UK warns it could recognize Palestine
The warning came after a hunger monitor said a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding and immediate action is needed to avoid widespread death. Palestinian authorities said more than 60,000 Palestinians were now confirmed killed by Israel's air and ground assault on the Gaza Strip.
The hunger alert and the new death toll are grim milestones in a conflict that began almost two years ago when Hamas attacked Israel, sparking an offensive that has flattened much of the enclave and ignited hostilities across the Middle East.
The alert by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification raised the prospect that the man-made starvation crisis in Gaza could be formally classified as a famine, in the hope that this might raise the pressure on Israel to let in far more food.
Britain's warning heightens pressure on Israel amid an international outcry over its conduct of the war. France announced it would recognize Palestinian statehood in a move that enraged the Israeli government. Israel dismissed Britain's announcement as a "reward" for Hamas.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer told his Cabinet on Tuesday that Britain would follow suit at the UN General Assembly in September "unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution," his government said.
The move, if carried through, would be mostly symbolic, with Israel occupying the territories where the Palestinians have long aimed to establish that state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capital.
It makes Israel appear more isolated on the international stage as a growing number of countries call for it to allow unfettered aid into Gaza, where it controls all entry and exit points to the besieged coastal territory.
However, US President Donald Trump's administration -- Israel's closest and most influential ally -- has made clear it has no intention of joining others in recognizing Palestinian statehood anytime soon. Since returning to office in January, Trump has left it unclear whether he would support an eventual Palestinian state.
Trump said on Tuesday he and Starmer did not discuss Britain's proposal to recognize a Palestinian state when the two held talks in Scotland over the weekend. Trump told reporters at the time he did "not mind" if Britain did so.
With the international furor over Gaza's ordeal growing, Israel announced steps over the weekend to ease aid access. But the UN World Food Program said Tuesday it was not getting the permissions it needed to deliver enough aid since Israel began humanitarian pauses in warfare on Sunday.
"Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths," the IPC said, adding that "famine thresholds" have been reached for food consumption in most of Gaza.
It said it would quickly carry out the formal analysis that could allow it to classify Gaza as "in famine."
Gaza health authorities have been reporting more and more people dying from hunger-related causes. The total stands at 147, among them 88 children, most of whom died in the last few weeks.
Images of emaciated Palestinian children have shocked the world, with Israel's strongest ally Trump declaring that many people were starving. He promised to set up new "food centers."
Israel has denied pursuing a policy of starvation. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Tuesday that the situation in Gaza was "tough" but there were lies about starvation there.
The Gazan casualty figures, which are often cited by the UN and have previously been described as reliable by the World Health Organization, underline the war as the deadliest involving Israel since its establishment in 1948.
Israel launched its offensive in response to Hamas' cross-border attack on Oct. 7, 2023, when militants killed some 1,200 people and took another 251 hostage -- Israel's deadliest ever day. Since Israel launched ground operations in Gaza in October 2023, 454 soldiers have been killed.
The new Palestinian toll does not distinguish between fighters and civilians. Thousands more bodies are believed to be buried under rubble, meaning the true toll is likely to be significantly higher, Palestinian officials and rescue workers say.
Israeli airstrikes overnight killed at least 30 Palestinians in Nuseirat camp in central Gaza, Gaza health authorities said. Doctors at Al-Awda Hospital said at least 14 women and 12 children were among the dead.
The hospital also said that 13 people had been killed and dozens wounded by Israeli gunfire along the Salahudeen Road as they waited for aid trucks to roll into Gaza.
Saar said 5,000 aid trucks had entered Gaza in the last two months, and that Israel would assist those wanting to conduct airdrops -- a delivery method that aid groups say is ineffective and tokenist.
Ross Smith, a senior regional programme adviser at the World Food Program, told reporters in Geneva by video, "We're getting approximately 50 percent of what we're requesting into Gaza since these humanitarian pauses started on Sunday.
