
Customs wants stronger law to seize childlike sex dolls favoured by paedophiles
'Full-unit is our interpretation of 'indecent or obscene', which is what we can seize under the law: a full doll.
'We ask our frontline staff 'If this was alive, would it be a child?'
'If the doll is short but developed like an adult we wouldn't call that a childlike sex doll – just a short sex doll. Other countries do, and their [seizure] numbers are higher.'
Peterson said Customs had to work with the legislation as it was written.
'We need to be careful we're not prohibiting the importation of things people would be okay with.
'We don't have legislation here that says what a child sex doll is, so we have to be quite conservative so we're not forever in court disputing people's appeals about what we've taken. Clarifications in law would be useful for that.'
Peterson said since 2017 there have been seven border seizures and four post-border seizures of the high-tech, expensive and very controversial 'full-unit' dolls in New Zealand.
By comparison, 47 dolls (inclusive of full and part-dolls) were seized nationally by the Australian Border Force during the 2024-25 financial year alone.
Chief Customs Officer Simon Peterson said Australia has aggressive seizure laws but New Zealand Customs is limited to confiscating only 'full-unit' childlike sex dolls. Photo / NZME
In 2019, a Timaru man in his late 50s became the first New Zealander to be jailed for importing one.
What are they?
The dolls are manufactured to resemble children in terms of size, development and perceived age. They're anatomically detailed, and made from materials that mimic human structures, flesh and skin.
They're used for sexual purposes by paedophiles and their existence is extremely controversial, raising serious legal, ethical, psychological and child-welfare concerns globally.
According to Customs all the dolls seized in New Zealand were manufactured in Asia. Some were bought from large, China-based online shopping sites.
'They're not cheap' Peterson told the Herald. 'At least $2000 each, plus it's expensive to ship them here.'
In 2023 Customs sent an intelligence analyst to the Border Five Intelligence Conference in Canada, which included intelligence-sharing on the child sex dolls problem globally. Customs continues to talk to intelligence and investigation contacts overseas about the issue.
So far in New Zealand, would-be smugglers have worked alone, Peterson said.
'We haven't seen anyone try to commercially import them or anything organised-crime related. There may have been some concern up in Europe that that may have been a trend, and they tend to be ahead of us – so we're keeping an eye on that.'
Timaru man jailed for importing sex doll
In 2019, Timaru man Stephen Heppleston, 58, became the first person in New Zealand to be jailed for importing a child sex doll.
Customs officers found the lifelike doll resembling a young child while they were examining imports from China.
Three NSW men were arrested in 2020 for the alleged purchase of these dolls. Photo / Australian Border Force
Heppleston pleaded guilty to importing the child sex doll and possessing objectionable publications relating to the sexual exploitation of children. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
'Full-unit' dolls and the law
While the dolls aren't mentioned in New Zealand law, the Customs and Excise Act 2018 prohibits the importation of 'indecent or obscene articles' – interpreted by Customs as 'full-unit' dolls.
Offenders can face up to six months in prison for trying to import one.
'The legislation does work,' said Peterson. 'It could be better [but] we work really well with Police and Department of Internal Affairs and we're motivated to make it work.'
By contrast, in Australia importing childlike sex dolls is a specific offence under the Customs Act. The maximum penalty if convicted is up to 10 years' imprisonment and/or fines up to $525,000 ($575,000).
The UK has similar rules to New Zealand but interprets them more strictly, including seizing dolls based on height and childlike faces.
'Proportionally per capita we have similar numbers of full-unit seizures but [the UK is] seizing a lot more parts,' said Peterson.
'If you import the lower part of a sex doll, there's no way we can tell that it is childlike.
'A part might be a flesh-like kind of thing. We can't say it represents a child – but other jurisdictions do.'
It's unclear whether parts have been reassembled in New Zealand into full-unit dolls. Peterson said it's a potential workaround to evade the law, but Customs hasn't seen it.
Peterson would like to see a review of the various laws that oversee child sexual exploitation and abuse so that modern loopholes to do with dolls, as well as rising threats from AI and the streaming of abuse, are captured.
'Other countries have adopted 'crimes against children' legislation. Australians do it well – they're aggressive with it,' he said.
A second loophole
Eleanor Parkes, national director of Ecpat – a New Zealand-based NGO working to end child sexual exploitation – told the Herald importing part-dolls is not the only loophole New Zealand paedophiles have exploited in order to get a doll.
She said one adult anatomical detail will be added to an otherwise-childlike doll so importers can 'make the case they're not childlike'.
'The dolls are small, they are like children in every way, their skin feels like real skin, they respond like children, they sound like children – then they point to one feature, such as breasts or pubic hair, to make the case it's not childlike – when everything else about it is clearly childlike.
'Some say these childlike sex dolls act as a safe outlet for people who have dangerous sexual preferences but that doesn't hold up to scrutiny and actually the opposite might be true. They're an indulgence and [accepting them] risks harm to real children.'
