logo
Swinney: Reasonable for ex-Dundee University principal to return £150,000 payout

Swinney: Reasonable for ex-Dundee University principal to return £150,000 payout

Rhyl Journal8 hours ago

Professor Iain Gillespie told MSPs on Thursday it was not in his 'thought process' to hand back the cash, although he accepted the 'buck stops with me' for the university's difficulties.
He stepped down from his post at the university – which is looking to cut hundreds of posts as it tries to deal with a £35 million deficit – in December.
He told Holyrood's Education Committee, which is examining the difficulties faced by the institution, that the university had a 'contractual obligation' to pay him the cash.
Prof Gillespie insisted it was 'not in my thought process to repay a contractual obligation to me for my work at the university' – although he added later he would 'reflect' on the matter.
Mr Swinney however later insisted: 'I think that would be the right thing to do because the University of Dundee is facing an acute challenge.'
A report into the situation at Dundee by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies last week heavily criticised Prof Gillespie.
Asked if Prof Gillespie should give back the money, the First Minister said: 'Given the awfulness of the Gillies review of the handling of the finances of the University of Dundee, I think that would be a reasonable thing to do.'
His comments came after Education Committee convener Douglas Ross branded Prof Gillespie a 'coward' and accused him of having 'created this mess and walked away into the sunset'.
Pressing the former principal over his time in charge, Mr Ross asked him if he was 'incompetent or corrupt' – with him replying he was 'certainly not corrupt' so he would 'have to choose incompetent'.
Prof Gillespie began his evidence to the committee with a 'heartfelt apology' to staff and students at Dundee – which is to receive an additional £40 million from the Scottish Government to help its financial situation.
'Let me start off with an apology to the staff and students,' he told MSPs.
'I think staff and students deserve better than they have had with the management and the governance of the University of Dundee over quite some time, but particularly over the period of 2024.
'It's a heartfelt apology for a university that I love, and a city that I hugely respect.
'I accept the buck stops with me. That is why at the end of last year I left.'
Mr Ross said the Gillies report showed Prof Gillespie had 'dangerous over self-confidence and complacency', and an 'overbearing leadership style'.
Prof Gillespie said that description was 'not something I recognise' – although he later told how a complaint had been made against him in a previous job at the Natural Environment Research Council about his 'overbearing behaviour'.
Prof Gillespie stepped down as principal at the University of Dundee in December, recalling this happened after others at the institution told him they had 'no confidence' in his leadership.
He told MSPs it was 'possible' he had then resigned by text – though he said he may instead have sent an email confirming his decision.
Mr Ross told him: 'The only thing I thought about you was you are a coward.
'You couldn't go back to the university and face the staff who were losing their jobs, face the students whose studies were so badly disrupted.
'You just created this mess and walked away into the sunset.'
Challenging him on the payout, Mr Ross told Prof Gillespie he had been given 'over £150,000 to walk away from a university you almost destroyed'.
He asked the former principal: 'At any point have you considered paying that money back?'
Prof Gillespie said the university had a 'contractual obligation' to pay him the money.
While he said he took 'overall management responsibility for what happened at the University of Dundee', he told Mr Ross he would 'push back' against the claim that he 'almost destroyed it'.
Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie also pressed for Prof Gillespie to give back the money.
He told the former principal: 'To hold on to that just seems astonishing with the pain other people are feeling.
'I just genuinely want you to think about that, because I think it would send an important message.
'It wouldn't repair the damage but it would send an important message.'
Conservative MSP Miles Briggs said giving back the money could be a way for Prof Gillespie to 'send a message to students, to the staff who are left at Dundee, that you understand your role in this saga'.
The former principal told him: 'You are one of several members of the committee who have suggested that and I will reflect on that.'
Prof Gillespie also hit back at claims from former Holyrood minister Wendy Alexander, who was vice-principal international at the university for almost a decade.
In a submission to the committee, Baroness Alexander had said she was 'frozen out' and then 'asked to leave' her post after raising concerns about university finances.
Prof Gillespie insisted he did 'not want to get into a slagging match about people's characters', he told MSPs: 'Wendy's performance in terms of delivering student numbers wasn't what we needed it to be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Holyrood committee calls for views on care experience legislation
Holyrood committee calls for views on care experience legislation

