Revised NDP will see increase in defence spending, minister says
The revised NDP, which will be announced on Tuesday, will include up to €30 billion in additional capital expenditure for infrastructure projects over 2026-2030.
Advertisement
Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers, who is responsible for the delivery of the NDP, said Government would be setting out a 'trajectory' of €200 billion in spending over the next 10 years to 'help bridge the infrastructure deficit we have in the Irish economy'.
That deficit is acting as a key constraint on the delivery of critical areas to the economy like housing.
Mr Chambers had previously said €20 billion was available to allocate across critical areas in the economy, with the Government identifying housing, energy, transport and water infrastructure as priority areas.
Asked on Sunday where the additional €10 billion for the short-term plan to 2030 had arisen, he said the Government is prioritising capital investment in its medium-term economic planning.
Advertisement
Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien (Brian Lawless/PA)
He explained the €10 billion had been ringfenced for 'specific strategic investment', such as the electricity grid, water infrastructure and the Dublin metro project.
Pressed on the timeline for the metro project, the deputy leader of Fianna Fáil said it would be dependent on the planning system.
Meanwhile on transport, Mr Chambers said the Government is no longer 'governed' by the 2:1 ratio of public transport to roads which was a feature of the previous coalition.
Speaking on RTÉ's This Week radio programme, he said the revised NDP would contain a 'major uplift' in commitments to public transports, road projects and active travel.
Advertisement
'But we also need to ensure that in regions across our country – whether it's in the west or the south-west or elsewhere – that roads projects which have been on the table for many years are progressed.'
Tánaiste Simon Harris (Brian Lawless/PA)
Asked if this would include road projects in the constituencies of independents which supported the Programme for Government, Mr Chambers said it would not set out a list of particular projects and the focus was on driving delivery.
However, he said Transport Minister Darragh O'Brien would have 'flexibility' to 'ramp up funding' for road infrastructure, as well as public transport projects.
Mr Chambers also said the profile of defence spending is set to increase, adding Tánaiste and Defence Minister Simon Harris would provide further details on the specifics after Tuesday's announcements.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the Government is also set to outline its Summer Economic Statement, which sets out the expenditure package for the Budget.
The Public Expenditure Minister said: 'We're approaching budget 2026 with significant caution.
'We have serious economic uncertainty surrounding our country, but we are coming at this from a position of real strength.'
He said Government would be seeking to moderate the level of increases in current expenditure.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US judge blocks Trump officials from diverting disaster prevention grants
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration on Tuesday from diverting funds from a multibillion-dollar grant program designed to protect communities against natural disasters. US district judge Richard Stearns in Boston issued a preliminary injunction preventing the government from spending money allocated to the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (Bric) program for other purposes. Twenty mostly Democratic-led states sued the administration last month, saying the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) lacked power to cancel the Bric program without congressional approval. Fema is part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Neither agency immediately responded to requests for comment. Created in 2018 during Donald Trump's first term, the Bric program helps state and local governments protect major infrastructure such as roads and bridges before the occurrence of floods, hurricanes and other disasters. According to the lawsuit, Fema approved about $4.5bn in grants for nearly 2,000 projects, primarily in coastal states, over the last four years. But the agency announced in April it would end the program, calling it wasteful, ineffective and politicized. Stearns said that while Fema does not appear to have since canceled grants, states should not have to wait to sue until after they lose funding, while the cancellation of new grants suggested Fema considered an eventual shutdown a fait accompli. He also said the states have shown a realistic chance of irreparable harm if the Bric program ended. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the states from the funds being repurposed is great,' the judge wrote. 'The Bric program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives,' Stearns added. 'The potential hardship to the government, in contrast, is minimal.' Led by Massachusetts and Washington, the 20 states that sued also include Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. The offices of Massachusetts' and Washington's attorneys general had no immediate comment.