Parkes said the dolls are getting increasingly realistic and numbers of them are rising overseas.
'Let's get that serious legislation in place before it happens,' she said. 'We should take the opportunity to get our systems in place because New Zealand tends to follow global trends.'
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Former Dilworth housemaster denied parole again
Warning: This story discusses sexual assault and may be distressing for some readers. Former Dilworth housemaster Ian Wilson, who is in jail for sexually abusing several students, has been grilled on whether there are other victims he has yet to disclose. "Not to my knowledge. I would be very surprised if any other people come forward," Wilson told the Parole Board today. But panel convenor Judge Arthur Tompkins rejected Wilson's response, stating it was "not an answer". "What does that mean - 'not to your knowledge'?" he asked. Wilson repeated his response, claiming he was not aware of anyone else whom he had sexually abused, who had not already laid a complaint against him. Judge Tompkins reminded Wilson that previously, he had only admitted his offending in sequential stages, when confronted with credible accounts by victims as they spoke up. Wilson claimed he had repressed memories of his previous actions. He said he "didn't dwell" on the abuse he inflicted, and it was only on hearing accounts from his victims that he thought, "yes, there's truth to that". "I had put them [memories] away, I tried to move on." The panel pressed him on whether it was a possibility that Wilson had repressed memories of there being further victims. He said there was always that possibility, but repeated he would be "very surprised". One of Wilson's supporters spoke to the board about how Wilson had been reading the Bible and praying to God to reveal any abuse that he may be holding back. "And nothing has been revealed," said the man, who cannot be named. Wilson, who worked at Dilworth from February 1971 until his resignation in December 1996, was arrested in 2020 as part of Operation Beverly, a long-running investigation into historical sexual abuse by several staff at the Auckland-based boys-only boarding school. He was jailed in March 2021 for three years and seven months for indecently assaulting five students between 1975 and 1992 - some of them more than once and over several years. Wilson was still in jail when he had one year and 11 months added to his sentence in August last year after belatedly admitting to having abused five others. At today's hearing, Wilson was denied parole for the sixth time, leaving him to serve most, if not all, of his prison sentence. The board determined he remained an undue risk and scheduled his next hearing for July 2026. His statutory release date is September 22 in that year. If granted parole in July, he would be released with parole conditions. However, if he were again declined, he would serve the remaining two months of his sentence and then be served with release conditions. The outcome was welcomed by one of Wilson's victims, Neil Harding, who has fought to keep the former housemaster behind bars for the duration of his sentence. "It's really, really good. I'm really comfortable with that. I'm grateful to the Parole Board that they listened," Harding told NZME. Before the hearing, Harding made submissions to the board, imploring it to ask Wilson if there were other victims. He said he believed there were at least two other people who had yet to come forward. "Of course, if he were truly remorseful, he would tell the truth," Harding said. In his submissions, Harding pointed out that Wilson was part of the school's senior management and claimed Wilson played a significant role in covering up abuse by other parties, as well as his own offending. "The Royal Commission into Abuse in Care named Dilworth School first in institutions that had the highest prevalence of sexual abuse in New Zealand between 1950-1999. "Ian Wilson was responsible, along with others, for the cover-up of sexual abuse of hundreds of young boys." He said Wilson was "sadistic and inhumane" towards students and described him as "a monster". More than 40 former pupils have taken their own lives after the decades of abuse that went on at the school, Harding submitted. "The impact of [Wilson's] abuse, and the role he played, is incalculable." Wilson has denied knowing others were sexually abusing students. "He most definitely knew other paedophiles were active at Dilworth," Harding told the board. He said Wilson continued to lie, including when he claimed his offending ended, and when asked about further victims. Harding rejected Wilson's claims that he had reformed and was remorseful. "If you believe that he has been rehabilitated, then he has again duped and conned the system." At the hearing, Wilson's lawyer submitted that Wilson was an eligible candidate for parole, given that he had a support network that held him accountable, and had approved interim accommodation. Wilson's ill-health, proposed special conditions, safety plan and the treatment he underwent in prison were additional factors for consideration. - By Tara Shaskey Open Justice multimedia journalist from NZ Herald


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Fijian among four ICC judges sanctioned by US for backing Netanyahu arrest warrants
A high-profile Fijian is among four International Criminal Court (ICC) judges sanctioned by the United States government. In a statement on Wednesday, the US Department of State announced that Fiji's Nazhat Shameem Khan, a ICC deputy prosecutor, alongside Canada's Kimberly Prost, France's Nicolas Guillou and Senegal's Mame Mandiaye Niang, would be sanctioned in response to the ICC's "ongoing threat to Americans and Israelis". According to the State Department, the sanctions were imposed under Executive Order 14203, which targets "foreign persons engaged in certain malign efforts by the ICC" and seeks to impose serious consequences on those directly participating in the Court's actions against the United States and Israel. Shameem Khan is "being designated for continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against Israel, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants targeting Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Gallant" since assuming her role at the ICC. The sanctions mean all four individuals will have their US-based assests and interests frozen, and any financial transactions involving them in the US will be prohibited unless specifically approved. The ICC strongly rejected the US sanctions against its judges, calling them "a flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution". "They constitute also an affront against the Court's States Parties, the rules-based international order and, above all, millions of innocent victims across the world. "As stated before by the ICC President and Judiciary, as well as the Presidency of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute, the Court stands firmly behind its personnel and victims of unimaginable atrocities." The Court said it will continue carrying out its mandate in strict accordance with its legal framework, as adopted by the 125 States Parties, and without regard to any restriction, pressure or threat.


NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Former Dilworth housemaster Ian Wilson remains an undue risk, declined parole for the sixth time
'What does that mean – 'not to your knowledge'?' he asked. Wilson repeated his response, claiming he was not aware of anyone else whom he had sexually abused, who had not already laid a complaint against him. Ian Wilson will next appear before the Parole Board in July next year. Photo / Michael Craig Judge Tompkins reminded Wilson that previously, he had only admitted his offending in sequential stages, when confronted with credible accounts by victims as they spoke up. Wilson claimed he had repressed memories of his previous actions. He said he 'didn't dwell' on the abuse he inflicted, and it was only on hearing accounts from his victims that he thought, 'yes, there's truth to that'. 'I had put them [memories] away, I tried to move on.' The panel pressed him on whether it was a possibility that Wilson had repressed memories of there being further victims. He said there was always that possibility, but repeated he would be 'very surprised'. One of Wilson's supporters spoke to the board about how Wilson had been reading the Bible and praying to God to reveal any abuse that he may be holding back. 'And nothing has been revealed,' said the man, who cannot be named. Dilworth School in Auckland has been linked to several historical sexual offending cases. Photo / Dean Purcell Wilson, who worked at Dilworth from February 1971 until his resignation in December 1996, was arrested in 2020 as part of Operation Beverly, a long-running investigation into historical sexual abuse by several staff at the Auckland-based boys-only boarding school. He was jailed in March 2021 for three years and seven months for indecently assaulting five students between 1975 and 1992 – some of them more than once and over several years. Wilson was still in jail when he had one year and 11 months added to his sentence in August last year after belatedly admitting to having abused five others. At today's hearing, Wilson was denied parole for the sixth time, leaving him to serve most, if not all, of his prison sentence. The board determined he remained an undue risk and scheduled his next hearing for July next year. His statutory release date is September 22, 2026. If granted parole in July, he would be released with parole conditions. However, if he were again declined, he would serve the remaining two months of his sentence and then be served with release conditions. The outcome was welcomed by one of Wilson's victims, Neil Harding, who has fought to keep the former housemaster behind bars for the duration of his sentence. Neil Harding made submissions to the Parole Board, arguing that Ian Wilson should serve his entire sentence. Photo / NZ Herald 'It's really, really good. I'm really comfortable with that. I'm grateful to the Parole Board that they listened,' Harding told NZME. Before the hearing, Harding made submissions to the board, imploring it to ask Wilson if there were other victims. He said he believed there were at least two other people who had yet to come forward. 'Of course, if he were truly remorseful, he would tell the truth,' Harding said. In his submissions, Harding pointed out that Wilson was part of the school's senior management and claimed Wilson played a significant role in covering up abuse by other parties, as well as his own offending. 'The Royal Commission into Abuse in Care named Dilworth School first in institutions that had the highest prevalence of sexual abuse in New Zealand between 1950-1999. 'Ian Wilson was responsible, along with others, for the cover-up of sexual abuse of hundreds of young boys.' He said Wilson was 'sadistic and inhumane' towards students and described him as 'a monster'. More than 40 former pupils have taken their own lives after the decades of abuse that went on at the school, Harding submitted. 'The impact of [Wilson's] abuse, and the role he played, is incalculable.' Wilson has denied knowing others were sexually abusing students. 'He most definitely knew other paedophiles were active at Dilworth,' Harding told the board. He said Wilson continued to lie, including when he claimed his offending ended, and when asked about further victims. Harding rejected Wilson's claims that he had reformed and was remorseful. 'If you believe that he has been rehabilitated, then he has again duped and conned the system.' At the hearing, Wilson's lawyer submitted that Wilson was an eligible candidate for parole, given that he had a support network that held him accountable, and had approved interim accommodation. Wilson's ill health, proposed special conditions, safety plan, and the treatment he underwent in prison were additional factors for consideration. Tara Shaskey joined NZME in 2022 and is an assistant editor and reporter for the Open Justice team. She has been a reporter since 2014 and previously worked at Stuff covering crime and justice, arts and entertainment, and Māori issues.