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

Holyrood committee calls for views on care experience legislation

A Holyrood committee has called for views on Scottish Government legislation aimed at providing more support for care-experienced young people. In 2020, the Scottish Government enshrined the findings of an independent review of care in what has since become known as The Promise – pledging to improve lives for those who spent time in care in childhood by 2030. Currently, aftercare – which includes help with education, housing and employment – is only afforded up to the age of 18 for those in care. But as part of fulfilling that pledge, the Government has proposed legislation which would provide such services until the age of 26, as well as lifelong advocacy services. As well as changes to services offered to care-experienced people, the legislation would create a national register of foster carers and put limits on the profits that can be made from the care of children. On Friday, Holyrood's Education, Children and Young People Committee launched a call for views, including those with care experience, on the legislation. 'In 2020, the Independent Care Review set out a series of promises to Scotland's care-experienced children and young people,' said the committee convener, Douglas Ross. 'We have kept a constant eye on progress towards meeting those promises and it is clear, from hearing from care-experienced young people and those supporting them, that there are many challenges still to overcome. 'The committee will look closely at this Bill, listen to the views of everyone affected by it, and assess whether it will bring about the changes needed to ensure that all care-experienced children and young people can enjoy the childhood they deserve. 'If you are care-experienced, or work to support care-experienced children and young people, please share your views on the proposals in this Bill.' The consultation will close on August 15, with the committee due to start evidence sessions when Holyrood returns from recess. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Readers Letters: Dundee Uni chiefs pay for failure but ferry bosses are left alone
Readers Letters: Dundee Uni chiefs pay for failure but ferry bosses are left alone

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Readers Letters: Dundee Uni chiefs pay for failure but ferry bosses are left alone