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Rachel Reeves must find £50billion in next Budget to keep Britain's finances in check, warn experts
RACHEL Reeves must find £50billion in her autumn Budget to keep the country's finances in check, experts warn. The shortfall is the equivalent of raising income tax by 5p for both basic and higher-rate earners, they say today. 1 The Chancellor has to raise taxes or cut spending to maintain her stated financial cushion of £9.9billion by the end of the decade, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. The think tank warned Ms Reeves faced an 'impossible trilemma' of meeting her own fiscal rules while hitting spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge to not raise taxes. Poor growth, eye-watering debt levels and welfare cut U-turns have led to a 'worsening' outlook, analysis shows. Prof Stephen Millard, from the NIESR, said: 'We would advocate building a bigger buffer. To do that requires a moderate but sustained increases in taxes.' The think tank has upped its growth forecast for this year to 1.3 per cent but 2026 is down from 1.5 per cent to 1.2 per cent. It said the UK can expect inflation at a higher-than-expected 3.5 per cent due to bigger wages and the national insurance hikes. Meanwhile, research shows the living standards of the poorest 10 per cent of households fell by 1.3 per cent in 2023-24. They are 10 per cent lower than pre-Covid levels. Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Labour will always reach for the tax rise lever because they don't understand the economy. 'Businesses are closing, unemployment is up, inflation has doubled and the economy is shrinking. And Labour are refusing to rule out more damaging tax rises on investment.'
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pitiful justice from the FCA: It took far too long to put Woodford in the stocks, says ALEX BRUMMER
How jolly good it is that financial justice has finally caught up with disgraced investment guru Neil Woodford and his irresponsible and deceitful management of the collapsed Woodford Equity Investment Fund (WEIF). There is satisfaction to be drawn from the ban imposed on Woodford from holding senior management roles and looking after retail investors' cash. Moreover, Woodford personally will have to cough up £5.8million in fines and his eponymous investment firm some £40million. Yet the process of delivering verdicts for Woodford savers (including this writer), which started when Andrew Bailey was chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), has been exasperating. It has taken six long years to reach this point, and one fears that there will be victims of Woodford's nefarious behaviour who will have missed out on seeing the regulator swing into action. And it is not over yet since Woodford, lawyered to the hilt, is taking the matter to the Upper Tribunal, the FCA's equivalent of the High Court. That means more delays. Much of the material in the voluminous decision documents relating to Woodford Investment Management and WEIF emerged at the time. It was known, for instance, that Woodford sought to cover up a lack of liquidity in his funds by transferring assets to the obscure Guernsey stock exchange. He also sought to shift the blame for what happened to corporate director Link. The FCA found them jointly culpable and Link, now controlled from Down Under, has already paid £230million in restitution for its error. The rules-based system under which the FCA operates needs to be preserved if retail investors and professionals, such as Kent County Council, are to be protected. What is intolerable is the bureaucratic faffing which has taken so long to put Woodford in the stocks. In the interim, Woodford still offers his services as a financial adviser. The FCA has also failed, thus far, to establish how it was that some 300,000 people who invested in Woodford funds were exposed through the Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) platform and its own fund of funds. HL is now owned by a consortium of private equity investors led by CVC. That is no excuse for escaping culpability and facing up to HL's responsibility for misleading savers. Musical chairs Often it is said that the main duty of the chairman is to fire the chief executive. At Diageo, Sir John Manzoni, who took over as chairman early this year, lost little time in disposing of one of the FTSE 100's small gang of women bosses, Debra Crew. Admittedly, at the time, Diageo's share price was in sharp retreat, falling by 30 per cent. Authoritative accounts suggest that Crew was ambushed. When she questioned the assertiveness of finance director Nik Jhangiani with Manzoni, she signed her own resignation letter. The latest results show that, were it not for the Trump tariffs – which cannot be blamed on Crew – the underlying picture was much better than thought with organic sales up 1.7 per cent at £15.1billion. The vital North American market was still robust with sales up 1.5 per cent. This is despite the trend of Gen Z turning away from alcohol. Where does this, one wonders, leave Murray Auchincloss, chief executive of BP, in another part of the corporate forest? New chairman Albert Manifold has ordered a review of the business and costs, and he hasn't even been seated. What that means for the sensible Auchincloss strategy, already under fire from activist Elliott, one shudders to think. Tech leakage No board of directors would dare turn down a bid premium of 104.9 per cent unless it came from the Ayatollah himself. So British scientific instrument maker Spectris has been able to sit back as private equity ghouls Advent and KKR fight it out for control, with the latter back in the driving seat. If the sharp minds at Advent and KKR were able to see the value, where were the British analysts and buy-side investors as Spectris languished in the lower reaches of the FTSE 250? And doesn't a Labour government, committed to a high-tech future for the UK, worry about the escape of British intellectual property overseas? It should do.
