal with the US 30% import tariffs. So I think this is largely routine from him. I wouldn't read too much into it,' he said. Peace talks in SA? One source suggested, however, that a future round of the peace talks starting in Alaska could be held in South Africa. Was this discussed in the phone calls? Dzvinka Kachur, co-founder of the Ukrainian Association in South Africa, noted that Ramaphosa had in the past spoken about the importance of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and so she hoped that he underscored this in his call with Putin. It should also be noted that Zelensky made about 30 calls to international leaders last week to underscore his point that no Ukraine peace negotiations were possible without Ukraine in the room, and that a ceasefire should be unconditional, rather than conditioned on territorial concessions, as the US had initially suggested. And it is understood that Putin also initiated the call to Ramaphosa. Nevertheless Ramaphosa's phone conversations – and there have been others, as well as Zelensky's visit to Pretoria in April and Ramaphosa's in-person meeting with Putin at the BRICS+ summit in Kazan in October 2024 – do prompt the wider question of whether Ramaphosa and South Africa are playing any kind of real role in the Ukraine peace process, and if so what is the contribution, and what should it be? Kachur noted that South Africa was playing a concrete role in the attempts to return some of the about 20,000 Ukrainian children abducted by Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and deported to Russia. When Zelensky met Ramaphosa in Pretoria, he gave him a list of 400 abducted children who South Africa promised to try to return – but with no success and no visible progress so far. African Peace Initiative But Kachur believes there is much South Africa and Ramaphosa could still do for Africa and otherwise. The 2023 African Peace Initiative remained important, not only because of those direct impacts which Ramani mentioned – such as African food insecurity caused by Russia's blockade of Ukraine's grain exports. It also remained important because the Ukraine war also had wider, deeper and longer impacts on principles important to Africa, such as restitution for war damages, accountability for aggression, reframing borders, and the future of the UN system. She also noted that Russia's questionable presence in the Central African Republic, Mali and Niger through the Wagner private security company and its successor, the Africa Corps, had direct negative outcomes for the human rights, safety and security of the continent. 'The illegal, undocumented export of raw materials from these countries also provides Russia with the funding to continue the aggression. This is not bringing any benefits to the continent, but creates more trauma, undocumented weapons and suffering.' And she believes that given its history and role as a champion of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, South Africa could and should be doing more to ensure nuclear safety – which has been jeopardised by Russia's military capture of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Perhaps Ramaphosa was conveying messages in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin, said Steven Gruzd, head of the Africa-Russia project at the South African Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg. 'But I don't think South Africa is playing any major role in peacemaking between Ukraine and Russia. 'I don't see much room and evidence of us being a major peacemaker. 'The African Peace Initiative didn't really go very far. And there was not much follow-up. I don't think the money or the infrastructure has been put behind it to really make it a serious effort.' Gruzd added though that South Africa had also 'taken measures to appear less one-sided (i.e. pro-Russian) in this conflict, the biggest being Zelensky's visit to SA in April'. He thought that South Africa could play a bigger role in the Ukraine peace effort but that would require US support, which could in turn improve its poor relations with Washington. And he noted that South Africa has attended most of Zelensky's international peace formula meetings (which began in 2023) and is working on two points of the formula – returning kidnapped Ukrainian children and exchanging prisoners of war. Denys Reva, researcher at the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, said those meetings still continued at a lower level (mainly, it seems, on the return of the abducted children). And although the African Peace Initiative did not seem to still exist as a formal grouping, South Africa had been engaging in different peace processes, promoting the values of the African peace plan, including advancing African interests and values. For example, at the UN in New York in September 2024, South Africa joined the 'Friends for Peace' group backing the China-Brazil peace plan (which Zelensky strongly opposes because he believes it serves Moscow's interests mainly because it does not demand the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine, as his plan does). Read more: War in Ukraine 'Realistically, no single initiative has yet succeeded in bringing peace,' Reva says. 'Pretoria seems to have shifted its emphasis towards humanitarian concerns, rather than positioning itself as a primary broker of a peace settlement.' He added that 'SA's readiness to mediate the return of the children is an important humanitarian contribution amid stalled negotiations elsewhere. I think Pretoria has been fairly consistent in this regard, and I think that both Kyiv and Moscow probably welcome South African efforts.' And he said both Kyiv and Moscow also see South Africa as crucial in improving their relations with Africa. Ramani said: 'I'm not hearing too much about South Africa being an influential interlocutor.' He added that other countries of the Global South were playing a greater peace role, citing the United Arab Emirates, which he said had hoped to host Friday's summit between Trump and Putin. However, he also added that South Africa was probably doing its best to ensure that the voice of Africa was heard in the Ukraine peace process, and that this was important because the war had significant implications for food security, supply chains and many other things that impacted Africa's socioeconomic development so profoundly. DM