Is there one law for university incompetence and another for government, asks reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A report from the Scottish Funding Council attributes the University of Dundee's financial crisis to poor financial judgment and weak governance. The Scottish Government has now provided a total of £62 million to bail the university out ('Dundee Uni gets £40m bailout using 'unprecedented' powers',' 25 June). As a result, a significant number of senior managers have been held accountable and have left the organisation through dismissal or resignation Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The cost of procuring the two ferries, MV Glen Sannox and MV Glen Rosa, has increased from £97m to more than £460m. That increase has resulted in an injection of public funds sixfold greater than that provided to the University of Dundee. There is also the significant indirect economic impact on island communities caused by years of delay. The construction of the CalMac ferry MV Glen Rosa has been continually delayed and cost much more than expected (Picture: John Devlin) Yet nobody has been held accountable and there have been no resignations or dismissals from the management at either the Scottish Government (at political or directorate level) or at its agencies, Transport Scotland and CMAL. Why is such a different approach to mismanagement of public funds considered acceptable? George Rennie, Inverness Feel free It seems Alan Woodcock is alarmed at the proscribing of Palestine Action as a terrorist group (Letters, 26 June). He worries that soon 'Scottish independence campaigners' will also be banned. But Mr Woodcock needn't worry. The spectacle of few thousand demonstrators shambling along the Royal Mile waving saltires while dressed up as Jacobites, New Age travellers or peace activists doesn't really do that much harm. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To qualify for this cherished illegal status, they'd need to try forcing their way into defence establishments in an attempt to vandalise military equipment which keeps them and everyone else safe from external aggression. It's strange indeed that we rarely hear these champions of liberty criticise hostile totalitarian powers or subversive groups who threaten the West's security. Besides, for some mysterious reason there haven't been that many 'freedom' marches recently so there would be nobody to arrest. Martin O'Gorman, Edinburgh Leaving time Presenting the SNP's seventh Medium-term Financial Strategy and first Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan on Wednesday, Finance Secretary Shona Robison deployed the ubiquitous 'levers' excuse thus: 'The levers that are available to us to stimulate economic growth are limited.' Economic models allow assumptions and estimates to be tweaked to produce different scenarios so I thought I'd do an orthographic tweak to the word 'levers' by adding an 'a'. The results were astounding: the upcoming Scottish elections give Scotland at least 22 more 'leavers' – SNP MSPs who are standing down – plus up to 20 'leaving' by being voted out. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So hopefully a government will be voted in that uses the current levers to repair the years of SNP failure and transform Scotland. In the meantime we just have to leave 'er – Ms Robison – to get on with it. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire No excuse Whenever SNP supporters feel on the defensive about their party's dire record in government, they say, 'What about Wales'? (Letters, 26 June). To which I imagine most of us in Scotland say, 'Wales? So what?' But Wales, with its own dysfunctional devolved administration, provides an alibi for the failings of the SNP in Scotland. These are, as we know, legion, and those in the NHS have been highlighted particularly recently, including by correspondents David Millar and Alexander McKay (Letters, same day), following the damning judgment of the BMA Scotland Chair, Dr Iain Kennedy, who claims that the NHS in Scotland is 'dying'. The NHS in England has its problems, but in many respects it performs better than the Scottish and Welsh varieties, and UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting is addressing issues that require reform. No sign of that in Scotland. So it suits SNP apologists to emphasise that poorly performing Wales is ruled by a Labour administration, as if that somehow excuses the SNP's incompetence. It seems to me that all it shows is that the problem in both Scotland and Wales is that we have devolved rule. Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Never forget Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We are regularly told by UK ministers that Israel 'has a right to defend itself'. Fair enough. And does that right extend to other peoples – the Palestinians, for example. Apparently not. While Israeli forces have murdered almost 50,000 civilians – many of them children – and used starvation of an entire population as a weapon they are not terrorists. But Palestine Action, which has defended Palestinian rights for a generation is, in the eyes of a 'Labour' government, a terrorist organisation. Well, it is quite clear where Labour stands in relation to the Gaza genocide and we must not ever forget the complicity of Labour MPs and ministers. History will judge them. David Currie, Tarland, Aberdeenshire Unlikely boast In a Sustainable Scotland article of 25 June by Emily Beament there is a claim made by the Climate Change Committee (CCC) that 'by mid-century British households would save around £700 a year on heating bills by shifting to electric heating'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Just do the maths. According to Ofgem the average UK householder uses 15,000 units of energy a year, comprising 12,000 units of gas (6.3p/unit) and 3,000 units of electricity (currently 25.8p/unit). That means the annual gas bill is about £756 (excluding standing charges as subject to Ofgem review). Assuming households spend £56 running their gas cooker, that indicates a yearly cost of £700 to operate their central heating. An annual CCC saving of £700 implies that whether in Altnaharra or Braemar, Oban or Kelso consumers will be able to heat their homes to 20 degrees Centigrade, in spite of -10 Centigrade degrees of air temperature, at zero cost. The numbers do not stack up, especially as wind farm operators have a guaranteed strike price of around £75 per megawatt-hour via the Contract for Difference provided by Ofgem on behalf of the consumer. Perhaps Piers Forster, interim chair of the CCC, could provide an explanation to Scottish consumers over the £700 saving by 2045, especially when the SNP have scrapped the decarbonisation of homes project in Scotland after the initial cost of £33 billion faced a massive hike to £130bn. Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Heated debate Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Hugh Pennington refers to 'massive amounts of greenhouse gas, a far more dangerous pollutant than nuclear waste' (Letters, 17 June). Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. The sun and plants use carbon dioxide to produce all of our food and oxygen. And, the higher the carbon dioxide level, the better, because plants grow much better at higher levels than the current 420 parts per million (ppm). That is why commercial greenhouses control carbon dioxide at about 1,200 ppm. With no carbon dioxide, we would die. Satellite photos of the Earth show it is 'greening' in response to higher levels of carbon dioxide, which promotes food security. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) promotes the false concept that increasing levels of carbon dioxide can cause dangerous warming. The IPCC overlooks the robust cooling system that maintains the Earth's temperature within the range necessary for current life forms to flourish. The sun sends as much heat to Earth in two hours as the world consumes in one year. It is the storms, such as thunderstorms and hurricanes, that release heat to space, which remove the excess heat from the sun. H Douglas Lightfoot, Baie-D'Urfe, Quebec, Canada Timely convert How fortuitous Ian Murray MP should undergo his Damascene conversion into a fervent advocate of nuclear weapons (Comment, 3 June) at the very time Keir Starmer announced his intention to ramp up defence spending even further. I suspect that if the Scottish Secretary had remained a committed unilateralist he would find himself gracing the Labour back benches in the very near future! Alan Woodcock, Dundee Pay Scots back Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The government scrabbles around trying to reduce our public expenditure and thereby our National Debt by sums ranging upwards from a few million to billions, while also committing itself, quite rightly, to increasing our defence budget due to Putin's war. So why has it accepted that we taxpayers should bear a £10 billion loss on our £45bn bail-out in 2008 of RBS (now NatWest), as reported in The Scotsman of 31 May, which prevented its descent into total bankruptcy due to the incompetence, vanity and greed of its then directors led by Fred Goodwin? Presumably the justification is that this loss is the price we must all pay for having avoided far worse potential consequences throughout the whole UK economy. But does the current board of the restored private enterprise feel no moral obligation to pay that liability effectively incurred by its culpable predecessor? And why has there been so little debate, let alone condemnation, by MPs and financial journalists? John Birkett, St Andrews, Fife Write to The Scotsman