"We are not going to be able to address the needs of the population unless we can move in the volume that we need." Israel and the US accuse Hamas of stealing aid -- which the militants deny -- and the UN of failing to prevent it. The UN says it has not seen evidence of Hamas diverting much aid. Hamas accuses Israel of causing starvation and using aid as a weapon. (Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Senior Seoul official notes possibility of USFK role change due to 'various factors'
Senior Seoul official notes possibility of USFK role change due to 'various factors' WASHINGTON (Yonhap) -- A senior South Korean official made a rare mention Thursday of a possible change in the role of the US Forces Korea (USFK), amid speculation that US President Donald Trump's administration may seek to shift the focus of its mission to deterring China rather than countering North Korean threats. The official made the remarks in a meeting with South Korean correspondents in Washington as the Trump administration is seeking to "modernize" the South Korea-US alliance to make it "strategically sustainable" in the midst of an intensifying Sino-US rivalry. "I think there can be a change in the role and character of the USFK due to various factors," he said. The official pointed to the evolving international security environment, technological shifts and a "growing strategic role" of China, as he enumerated the factors that could drive a possible shift in the role of the 28,500-strong USFK. However, he cautioned against misconstruing his remarks, saying his talk of a possible change in the USFK role does not mean he concurs on the US view in support of the change. "Allies cannot see eye to eye perfectly with each other on everything," he said. As the Pentagon is working on crafting its National Defense Strategy to prioritize deterring China, speculation has persisted that the Trump administration might pursue greater "strategic flexibility" of the USFK to use it for a wider range of security operations beyond the Korean Peninsula. Opponents of a shift in the USFK role argue that it could lead to a weakening of efforts by Seoul and Washington to deter North Korea's advancing nuclear and missile threats, and that the potential use of the USFK for a mission against China would needlessly put Seoul in a geopolitically challenging position. US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby has advocated for a shift in the USFK mission, saying American troops in South Korea should not be "held hostage to dealing with the North Korean problem." The future direction of USFK operations is likely to be a key agenda item as South Korea and the US are expected to have earnest discussions on a shared understanding of where their longstanding alliance should be headed for. The official's remarks came after Foreign Minister Cho Hyun held his first talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio since the launch of President Lee Jae Myung's administration.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Top S. Korean, U.S. diplomats reiterate 'resolute' commitment to N.K. denuclearization
The top diplomats of South Korea and the United States reaffirmed the allies' "resolute" commitment to the "complete" denuclearization of North Korea and the "full" enforcement of sanctions against it during their talks in Washington on Thursday, a State Department spokesperson said. Foreign Minister Cho Hyun and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio held their first talks since the launch of the Lee Jae Myung administration last month, as Seoul and Washington face a series of cooperation issues, including preparations for a summit between Lee and US President Donald Trump. Their meeting came just a day after Trump announced a trade deal with Korea, saying that his summit with President Lee will take place at the White House in two weeks. "Secretary Rubio and Foreign Minister Cho also reaffirmed their resolute commitment to the complete denuclearization of the DPRK, the full implementation of international sanctions, and expressed serious concerns about North Korea's increasing military cooperation with Russia," Tammy Bruce, the spokesperson, said in a readout. DPRK is short for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The chief diplomats' show of unity against North Korean nuclear threats came days after Kim Yo-jong, the influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un ruled out the possibility of talks on the North's denuclearization, while noting the personal relationship between Trump and Kim is "not bad." (Yonhap)
![[Lee Byung-jong] Boss politics in Korea and US](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F31%2Fnews-p.v1.20250731.20fa216ac199400881a5a3459f5d9df6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Byung-jong] Boss politics in Korea and US