Why John Swinney should beware calling for price to be paid for 'incompetence'
Why John Swinney should beware calling for price to be paid for 'incompetence'

Scotsman

time4 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Why John Swinney should beware calling for price to be paid for 'incompetence'

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On being asked if he was incompetent or corrupt at a Scottish Parliament education committee hearing, Professor Iain Gillespie – accused of almost destroying Dundee University during his time as principal – at least did not dodge the question. 'Certainly not corrupt, so I would have to choose incompetent,' he said, with a candour, or perhaps a flippancy, that may have surprised some politicians. The academic, who resigned in December, has been widely pilloried for his role in the university's financial crisis, which has prompted plans for hundreds of job cuts and Scottish Government bailouts so far totalling £62 million. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Given the situation, John Swinney and MSPs from other parties have suggested that Gillespie should hand back a £150,000 payment he received on his resignation. Asked if he would do so, he told MSPs the money was a 'contractual obligation' although he eventually agreed to 'reflect' on the idea with his family. Scottish Government ministers are unlikely to pay a financial price for their failings, but they could pay a political one (Picture: Jane Barlow) | PA Public money squandered However, the First Minister, in particular, should have a care. After all, the Scottish Government is facing the prospect of its own yawning funding gap of an estimated £5 billion, which could grow to nearly £6bn. And the Scottish Government has warned the situation appears to be so dire that it may have to cut more than 12,000 public sector jobs in the coming years. The parallels with the situation at Dundee University are hard to ignore. If the SNP ministers had not squandered so much public money on pointless independence papers, botched legislation like the calamitous deposit return scheme – which may end up costing far more as private companies seek compensation – and the construction of two over-budget, long-delayed ferries, the government's financial position would have been in a far better state. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So it would be understandable if taxpayers look at the pressure being put on Gillespie to pay a price for his failings and start to think about whether ministers should offer to do something similar.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store