Despite vastly different political histories, South Korea and the United States are beginning to resemble each other in one critical respect: the rise of boss politics. This style of personality-driven leadership, defined by charismatic control over political parties and unwavering loyalty from supporters, has become increasingly evident in both countries. It marks a shift from institutional politics to one dominated by individual influence — where dissent is punished and power is concentrated around a singular figure. Boss politics is hardly new to South Korea. Since democratization in the late 1980s, charismatic political leaders have held sway over their parties through tightly controlled political machines. The 'Three Kims' — former Presidents Kim Young-sam, Kim Dae-jung and former Prime Minister Kim Jong-pil — dominated the political landscape for decades. Their power was rooted in regional loyalties and an ability to distribute resources, positions and nominations. Political funding and National Assembly candidate selections were tools for consolidating authority, and loyalty was often valued over competence. Dissenters were purged, and sycophancy was rewarded. Though the era of the Three Kims formally ended in the early 2000s, their legacy lives on. Presidents from both conservative and progressive camps have continued the practice of consolidating power within their parties. Patronage networks remain strong, where personal connections and allegiance are often more critical than experience or ability. Former President Yoon Suk-yeol, who was eventually impeached, was criticized for appointing close friends and former prosecutor colleagues to key posts, suggesting that meritocracy took a back seat to loyalty. President Lee Jae Myung, currently in office, presents a mixed picture. While his first cabinet includes respected professionals, it also features loyalists known for their unwavering support. His political rise — from a mayor of a small city to national prominence — was largely fueled by a fiercely devoted base comprising 30 to 40 percent of the electorate. This "concrete base" has not only protected Lee during legal and political challenges but has also aggressively targeted his critics, especially online. During the 2024 parliamentary elections, for instance, many of Lee's intraparty rivals lost their seats, while his allies cruised to victory thanks to mobilized grassroots support. A similar political dynamic exists across the Pacific. In the United States, President Donald Trump has established near-total control over the Republican Party through his Make America Great Again movement. Trump's influence is so powerful that few in the GOP dare to oppose him publicly. The fate of former Rep. Liz Cheney — a senior Republican and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney — illustrates the point. After denouncing Trump's false claims about the 2020 election, she was removed from her leadership role and lost her reelection bid. The message was clear: Loyalty to Trump trumps loyalty to the party or constitutional principles. Those who remain loyal to Trump are often rewarded. He has handpicked candidates for elections and installed allies in key government roles. Notable examples include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News contributor who wholeheartedly supported Trump's foreign policy. Federal Attorney General Pam Bondi is a former Florida attorney general who served on Trump's impeachment defense team. Critics argue that these appointments prioritized personal loyalty over qualifications or institutional knowledge. Trump's governance philosophy is grounded in the belief that elected officials should wield unquestioned authority over the government. He has long railed against the so-called 'Deep State,' a term he uses to describe career bureaucrats whom he views as obstructing his policy goals. Determined to avoid what he sees as sabotage, Trump is pursuing a sweeping overhaul of the civil service, including mass firings and agency shutdowns — all with the goal of ensuring full compliance from the bureaucracy. To a somewhat lesser extent, President Lee Jae Myung shares Trump's views on the power of elected officials over appointed ones. In a lecture to newly appointed government managers last month, Lee said, 'Bureaucrats should follow the will of elected power — namely, the president. That is the principle of democracy, because elected officials most directly represent the people's will.' Reflecting that philosophy, his administration is considering a major structural shift: moving the government's budgetary authority from the Ministry of Strategy and Finance to the presidential office or the prime minister's office, a change that would significantly increase executive control over national policy. Both Korea and the US operate under presidential systems, where a strong executive is a constitutional feature. Yet, equating presidential strength with unchallenged authority risks undermining the bureaucracy's role. Professional civil servants bring institutional memory, expertise and continuity, which are essential for effective governance — especially in complex, policy-heavy areas like health care, defense and climate change. Frequent leadership changes already lead to inconsistent policymaking. In South Korea, for example, nuclear energy policy has swung back and forth depending on which party is in power, creating confusion among stakeholders and inefficiencies in long-term planning. Similar instability can be seen in US foreign policy and environmental regulations, which have shifted dramatically between administrations. Charismatic political leaders with devoted followings may appear to be political titans. In the short term, their dominance over party structures and policymaking may seem unshakable. But effective governance is not about control — it's about collaboration. Presidents Trump and Lee both enjoy strong support from passionate political bases, enabling them to dominate their parties. However, long-term success in government depends less on fervent followers and more on capable, independent institutions. Boss politics might secure elections. But only bureaucratic integrity and institutional professionalism can secure lasting national progress.
